< Back to IRS

Chloe Taylor

Net investment income tax (Form 8960) - How to handle rental real estate for NIIT?

I think I'm about to lose my mind trying to figure this out, so any help would be awesome. I have several commercial rental properties I manage through my single-member LLC (disregarded entity for tax purposes). I'm hands-on with all aspects of running this business - finding tenants, coordinating repairs, dealing with issues, etc. The properties have the usual expenses - mortgage interest around $43,000, property taxes about $15,000, maintenance/repairs roughly $22,000 annually. My confusion comes with Form 8960 for the Net Investment Income Tax. My rental income is definitely included in NIIT, but I'm completely stuck on line 4b "Adjustment for net income or loss derived in the ordinary course of a non section 1411 trade or business." Can I adjust for the entire rental income amount since I actively participate, or is it still considered passive because I'm not officially a "real estate professional"? Can I reduce my NIIT by the expenses from running the real estate business? And while I'm at it - for my dividend income, can I also include my investment advisor fees (about $3,500) in line 4b? The instructions for line 4b mention adjusting for "Net income or loss from a section 162 trade or business that is not a passive activity and is not engaged in a trade or business of trading financial instruments or commodities." Based on current case law and IRS guidance, I believe my commercial rental operation fits the definition of a section 162 trade or business. Thanks in advance for any clarity on this Form 8960 nightmare!

ShadowHunter

•

The key for Form 8960 line 4b comes down to two critical questions: 1) Is your rental activity a Section 162 trade or business? and 2) Is it passive or non-passive to you? For commercial rentals managed actively like yours, you're right that they likely qualify as a Section 162 trade or business based on recent tax developments (especially after the Aragona Trust case). However, that's only half the equation. The more important factor is whether your activity is passive or non-passive. Unless you qualify as a real estate professional (which requires 750+ hours and more than half your working time in real estate activities), your rental activities are generally considered passive by default - regardless of how hands-on you are. This is different from the "active participation" standard used for the rental loss allowance. For your expenses like mortgage interest, property taxes, and repairs - these reduce your net rental income already before it flows to Form 8960. They're not separate adjustments on line 4b. As for investment advisor fees, these aren't considered directly connected to the production of investment income for NIIT purposes after the TCJA changes, so they wouldn't qualify for line 4b.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

Wait, so even if OP is actively managing these properties hands-on, it's still considered passive unless they hit that real estate professional threshold? That seems crazy tough for someone who might have another job too. Does the Aragona Trust case you mentioned change anything about this?

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

You're right that it can seem unfair, but that's how the tax code structures it. The Aragona Trust case helped establish that rental activities can qualify as Section 162 trades or businesses, which is important. However, it didn't change the passive activity rules. The real estate professional status requires significant time commitment specifically because Congress wanted to create a high bar for claiming rental activities as non-passive. Even if someone is truly hands-on with their properties, without meeting those specific hour requirements, the activities remain passive by default for tax purposes. This applies regardless of how much actual work they're doing with the properties.

0 coins

After struggling with something similar, I found an amazing tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that actually helped me figure out my Form 8960 issues. Like you, I was managing commercial properties and couldn't figure out if I could exclude that income from NIIT. The tool analyzed my situation and showed me exactly how to handle line 4b based on my level of participation and business structure. It's basically an AI system that reviews your tax documents and clarifies these super complicated scenarios. What really helped was that it explained WHY certain income qualified for adjustments and others didn't. It also helped me understand how my specific situation fit into the real estate professional rules, which saved me thousands.

0 coins

Sean O'Connor

•

That sounds promising. Does it actually give you specific advice about your situation or just general info that I could get from reading IRS publications? My CPA seems confused about this exact issue with Form 8960.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

I've tried other "AI tax help" things before and they just spouted generic advice. How exactly did it help with determining if your real estate counts as passive vs non-passive for NIIT? Did it just ask about your hours or did it look deeper?

0 coins

It actually provides specific analysis based on your situation, not just generic information. It reviews documents you upload and walks through a series of questions about your specific activities. Much more targeted than IRS publications which often leave you more confused. For the passive vs. non-passive determination, it did a detailed analysis looking beyond just hours. It examined the types of activities I performed, whether I had employees, how decisions were made, and the regularity of my involvement. Then it mapped this against recent tax court cases to show where my activities fell on the spectrum. It even flagged specific evidence I should maintain to support my position.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

I was skeptical about taxr.ai but finally tried it with my rental property situation. I uploaded my Schedule E and last year's tax return, and it immediately identified that I was missing potential NIIT exclusions. Turns out I qualified as a real estate professional (I never knew the exact hour requirements before) and could actually adjust out most of my rental income on line 4b of Form 8960! The tool showed me exactly how to document my time to support this position if audited. It also explained that certain properties I managed more actively could be treated differently than others with less involvement. They had this case analysis feature that showed how my situation compared to relevant tax court decisions. Honestly wish I'd found this last year.

0 coins

Luca Conti

•

Have you tried calling the IRS directly? I was stuck on a similar NIIT question last year and spent WEEKS trying to get through to someone who actually understood Form 8960. After 7+ attempts and hours on hold, I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that got me through to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent walked me through the exact criteria for section 162 trade or business determination for rental properties and explained how to properly document my participation to support my position on Form 8960. Saved me so much stress and potentially thousands in taxes. They have real specialists who understand these technical forms, not just general tax help.

0 coins

Nia Johnson

•

How exactly does Claimyr work? I've literally spent hours on hold with the IRS and always get disconnected. Is this really legit? Seems too good to be true if it gets you through in 15 mins when the IRS says wait times are 2+ hours.

0 coins

CyberNinja

•

Yeah right. No way the IRS is giving detailed advice on complex NIIT issues over the phone. Even if you got through, they probably just read the same confusing instructions we all have access to. Did they actually give you specific guidance on Form 8960 line 4b adjustments?

0 coins

Luca Conti

•

It uses a callback system that navigates the IRS phone tree and holds your place in line. When an agent is about to be available, it calls you and connects you directly. It's completely legitimate - they just automate the hold process so you don't have to stay on the phone yourself. Yes, I was surprised too, but I got connected with someone in the business tax department who actually understood Form 8960. They explained the specific criteria for determining whether rental activities rise to the level of a Section 162 trade or business and how that interacts with the passive activity rules for NIIT purposes. They didn't just read instructions - they walked me through how to apply the rules to my specific situation with commercial properties.

0 coins

CyberNinja

•

I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I was getting nowhere with my Form 8960 questions. Got connected to an IRS tax law specialist in about 20 minutes (after weeks of failing to get through on my own). The specialist explained that for my commercial properties, I needed to look at the Groetzinger standard (which I'd never heard of) to determine if my rentals qualified as a Section 162 business. She walked me through how to document my activities to support treating some properties as businesses rather than just investments. She also clarified that even though my activities were likely passive under Section 469 rules, I could still potentially qualify some properties as Section 162 businesses - they're separate tests! This one call probably saved me around $7,000 in NIIT. Completely changed my understanding of Form 8960 line 4b.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Here's a practical approach that worked for me with a similar Form 8960 situation: Document EVERYTHING about your rental activities. Keep a detailed log of hours, tasks, decisions made, etc. If you can demonstrate continuous, regular, and substantial activity in your rental business, you have a stronger case for Section 162 trade or business status. For line 4b specifically, I found that the key is proving your rental rises to the level of a trade or business (using the Groetzinger standard mentioned by someone else - continuity and regularity with profit motive) while ALSO addressing the passive activity rules. They're related but separate tests.

0 coins

What kind of documentation did you find most helpful? I have emails and texts with tenants/contractors, but I've never kept a formal log of hours spent. Would starting one now help for this tax year or am I already behind?

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

The most helpful documentation was a detailed activity log showing what I did each day related to the properties. I created categories like: tenant management, property maintenance, business development, administrative tasks, and financial management. It's not too late to start for this tax year. Begin keeping records now, and make reasonable estimates for earlier months based on recurring activities and any documentation you do have (emails, texts, appointment calendar). Going forward, I use a simple spreadsheet with date, property, activity description, time spent, and business purpose. Those emails and texts are actually great supporting evidence too - save them systematically. Remember, contemporaneous records (created at the time) are always strongest, but reconstructed logs based on other evidence are better than nothing.

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

I know everyone's focused on the passive vs. non-passive aspect, but don't forget to check if you're subject to NIIT in the first place. The 3.8% NIIT only kicks in if your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds $200k (single) or $250k (married filing jointly). Also, regardless of your activity level, if your rentals are generating losses, those won't increase your NIIT (though passive losses can only offset passive income). And if your properties are heavily mortgaged with depreciation, you might not even have net income to worry about for NIIT purposes.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Good point! I completely overlooked the MAGI threshold when stressing about this. What exactly gets included in MAGI for NIIT purposes? Is it different from regular MAGI?

0 coins

Chloe Zhang

•

For NIIT purposes, MAGI is your regular adjusted gross income with a few specific add-backs. The main ones are foreign earned income exclusion, foreign housing exclusion/deduction, and excluded income from Puerto Rico. For most US taxpayers without foreign income, NIIT MAGI is essentially the same as your regular AGI. So you'd look at line 11 of your Form 1040 - if that's under the threshold ($200k/$250k), you don't owe NIIT at all regardless of how much investment income you have. This is definitely worth checking first before diving into all the passive activity complexities!

0 coins

Jean Claude

•

The complexity you're facing with Form 8960 is incredibly common, and you're asking all the right questions. Based on your description of actively managing commercial properties through your LLC, you're in a gray area that requires careful analysis. Here's my take: Your rental activities likely DO qualify as a Section 162 trade or business under the Groetzinger standard (regular, continuous activity with profit motive), especially given your hands-on management approach. However, the passive activity determination is separate and more restrictive. For line 4b adjustments, you can only reduce NIIT for income from trades or businesses that are NOT passive activities. Unless you qualify as a real estate professional (750+ hours annually in real estate activities AND more than half your total working time), your rentals remain passive regardless of your involvement level. The expenses you mentioned (mortgage interest, taxes, repairs) already reduce your Schedule E income before it flows to Form 8960 - they're not additional line 4b adjustments. Your investment advisor fees also don't qualify for line 4b treatment under current rules. My recommendation: Start documenting your time and activities meticulously NOW. Track every hour spent on property management, tenant relations, maintenance coordination, etc. If you can demonstrate you meet the real estate professional thresholds, you could potentially exclude significant rental income from NIIT through line 4b adjustments. Consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in NIIT and real estate taxation - this area has evolved significantly with recent court cases and the stakes are high enough to justify expert guidance.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive breakdown I needed! The distinction between Section 162 trade or business qualification and the passive activity rules was really confusing me. So if I understand correctly, I could potentially have rental activities that qualify as a legitimate business under Groetzinger but still be considered passive for NIIT purposes unless I hit that real estate professional threshold? The time tracking advice is spot on - I wish I'd started this earlier in the year. Do you know if there's any flexibility in how the 750+ hours are calculated? Like, does time spent researching new properties or analyzing market conditions count toward that threshold, or is it strictly hands-on property management activities? Also, you mentioned recent court cases have evolved this area - are there any specific cases beyond Aragona Trust that property owners should be aware of when structuring their documentation and arguments?

0 coins

Mia Green

•

Yes, you've got it exactly right! You can have rental activities that clearly qualify as a Section 162 trade or business under Groetzinger (regular, continuous, profit-motivated activity) but still be considered passive for NIIT purposes. It's frustrating but that's how the tax code works - two separate tests with different thresholds. For the 750+ hour calculation, the IRS is actually quite broad in what counts. Time spent researching properties, analyzing markets, evaluating financing options, attending real estate seminars, and even reasonable travel time to properties all count toward your hours. The key is that activities must be directly related to your real estate business operations. Keep detailed records of everything - even phone calls with lenders or reviewing property reports. Beyond Aragona Trust, you should know about the Hawkins case (2023) which further clarified that rental activities can constitute trades or businesses even without significant development or improvement activities. Also, the Sesler case (2022) is helpful for understanding how courts evaluate the "regular and continuous" standard. These cases have made it easier to argue that actively managed rental operations qualify as Section 162 businesses. The documentation Jean Claude mentioned is crucial - start that activity log immediately. Even if you don't hit real estate professional status this year, having detailed records will help you plan for future years and support your Section 162 business argument regardless.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

The confusion you're experiencing with Form 8960 is completely understandable - this is one of the most complex areas of tax law right now. Let me break down your situation based on what you've described. Your commercial rental properties managed through your single-member LLC likely DO qualify as a Section 162 trade or business under current case law, especially given your hands-on involvement. The Groetzinger standard looks at whether you're engaged in regular, continuous activity with a profit motive - which clearly describes your situation. However, here's the critical distinction that trips up many taxpayers: qualifying as a Section 162 business and being "non-passive" are two separate determinations. For Form 8960 line 4b adjustments, you need BOTH conditions to be met. Unless you can qualify as a real estate professional (750+ hours annually in real estate activities AND it represents more than half your total working time), your rental activities will be treated as passive regardless of how actively you manage them. This is different from the "active participation" standard used for the $25,000 rental loss allowance. Your expenses (mortgage interest, property taxes, maintenance) already reduce your net rental income on Schedule E before it flows to Form 8960 - these aren't separate line 4b adjustments. Similarly, investment advisor fees don't qualify for line 4b treatment under current NIIT regulations. My advice: Start meticulously documenting your real estate activities immediately. Track every hour spent on tenant management, property maintenance coordination, market research, financial analysis, etc. If you can demonstrate you meet the real estate professional thresholds, you could potentially exclude significant rental income from NIIT through line 4b. Given the complexity and potential tax savings involved, consulting with a tax professional who specializes in NIIT and real estate taxation would be a wise investment.

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

This is really helpful, thanks! I'm starting to see why this has been so confusing - I was thinking that being hands-on with my properties automatically meant I could use line 4b adjustments, but now I understand there are actually two separate hurdles to clear. Quick question about the real estate professional qualification - you mentioned 750+ hours AND more than half of total working time. If someone has a regular W-2 job working 40 hours per week (roughly 2,080 hours annually), would they need to spend over 1,040 hours on real estate activities to meet that second test? That seems almost impossible for someone who isn't doing real estate full-time. Also, when you say "meticulously document," what's the best way to track this retrospectively for activities I've already done this year? I have emails, calendar entries, and receipts, but no formal time log. Should I try to reconstruct based on what records I do have?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today