< Back to IRS

Zainab Ahmed

Tax benefits of marriage? Can't find any advantages at our income levels - what am I missing?

I'm trying to understand if there's any tax benefit to getting married and I'm drawing a blank. For context, I earn about $135k and my partner makes around $105k. We're planning to buy a home next year and with interest rates where they are, we'll probably pay $40k+ in mortgage interest for the first several years. Also planning for a baby in late 2024 or early 2025. Looking at the numbers, I can't see where getting married helps us tax-wise. If we file jointly, we'd itemize for the mortgage interest. But our Roth IRA contribution limits would be lower than if we stayed single filers. If we go married filing separately, we basically can't contribute to Roths at all because of the super low income limits, and both would need to itemize for the interest deduction. If we stay unmarried, we both keep higher Roth contribution limits, I could itemize and deduct most or all of the mortgage interest (since my income will be going toward the mortgage payments), and my partner could still take the standard deduction. I'm also confused about how a child factors in. Who claims head of household? How do child tax credits work for unmarried vs. married couples? I always hear people say marriage and kids provide tax benefits, but I'm just not seeing it. What am I missing here? Is there some credit or deduction for married couples I don't know about?

Connor Byrne

•

You're actually hitting on something many higher-earning couples discover - the "marriage penalty" can be real at certain income levels. At your combined incomes, you're right that Roth IRA phase-outs become an issue when married. However, there are some benefits you might be overlooking: If one spouse has substantially higher income than the other, there can be tax savings from "income splitting" - this isn't your situation since you're both high earners. For mortgage interest, unmarried couples face potential ownership issues - only the person(s) on the deed/mortgage can claim the interest, and if you split ownership, tracking who paid what gets complicated quickly. For children, unmarried couples can't both claim the same child. Only one parent can claim the child as a dependent and take the child tax credit. If married, you can optimize this together. Head of household status is valuable but only available to unmarried taxpayers who pay more than half the cost of keeping up a home where a qualifying person lives with them for more than half the year. The big marriage benefits often come from simplified filing, legal protections, estate planning advantages, and Social Security benefits later in life. Tax benefits vary widely based on specific situations and relative incomes.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Thanks for the detailed response. The ownership/mortgage issue is something I hadn't fully considered. If we're both on the deed but I make most of the payments, can I still claim most of the interest? And for the child situation, if we're unmarried, does it make sense for whoever makes less to claim the child to maximize potential credits?

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

If you're both on the deed but you make most payments, you can only deduct the portion you actually paid. This gets messy because you need documentation showing exactly how much each person contributed, and the IRS might question large disparities. It's not as simple as "I make more so I'll claim more." Generally, the lower-earning parent claiming the child often optimizes tax benefits since many credits phase out at higher income levels. However, this depends on multiple factors including who provides more support for the child and who the child lives with more. Remember that unmarried couples can't both claim head of household for the same qualifying person, so only one of you would get that filing status advantage.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

Just wanted to share my experience using taxr.ai for a similar situation. My partner and I were stuck in the same "marriage penalty" analysis for months - trying to calculate whether getting married would help or hurt us tax-wise. We have similar incomes to yours and were also planning on buying a house. I finally got tired of spreadsheets and found https://taxr.ai which analyzed our specific situation including future mortgage interest, retirement accounts, and adding children to the mix. It ran simulations for married filing jointly, separately, and remaining unmarried with various dependent scenarios. In our case, it actually showed we'd save about $3200 by staying unmarried for a few more years until our income situation changes. The biggest factor was exactly what you mentioned - the Roth IRA limits and the mortgage interest deduction optimization.

0 coins

PixelPioneer

•

How detailed does it get with the analysis? Does it factor in state taxes too? We're in a high tax state and I'm wondering if that would change the equation for us.

0 coins

Did you find any non-tax benefits that outweighed the tax disadvantages? I mean, I'm kinda thinking there's more to marriage than just tax optimization 😂 but I'm also not trying to throw money away.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

It gets surprisingly detailed - it even analyzed different scenarios based on potential income changes over a 5-year forecast. Yes, it does factor in state taxes which was huge for us since we're in California. The state tax impact was actually different than the federal impact in our situation. There are definitely non-tax benefits that matter a lot! For us, the legal protections for healthcare decisions and property ownership were important. We ended up getting legally married but optimizing our tax situation with proper planning. The tax analysis helped us make financial moves before and after marriage to minimize the "marriage penalty" effects. It was more about being strategic with timing rather than letting taxes dictate our life choices.

0 coins

I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and WOW - what an eye-opener! I was in a similar income situation ($125k me, $95k partner) and we were also planning on buying a house and starting a family. The analysis showed that for us, getting married would actually cost us about $4800 in additional taxes compared to staying unmarried. But it also showed that once we had a child, the equation changed significantly because of how the child tax credit, dependent care credit, and head of household status all interact. What I really appreciated was how it showed us exactly which deductions and credits were creating the differences. In our situation, the mortgage interest deduction optimization was the biggest factor, just like you suspected. The tool even showed us how to time certain financial decisions to minimize the impact of getting married. We ended up getting married anyway for non-tax reasons, but now we're much more strategic about our financial planning to offset the marriage penalty.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

Another consideration that people often overlook is dealing with the IRS if you have questions or issues with your return. My wife and I went through HELL trying to get answers from the IRS about our marriage penalty situation last year. We spent weeks calling the IRS - constant busy signals, disconnects after waiting on hold for hours, and when we finally got through, the person couldn't help with our specific situation. Super frustrating when you're trying to make important life decisions. Then a friend told me about https://claimyr.com which gets you through to an IRS agent usually within 15 minutes instead of waiting for hours or days. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. It changed everything for us - we got clear answers about our specific situation regarding mortgage interest allocation and Roth IRA strategies when married.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

How does this actually work? Seems kinda sketchy that they could get you through when no one else can. Does it actually connect you with real IRS agents?

0 coins

This sounds like BS honestly. If there was a way to skip the IRS phone queue everyone would be using it. The IRS is notorious for being impossible to reach. I've tried everything and always end up waiting forever or getting disconnected.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

It's actually pretty straightforward - they use an automated system that calls the IRS and navigates the phone tree, then waits in the queue for you. When they reach an agent, you get a call connecting you. So you're absolutely talking to real IRS agents - the service just handles the waiting part for you. The technology is similar to what large businesses use to avoid wait times with customer service. It's not skipping the line exactly - they're just doing the waiting for you so you don't have to sit with a phone to your ear for hours. I was skeptical too until I tried it. Got through to an IRS rep in about 20 minutes after spending weeks trying on my own.

0 coins

I'm eating crow here. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try Claimyr because I've been trying to reach the IRS for 2 months about my marriage/mortgage interest situation. Holy crap it actually works. Got a call back in 27 minutes with a real IRS agent on the line. The agent answered all my questions about how to handle mortgage interest deductions as married filing separately vs. jointly in our specific situation. For what it's worth, the agent confirmed what others are saying here - at higher income levels, the "marriage penalty" is very real, especially with two good incomes. She said one advantage of marriage that's often overlooked is simplified asset transfers between spouses with no tax consequences. Also mentioned that with children, the math often changes and sometimes favors marriage depending on specific circumstances. Worth every penny for the clarity I got. Would have spent weeks more in phone hell without it.

0 coins

Something everyone's missing in this conversation - qualified retirement plans! While Roth IRAs have that marriage penalty with the lower limits, employer plans like 401ks don't have this issue. Also, don't forget about spousal IRAs - if one of you stops working when the baby comes, the working spouse can still contribute to the non-working spouse's IRA even with no income. This is ONLY available if you're legally married. And remember, with a kid, one of you gets head of household filing status if unmarried, which is better than single filing status but not as good as MFJ in many cases. The higher standard deduction for MFJ vs HOH+Single might offset some of what you're calculating.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

I hadn't thought about the spousal IRA angle - that's a good point if one of us takes time off work. For the head of household vs. MFJ comparison, do you know roughly what income levels the breakeven point would be? We're trying to plan for several scenarios.

0 coins

The breakeven point between HOH+Single vs. MFJ varies widely based on income distribution, deductions, and credits. Generally, if you both make similar high incomes (like your situation), staying unmarried often provides tax advantages. The MFJ advantages typically shine when incomes are very disparate. For 2024/2025, the standard deduction for MFJ is $29,200 while HOH is $21,900 and Single is $14,600. So HOH+Single combined is $36,500 - already higher than MFJ. But when you factor in the different tax brackets, EITC, child tax credits, etc., it gets complicated. The child tax credit phase-out starts at different income levels for different filing statuses. If one of you might take extended time off work with the baby, that's when marriage often becomes more advantageous tax-wise due to the income splitting effect and spousal IRA.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

Has anyone mentioned the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)? At your income levels, especially if you're in a high tax state with high property taxes, AMT can kick in and eliminate some deductions when married. Also consider that many tax benefits phase out based on AGI - not just Roth contributions but also student loan interest deductions, rental loss deductions, etc. As a married couple your combined AGI could push you over these limits. Something else to consider - marriage gives you double the capital loss deduction ($6,000 vs $3,000) which matters if you have investment losses to harvest.

0 coins

Javier Garcia

•

The capital loss thing is interesting, but only matters if both people have capital losses exceeding $3k individually, right? Otherwise it doesn't seem like an advantage.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today