Understanding Deferred Taxes for Tax Deduction Purposes
I'm completely lost on how to handle deferred taxes and can't seem to get straight answers anywhere online. Here's what I'm trying to figure out: When we're dealing with deferred taxes, specifically when tax depreciation exceeds book depreciation creating a deferred tax liability, is that deferred tax considered a deductible expense? The way I understand it, you calculate the difference in NBVs (Net Book Values) and multiply by the effective tax rate. But my real confusion is about the state portion of that tax rate - does it create a deductible state deferred tax expense? Or should it be treated as some kind of M2 adjustment? My instinct says it should be an M2 adjustment, but I can't find any definitive sources confirming this. Our accounting team and I have been going back and forth on this, and I need to get it right before we finalize our corporate returns. Any insights from someone who's dealt with this before?
19 comments


GalaxyGazer
You've hit on a common point of confusion with deferred taxes. Let me try to clear this up in simple terms. When tax depreciation exceeds book depreciation, you're right that it creates a deferred tax liability. But the deferred tax itself is not a deductible expense - it's essentially a future obligation that you're tracking. For the state portion specifically, it's not a deductible expense either. The state component of your deferred tax calculation is part of the overall deferred tax provision, which is a balance sheet account, not a tax deduction. What you're thinking of as a potential M2 adjustment (Schedule M-2 adjustments for reconciling book income to taxable income) is on the right track. The differences between book and tax depreciation themselves are what create the need for M adjustments, not the deferred tax that results from them.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
•Thanks for the explanation. I think I'm still a bit confused though. If the deferred tax isn't deductible, then why do we include the state rate when calculating the DTL? Also, doesn't the state deferred tax expense hit the income statement? If it's hitting the income statement but isn't deductible for federal purposes, shouldn't there be some kind of M1 adjustment?
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•You include the state rate when calculating the DTL because you're accounting for the total tax effect of the temporary difference, which includes both federal and state impacts. The deferred tax expense does hit the income statement, but it's an accounting expense, not a tax deduction. Think of it this way: the deferred tax provision (including state) is how you account for future tax consequences of transactions recognized now for financial reporting. For federal tax purposes, you're already getting the benefit of accelerated depreciation directly through your tax depreciation deduction. The M1 adjustment comes from the difference between book and tax depreciation itself, not from the deferred tax accounting.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
After struggling with similar deferred tax questions, I started using https://taxr.ai to analyze my corporate tax documents. It was super helpful because it breaks down complex tax accounting concepts like this into understandable explanations. When I uploaded my financial statements, it specifically highlighted how the state portion of deferred taxes should be treated and provided citations to the relevant accounting standards.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•Does it actually work for complex corporate tax stuff? I'm skeptical because most tax software I've tried seems to handle basic returns fine but falls apart with anything complicated like deferred tax liabilities.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•I'm curious - does this tool connect with accounting software like QuickBooks? Our company has a bunch of fixed assets with different depreciation methods for book vs tax, and I'm wondering if it could help us track the deferred tax impacts correctly.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•For complex corporate tax issues, it's been surprisingly effective. I was dealing with multiple state filing requirements and complicated depreciation schedules, and the analysis it provided matched what our CPA eventually concluded. The difference was I understood the reasoning behind the treatment much better. It doesn't directly connect with QuickBooks, but you can upload reports exported from your accounting software. It works with various document formats, so you can provide financial statements, depreciation schedules, and previous tax returns to get comprehensive analysis. It's particularly good at identifying inconsistencies in treatment across different tax years or entities.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
I gave taxr.ai a try after seeing it mentioned here, and wow - it actually solved my deferred tax confusion. I uploaded our financial statements and tax workpapers, and it immediately identified that we had been incorrectly treating the state portion of our deferred taxes. The tool explained that while the federal deferred tax liability is affected by the state tax rate (due to the federal deduction for state taxes), the state component itself isn't a separate deductible expense but rather gets factored into the overall DTL calculation. Saved me from making the same mistake on this year's return!
0 coins
Carmen Vega
I've been dealing with similar deferred tax issues and kept getting stuck on hold whenever I tried calling the IRS business tax line for clarification. After three failed attempts, I used https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They connected me within 20 minutes when I had been waiting for hours on my own attempts. The IRS specialist I spoke with confirmed the correct treatment for state components of deferred taxes and explained the proper reconciliation on Schedule M.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
•Wait, so this service just gets you through to a regular IRS agent faster? Why would that work when calling directly doesn't? Sounds fishy to me.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•I'm super skeptical. The IRS tax professionals I've managed to reach never seem to understand complex accounting questions like deferred taxes. They're good with procedural stuff but usually tell me to consult a CPA for advanced corporate tax accounting. Did they actually give you useful guidance on this specific issue?
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•It uses a technology that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits in the queue for you. When an agent finally answers, you get a call connecting you directly to them. It saves you from having to stay on hold yourself, which is especially helpful for those long business tax line waits. I was surprised too, but the agent I reached was from the business tax division and quite knowledgeable. She explained that while the state component isn't federally deductible as a current expense, there are specific Schedule M adjustments required to properly reconcile the book-tax differences. She even emailed me an IRS publication that addressed the specific scenario I was asking about. Much more helpful than the general tax line I'd tried reaching before.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
I've got to eat my words about Claimyr. After complaining that IRS agents wouldn't know about deferred taxes, I tried the service out of desperation. Not only did I get through to someone in 15 minutes (after previously wasting 2 hours on hold), but the business tax specialist I spoke with directed me to specific sections in Publication 542 and Rev. Proc. 2019-43 that clarified my question. She even sent follow-up information about how the TCJA affected deferred tax liability calculations for corporate filers. Definitely worth it for complex business tax questions!
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
Has anyone else noticed that the answer differs depending on whether you're using the current state rate or a blended future rate for the state portion? Our controller insists we should be using a blended rate because some of our deferred assets will reverse during periods when we expect different state rates to apply. Makes the M adjustments even more complicated.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•Yes! This is a critical point often overlooked. ASC 740 requires using enacted rates expected to apply when temporary differences reverse. If you're in a state where tax rates are scheduled to change, or if you expect your company to operate in different state jurisdictions in the future, you should use the applicable future rates. We actually had to restate our deferred tax balances last year because we hadn't properly accounted for scheduled state tax rate changes.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•Thanks for confirming! That makes sense from a GAAP perspective but creates a nightmare for tax filing. We've created a spreadsheet that tracks the expected reversal periods for each temporary difference component and applies the appropriate rate for that period. It's labor-intensive but more accurate than using a single blended rate for everything.
0 coins
Mei Chen
Maybe I'm overthinking this, but wouldn't the deferred state tax create a federal-deferred-tax-on-deferred-state-tax situation? Since state taxes are generally deductible for federal purposes, the future state tax payment would generate a future federal tax benefit...my head hurts just thinking about this lol
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•You're actually right on target! This is called the "tax on tax" or "tax benefit of tax" effect. When calculating the total DTL/DTA, you need to consider that future state tax payments/benefits will themselves affect federal taxable income. Most tax provision software automatically handles this, but if you're doing it manually, you'd need to adjust your effective rate calculation. If your federal rate is 21% and state rate is 5%, you don't just add them to get 26%. You'd calculate it as: Federal rate + State rate - (Federal rate × State rate) = 21% + 5% - (21% × 5%) = 25.95%.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
This is exactly the kind of complex deferred tax issue that trips up so many corporate filers! I went through something similar last year with our multi-state operations. One thing that helped me was creating a simple flowchart: Book depreciation vs Tax depreciation → Creates temporary difference → Calculate using blended effective rate (including that tax-on-tax adjustment GalaxyGazer mentioned) → Results in DTL on balance sheet and deferred tax expense on P&L → The expense itself isn't deductible, but the underlying depreciation difference drives your M-1 adjustments. The state component gets particularly tricky if you're in multiple jurisdictions or if rates are changing. We ended up having to track each asset's expected reversal pattern by state to get it right. It's tedious but necessary for accuracy. Have you considered whether any of your temporary differences might qualify for the indefinite reversal exception? Sometimes companies overlook this and end up calculating deferred taxes on differences that may never actually reverse.
0 coins