< Back to IRS

StarSailor

Form 1120S: How to Handle Prior Period Adjustment to Retained Earnings from Change in Accounting Basis

Hey there, tax community! I'm new to the tax world but have spent years in audit, so I understand financials pretty well but I feel like a complete rookie with tax forms. Bear with me if this is something every tax preparer should know! I'm preparing an 1120S for a client who switched from tax basis to GAAP accounting, and my Schedule M-2 (Retained Earnings) worksheet is driving me crazy. I've entered the Schedule L beginning balance sheet exactly as it was filed last year, but Line 6 on the M-2 won't balance to zero. I've reconciled all the book-tax differences I can find. The main differences are accumulated depreciation and the corresponding impact to retained earnings. I've been searching online, but everything I find about prior period adjustments deals with correcting errors, not a change in accounting principle like this. What I really need to know: 1. Can I fix this on the current year return, or do I need to amend last year's return? (Amending seems like it would just push my problem back a year) 2. If I can fix it this year, should it be handled through the M-1 or somewhere else? 3. Could I change the beginning Schedule L balances to reflect as if GAAP had been used all along? Someone told me that's not advisable, but at this point, I'm desperate to get this to balance! Thanks for any guidance you can offer - I'm really stuck on this one!

The change from tax basis to GAAP is definitely a tricky situation! This is actually more common than you'd think. When a client switches accounting methods, you're basically dealing with a Section 481(a) adjustment. For your situation, you don't need to amend the prior year return. Instead, you'll need to report the cumulative effect of the change in accounting method on the current year return. This is handled primarily through Schedule M-1 (or M-3 if required). The beginning retained earnings on Schedule L should match what was reported on last year's return. For the difference caused by the switch to GAAP, you'll create an adjustment on Schedule M-1, line 5 "Expenses recorded on books this year not deducted on this return." If the adjustment increases taxable income, it goes on line 3 instead. For your Schedule M-2 issue, you'll need to include the cumulative effect of the accounting change as an "other increase" or "other decrease" to retained earnings, depending on the direction of the adjustment. Make sure to clearly label it as "Sec 481(a) adjustment - change from tax basis to GAAP." This approach maintains proper tax treatment while acknowledging the accounting principle change.

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

•

Thanks for this explanation! I'm actually facing a similar situation with a client. Quick question - does the entire 481(a) adjustment get recognized in the current year, or can it be spread over multiple years? Also, do we need to file any special forms to notify the IRS of this change in accounting method?

0 coins

The general rule is that a Section 481(a) adjustment is recognized entirely in the year of change. However, in some cases, the IRS allows for spreading the adjustment over four tax years (the year of change and the next three years). This typically applies to negative adjustments over a certain threshold. For your second question, yes, you generally need to file Form 3115 "Application for Change in Accounting Method" to properly notify the IRS of the change from tax basis to GAAP. This is important because without proper notification, the IRS could potentially challenge the treatment. The form requires detailed explanation of the change and calculation of the Section 481(a) adjustment.

0 coins

After struggling with a similar Form 1120S accounting basis change issue that was driving me crazy, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it was seriously helpful. I uploaded my client's financial statements and prior year return, and the system actually identified exactly where the retained earnings adjustment needed to be made. What was great is that it specifically explained how to handle the Section 481(a) adjustment on both Schedule M-1 and M-2, and provided the proper disclosure language to include with the return. It pointed out that my retained earnings discrepancy was actually related to the accumulated depreciation differences between tax and GAAP basis - exactly what you're dealing with. The system walked me through where each adjustment needed to go, and even flagged that I needed to file Form 3115 for the accounting method change. Saved me hours of frustration trying to figure this out on my own!

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

How exactly does this work? Do you have to provide all the financial statements and tax returns? I have some clients with complex basis issues and wondering if this would actually help or just be another thing I have to learn how to use.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. Does it actually tell you where to make entries on the tax forms themselves or just give general advice? The devil is always in the details with these accounting method changes.

0 coins

You can upload the financial statements and prior tax returns, and it analyzes them to identify discrepancies and recommend specific adjustments. The system is pretty flexible - you can upload whatever documents you have available, and it works with what you give it. For specific tax form guidance, yes, it actually does tell you exactly which lines to use on Schedule M-1, M-2, M-3, and other forms. For example, with my retained earnings issue, it identified the specific line items on Schedule M-2 that needed adjustment and explained the proper labeling for the Section 481(a) change. It's not just general advice - it gives you actionable steps.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

Just wanted to follow up about taxr.ai that I asked about earlier. I decided to give it a try with a particularly difficult S-Corp return that had a similar retained earnings issue from a change in accounting method. I was honestly surprised by how well it worked! I uploaded last year's return and the current year financials, and it immediately identified the exact Schedule M-2 imbalance I was struggling with. What really impressed me was that it showed me step-by-step how to properly report the Section 481(a) adjustment, including which specific lines needed adjustments on both Schedule M-1 and M-2. The system even generated the proper disclosure statement language for the tax basis to GAAP change that I could add to the return. Saved me at least 4-5 hours of research and trial-and-error. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with these accounting method change issues!

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

After spending 3 hours on hold trying to get through to the IRS Practitioner Priority Service for guidance on a complex 1120S basis change issue like yours, I finally discovered Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). You can check out how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was skeptical at first, but they actually got me connected to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes instead of the usual 2+ hour wait. The agent was able to confirm that our Section 481(a) approach for the accounting method change was correct and gave me specific guidance on the Schedule M-2 reporting. The IRS agent also walked me through the proper way to document the change in accounting method and confirmed we were handling the depreciation adjustments correctly. This saved me from potentially filing an incorrect return and facing amended returns later. Sometimes you just need to speak directly with the IRS to get clear guidance on these complex issues.

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? I thought the IRS phone system was completely automated now. Does this actually get you to a real person faster or is it just another paid service that doesn't deliver?

0 coins

This sounds like complete BS to me. I've tried EVERYTHING to get through to the IRS faster. Nothing works. They have their own system and no third party service can magically get you to the front of the line. Don't waste your money on services like this.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

It works by essentially handling the waiting for you. When you call the IRS directly, you're stuck on hold yourself for hours. With Claimyr, their system waits in the queue for you and calls you once an agent is about to be connected. Regarding the skepticism, I totally get it. I was extremely doubtful too. But it genuinely worked for me. The service uses a combination of automated systems and real people to monitor the hold times. They don't "cut the line" - they're just waiting in it for you so you don't have to sit there listening to the hold music for hours. When an agent is about to come on the line, you get a call to connect with them.

0 coins

I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I was still desperate to get through to the IRS about a complex 1120S issue similar to what OP described. Against my better judgment, I decided to try the service. I'm shocked to admit it actually worked. I got a call back in about 45 minutes telling me an IRS agent was on the line. The agent helped clarify exactly how to handle the Section 481(a) adjustment on my client's return and confirmed that we didn't need to amend the prior year. The agent also explained that for S-Corps specifically, the accumulated depreciation difference from the accounting method change should be detailed in a separate statement attached to the return. This was the exact guidance I needed but couldn't find anywhere online. So yeah, I was wrong. If you're stuck on complex S-Corp issues and need IRS guidance, it's worth a shot. Saved me from potentially filing incorrectly and having to deal with notices later.

0 coins

One approach I haven't seen mentioned yet is using the "other adjustments account" on Schedule L. I had a similar situation with a tax basis to GAAP conversion. What I did was: 1. Keep beginning Schedule L exactly as it was on prior year return 2. Create an "other adjustments" account on Schedule L to balance the beginning balances (basically creating a plug) 3. On M-1, show the adjustment for items that affect current year taxable income 4. On M-2, include the cumulative effect as "other increases/decreases" Make sure you include a detailed statement explaining the conversion from tax to GAAP basis and how it impacts each affected account. The statement is really the key to avoiding questions from the IRS.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

Thanks for this alternative approach. Did you have any issues with the IRS accepting this method? And did you have to file Form 3115 with this approach, or were you able to handle it all within the current year return?

0 coins

No issues with the IRS accepting this method. The key is documentation - I attached a comprehensive statement explaining the conversion process, which accounts were affected, and why the adjustment was necessary. Regarding Form 3115, I did file it as a protective measure, even though some practitioners argue it's not strictly required in all tax basis to GAAP conversions. The form demonstrates transparency about the change, which helps prevent questions later. I filed under the automatic change procedures and didn't have to wait for approval before filing the return.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

Just a warning that my firm handled a similar situation incorrectly and it caused major headaches. We didn't use Form 3115 because we thought it was just a "financial statement change" not an "accounting method change" - big mistake. The IRS questioned the unreconciled differences in Schedules L, M-1 and M-2 during an examination two years later. We ended up having to amend returns and pay penalties for our client. Make sure you document EVERYTHING about this change and consider consulting with a firm that specializes in accounting method changes if you're uncertain. The rules around Sec 481(a) adjustments are complex and fact-specific.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

Exactly this. We see these issues constantly in our practice. Question for you - did you end up having to go back and file the 3115 for the prior year, or were you able to handle it in the year under examination?

0 coins

PixelWarrior

•

As someone who's dealt with several S-Corp accounting method changes, I want to emphasize that the Form 3115 is absolutely critical here. Don't skip it even if you think it might not be required - it's your protection against future IRS questions. For your specific Schedule M-2 balancing issue, here's what I typically do: 1. Start with beginning retained earnings exactly as reported on last year's return 2. Calculate the cumulative Section 481(a) adjustment (difference between tax basis and GAAP accumulated depreciation/other timing differences) 3. Report this adjustment on Schedule M-2 as "Other increases" or "Other decreases" with clear labeling 4. Make corresponding entries on Schedule M-1 for current year impact The key is that your Schedule M-2 Line 6 should reflect the ending retained earnings per books (GAAP basis), not tax basis. The Section 481(a) adjustment bridges that gap. Also, prepare a detailed statement explaining the change and attach it to the return. Include calculations showing how you determined the adjustment amount. This documentation is crucial if the IRS ever questions the return. Don't try to "fix" the beginning Schedule L balances - that's not the proper approach and could create bigger problems later.

0 coins

Jessica Nolan

•

This is incredibly helpful! I'm relatively new to tax preparation and have been struggling with understanding when Form 3115 is actually required versus just recommended. Your point about it being protection against future IRS questions makes total sense - it's like having documentation that you properly notified them of the change. One follow-up question: when you calculate the cumulative Section 481(a) adjustment for the accumulated depreciation differences, do you typically go back to the very beginning of the asset's life, or just from when the discrepancy started? I'm trying to figure out how far back I need to research for my client's situation. Also, thank you for the clear step-by-step process for Schedule M-2 - that's exactly what I needed to understand how these pieces fit together!

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

Great question about the accumulated depreciation calculation! For the Section 481(a) adjustment, you typically need to go back to the beginning of each asset's life to calculate the cumulative difference between tax and GAAP depreciation methods. This can be quite a bit of work, but it's necessary to get the adjustment right. Here's how I approach it: 1. Create a spreadsheet listing all depreciable assets 2. For each asset, calculate what depreciation would have been under GAAP from the beginning 3. Compare that to what was actually taken for tax purposes 4. The cumulative difference for all assets becomes your Section 481(a) adjustment If you have assets that were acquired many years ago, this can involve going back quite far. However, you only need to include assets that are still on the books - disposed assets generally don't affect the current adjustment. One practical tip: if your client has been using tax depreciation for book purposes in prior years, the adjustment will typically be the difference between GAAP straight-line and accelerated tax depreciation methods like MACRS. The Form 3115 instructions actually provide worksheets to help calculate these adjustments, and they're worth using to ensure you're capturing everything correctly. Don't forget to also consider any bonus depreciation or Section 179 elections that created timing differences. @Jessica, I hope this helps clarify the calculation process! The research can be time-consuming, but getting it right prevents major headaches down the road.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! As someone new to handling accounting method changes, the spreadsheet approach you've outlined makes so much sense. I've been trying to figure out how to systematically tackle the depreciation differences without missing anything. Your point about only including assets still on the books is really helpful - I was wondering whether I needed to track down disposed assets too. And the clarification about GAAP straight-line vs MACRS timing differences gives me a clear framework to work with. I'm definitely going to use the Form 3115 worksheets you mentioned. I hadn't realized those were available and that could save me a lot of time in setting up my calculations correctly. One last question - when you say "bonus depreciation or Section 179 elections that created timing differences," are you referring to situations where these were taken for tax but wouldn't be allowed under GAAP, or vice versa? I want to make sure I'm capturing all the potential differences in my analysis. Thanks again for such a thorough explanation - this community is incredibly helpful for someone still learning the ropes!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today