What exactly is K1 income and how will the Republican tax plan affect me as a physician?
Hey everyone, I'm feeling a bit embarrassed about asking this but I guess they don't teach financial literacy in medical school! I'm an emergency medicine physician and I'm about to start a new position with EmergencyHealth Partners in 2025. The hiring manager mentioned that for tax purposes I'll be receiving a Schedule K-1 instead of a W-2. I tried looking this up on TurboTax's website but honestly got even more confused. From what I gather, this means I'll be considered some kind of partner or LLC member rather than an employee? I'm used to just getting a W-2 and filing my taxes pretty straightforwardly. Can someone explain what K-1 income actually is in simple terms? Also, I keep hearing about potential changes to the tax code with the new Republican plan, and I'm worried about how that might affect someone in my situation with this K-1 thing. Will I end up paying more in taxes? Do I need to make quarterly payments now? Any advice would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
25 comments


Nia Wilson
K-1 income means you're being treated as a partner rather than an employee - this is actually pretty common in physician groups these days. A Schedule K-1 is a tax form that reports your share of income, deductions, credits, etc. from a partnership (or S-corporation or certain LLCs). The big difference from W-2 employment: no tax withholding happens automatically. You'll need to make quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid penalties. Also, you'll likely be responsible for self-employment taxes (15.3% covering both employer and employee portions of Social Security and Medicare). The potential upside is you may be eligible for the Qualified Business Income deduction (Section 199A), which could allow you to deduct up to 20% of your qualified business income, though there are income limitations for physicians. This deduction is currently set to expire after 2025 under current law, but the Republican tax plan proposes making it permanent.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
•Thanks for this explanation! One question though - if OP is getting a K-1, does that mean they'll be able to deduct business expenses like medical equipment, continuing education, malpractice insurance, etc.? And do they need to set up a separate business banking account now?
0 coins
Nia Wilson
•Yes, as a partner receiving a K-1, you'll generally be able to deduct legitimate business expenses. This is a significant advantage over W-2 employees who lost the ability to deduct unreimbursed employee expenses after the 2017 tax changes. Things like medical equipment, CME, professional dues, malpractice insurance, and home office expenses (if you have administrative duties at home) can potentially be deductible. I would strongly recommend setting up a separate business banking account and credit card exclusively for business expenses. This creates a clean paper trail and makes documenting deductions much easier if you're ever audited. It's also good practice to track everything contemporaneously rather than trying to reconstruct expenses at tax time.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
After reading about your situation, I wanted to share my experience. I'm a physician who switched from W-2 to K-1 income three years ago and was completely overwhelmed by the tax implications. I spent hours researching online and getting conflicting advice about estimated payments, deductions, and record-keeping. What finally saved me was using https://taxr.ai to analyze my partnership agreement and previous tax documents. The AI helped me understand exactly what income would flow through on my K-1, what expenses were deductible, and how to properly structure my quarterly payments. The system even identified that my partnership agreement had favorable retirement plan options I was completely overlooking! I ended up saving about $16,000 in taxes my first year compared to what I would have paid without proper planning.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•How exactly does this taxr.ai thing work? Can it actually review legal documents like partnership agreements? I'm in a similar position where I'm joining a radiology group next month and getting a K-1, but our partnership agreement is like 50 pages of dense legalese.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. Does it actually give personalized advice or just generic information you could find on the IRS website? And how does it compare to just hiring a CPA who specializes in physician partnerships?
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•The system works by uploading your documents securely and the AI analyzes them specifically for tax implications. It's not just scanning - it actually understands complex agreements and identifies specific clauses that have tax consequences. For something like a 50-page radiology partnership agreement, it would highlight provisions about income allocation, expense reimbursement, retirement options, and buy-in requirements with explanations about the tax impact of each. It's definitely more specific than generic IRS information. While it doesn't replace a good CPA, it helps you understand your situation before meeting with one, so you can ask better questions and evaluate their advice. I actually brought the taxr.ai analysis to my CPA appointment, and she was impressed by how comprehensive it was. She ended up focusing our time on strategic planning rather than just explaining basics to me.
0 coins
AstroAce
Following up on my question about taxr.ai - I decided to try it with my partnership agreement after our conversation. I was genuinely impressed. The system identified that my agreement had a special allocation provision that would shift more income to me in high-revenue quarters, which would have thrown off my estimated tax payments. It also flagged that my agreement didn't clearly address how certain expenses would be allocated, which could have created issues down the road. I took this information to my partnership's accountant, and we're now clarifying these provisions before I start. For anyone going from W-2 to K-1 income, I'd definitely recommend using this tool before signing anything. Saved me from potential headaches and probably some significant tax misunderstandings.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
If you're dealing with K-1 income, you should know that communicating with the IRS if you have questions can be almost impossible these days. The Republican tax plan might introduce changes, but first understanding your current situation is essential. I spent 3 WEEKS trying to get through to the IRS about partnership tax rules last year - constant busy signals or disconnects after waiting for 2+ hours. Incredibly frustrating when you're trying to comply with complicated partnership rules. I eventually used https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes. They have this callback service where they navigate the IRS phone tree for you and call when they've got an agent on the line. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent clarified exactly how my K-1 income affected my quarterly estimated payments and prevented me from making a mistake that would have triggered underpayment penalties.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•Wait wait wait. So you're saying there's a service that gets you through to an actual human at the IRS? How does that even work? I thought the whole point of the IRS phone system was to make it impossible to talk to anyone lol
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•This sounds like complete BS to me. No way this actually works. The IRS answers like 2% of their calls during tax season. If this service actually existed and worked, everyone would be using it. Sounds like you're selling something.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•It works by using technology to navigate the IRS phone system and continuously redial when there are busy signals or disconnects. They basically wait in the queue for you instead of you having to do it yourself. When they finally get through to a human agent, they call you and connect you directly. I was skeptical too initially. I had tried calling the IRS myself over a dozen times with no success. What convinced me was that they don't charge unless they actually get you through to an agent. There's no incentive for them to waste their own resources if they can't deliver. And from what I understand, they use a combination of automation and human operators to make it work at scale.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
I need to eat my words about that Claimyr service. After posting my skeptical comment, I was still struggling with questions about my K-1 from a rental property partnership. I decided to try it since they don't charge if they can't get through. To my complete shock, I got a call back within 20 minutes with an actual IRS agent on the line. The agent helped me understand exactly how to report passive losses from my K-1 and clarified the at-risk limitations that my accountant had explained poorly. Regarding the Republican tax plan that OP mentioned - the agent couldn't speculate on future legislation but did confirm that making the QBI deduction permanent would benefit many partnership arrangements, potentially including medical practices depending on structure. This service saved me hours of frustration and potentially an amended return later. Consider me converted.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
Speaking as someone who's been receiving K-1s for about five years as a physician partner, here's some practical advice: 1) Find a CPA who specializes in healthcare professionals. General tax preparers often miss nuances of medical partnership structures. 2) Set aside 35-40% of your income for taxes initially until you understand your specific tax situation better. 3) Set calendar reminders for quarterly estimated payments (April 15, June 15, Sept 15, Jan 15). 4) Track ALL potential business expenses meticulously from day one. 5) Consider setting up a SEP-IRA or Solo 401k to reduce your taxable income. The current Republican tax proposals would likely benefit K-1 recipients through making the QBI deduction permanent and potentially lowering certain brackets, but nothing is certain until legislation passes.
0 coins
Luca Russo
•This is exactly the kind of practical advice I needed, thank you! One follow-up question: my contract mentions something about "guaranteed payments" vs. distributive share. Do these get taxed differently? And is there a simple way to track business expenses that you'd recommend?
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•Guaranteed payments are similar to a salary and are subject to self-employment tax (Medicare and Social Security taxes). Your distributive share is your portion of the partnership's profits after expenses and guaranteed payments, which is also subject to self-employment tax but might qualify for the QBI deduction depending on your income level. For tracking expenses, I use a dedicated credit card for all business expenses and a simple spreadsheet with categories that match Schedule C. Many of my colleagues use apps like Expensify or QuickBooks Self-Employed, which let you take photos of receipts on the go and automatically categorize expenses. The key is consistency - pick a system and stick with it from day one.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
Anyone recommend tax prep software for K-1 recipients? I used TurboTax last year but it struggled with some of the more complex K-1 entries.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•I switched from TurboTax to H&R Block Premium last year and found it much better for handling K-1s, especially for medical professionals. The interview format asks more relevant questions and the help content is more detailed for partnership income.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•Thanks for the recommendation! I'll give H&R Block a try this year. Last year's experience with TurboTax was frustrating - it kept asking me questions about farm income and oil/gas allocations that weren't relevant to my medical practice K-1.
0 coins
Hunter Hampton
As someone who made the transition from W-2 to K-1 income as a pediatric hospitalist two years ago, I completely understand your confusion! The learning curve is steep but manageable once you get the basics down. One thing I wish someone had told me upfront: your EmergencyHealth Partners agreement should specify whether you're entering as a full partner immediately or starting as an associate with a path to partnership. This affects your K-1 significantly. Associates often receive guaranteed payments (similar to salary) while full partners get a share of profits/losses. Regarding the Republican tax plan - while we can't predict exactly what will pass, the current proposals generally favor pass-through entities like partnerships. The potential permanence of the QBI deduction could save you thousands annually, but it phases out at higher income levels for medical professionals. My biggest recommendation: start making quarterly payments immediately, even if you're estimating. I got hit with underpayment penalties my first year because I underestimated how much I'd owe. Better to overpay slightly and get a refund than face penalties and interest. Good luck with the new position! Emergency medicine partnerships can be very lucrative once you understand the tax implications.
0 coins
Luca Ferrari
•This is really helpful context about the associate vs. full partner distinction - I hadn't even thought about that! My offer letter mentions "partnership track" but doesn't specify the initial structure. I should definitely clarify this with HR before I start. Quick question about the underpayment penalties you mentioned - is there a safe harbor rule for estimated payments? Like if I pay 100% of last year's tax liability, am I protected even if I end up owing more due to the partnership income? Also, do you know if malpractice insurance premiums paid by the partnership show up differently on the K-1 than if I paid them myself? Thanks for sharing your experience - it's reassuring to hear from someone who's been through this transition successfully!
0 coins
Nasira Ibanez
•Yes, there is a safe harbor rule! If you pay at least 100% of last year's tax liability through estimated payments and withholding, you're generally protected from underpayment penalties (it's 110% if your prior year AGI was over $150k). This is really helpful when transitioning to K-1 income because you can use your last W-2 year as a baseline while you figure out your new tax situation. Regarding malpractice insurance - if the partnership pays it directly, it typically shows up as a business expense that reduces the partnership's income before it flows through to your K-1. So you'd see the benefit as reduced income rather than a separate deduction. If you pay it yourself as a partner, you can usually deduct it as a business expense on your individual return. Definitely get clarity on your partnership structure from HR! The financial implications between associate track and immediate partnership can be significant, especially regarding guaranteed payments vs. profit sharing and how expenses are allocated.
0 coins
Samantha Johnson
I'm also transitioning from W-2 to K-1 income next year and this thread has been incredibly helpful! One thing I'm still confused about though - when you receive a K-1, does the partnership withhold any taxes at all, or is it 100% on you to handle quarterly payments? Also, I keep seeing references to the QBI deduction but I'm not clear on the income limits for physicians. Does anyone know the exact thresholds where it starts phasing out? I want to make sure I understand if this will apply to my situation or not. The tax software recommendations are great too - I was planning to stick with TurboTax but sounds like I should explore other options for handling K-1s properly.
0 coins
Peyton Clarke
•Great questions! Partnerships typically don't withhold any taxes from K-1 distributions - it's 100% on you to handle quarterly payments. This is one of the biggest adjustments coming from W-2 employment where withholding happens automatically. For the QBI deduction in 2024, it starts phasing out at $191,950 for single filers and $383,900 for married filing jointly. For physicians, it's completely phased out at $241,950 (single) and $483,900 (married filing jointly) because we're in a "specified service trade or business." So if your income is below the phase-out threshold, you could potentially deduct up to 20% of your qualified business income. Regarding tax software - definitely consider alternatives to TurboTax for K-1s. I've had good experiences with FreeTaxUSA for partnerships, and many colleagues swear by just going straight to a CPA who specializes in medical professionals. The complexity of partnership taxation often justifies the professional fee, especially in your first year. Make sure to set aside money for quarterly payments from your very first distribution - I learned this lesson the hard way!
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
Welcome to the K-1 world! I made this same transition about 4 years ago from emergency medicine W-2 to partnership K-1, and while it's definitely more complex, there are some real advantages once you get the hang of it. A few things that weren't mentioned yet that might be helpful: 1) Ask EmergencyHealth Partners if they provide any tax guidance or have a recommended CPA. Many larger medical partnerships have relationships with tax professionals who understand their specific structure. 2) Consider opening a high-yield savings account specifically for tax payments. I automatically transfer 30% of each distribution there so I'm never scrambling to make quarterly payments. 3) Keep detailed records of any home office space you use for administrative work - this can be a significant deduction that many physicians overlook. 4) If you're planning any major purchases (car, equipment, etc.) that could be business-related, consider timing them strategically for tax purposes. The Republican tax plan uncertainty is frustrating, but honestly the current system already favors partnerships pretty well compared to W-2 employment. The potential QBI deduction permanence would just be icing on the cake. Don't be embarrassed about the learning curve - most of us in medicine never learned this stuff in school! You'll figure it out quickly, and the financial flexibility of partnership income is usually worth the extra tax complexity.
0 coins