Traditional IRA direct deposit from paycheck - Are there tax benefits?
I'm currently contributing 6% of my paycheck to my employer's 401k plan automatically. I'm wondering if there's any tax advantage to also setting up automatic deposits from my paycheck directly to my Traditional IRA? Would this reduce my taxable income for each pay period similar to how my 401k contributions do? I'm also confused about potential double taxation. Right now, I'm funding my Traditional IRA by transferring money from my bank account (which comes from my already-taxed take-home pay). When I eventually withdraw from my Traditional IRA in retirement, those withdrawals will be taxed. Does this mean I'm getting hit with taxes twice on the same money? Or is there some adjustment that happens since I've already paid taxes on these funds decades earlier when they first hit my bank account? I have a Roth IRA too, but I'm assuming there's no special benefit to automatic paycheck deductions for that since Roth contributions are made with after-tax dollars anyway.
20 comments


Aidan Hudson
Great questions about retirement accounts! Let me clarify a few things: For your first question: Having your employer direct deposit money from your paycheck straight to your Traditional IRA won't provide the immediate tax benefit that your 401k does. With a 401k, your contributions reduce your taxable income right away because they're taken out pre-tax. However, with an IRA, you'd need to claim the deduction when you file your taxes - it won't reduce the income shown on your paycheck. Regarding your double taxation concern - don't worry! When you contribute to a Traditional IRA using money from your bank account, you'll get to deduct those contributions on your tax return (subject to income limits). This essentially "undoes" the initial taxation, making those contributions pre-tax. When you withdraw in retirement, you'll only be taxed once. For the Roth IRA, you're correct. Since Roth contributions are always made with after-tax dollars, there's no tax advantage to having them automatically deducted from your paycheck versus transferring from your bank account.
0 coins
Zoe Wang
•Thanks for the explanation! So if I understand right, I need to track my Traditional IRA contributions myself and then claim them on my taxes to get the tax benefit? Is there an income limit where I can't deduct these anymore? I make about $85k if that matters.
0 coins
Aidan Hudson
•Yes, you need to track your Traditional IRA contributions and claim them as a deduction when you file your taxes. The deduction may be limited based on your income and whether you're covered by a retirement plan at work (which you are with your 401k). For 2025, if you're single and covered by a workplace retirement plan, the deduction begins to phase out at $78,000 and is completely eliminated at $88,000. Since you make $85k, you're in the phase-out range, so you'll only be able to deduct a portion of your contributions. If you're married filing jointly, the phase-out range is different. You might want to consider focusing on your 401k or Roth IRA instead since your Traditional IRA deduction will be limited.
0 coins
Connor Richards
I went through this exact same confusion last year! After trying to figure out the best way to handle my retirement accounts, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which analyzed my tax situation and helped me understand my optimal contribution strategy. The tool showed me that since I was in the phaseout range for Traditional IRA deductions because of my employer plan, I was better off maxing my 401k first before worrying about IRA contributions. What I really liked was that it showed me the projected tax impact of different contribution strategies over time, including how much I'd save this year vs. in retirement. It basically confirmed what the previous commenter said but with actual numbers for my specific situation.
0 coins
Grace Durand
•Does it work if you're self-employed with a SEP IRA instead of a 401k? I've been struggling to figure out my optimal contribution strategy since I have variable income.
0 coins
Steven Adams
•I'm skeptical about these tax tools. How does it know what tax rates will be decades from now when I retire? Seems like a lot of guesswork.
0 coins
Connor Richards
•For self-employed individuals with SEP IRAs, the tool absolutely works! It factors in your variable income and helps calculate your maximum allowable contributions based on your self-employment earnings. It's actually really helpful for people with inconsistent income because it can show you different scenarios based on projected earnings. The tool doesn't claim to predict future tax rates with certainty - you're right that would be impossible. Instead, it lets you model different scenarios (like tax rates going up, staying the same, or going down) so you can see how various strategies would play out under different conditions. It's more about understanding the relative impacts of different choices rather than promising exact future numbers.
0 coins
Grace Durand
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai from the recommendation above. It was super helpful for my situation! I uploaded my last tax return and it immediately identified that I was missing some optimal retirement contribution strategies. Turns out I could be saving an additional $4,300 in taxes this year by restructuring how I contribute to my retirement accounts. It recommended I max out my employer 401k first before contributing to IRAs and showed exactly why with actual numbers. For anyone confused about retirement account tax benefits like the original poster, it really helps visualize the tax implications now versus in retirement. Definitely cleared up my confusion about Traditional vs Roth and paycheck deductions.
0 coins
Alice Fleming
For anyone struggling to get answers from the IRS about retirement account questions (I've been there!), I recently used Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to actually get through to a human at the IRS. I had spent HOURS trying to figure out if my prior Traditional IRA contributions were deductible with my specific income situation. The IRS website was confusing and the hold times were ridiculous. Claimyr got me connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of the 2+ hours I had been experiencing. They have a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent was able to confirm exactly how the phaseout worked in my situation and even helped me understand some form documentation I needed. Totally worth it for the peace of mind on a tax question this important.
0 coins
Hassan Khoury
•How does this actually work? Is it just paying to skip the line or something? Seems kinda unfair if people can pay to get faster IRS service.
0 coins
Victoria Stark
•This sounds like BS. The IRS doesn't have some secret priority line you can access. I've called them dozens of times and you just have to wait like everyone else.
0 coins
Alice Fleming
•It's not a way to skip the line or get priority service. What Claimyr does is automate the calling and waiting process. They use technology to repeatedly call the IRS until they get through, then they call you when they have an agent on the line. You're still going through the same channels as everyone else, they're just handling the frustrating part of repeatedly calling and waiting on hold. I was skeptical too until I tried it. It's not some special access - it's just a service that does the tedious calling part for you. The IRS doesn't even know you're using a service - they just think you're a regular caller who finally got through after waiting. It saved me hours of sitting with a phone to my ear listening to the same hold music over and over.
0 coins
Victoria Stark
I owe everyone an update and an apology about my comment on Claimyr. After being frustrated with getting no answers about my Traditional IRA deduction phase-out questions, I decided to try it despite my skepticism. I'm honestly shocked it worked. They called me back in about 25 minutes with an IRS agent already on the line. The agent walked me through exactly how my Traditional IRA deductions would be limited based on my income and 401k participation. Turns out I was making a mistake on previous returns by deducting the full amount when I should have only been taking a partial deduction due to the phase-out. I've been trying to get this clarified for months. Should have tried this service sooner instead of being stubborn.
0 coins
Benjamin Kim
One thing to consider that nobody's mentioned yet - you can actually max out BOTH your 401k and your IRA in the same year if you have the funds. For 2025, you can put up to $23,000 in your 401k (plus catch-up contributions if you're over 50) AND still put $7,000 in an IRA ($8,000 if over 50). Even if you can't deduct your Traditional IRA contributions due to income limits, you might be able to do a backdoor Roth conversion if that makes sense for your situation.
0 coins
Samantha Howard
•What's this backdoor Roth thing? I keep hearing about it but don't understand how it works. Is it legal?
0 coins
Benjamin Kim
•The backdoor Roth is completely legal and is a commonly used strategy. It works like this: If your income is too high to contribute directly to a Roth IRA, you can instead contribute to a Traditional IRA (with non-deductible contributions), then immediately convert those funds to your Roth IRA. While there's technically no income limit for making non-deductible contributions to a Traditional IRA, the conversion is most straightforward if you don't have existing pre-tax money in any Traditional IRA accounts. If you do have existing Traditional IRA balances, you'll need to be aware of the "pro-rata rule" which can make things more complicated from a tax perspective. The IRS treats all your Traditional IRAs as one account for conversion purposes, so you can't just convert the non-deductible portion.
0 coins
Megan D'Acosta
I think everyone's overthinking this. I just have my employer split my direct deposit - main portion goes to checking, then fixed amounts go to both my 401k and my IRA. Super simple and I never "see" the money so I'm not tempted to spend it.
0 coins
Sarah Ali
•But that's not giving you the tax benefit OP is asking about! Your 401k contribution should be coming out pre-tax through your employer's plan, not as a direct deposit split. And sending money directly to your IRA this way doesn't give you any immediate tax advantage either - you're just automating what OP is already doing manually.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
I'll add some clarity to the tax mechanics here since there's been some great discussion but a few key points could use emphasis. Lucy, you're absolutely right to be confused about the double taxation aspect - it's one of the most common misconceptions about Traditional IRAs. Here's the key: when you contribute to a Traditional IRA with after-tax dollars (money that's already hit your bank account), you get to deduct those contributions on your tax return, which essentially "gives back" the taxes you already paid on that money. So you're NOT getting double-taxed. However, given your $85k income and 401k participation, you're in the phase-out range for Traditional IRA deductions. This means you can only deduct a portion of your contributions, which significantly reduces the benefit. You might want to run the numbers on whether it's worth the complexity. One strategy to consider: max out your 401k first (you're only doing 6% currently), then if you have additional funds for retirement savings, consider a Roth IRA instead. Since your Traditional IRA deduction is limited anyway, the Roth gives you tax-free growth and withdrawals in retirement, plus more flexibility with early withdrawals if needed. The payroll direct deposit to your IRA is really just a convenience feature - it doesn't change the tax treatment at all compared to transferring from your bank account.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
•This is really helpful Lucas! I'm in a similar situation to Lucy and was also confused about the double taxation issue. Your explanation makes it much clearer - so the deduction essentially "undoes" the initial taxation. Given the phase-out limitations at that income level, would you recommend prioritizing the 401k match first, then maxing out the full 401k contribution before considering any IRA contributions? I'm wondering if there's a general rule of thumb for the order of retirement account priorities when you're in that middle-income range where some benefits start to phase out.
0 coins