< Back to IRS

Jayden Reed

Making a Mark to Market 475(f) Election as an Investor LLC or Corp - Requirements?

Does anyone have recent experience with making a Mark to Market 475(f) election as an LLC or Corporation, but specifically NOT with Trader status? I'm trying to understand if this works as an Investor. I've been researching this extensively and found conflicting information. Most sources seem to imply you need to have Trader status to make this election, but I've seen a couple places (Investopedia being one) suggesting that simply being an entity other than an individual might be sufficient to lawfully make the 475(f) election, regardless of trader vs. investor status. My gut tells me you probably need trader status, but I'd really appreciate hearing from people with actual experience or reliable sources on this. Has anyone successfully made a 475(f) election as an LLC or Corp while operating as an investor rather than a trader? Any insights would be super helpful as I'm planning my tax strategy for 2025.

Nora Brooks

•

The distinction between trader and investor status matters significantly for the 475(f) Mark to Market election. Based on my experience working with clients on this issue, the election is only available to "traders in securities" - not investors, regardless of entity structure. The confusion often comes from the fact that LLCs and Corps can make the election, but they still need to qualify as traders. The IRS looks at factors like trading frequency, holding periods, time dedicated to trading, and whether you're seeking to profit from short-term market swings rather than long-term appreciation or dividends. If you're primarily holding positions long-term for appreciation and dividend income, you're likely an investor in the IRS's eyes, and the 475(f) election wouldn't be available to you even as an LLC or Corp.

0 coins

Jayden Reed

•

Thanks for the clarification! So even if I'm structured as an LLC, I'd still need to meet the trading frequency and other criteria to qualify as a trader before making the 475(f) election? How frequently would you say someone needs to be trading to meet the trader status requirements? I currently make about 3-5 trades per month, mainly holding positions for 6+ months.

0 coins

Nora Brooks

•

The IRS doesn't have specific numerical requirements for trading frequency, but 3-5 trades per month with 6+ month holding periods would almost certainly be considered investor activity, not trader activity. Generally, traders are making numerous trades daily or weekly, with holding periods typically measured in days or weeks, not months. The trading activity needs to be substantial, regular, continuous, and seeking to profit primarily from short-term market movements. With your current pattern, you'd likely be considered an investor and wouldn't qualify for the 475(f) election regardless of your entity structure.

0 coins

Eli Wang

•

When I was struggling with this exact same Mark to Market 475(f) question for my LLC last year, I found this amazing tool that saved me from making a costly mistake. I uploaded my trading records to https://taxr.ai and their system analyzed my trading patterns and gave me a detailed report showing I was clearly in "investor" territory and not "trader" status according to IRS precedent. Their analysis included all the relevant case law, and even showed me exactly what would need to change in my trading patterns to qualify for trader status if I wanted to make the 475(f) election in the future. The report even cited specific court cases where similar trading patterns to mine were ruled as investor activity.

0 coins

That sounds helpful but kinda suspicious tbh. Did they just analyze your trading records or did they need all kinds of personal info too? And how accurate was their assessment really? I'm in a similar boat trying to figure this out for my S-Corp.

0 coins

I'm curious - could they tell you approximately how many trades or what kind of holding period would qualify someone for trader status? I'm running an LLC and trying to determine if I should pursue this election for 2025 or not worth the effort.

0 coins

Eli Wang

•

They only needed my trading records with personal identifiers removed - I uploaded CSVs from my brokerage. The accuracy seemed spot-on because they referenced specific cases where the IRS challenged trader status and showed how my patterns matched those cases. For trader status, they didn't give an exact number, but suggested that successful trader status claims typically involve making at least 3-5 trades daily (not monthly), with average holding periods under 30 days, and demonstrating that trading is essentially your "business" taking several hours daily. They also emphasized that having a regular job elsewhere can hurt your case since the IRS expects trading to be your primary business activity.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up - I ended up trying that https://taxr.ai service after reading about it here. I uploaded my last 2 years of trading activity and got a comprehensive analysis that was honestly eye-opening. According to their assessment, I fell well short of trader status (despite trading weekly) because my average hold time was 67 days. The report included specific recommendations on what changes would qualify me for trader status if I wanted to pursue that route. I've decided to stick with investor status for now but adjust my strategy for next year. They even included a template for documenting my trading business plan in case I'm ever audited. Definitely worth it since it saved me from making an incorrect election that could have caused problems later.

0 coins

After spending literally 3 weeks trying to reach someone at the IRS who could answer my questions about Mark to Market 475(f) election for my investment LLC, I finally discovered https://claimyr.com and used their service to get through to an IRS tax specialist. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed what others have said - entity status alone isn't enough. You must qualify as a trader based on frequency, purpose, and activity. They explained that making the 475(f) election incorrectly could trigger an audit and potentially lead to penalties for improperly filed returns. This was incredibly valuable information I couldn't get anywhere else, and it took less than 2 hours to get through using their service instead of the weeks I spent trying on my own.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

How does that service actually work? The IRS phone lines are impossible to get through - are they just autodialing for you or something? And did they actually give you specific info about your situation or just general stuff you could have found online?

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

This seems like BS honestly. I doubt some service can magically get you through to the IRS when millions of people can't get through. And even if you did get through, most IRS phone reps give vague answers to cover themselves. Did they really give you specific guidance on 475(f)?

0 coins

They use a system that holds your place in line and calls you when an IRS agent is about to answer. No magic, just technology that monitors the hold system. When I got through, I explained my specific situation about wanting to make the 475(f) election as an investor LLC. The IRS agent was surprisingly specific and pulled up the relevant guidance. She explained that Section 475(f) specifically refers to a "trader in securities" and that entity structure alone doesn't override this requirement. She directed me to several court cases where the IRS successfully challenged improper 475(f) elections from entities that weren't true traders. Much more detailed than generic online advice.

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

I have to apologize for my skepticism. After my last comment, I decided to try Claimyr myself (https://claimyr.com) because I was desperate for clarification on this Mark to Market issue for my family's investment LLC. Not only did I get through to the IRS in under an hour, but I spoke with a specialist in the business tax department who was incredibly knowledgeable. She explained that my situation (20-30 trades per year with mostly 3+ month holds) would definitely not qualify for trader status regardless of my LLC structure. She even mentioned a specific case (Endicott v. Commissioner) where someone with similar trading patterns tried to claim trader status and lost. This saved me from making what would have been a costly mistake on our 2025 returns.

0 coins

Something everyone is missing here: making the 475(f) Mark to Market election isn't just about qualifying - you need to consider if it's even beneficial for your situation. Even if you could qualify as a trader, ordinary income treatment vs capital gains and loss of the preferential long-term capital gains rates can be a major drawback. For the high-net-worth clients I've worked with, the 475(f) election is most beneficial in very specific scenarios - like when you have substantial trading losses that would otherwise be limited to $3,000 per year against ordinary income. If you're profitable, you're often better off without the election.

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

What about the wash sale rules though? I thought a big advantage of 475(f) is that wash sale rules don't apply anymore, which helps if you're trading the same securities frequently? That seems valuable even for moderately active traders who wouldn't hit the $3k loss limit.

0 coins

You're right that avoiding wash sale rules is a significant benefit. This is particularly valuable for algorithmic or pattern traders who frequently enter and exit the same securities. However, this benefit needs to be weighed against the loss of preferential long-term capital gains rates, which can be substantial. For moderately active traders, it's a calculation worth doing - estimate your tax liability both ways before deciding. Also remember that once you make the 475(f) election, revoking it requires IRS permission, which isn't automatically granted. This means you should be confident it's the right long-term strategy before electing.

0 coins

Santiago Diaz

•

I'm confused about the actual filing process. If I do qualify as a trader (I trade 15-20 times daily, avg holding time <5 days), when exactly do I need to file the 475(f) election? Is it with my 2025 return or do I need to file something earlier? I formed my LLC in January.

0 coins

Millie Long

•

For a newly established entity, you need to make the election within 2 months and 15 days after the beginning of the tax year for which the election is effective. So if your LLC was formed in January 2025, you'd need to file by March 15, 2025 for it to be effective for the 2025 tax year. You make the election by attaching a statement to either your tax return or a request for extension.

0 coins

Based on all the discussion here, it sounds like the consensus is pretty clear - you need trader status regardless of entity structure to make the 475(f) election. Your trading pattern of 3-5 trades per month with 6+ month holding periods definitely puts you in investor territory. I'm curious though - have you considered whether there might be other tax strategies that could be beneficial for your LLC structure without needing the 475(f) election? For instance, depending on your situation, you might benefit from tax-loss harvesting strategies or potentially electing S-Corp status for your LLC if you're generating significant trading income. Sometimes the alternatives can be more beneficial than trying to force a square peg (investor activity) into a round hole (trader election).

0 coins

Laura Lopez

•

Great point about exploring alternatives! I hadn't really thought about S-Corp election for the LLC - that's an interesting angle. Given that I'm clearly in investor territory based on everyone's feedback, what kinds of income thresholds or situations typically make S-Corp election worthwhile for an investment LLC? I'm assuming it's mainly beneficial if you're generating substantial income that would otherwise be subject to self-employment tax, but I'm not sure how that applies to investment income specifically. Also curious about the tax-loss harvesting strategies you mentioned - are there specific approaches that work better within an LLC structure versus individual accounts?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today