Tax treatment of synthetic long options positions - capital gains reporting concerns
I'm trying to figure out how synthetic long options are treated for tax purposes and could use some expertise. So a synthetic long is when you buy a call option and simultaneously sell a put option on the same stock, with the same strike price and expiration date. In my situation, I opened a synthetic long when the stock was trading at $52.50, so both options had a $52.50 strike price. I understand that economically it's equivalent to owning 100 shares of the stock for each call/put pair. At expiration, one of two things happens: 1. If price ends above $52.50: My call is valuable, I exercise it, and the put expires worthless 2. If price ends below $52.50: I get assigned on the put, and my call expires worthless Here's what's confusing me about the tax treatment. My broker is showing: Scenario 1: My cost basis for the 100 shares equals strike price ($52.50 × 100) plus the call premium I paid ($215). And I have a capital gain equal to the put premium I received ($192). Scenario 2: My cost basis for the 100 shares equals strike price ($52.50 × 100) minus the put premium I received ($192). And I have a capital loss equal to the call premium I paid ($215). But scenario 2 seems like a tax loophole. The stock was $52.50 when I opened the position but only $52.00 at expiration. The call premium was $215. So I've immediately generated a $215 tax loss, while getting a lower cost basis on shares I might not sell for years. Some sources suggest that if you sell a call at a loss and immediately buy the underlying shares, it's a wash sale. That seems similar to scenario 2, except the purchase happens due to put assignment. Does anyone know how this is properly reported for taxes?
21 comments


Andre Lefebvre
The tax treatment of synthetic long positions can be tricky, but I can help clarify. What your broker is showing is technically correct from a reporting standpoint, but you're right to question the tax implications. In Scenario 2, the IRS would likely view this as a potential wash sale situation. When your call expires worthless and you acquire shares through put assignment in the same strategy, the loss on the call option would generally be disallowed under wash sale rules if the transactions occur within the 30-day window (which they do in your case). This means the $215 loss should actually be added to your cost basis in the acquired shares rather than being immediately deductible. The proper treatment would be to adjust your cost basis in the acquired shares to include the disallowed loss, so your basis would be: $52.50 × 100 - $192 (put premium) + $215 (disallowed call loss) = $5,273. Think of it this way - the synthetic long is economically equivalent to owning the shares outright, so the tax treatment should ultimately reflect that economic reality.
0 coins
Zoe Dimitriou
•But what if the call and put were opened at different times? Like if I already had the long call for a few months and then decided to sell the put later? Would the wash sale rule still apply since they weren't opened as an explicit "synthetic long" strategy?
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•If you opened the positions at different times, it becomes more complicated. The wash sale rule still applies to substantially identical securities within the 30-day window, regardless of when you initially opened each position. What matters is the timing between recognizing the loss and acquiring the replacement position. If you held a call for months, then sold a put, and that put gets assigned causing you to acquire shares within 30 days before or after the call expires worthless, the IRS would likely still consider it a wash sale. The key is that you ended up with the underlying security (shares) within the wash sale window of recognizing a loss on an option for that same security.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
I've been using taxr.ai for my options trading tax situations and it was incredibly helpful for sorting out similar synthetic position issues. Last year I had multiple complex options strategies including several synthetic longs that expired in different scenarios, and I was completely lost trying to figure out the proper tax treatment. I uploaded my trading statements to https://taxr.ai and it immediately identified the synthetic positions and properly applied wash sale rules where appropriate. It also flagged when my broker's 1099 was likely to be incorrect based on the actual tax regulations. The explanations helped me understand exactly why certain losses were disallowed and how my cost basis should be adjusted. Saved me hours of research and potentially an expensive conversation with a tax professional who might not even specialize in options trading!
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•How exactly does taxr.ai handle the situation the OP described? Does it treat scenario 2 as a wash sale automatically? I'm curious because I have similar positions and my broker is definitely not marking them as wash sales on their statements.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•I'm skeptical of using automated services for complex tax situations. How can you be sure it's applying the correct treatment when even tax professionals disagree on these edge cases? Does it generate any documentation to support its position if you get audited?
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•For the scenario the OP described, taxr.ai specifically analyzes option expirations and acquisitions of underlying securities, and will flag scenario 2 as a wash sale when appropriate. It automatically adds the disallowed loss to your cost basis in the acquired shares rather than treating it as an immediate tax loss. The service provides detailed documentation with references to specific IRS regulations and tax court cases that support each tax treatment decision. This includes a complete audit trail showing how each transaction was categorized and why specific tax rules were applied. If you get audited, you can share these reports with the IRS or your tax professional to justify the positions taken on your return.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
Just wanted to follow up on my experience with taxr.ai after trying it based on this discussion. I uploaded my brokerage statements which had several synthetic long positions similar to what was described here, and the service immediately flagged several transactions where my broker had incorrectly reported losses that should have been disallowed under wash sale rules. The detailed explanations made it clear why certain option expirations followed by share acquisitions were subject to wash sale treatment. It even separated my transactions into distinct strategies (identifying which puts and calls were part of synthetic longs versus standalone positions) which my broker doesn't do. The documentation it generated will be super helpful if I get any questions from the IRS, since my tax return will differ from what my 1099-B shows. Definitely worth using if you're doing complex options trades!
0 coins
Liam McGuire
If you're dealing with these complex options tax situations, good luck trying to get help from the IRS directly. I spent WEEKS trying to reach someone who could answer questions about synthetic positions. Kept getting transferred between departments, put on hold for hours, or told to "check the website" which had zero info on this specific scenario. I eventually found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) which got me connected to an actual IRS agent who specializes in investment taxation within 20 minutes. They have this system that navigates the IRS phone tree for you and calls you back when they have an agent on the line. You can see a demo of how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with confirmed that in most cases, scenario 2 would be treated as a wash sale, and the loss should be added to the basis rather than taken immediately. Saved me from potentially filing incorrectly and dealing with an amended return later.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•How exactly does Claimyr work? Do they just call the IRS for you? I'm confused because I thought there's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS.
0 coins
Amara Eze
•This sounds too good to be true. The IRS wait times are insane by design. How could some service possibly get you through faster than calling yourself? And even if you do reach someone, most IRS agents give conflicting answers to complex tax questions anyway.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•They don't skip the line exactly - they have a system that automatically redials and navigates the complex IRS phone menus for you. When they finally reach a human at the IRS, they call you to connect. So you don't have to waste hours listening to hold music or repeatedly calling back when disconnected. The key benefit is that they know which specific options to select in the phone tree to reach the right department for your tax question. When I used it, I specifically mentioned I needed help with options trading tax treatment, and they routed me to someone in the investment tax department rather than a general tax representative. The agent was surprisingly knowledgeable about options strategies and didn't give me the usual runaround.
0 coins
Amara Eze
I was extremely skeptical about Claimyr as I mentioned in my previous comment, but I have to admit I was wrong. After continuing to struggle with getting reliable information about my synthetic options positions, I decided to give it a try yesterday. Within 25 minutes of using the service, I was speaking with an IRS tax law specialist who actually understood options trading. She confirmed that when you have a synthetic long position where the call expires worthless and you acquire shares through put assignment, the wash sale rules absolutely apply. She directed me to Publication 550 and explained how to properly adjust my cost basis. I've been trying for almost two months to get this clarification through normal channels. Would have saved myself a lot of stress if I'd tried this service sooner. The fee was worth every penny compared to the potential tax issues from reporting incorrectly.
0 coins
Giovanni Ricci
Something else to consider with synthetic longs - the holding period for the acquired stock. If you get assigned on the put (scenario 2), your holding period for the stock begins on the assignment date, not when you originally opened the options position. This can have implications if you're trying to qualify for long-term capital gains treatment. I learned this the hard way last year when I thought my synthetic long positions would carry over the holding period from when I opened them. Nope - it's all short-term until you've held the actual shares for >1 year from assignment.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•Is that always true even if the synthetic long is effectively economically identical to owning the shares? Seems weird that there would be that distinction when the risk/reward profile is identical from day one.
0 coins
Giovanni Ricci
•Yes, unfortunately that's how the IRS treats it. Despite the economic equivalence, the holding period legally starts when you actually own the shares. The IRS doesn't consider having options positions as "owning" the underlying security for holding period purposes, even if the positions create the same economic exposure. This is one area where the tax code hasn't caught up with modern financial instruments. The regulations were written before synthetic positions became common, and they haven't been updated to recognize the economic reality of these instruments.
0 coins
NeonNomad
Another quirk to be aware of - qualified dividends! If your synthetic long crosses an ex-dividend date, any dividend equivalents you effectively receive aren't eligible for qualified dividend tax treatment. With actual share ownership, you can get the preferential qualified dividend tax rate if you meet the holding period requirements. But with a synthetic long, you're technically not receiving dividends - you're just seeing the options prices adjust to account for the dividend. So any dividend benefit gets taxed as ordinary income through the options pricing.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•Wait what? How does the dividend even work with a synthetic long? You don't actually own the shares until expiration/assignment, so you wouldn't get any dividend payment, right?
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•You're absolutely right - with a synthetic long, you don't receive actual dividend payments since you don't own the shares. What happens instead is that the options prices adjust on the ex-dividend date to reflect the dividend. Specifically, both the call and put strike prices get reduced by the dividend amount, and if you're holding American-style options, there might be early assignment risk on the short put if the dividend is large enough. The "dividend equivalent" I mentioned refers to how the net value of your synthetic position changes - it should theoretically increase by roughly the dividend amount, but that gain gets captured through the options pricing rather than as a separate dividend payment. This is why it doesn't qualify for the preferential dividend tax rates - you're not actually receiving dividends, just capital appreciation on your options position.
0 coins
Isabella Russo
This is a great discussion on a complex topic. One thing I'd add is that the IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing synthetic positions in recent years, especially when traders use them to manufacture tax losses while maintaining economic exposure to the underlying asset. The wash sale treatment that @Andre Lefebvre mentioned is definitely the correct approach for scenario 2. What many people don't realize is that the IRS views the entire synthetic long strategy as a single integrated transaction, not separate option trades. This is why timing the individual legs differently doesn't necessarily help you avoid wash sale treatment. I'd also recommend keeping very detailed records of your synthetic positions, including the dates opened, premiums paid/received, and your intent when entering the strategy. If you get audited, being able to demonstrate that this was part of a legitimate investment strategy (rather than tax loss harvesting) will be important. The key principle to remember is that tax treatment should follow economic substance. Since a synthetic long has the same risk/reward profile as owning shares outright, the IRS expects the tax consequences to be similar as well.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•This is really helpful context about the IRS viewing synthetic positions as integrated transactions. I'm curious though - what constitutes "detailed records" in practice? Beyond the basic trade data, should I be documenting things like market conditions when I opened the position, or my investment thesis? And how do you prove "legitimate investment strategy" versus tax loss harvesting if the economic outcome is identical either way?
0 coins