< Back to IRS

Ava Martinez

Unmarried couple with 3 kids - can lower-earning partner file and claim kids for bigger refund?

My girlfriend and I have been living together for years with our 3 kids. We're not married (yeah I know, we should get on that lol). I bring home about $95k annually while she makes around $52k. Every year I've filed as Head of Household and claimed all three children as dependents. This year, she's suggesting that she should file and claim the kids instead. Her reasoning makes financial sense on paper - if she claims the kids, she'd qualify for Earned Income Credit since her income is considered low enough for a household with 3 dependents. According to our calculations, if I claim the kids our combined refund would be around $5.5k (with me getting $5k and her getting about $500). But if she claims them, we'd get approximately $19k total refund, plus extra child credit from our state program. Here's what's making me hesitate: we live together full-time in a house we co-own, split expenses (though obviously I contribute more since I earn more), and there are absolutely no custody arrangements or anything like that. We're essentially a married couple without the certificate. I'm worried this might be some kind of oversight that could come back to bite us later. Would we have to refile? Is this even allowed when we're permanently living together? Does the higher-earning parent have to be the one who claims the kids? I don't want to mess with the IRS or have to pay everything back later.

Miguel Ortiz

•

What you're describing touches on some important tax rules. The key issue here isn't about who makes more money, but rather who qualifies for Head of Household status and who can claim the kids as dependents. For Head of Household, you need to pay more than half the cost of keeping up the home where you and your qualifying person (like your child) lived for more than half the year. Since you both contribute to household expenses, only one of you can meet this "more than half" threshold. For claiming children as dependents, there are "tiebreaker rules" when more than one person could claim the same child. Generally, if both parents are living together with the children, the parent with the higher adjusted gross income (AGI) gets to claim them. That said, unmarried parents living together can sometimes arrange who claims which children to maximize tax benefits, as long as each person legitimately qualifies for their claimed status. But having one person claim all three when both parents live together might raise flags if the lower-income person isn't actually providing more than half of the household support.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

So even though she makes less, if we're living together full-time, the IRS default assumption would be that I should claim them since I make more? Is there any way we could document that she's contributing more to the household expenses even though she earns less? Like if she paid more of the direct child expenses?

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

For the IRS tiebreaker rules, if both parents live with the children and could claim them, the higher-income parent gets priority. There's no documentation that would override this specific tiebreaker rule when both parents live together full-time. However, you could potentially split the dependency claims if you have multiple children. For example, you might claim one or two children while she claims the other(s), as long as each of you meets all requirements for your respective claims. This approach might still allow her to qualify for some benefits like EIC with at least one qualifying child, while you maintain HoH status with another.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

After years of struggling with similar tax situations, I found this amazing AI-powered tax assistant at https://taxr.ai that completely transformed how we handle our taxes. My partner and I were in a somewhat similar situation (unmarried with children), and we were getting conflicting advice about who should claim the kids. The tool analyzed our full tax scenario, including our state taxes which are often overlooked, and helped us understand exactly how to maximize our combined refund while staying compliant. It even clarified all those confusing "tiebreaker rules" mentioned above, which honestly made zero sense to me before. What I really loved was that it showed us multiple filing scenarios with actual dollar amounts for each option, which made the decision so much clearer. Plus, it explained the potential audit risks for each approach so we knew exactly what we were getting into.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Does this service actually work for complicated situations like this? I've tried TurboTax and H&R Block and they always seem confused when dealing with unmarried parents. How is this different?

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

I'm skeptical about any service claiming to solve these issues. Did it actually help you avoid problems with the IRS? Because I've heard horror stories about people having to pay back thousands in refunds when they got these dependent claims wrong.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

It absolutely handles these complex situations better than standard tax software. Unlike TurboTax or H&R Block which lead you through a linear questionnaire, this analyzes your entire tax situation holistically, considering both federal and state implications simultaneously. It specifically has options for unmarried parents that the big tax services often oversimplify. Regarding the IRS concerns, that's actually why I recommend it - it clearly outlines the qualification rules and tiebreaker situations, and even gives you a risk assessment for different filing approaches. In our case, it showed us that splitting the dependents was actually compliant with tax law while still optimizing our refund. We've been using the approach it recommended for two tax seasons with no issues.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

I just wanted to follow up and say I actually tried that taxr.ai service after my skeptical comment. I was genuinely surprised at how helpful it was for my unmarried partner situation. It walked us through multiple scenarios and showed exactly how different claiming strategies would affect our refunds. The biggest revelation was that we were actually leaving money on the table by having just one of us claim all kids rather than splitting them strategically. We discovered my partner could claim one child and still get a significant EIC while I claimed the other child and maintained my HoH status. The documentation explaining the tiebreaker rules was especially clear. What really sold me was the custom report it generated explaining exactly why our arrangement was compliant with tax laws - something I can keep on hand in case of questions. Definitely worth checking out if you're in a similar situation.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

If you've been struggling to get clear answers from the IRS about your specific situation, I totally understand your frustration. I was in a similar position last year - couldn't get through on the phone for weeks and kept getting contradictory information online. I discovered a service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that actually got me connected with an IRS agent in under 15 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own. They have a whole process that bypasses the typical IRS phone tree nightmare. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c When I finally spoke with an actual IRS representative, they confirmed that in our unmarried parents situation, we could strategically split our dependents while both maintaining legal compliance. Having that official confirmation directly from the IRS gave us so much peace of mind about our filing strategy.

0 coins

Wait, how does this even work? Is this legit? The IRS phone lines are notoriously impossible to get through - I tried for literally 3 weeks last year.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Sounds like BS to me. Nobody can magically get through to the IRS faster than anyone else. They probably just keep you on hold themselves and then connect you when they finally get through, charging you for the privilege.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

It's completely legitimate - they use a technology that continuously redials the IRS for you and navigates the phone tree once connected. Think of it as having a dedicated system working on your behalf rather than manually redialing yourself. Once they secure a spot in the queue, they call you and connect you directly with the IRS agent. They don't keep you on hold - you're only connected when an actual IRS agent is on the line. The service does charge a fee, but for me it was worth it considering I had already wasted hours trying to reach someone. In my case, getting definitive answers about my unmarried partner dependent situation saved us thousands in potential improper filing penalties.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

I need to publicly eat my words about Claimyr. After dismissing it as BS, I was desperate enough to try it when I received a concerning letter from the IRS about my unmarried partner situation and dependent claims. I had been trying to reach the IRS for over a week with no success. Used Claimyr on Monday morning, and I was literally talking to an IRS agent within 20 minutes. The agent clarified that my partner and I were actually eligible to split our dependents in a way that maximized our refund while remaining compliant. The peace of mind from getting official confirmation was absolutely worth it. I was able to respond to the IRS letter immediately with the right information instead of stressing for weeks. For anyone dealing with complicated dependent situations between unmarried partners, being able to actually speak with the IRS and get clear guidance is invaluable.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

I've been in exactly your situation for years. What most tax preparers never tell you is that you can actually split the children between both parents in some cases, even while living together. For example, if you have 3 kids, you could claim 1 or 2 while she claims the other(s). This way, you both might qualify for Head of Household (if each of you can show you paid more than half the expenses for the respective children you're claiming). She would still get EIC for the child(ren) she claims, and you'd maintain some tax benefits too. The key is properly documenting who pays what expenses for which children. Keep track of who pays for what - childcare, medical, clothing, activities, etc. for each specific child. This documentation is crucial if you're ever questioned.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Does this actually work though? I thought there was a "same household" rule that prevented this kind of splitting when both parents live together full-time?

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

There's some confusion about the "same household" rules. While it's true that the tiebreaker rules generally give the claim to the higher-income parent when both parents live with the child, parents can choose which parent claims each qualifying child if they're willing to coordinate their returns. The key requirement is that each parent must independently qualify for all the tests for their respective claimed children - providing support, residency, etc. This approach isn't "splitting one child" but rather each parent claiming different children. I've done this successfully for years, though I do recommend keeping very clear documentation of expenses by child.

0 coins

Be super careful with this! My cousin and her boyfriend tried something similar and got audited. The IRS made them pay back all the extra refund money plus penalties. The problem was they both lived together full-time and the lower-income partner claimed all the kids even though the higher-income partner was providing most of the household support. The IRS has specific tiebreaker rules that say if you both live with the kids and both qualify to claim them, the person with the higher AGI gets to claim them.

0 coins

This happened to my sister too! The IRS came back TWO YEARS later asking for everything back plus interest. They said since both parents lived in the home full-time, the higher income parent had to claim the kids according to the tiebreaker rules.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

I understand your situation completely - my partner and I faced this same dilemma a few years ago. The $13.5k difference in refunds is definitely tempting, but you're right to be cautious. The reality is that when both unmarried parents live together full-time with the children, the IRS tiebreaker rules typically require the higher-income parent (you) to claim the dependents. Your girlfriend claiming all three kids while you both live together and you earn nearly double her income would likely trigger red flags if audited. However, there are legitimate strategies you might consider: 1. **Split the dependents**: You could claim 1-2 children while she claims the other(s). This allows both of you to potentially qualify for Head of Household status and her to get some EIC benefits. 2. **Document everything**: If you do split, keep meticulous records of which parent pays for what expenses for each specific child (childcare, medical, clothes, activities, etc.). 3. **Consider marriage**: I know you joked about it, but getting married might actually optimize your tax situation even further, especially with the changes to filing jointly vs. separately. The key is staying compliant while maximizing benefits. That $19k refund sounds great until you have to pay it all back with penalties and interest. I'd recommend consulting with a tax professional who specializes in unmarried parents situations before making any major changes to your filing strategy.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today