


Ask the community...
fr fr they just mad you left for something better 💅
Been through something similar - you should be good as long as you worked enough at the new job to qualify. The most recent separation (your layoff) is what matters for eligibility, not the previous quit. When filling out those forms, be clear about the timeline: quit old job in January for better opportunity, worked new job until laid off in March. Keep it simple and factual. The old employer is probably just trying to avoid their UI tax going up but it shouldn't affect your claim since your qualifying wages came from the new job.
If ur not certifying for a full week that could be why. Like if your benefit week starts on a Monday and you certified from Wednesday-Sunday you'd only get partial payment. Just a thought.
This exact thing happened to me two months ago! Got $180 instead of my usual $360 with zero explanation. Turns out they had flagged my claim for "review" because I had briefly worked a temp job 4 months earlier that somehow triggered their system. The kicker? They never sent any notification about the review or the payment reduction. I only found out when I finally got through to someone after calling for literally 3 weeks straight. The agent said it's becoming super common lately - their system is automatically flagging claims for various reasons and reducing payments without proper notice. Keep trying to get through because mine got resolved once I spoke to an actual person, but it took about a week after that call for payments to return to normal.
Just make sure you file your claim as soon as possible after losing your job! There's no waiting period in New York but you can't get benefits for any week before you actually file your initial claim. And you have to file weekly claims to continue getting payments even after you're approved.
One thing to add about the "unemployed through no fault of your own" requirement - this also includes certain situations where you quit for "good cause." Things like unsafe working conditions, harassment, significant changes to your job duties or pay, or domestic violence situations can qualify as good cause. So even if you technically quit rather than being laid off, you might still be eligible depending on the circumstances. The NYS DOL will evaluate each case individually to determine if your reason for leaving meets their good cause criteria.
What was your original denial reason? That can affect timing too - if it's a simple eligibility issue vs something more complex like misconduct allegations, the process might be different.
I'm going through a similar situation right now - filed my appeal about 7 weeks ago after getting denied for "voluntary quit" even though I was laid off. Still no hearing notice either. From what I've read on the NYS DOL website, they're supposed to send the hearing notice at least 10 days before your scheduled date, so you might still be in the normal timeframe. The uncertainty is definitely the hardest part when you're already stressed about finances. Have you tried creating an online account on the DOL website? Sometimes you can see status updates there before you get anything in the mail.
That's really frustrating that you got denied for "voluntary quit" when you were actually laid off! I hope your appeal goes smoothly. I do have an online account but it just shows the same "appeal pending review" status with no additional details. It's good to know 7 weeks without a hearing notice might still be normal timing - makes me feel a bit less worried that something went wrong with my paperwork.
Zara Rashid
Make sure you attend the hearing! I know someone who didn't show up thinking they could just submit paperwork and they lost automatically. The judge needs to hear from you directly about what happened.
0 coins
Sean Matthews
Another important tip - if your employer claims you violated a specific policy, ask them to produce the written policy during the hearing. Many employers rely on vague or unwritten "rules" that wouldn't hold up under scrutiny. Also, check if you ever received an employee handbook or signed acknowledgment of the policy they say you violated. The burden is on them to prove you knew about the rule AND willfully violated it. I've seen cases where employers couldn't even produce the policy they claimed was violated.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my employer is claiming I violated their "zero tolerance" policy, but I never actually received a copy of their employee handbook. They just mentioned some rules verbally during orientation months ago. Should I specifically ask the judge to require them to show proof that I was properly informed about this policy? Also, does it matter if other employees weren't disciplined the same way for similar issues?
0 coins