Tax pros: Should rental property losses with negative QBI be reported on Form 8995, even when it reduces client's Qualified Business Income deduction?
I've been working on several tax returns for clients with rental properties, and I'm conflicted about how to handle their taxable losses on Form 8995. In most cases, these rental properties are operating at a taxable loss, and the clients are definitely involved enough in managing them to qualify as a Section 162 trade or business for QBI purposes. Technically, we should report the taxable loss on Form 8995, but doing so reduces their current or future QBI deduction, which seems counterproductive for the client. When I review past returns prepared by other accountants, I rarely see rental losses included on the 8995. I'm stuck between following the letter of the law (including the loss and reducing QBI) versus doing what seems common practice (leaving it off). For clients who are clearly running their rental as a business and are actively involved in management, it feels wrong to reduce their QBI deduction by including the loss. I understand the IRS Rev. Proc. 2019-38 safe harbor has a very high threshold, but the actual qualification in the tax code is just meeting the Section 162 trade or business standard, which most active rental operations satisfy. What's your approach with clients in this situation? Include the rental loss on 8995 and reduce QBI, or leave it off?
20 comments


Amara Chukwu
The way I approach this with my clients is to evaluate each rental activity individually rather than applying a blanket rule. The key question is whether the rental truly rises to the level of a Section 162 trade or business, not just whether the client is "involved." You're right that the bar for Section 162 is relatively low, but it does require "regular and continuous" activity. For clients who are truly engaged in the rental business (managing multiple properties, handling tenant issues directly, making regular repairs, etc.), I generally include the activity on Form 8995 whether it shows a profit or loss. The tax code doesn't give us the option to only report profitable QBI activities while ignoring losses. For "passive" rental owners who use management companies and have minimal involvement, I might take the position that the activity doesn't rise to Section 162 levels and therefore doesn't need to be reported on Form 8995 at all. Remember that rental losses often aren't "real" economic losses - they're frequently the result of depreciation. So while including the loss might reduce QBI in the current year, it could be the correct technical position.
0 coins
Giovanni Conti
•Thanks for the thorough response! I'm wondering though - what about situations where clients have just one rental property that they manage themselves but still show a loss due to depreciation? Do you have any concerns about inconsistent treatment if you include some rentals on 8995 but exclude others?
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
•For single-property owners who manage everything themselves, I still evaluate whether their activity is regular and continuous. Most do qualify as Section 162 businesses if they're handling tenant relations, maintenance, etc. themselves rather than outsourcing everything. I'm less concerned about inconsistent treatment between clients because each situation gets evaluated on its individual facts and circumstances. The key is documenting your reasoning for each decision. If the facts support treatment as a Section 162 business, then technically the activity belongs on Form 8995 regardless of whether it produces a profit or loss.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
I discovered an amazing tool that saved me hours of deliberation on this exact issue! I was struggling with the same QBI rental loss question for several clients and wasn't sure about the right approach. I tried https://taxr.ai and uploaded a sample return with rental activities showing losses. The AI analyzed my forms and previous treatment, then provided specific guidance for my situation. What impressed me was that it cited the relevant sections of the tax code AND recent tax court rulings on similar Section 162 qualification issues. It even gave me specific documentation recommendations to support my position if there was ever an audit. No more second-guessing whether I'm making the right call on Form 8995 treatment!
0 coins
NeonNova
•Did it actually give you a definitive answer on whether to include rental losses on 8995? Or just general information about Section 162? I'm skeptical that an AI tool could provide better guidance than a human tax professional on something that requires judgment.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•I'm curious about this too. How exactly does it work? Do you have to upload an entire return with all the client's info or can you just pose the specific QBI question? Also wondering how current its tax law knowledge is given the constant changes to QBI interpretation.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
•It actually gave me a specific recommendation based on the facts in my sample return. It suggested including the rental loss on 8995 but then provided a detailed explanation of factors that could support a different position if client facts differed. You don't have to upload an entire return with sensitive client information. You can upload just the specific forms you have questions about, or even just type your scenario directly. I've found its tax law knowledge to be surprisingly current - it referenced a tax court case from just a few months ago that addressed Section 162 factors for short-term rentals.
0 coins
NeonNova
I'm back to report that I tried https://taxr.ai after my skeptical question above, and I have to admit I was impressed. I uploaded my client's Schedule E and some notes about their involvement level with their rental properties, and it gave me a nuanced analysis. For my particular case (client with 3 rental properties showing paper losses due to depreciation but positive cash flow), it recommended including the properties on Form 8995. But what really helped was the detailed explanation of why - it walked through the Section 162 factors and explained how my client's level of activity met the standard. The tool even suggested specific documentation I should keep in my files to support the position. I feel much more confident in my approach now and have a clear rationale I can explain to my client. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with these borderline QBI situations.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
For anyone struggling with getting clarification directly from the IRS on QBI treatment of rental losses - I found an unexpected solution. After being on hold for 2+ hours multiple times trying to get through to an IRS representative who could address this specific issue, I tried https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. Their service got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of the 3+ hour waits I was experiencing before. I was able to discuss multiple rental property QBI scenarios with the agent and get their guidance on Form 8995 reporting. Obviously the agent couldn't provide binding advice, but it was incredibly helpful to hear their perspective on how they're evaluating these situations during reviews.
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
•How does this actually work? Does it just keep redialing the IRS until it gets through? I'm confused about how a third-party service could possibly get you to the front of the IRS queue when everyone else is waiting hours.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•This sounds fishy. The IRS wait times are what they are because of their limited staffing. No service can magically create more IRS agents or move you ahead of others who've been waiting. And even if you do get through, most frontline IRS agents won't have specialized knowledge about nuanced QBI issues for rental properties.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•It doesn't move you to the front of the queue or create more agents. From what I understand, their system navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold so you don't have to. When an agent finally answers, their system calls you to connect with the agent who's on the line. You're right that not every IRS agent will have specialized QBI knowledge. In my case, I specifically requested to speak with someone in the business tax department, and the agent I connected with was knowledgeable about Form 8995 reporting requirements. Your mileage may vary depending on who answers, but at least you're not wasting hours on hold finding out.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
I need to follow up on my skeptical comment above. After continuing to waste entire afternoons on hold with the IRS trying to get clarity on several complex QBI situations, I finally broke down and tried the Claimyr service. I was genuinely surprised when I got a call back in about 25 minutes connecting me to an actual IRS representative. The agent I spoke with was able to answer my questions about rental property treatment on Form 8995 and directed me to specific sections in Publication 535 I hadn't previously considered. While they emphasized they couldn't provide binding advice for specific taxpayer situations, the general guidance was extremely helpful. I still think the IRS needs to improve their staffing and accessibility, but in the meantime, this service saved me hours of frustration. For complex technical questions where written guidance is unclear, sometimes you just need to speak with someone at the IRS directly.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
I think there's a practical middle ground here that I've been using with my rental property clients. Rather than making a blanket decision to include or exclude all rental activities from Form 8995, I evaluate them individually. For properties showing a true economic loss (negative cash flow even before depreciation), I generally include them on Form 8995 if the client's involvement meets Section 162 standards. However, for properties showing positive cash flow but a tax loss purely from depreciation, I sometimes take the position that these aren't "true" business losses that should offset other QBI. The regulations aren't crystal clear on this distinction, which gives us some reasonable basis for interpretation. Documentation of your reasoning is key.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•Is there any actual support in the tax code for treating depreciation-only losses differently than "true" economic losses for QBI purposes? I've never seen this distinction mentioned in any IRS guidance. Seems like you're creating your own rules.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
•You raise a valid point - there's no explicit language in the regulations making this distinction. My approach is based on the intent of the QBI provisions, which were designed to provide a deduction for business income. When a rental property generates positive cash flow but shows a tax loss solely due to depreciation (a non-cash expense), there's an argument that including this "loss" to offset other QBI doesn't align with the economic reality or legislative intent. However, I acknowledge this is an interpretation rather than a clear rule. I always document my reasoning and ensure clients understand the potential risks of this position. As with many areas of tax law, reasonable minds can differ on the application of general rules to specific situations.
0 coins
StarSailor
Has anyone considered the aggregation election for rental properties? If your client has multiple rentals and some are profitable while others show losses, electing to aggregate them as a single business for QBI purposes might be beneficial. This way, you're properly reporting everything on Form 8995, but the losses and profits offset each other. The requirements for aggregation are in Reg. 1.199A-4, and you need to meet the 50% common ownership test, plus at least 2 of the 3 factors (similar businesses, shared resources, or interdependence). For many clients with multiple rentals in the same area, this might be a viable approach.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•That's an excellent point about aggregation! I've found this especially useful for clients who own commercial buildings rented to their own operating businesses. Do you typically make the aggregation election on the initial return, or have you had success adding it in later years?
0 coins
Ryder Ross
I've been following this discussion with great interest as I've encountered similar dilemmas with my rental property clients. One approach I've found helpful is creating a clear decision matrix for each client that documents the factors supporting Section 162 trade or business status. For each rental property, I evaluate: (1) hours per week spent on management activities, (2) whether they use a management company or handle operations directly, (3) frequency of tenant interactions, (4) involvement in maintenance and repairs, and (5) marketing efforts for vacant units. I document this analysis in the client file regardless of whether I ultimately include the activity on Form 8995. What's helped me sleep better at night is being consistent in my application of these criteria across all clients. If the facts support Section 162 treatment, I include the activity on Form 8995 whether it shows a profit or loss. The tax code doesn't give us the luxury of cherry-picking only profitable QBI activities. That said, I do make sure clients understand the impact on their current-year QBI deduction when rental losses are involved. Sometimes we discuss strategies like timing of repairs or equipment purchases to help manage the overall QBI picture across multiple business activities.
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
•This is exactly the kind of systematic approach I've been looking for! Your decision matrix idea is brilliant - I've been making these determinations somewhat intuitively, but having documented criteria would provide much better support for my positions. I'm curious about how you handle the "hours per week" factor. Do you have clients track their time, or do you estimate based on their description of activities? Also, have you found that the IRS or courts give more weight to certain factors over others when determining Section 162 status for rentals? The consistency point really resonates with me. I think part of my original dilemma came from not having a clear framework to apply across all situations. Thanks for sharing this approach!
0 coins