< Back to IRS

Ava Thompson

Tax implications of withdrawing 401k early to invest in depreciated real estate?

My income has taken a significant hit this year due to some deliberate career moves I've made. I'm currently in the process of purchasing my first rental property and plan to acquire a few more before December. I'm considering cashing out my entire 401k to fund these real estate investments. If I completely empty my 401k and then use forward depreciation on my rental properties to bring my taxable income down to zero, would I only have to pay the 10% early withdrawal penalty on the 401k distribution? I realize this is probably not conventional financial advice, but the rental properties I'm looking at are projected to generate annual returns over 18%, which far exceeds what my 401k has been doing. Just trying to understand the tax implications before making this move. Thanks for any insights!

Taking funds from your 401k for real estate investing is something I've seen people do, but there are important tax considerations beyond just the 10% penalty. When you withdraw from your 401k, that money becomes ordinary income in the year you take it out. Even if you reduce your other income to zero through depreciation on your rentals, the 401k withdrawal itself is still taxable income. You'll owe your normal income tax rate on that amount PLUS the 10% early withdrawal penalty if you're under 59½. Depreciation on rental properties is a great tax advantage, but there are limits to how it can offset your income. You need to consider passive activity rules, which might restrict how much of that depreciation you can use against non-rental income in a single year. The 401k distribution is considered non-rental income. Also, keep in mind that accelerated depreciation methods might help in the short term but could lead to larger tax implications later through depreciation recapture when you sell the properties.

0 coins

But what if their income really is super low this year? Wouldn't they be in a much lower tax bracket for the 401k withdrawal? Also, can't you do a cost segregation study to front-load even more depreciation?

0 coins

They would indeed be in a lower tax bracket if their other income is reduced, which could make this a more favorable year for the withdrawal compared to a high-income year. That's a good point. Yes, cost segregation studies can significantly accelerate depreciation by identifying components of the property that can be depreciated over shorter periods (5, 7, or 15 years instead of 27.5 or 39 years). This can create larger depreciation deductions in the early years of ownership. Just remember that passive activity loss rules may still limit how much of those losses can offset the 401k distribution, depending on the taxpayer's involvement in the real estate activity and total income.

0 coins

I went through something similar last year and discovered a tool that really helped me understand the tax implications. Check out https://taxr.ai - it analyzes your specific situation and gives you a clear breakdown of how different decisions will impact your taxes. In my case, I was considering using my retirement funds for real estate investment and wasn't sure about the passive activity loss limitations. The tool showed me exactly how much of my 401k withdrawal would still be taxable even with rental depreciation, and helped me structure the timing to minimize my tax hit. It also identified some tax strategies I hadn't considered, like potentially qualifying as a real estate professional to avoid some passive activity restrictions if you put enough hours into managing properties.

0 coins

How accurate is this tool compared to talking with an actual CPA? I'm always skeptical of automated tax advice since everyone's situation is unique.

0 coins

Does it actually explain the passive loss limitations specifically? That's the most confusing part for me with rental properties. And can it handle cost segregation calculations?

0 coins

It's surprisingly accurate - I verified the results with my accountant afterward, and he was impressed with the detailed analysis. The tool doesn't replace professional advice for complex situations, but it gives you a solid foundation to have more informed conversations. The tool does explain passive loss limitations clearly, breaking down how much of your losses you can utilize based on your income types and levels. It even has a specific section that analyzes whether taking actions to qualify as a real estate professional would benefit your specific tax situation. For cost segregation, it provides estimates based on typical property types and helps you understand if it would be beneficial enough to justify the expense of a professional cost seg study.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up - I tried https://taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here, and wow! It actually showed me that in my specific situation (similar to yours with lower income this year), I could offset about 60% of my 401k withdrawal with rental property depreciation, but not all of it. The tool explained that even with accelerated depreciation methods, the passive activity loss rules would limit how much I could use against the 401k distribution. However, it suggested spreading the 401k withdrawal across two tax years (December and January) and showed exactly how much I would save by doing that. The real game-changer was when it analyzed whether I would qualify as a real estate professional based on my hours, which would have removed the passive loss limitations entirely. Super helpful for making an informed decision!

0 coins

If you're having trouble getting IRS clarification on how the passive activity rules apply to 401k withdrawals and real estate depreciation, I highly recommend using https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent. I spent weeks trying to get clear answers on a similar situation last year. With Claimyr, I got through to the IRS in about 20 minutes instead of waiting on hold for hours. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with explained exactly how my 401k distribution would be treated in relation to my rental property losses and what documentation I would need if I ever got audited. They also clarified how the passive activity rules would apply to my specific situation in a way that none of the online resources could.

0 coins

Wait, this sounds too good to be true. The IRS actually picked up the phone and gave helpful advice? Usually when I call I get disconnected after waiting for 2 hours.

0 coins

I'm skeptical. How does this service actually work? And why would I pay for something when I should be able to call the IRS directly for free? Sounds like another scam trying to profit off a broken system.

0 coins

Yes, they actually did! The key is that Claimyr navigates through the IRS phone system and waits on hold for you. Then when an agent is about to pick up, you get a call so you only spend time talking to a real person, not waiting. The service works by essentially waiting in the phone queue for you. It uses technology to navigate the IRS phone tree and hold in line, then calls you when an actual human agent is on the line. You're not paying for information that should be free - you're paying to avoid wasting hours of your life on hold. It's like paying for a line-waiting service. For me, spending $20-30 was worth not losing half a day of productivity sitting on hold, especially when I needed specific answers about 401k distributions and passive loss rules that affected thousands of dollars in tax liability.

0 coins

I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After seeing the responses here, I decided to try it since I've been trying for WEEKS to get an answer from the IRS about passive activity losses offsetting retirement distributions. Got through to an actual IRS tax law specialist in about 25 minutes. The agent confirmed what others have said here - the 401k withdrawal counts as ordinary income and is separate from your rental activity. Depreciation from rental properties typically can't offset it unless you qualify as a real estate professional. The agent also explained that if I did qualify as a real estate professional (which requires 750+ hours working in real estate and more time in real estate than any other profession), then I COULD potentially use rental losses to offset the 401k income. That's a game-changer for my situation that I couldn't find clear answers about anywhere online.

0 coins

Just want to point out something important - when you take money from your 401k, your plan administrator will automatically withhold 20% for federal taxes. So if you need $100k for your real estate purchases, you'll actually need to withdraw $125k to get $100k in hand. Also, don't forget that when you sell these properties later, you'll face depreciation recapture at 25%, which is higher than most capital gains rates. So you're essentially trading potentially lower taxes now for guaranteed higher taxes later.

0 coins

Is there any way around the 20% withholding? What if I need exactly the amount in my 401k for the down payment on a property?

0 coins

Unfortunately, the 20% withholding is mandatory for direct 401k withdrawals - the plan administrator is required by law to withhold this amount. One potential workaround is to roll your 401k into an IRA first, then take a distribution from the IRA. IRAs give you more flexibility, and while taxes will still be due when you file, the upfront withholding requirements are different. For IRAs, withholding is generally optional, though there are some specific rules depending on how you take the distribution. Just be aware that if you choose no withholding, you'll need to budget for the taxes due at filing time and possibly make estimated tax payments to avoid underpayment penalties.

0 coins

Has anyone actually calculated the interest rate equivalent of the 401k withdrawal penalty + taxes vs just getting a loan? Seems like you'd need a REALLY good real estate deal to make this worthwhile.

0 coins

I did this calculation recently. Assuming a 22% federal tax bracket + 10% penalty + potential state taxes (varies by state), you're looking at roughly 35-40% of your withdrawal gone immediately. That's equivalent to a loan with 35-40% upfront points, which is enormous. In real estate terms, your property would need to appreciate by that much just to break even. Then factor in the lost tax-deferred growth on those retirement funds, and it becomes an even higher hurdle.

0 coins

Thanks for breaking that down! When you put it that way, it seems like I'd be better off looking at hard money loans even at 10-12% interest rather than tapping retirement funds.

0 coins

Before making this move, consider looking into a 401k loan instead of a full withdrawal. Many plans allow you to borrow up to 50% of your vested balance (up to $50,000) and pay yourself back with interest over 5 years. This way you avoid the 10% penalty and immediate tax hit entirely. The interest you pay goes back into your own 401k account, so you're essentially paying yourself. The loan payments come from after-tax dollars, but you were going to pay taxes on a withdrawal anyway. If your real estate investments perform as projected, you could potentially pay back the loan early and still keep your retirement savings growing. Just be aware that if you leave your job, most plans require the loan to be repaid within 60 days or it becomes a taxable distribution. Also, you'll miss out on potential market gains on the borrowed amount while it's out of your 401k. But given your situation with lower income this year and promising real estate opportunities, it might be worth exploring as an alternative to a full withdrawal.

0 coins

One important consideration that hasn't been fully addressed is the timing of when you can actually use rental property depreciation. Even if you purchase multiple properties before December, you can only depreciate them starting from when they're placed in service (ready for rent). If you withdraw your entire 401k in 2024 but don't get your rental properties generating income until late in the year, you'll have very limited depreciation to offset that withdrawal in the current tax year. Depreciation is calculated monthly, so a property placed in service in November would only give you 2 months of depreciation deductions for 2024. Also, keep in mind that you'll need to have actual rental income to justify the depreciation deductions. The IRS expects rental properties to have a profit motive - if you're showing large losses year after year with no rental income, that could trigger scrutiny. Given your projected 18% returns, have you considered whether those are realistic after factoring in vacancy rates, maintenance costs, property management, and the time value of money? The numbers need to work even in less-than-ideal scenarios to justify the immediate tax hit from the 401k withdrawal.

0 coins

This is such a crucial point that I wish I had understood better when I first started investing in real estate. The timing issue with depreciation can really catch you off guard, especially if you're counting on those deductions to offset other income in the same tax year. I made a similar mistake a few years back - took a large distribution expecting to offset it with rental depreciation, but my property didn't actually start generating rental income until the following year. Ended up with a much larger tax bill than anticipated because I could only claim a fraction of the depreciation I was counting on. @Honorah King is absolutely right about the profit motive requirement too. The IRS has specific rules about when rental activities are considered legitimate businesses versus hobbies, and showing consistent losses without rental income can definitely raise red flags. Have you run the numbers on what your monthly cash flow will actually look like after mortgage payments, insurance, property taxes, maintenance reserves, and potential vacancy periods? Those 18% returns sound great on paper, but real estate investing has a lot of hidden costs that can eat into those projections quickly.

0 coins

I'd strongly recommend getting professional tax advice before making this move. While the math on 18% returns sounds appealing, there are several complex factors at play here that could significantly impact your tax liability. First, the passive activity loss rules are more restrictive than many people realize. Even if you generate substantial depreciation from your rental properties, you may only be able to use $25,000 of those losses against other income (like your 401k withdrawal) if your adjusted gross income is under $100,000. Above that threshold, the allowable loss phases out completely. Second, consider the opportunity cost. Your 401k funds are growing tax-deferred, and once you withdraw them, you lose that tax shelter forever. You can't just put the money back later. At your age, those funds could potentially grow to several times their current value by retirement. Have you explored alternatives like a HELOC, hard money lending, or partnering with other investors? These might give you access to capital without the immediate tax consequences and permanent loss of retirement savings. Also, make sure your 18% return projections account for all expenses - vacancy rates, repairs, property management, insurance increases, and potential market downturns. Real estate can be lucrative, but it's not without risks, especially if you're leveraging your entire retirement to get started.

0 coins

This is excellent advice from @Freya Larsen. The $25,000 passive loss limitation is a critical detail that could completely change your tax calculations. I learned this the hard way when I assumed I could offset a large IRA conversion with rental depreciation, only to discover most of those losses were suspended due to passive activity rules. One thing to add - even if you do qualify as a real estate professional to avoid passive loss limitations, you need to meet both the 750-hour test AND spend more time on real estate than any other business activity. The IRS is pretty strict about documentation here, so you'd need detailed time logs. Have you considered a self-directed IRA instead? You could potentially invest your retirement funds directly in real estate while maintaining the tax advantages. There are restrictions on what you can do (no personal use, arm's length transactions only), but it might let you pursue real estate investing without the immediate tax hit. The opportunity cost point is huge too - at typical market returns, the amount you withdraw now could be worth 3-4x more by retirement. Make sure your real estate projections can beat that hurdle over the long term.

0 coins

I've been following this discussion and wanted to add some practical perspective as someone who's navigated similar decisions. The tax complexity here is significant, and I think many of the warnings about passive activity limitations are spot on. One angle that hasn't been fully explored - if your income is genuinely low this year due to career changes, you might be in a unique position to do a partial Roth conversion instead of (or alongside) your real estate strategy. Converting some 401k funds to Roth while in a lower tax bracket could give you tax-free growth going forward, and you'd only pay ordinary income tax (no 10% penalty) on the conversion amount. This could be combined with a smaller real estate investment using funds you can access penalty-free - perhaps through a 401k loan as @Paolo Romano mentioned, or if you have any Roth IRA contributions that can be withdrawn penalty-free after 5 years. The 18% projected returns do sound optimistic. I'd suggest stress-testing those numbers with more conservative assumptions - maybe 12-14% returns with 10-15% vacancy rates and higher maintenance costs. If the numbers still work at those levels, you'll have more confidence in your decision. Also consider that real estate is much less liquid than your 401k. If you need access to capital quickly, you can't just sell a portion of a rental property like you can with retirement funds.

0 coins

@Benjamin Kim makes an excellent point about the Roth conversion strategy! I hadn t'considered that angle, but it could be brilliant for someone in a temporarily low income year. You d'pay taxes on the conversion at your current lower rate, then have tax-free growth forever after. The stress-testing advice is crucial too. I ve'seen too many real estate investors get burned by being overly optimistic with their projections. When I was starting out, I learned the hard way to always plan for higher vacancy rates and unexpected repairs. Even great properties can have extended vacancy periods or major system failures that eat into those projected returns. The liquidity concern is huge as well. With your 401k, you can access funds relatively quickly if needed even (if it costs penalties .)With real estate, selling can take months, and you might be forced to sell at an unfavorable time if you need cash quickly. Having some diversification between liquid retirement accounts and illiquid real estate investments is usually a safer approach than going all-in on one strategy.

0 coins

I've been reading through all these responses, and there's a lot of excellent advice here about the tax implications and alternatives to consider. One thing I want to emphasize that several people have touched on but might be worth highlighting more - the permanent nature of this decision. Once you withdraw those 401k funds, you lose that contribution space forever. You can't just put the money back later if the real estate doesn't work out as planned. At your current age, those funds could potentially grow to be worth several hundred thousand more by retirement through compound growth and tax deferral. Given that your income is down this year anyway, you might want to consider a hybrid approach: take a smaller 401k withdrawal to fund one property, see how it performs over the next 12-18 months, and then reassess. This would let you test your investment thesis and market assumptions without betting your entire retirement on it. Also, have you looked into whether any of your target properties might qualify for bonus depreciation or other accelerated depreciation methods beyond standard depreciation? This could potentially give you more immediate tax benefits to offset the withdrawal. The passive activity loss limitations that others have mentioned are real constraints, but if you can document spending enough time to qualify as a real estate professional, it opens up much more flexibility in using those losses against other income types.

0 coins

@Monique Byrd s'hybrid approach makes a lot of sense, especially given all the complexity around passive activity rules that everyone has been discussing. Testing the waters with one property first would let you see how the actual numbers play out versus your projections. I m'curious though - has anyone here actually gone through the process of documenting the 750+ hours needed to qualify as a real estate professional? The IRS requirements seem pretty strict about keeping detailed logs of time spent on property management, tenant screening, maintenance coordination, etc. It sounds like it could be a significant administrative burden on top of actually managing the properties. Also, @Monique Byrd mentioned bonus depreciation - isn t that'mainly for new construction or certain improvements rather than existing rental properties? I thought most residential rentals are limited to the standard 27.5-year depreciation schedule unless you do a cost segregation study to separate out shorter-lived components. The permanent nature of losing that 401k contribution space is really what gives me pause about this whole strategy. Even with 18% projected returns, you re essentially'betting your retirement security on your ability to successfully manage rental properties over the long term.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today