< Back to IRS

Anastasia Popov

Roth 401(k) vs Traditional 401(k) - Simple Explanation for High Earners

Title: Roth 401(k) vs Traditional 401(k) - Simple Explanation for High Earners 1 Hey everyone, I've been trying to figure out which retirement account makes more sense for my situation. I always assumed that Roth 401(k) would be the better option since you get tax-free money in retirement, which sounds amazing! But I've been hearing from colleagues that as a high earner, I might actually be better off with a traditional 401(k). I just can't understand why anyone would want to pay taxes later instead of now, especially with the way government spending keeps increasing. Wouldn't tax rates likely be higher when I retire? If anyone could break down the Roth 401(k) vs Traditional 401(k) decision for high income earners in simple terms, I'd really appreciate it! Also would love to hear from anyone who's firmly in the Roth camp despite being a high earner. Thanks!!

4 The main reason high earners often prefer Traditional 401(k) over Roth 401(k) comes down to current tax brackets. When you're in a high tax bracket now (32%, 35%, or 37%), you're getting a significant tax break by contributing pre-tax dollars to a Traditional 401(k). The basic math works like this: If you're in the 37% tax bracket now, every $10,000 you put in a Traditional 401(k) saves you $3,700 in taxes immediately. With a Roth, you'd pay that $3,700 now. The key assumption is that in retirement, you'll likely be in a lower tax bracket than you are during your peak earning years. Most people don't need their full working income in retirement, so they drop to lower tax brackets—maybe 22% or 24%. If you pay 37% now for a Roth but could have paid only 24% later with a Traditional, you're essentially overpaying on taxes.

0 coins

9 That makes sense but what about inflation? Won't the dollar be worth less when I retire, so even if I'm in a "lower bracket," those brackets will have shifted due to inflation and I might end up paying more anyway?

0 coins

4 Inflation is actually accounted for in the tax code through bracket adjustments. Tax brackets are generally adjusted annually for inflation, so the bracket thresholds in 30 years will be much higher in nominal terms than they are today. The real question is whether your actual retirement spending (and thus taxable income in retirement) will put you in a lower bracket than your current one. For most high earners, retirement income is indeed lower than peak earning years, even accounting for successful investing, because you no longer need to save for retirement and may have lower expenses overall (paid off mortgage, kids through college, etc.).

0 coins

18 I actually discovered this awesome tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me model different retirement contribution scenarios. I was in the same boat trying to decide between Roth and Traditional for my 401(k) as someone making around $285K. The tax calculator at taxr.ai showed me that by putting $22,500 into my Traditional 401(k), I saved about $8,325 in taxes this year (at my 37% marginal rate). Then I could take that tax savings and invest it in a brokerage account. When I ran the numbers over 25 years, the Traditional + separate investment of the tax savings actually came out ahead of the Roth in most scenarios, unless tax rates go up dramatically in the future.

0 coins

3 Does that tool let you model different future tax rates? Like what if rates go up 5% across all brackets by the time I retire?

0 coins

11 I'm a bit skeptical about online calculators. How accurate is this one compared to others you've tried? And does it factor in RMDs (required minimum distributions) which force you to take money out of traditional accounts?

0 coins

18 Yes, you can adjust the future tax rate assumptions to see how different scenarios might play out. They have a slider where you can model tax rates increasing or decreasing by certain percentages, which is really helpful for seeing the breakeven points. As for accuracy compared to other calculators, I found it more comprehensive since it factors in things like RMDs, Social Security taxation, and even state taxes. It definitely accounts for RMDs starting at age 73 (current law), which is actually one of the downsides of the Traditional approach if you end up with a very large balance.

0 coins

3 Just wanted to follow up - I tried out taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it was super helpful! I was shocked to see how much I'm saving with the Traditional 401(k) route. I plugged in my $178k salary and saw that I'm saving over $6,600 a year in taxes by maxing out my Traditional 401(k). The tool helped me visualize what happens if I invest those tax savings separately - turns out I come out ahead unless tax rates jump by more than 8% across the board by retirement. It also pointed out that I should consider tax diversification by having some Roth accounts too, which makes total sense. Definitely gave me clarity on the whole Roth vs Traditional debate!

0 coins

7 If you're struggling to get through to the IRS to ask questions about 401(k) options or how they're taxed, try Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I spent days trying to get someone at the IRS on the phone to clarify some complicated questions about my Traditional to Roth conversion and backdoor Roth options. After getting nowhere with the standard IRS number, I found Claimyr which got me connected to an actual IRS agent in under 20 minutes! They have this system that navigates the phone trees and waits on hold for you, then calls you when an agent is on the line. You can see how it works in their demo video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with was super helpful and explained exactly how the pro-rata rule would affect my situation with both Traditional and Roth accounts. Saved me from making a costly mistake!

0 coins

15 How does this actually work? Isn't it just the same as calling the IRS yourself but with extra steps? I don't see how they could possibly get you through the queue faster than anyone else.

0 coins

11 This sounds like BS honestly. The IRS phone lines are equally busy for everyone. No way some service can magically get through faster. Probably just taking your money to do what you could do yourself for free.

0 coins

7 It doesn't get you through faster than the regular queue - it just waits in the queue for you. Instead of you personally sitting on hold for 2+ hours, their system does the waiting, and then calls you when a human agent is actually on the line. The benefit isn't skipping the line, it's not having to waste your own time on hold. I was able to go about my day and just got a call when an agent was ready. For my call about Traditional vs Roth 401(k) taxation, I was on hold for 1 hour and 47 minutes according to their tracker - time I would have completely wasted otherwise.

0 coins

11 I need to eat my words about Claimyr. I tried it after commenting here because I've been trying to get clarity on my Traditional 401(k) rollover for weeks. Got connected to an IRS representative in about an hour and a half - all while I was working on other things instead of sitting with a phone glued to my ear. The agent answered all my questions about how my Traditional 401(k) would be taxed if I rolled it over to a Roth IRA, and clarified the 5-year rule that I was confused about. Probably saved me thousands in potential tax mistakes. Turns out as a high earner, I'm better off keeping most of my retirement savings in Traditional accounts for now, but having some Roth for flexibility. Honestly kind of a game changer if you need to actually talk to someone at the IRS.

0 coins

13 One thing nobody has mentioned yet about Traditional vs Roth 401(k) for high earners: state taxes! If you live in a high-tax state like CA, NY, or NJ now but plan to retire in a no-income-tax state like FL, TX, or NV, that's HUGE extra savings with Traditional. I'm in California paying 9.3% state tax on top of federal. By maxing my Traditional 401(k), I avoid both federal AND state tax now. When I retire to Nevada in 10 years, I'll pay federal tax on withdrawals but zero state tax. That's a guaranteed 9.3% return on my money before it even gets invested!

0 coins

2 Wow thats a really good point! Do you know if you can split contributions between both types? Like could I put half in Traditional and half in Roth to kinda hedge my bets?

0 coins

13 Yes, you absolutely can split your contributions between Traditional and Roth 401(k) as long as your employer plan allows it (most do). The total combined contribution limit is still $22,500 for 2023 ($30,000 if you're over 50), but you can divide that however you want. Many financial advisors actually recommend this "tax diversification" approach. Put some money in Traditional to get the immediate tax savings, and some in Roth for tax-free growth. This gives you flexibility in retirement to control your taxable income by choosing which account to withdraw from each year.

0 coins

20 Just want to point out that everyone seems to be assuming tax rates won't change much. But look at the national debt... over $31 trillion! Tax rates in the 1970s were WAY higher than today. Top marginal rate was like 70% at one point! I'm putting everything in Roth accounts even though I'm in the 32% bracket now. I'd rather pay 32% today than risk 50%+ rates when I retire in 30 years. The government's gotta pay that debt somehow, and I'm betting it'll be through higher taxes, not spending cuts.

0 coins

24 That's a valid concern, but historically speaking tax rates on retirees haven't changed dramatically. Also remember that with Traditional 401(k), you're saving at your MARGINAL tax rate (your highest bracket) but will withdraw in retirement filling up from the BOTTOM brackets first. So even if all rates go up 10%, you're still likely coming out ahead with Traditional if you're a high earner now. You'd need massive tax increases targeted specifically at retirees to make the math work out in favor of Roth for most high earners.

0 coins

Great discussion everyone! As someone who switched from Roth to Traditional 401(k) after getting promoted to a higher tax bracket, I can share my experience. The math really does work out for Traditional when you're in those higher brackets. I was initially hesitant because like the OP, I was worried about future tax rates. But here's what convinced me: even if tax rates increase across the board, I'm still likely to be in a lower bracket in retirement than my current 35% marginal rate. My financial advisor helped me run the numbers - if I max out my Traditional 401(k) at $22,500, I save about $7,875 in taxes immediately. That's money I can invest in a taxable brokerage account right now. Even accounting for capital gains tax on that separate investment, the Traditional route comes out ahead in most realistic scenarios. The key insight was realizing that in retirement, I won't need my full current income. No more mortgage payments, kids will be independent, and I won't be saving 20%+ of my income for retirement anymore. So even with some tax rate increases, my effective rate in retirement should be lower than today's marginal rate. That said, I do put some money in a Roth IRA for diversification, but the bulk goes Traditional 401(k) for the immediate tax arbitrage opportunity.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today