< Back to IRS

Ravi Malhotra

Tax Comparison: Investing through LLC vs C Corporation Structure

I'm struggling to figure out the best tax structure for my investment activities and would appreciate some insight. Currently considering forming a single member LLC for investing/trading to limit my liability. My dilemma is this: with my full-time job, I'm already in the 22% tax bracket. Based on my projections, the investment profits would push me into the 24% bracket since an LLC is a pass-through entity. Most of my gains will be short-term, which I understand would be taxed at my personal rate. Plus, I'd get hit with self-employment tax on top of that. I've been researching using a C corporation instead (not an S corp). This would give me the corporate tax rate of 21%, which seems like a slight advantage. I also like that my personal and investment taxes would be completely separate. My plan is to reinvest all profits rather than taking distributions - I don't need the investment income for personal expenses. What would be the better approach from a tax perspective? Are there drawbacks to the C corp structure for an investment-focused business that I'm not seeing? Any advice from those who've been in a similar situation would be really helpful.

The LLC vs. C-corp decision isn't as straightforward as just comparing the tax rates. Let me walk you through some considerations that might help. With an LLC, yes, it's pass-through taxation and your investment income could push you into a higher tax bracket. But remember that self-employment taxes typically don't apply to most investment income - they apply to active business income. If you're just buying and selling securities as investments rather than as a trader, that's generally considered passive income and not subject to SE tax. For the C-corp route, while the 21% rate looks attractive, there's a potential double taxation issue you should be aware of. When you eventually take money out (even years later), you'll pay taxes again at the individual level. Also, C-corps don't get preferential long-term capital gains rates like individuals do - everything is taxed at the corporate rate. Since you mentioned reinvesting profits, the C-corp structure might work for your current goals, but consider your long-term plans. If you eventually want to access that money, you'll face dividend taxation on distributions.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

Thanks for the detailed response. I didn't realize self-employment taxes might not apply if I'm just investing rather than actively trading. How does the IRS distinguish between investing and trading? I was planning to make maybe 3-4 trades per week, mostly in stocks and some options. Also, regarding the double taxation with C-corps - if I plan to reinvest for at least 10-15 years, would the lower initial tax rate outweigh the eventual double taxation when I start taking distributions? Or is there a different structure I should consider?

0 coins

The IRS looks at several factors to determine if you're an investor or a trader, including frequency, holding periods, and time devoted to the activity. At 3-4 trades weekly, you're in a gray area. Traders typically have much higher volume, short holding periods, and derive their income primarily from the activity. If you have a full-time job and this is secondary, they'd likely consider you an investor. For your 10-15 year horizon, you need to calculate the compounding advantage of the lower initial C-corp rate versus the eventual double tax. The math usually favors pass-through entities for most small investors, especially if any of your gains will be long-term. Another option might be an LLC that elects to be taxed as an S-corporation, which can provide some self-employment tax benefits while maintaining pass-through status.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

After spending months researching the same question, I eventually found a solution that worked perfectly for me at https://taxr.ai - their AI tax analyzer saved me so much time figuring out the LLC vs Corporation question. I uploaded my financial projections and investment strategy, and it showed me the exact tax differences between the structures over a 10-year timeline. The analysis confirmed what I suspected - the C-corp looked better initially, but the double taxation eventually erased the benefits. What surprised me was how much the "trader" vs "investor" status affected everything. The tool helped me understand that my trading frequency would likely qualify me as an investor, not a trader, which completely changed my strategy.

0 coins

Does the taxr.ai thing also help with state-specific tax considerations? I'm in California and our state taxes make this decision even more complicated. Also, did it give you advice on the actual paperwork or just the tax calculations?

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

I'm skeptical about these AI tools. How accurate can it really be? Tax law changes all the time, and there are so many nuances especially with investment income. Did you verify its recommendations with an actual tax professional?

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

Yes, it does include state-specific analysis! I'm in New York, and it factored in both federal and state tax implications. It doesn't help with the actual formation paperwork, but it does provide a detailed report that shows exactly how each structure would work over time with projected tax liabilities. For the accuracy question, that's completely fair. I was skeptical too. What convinced me was that they source their rules directly from IRS publications and update when tax laws change. I actually did show the report to my accountant, and he was impressed with the thoroughness. He made a couple of small tweaks based on my specific situation but largely agreed with the analysis.

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

I need to follow up on my skeptical comment about taxr.ai - I decided to give it a try myself and I'm genuinely surprised at how helpful it was. The tax comparison between LLC and C-corp was incredibly detailed, showing year-by-year projections based on my actual trading patterns. What really stood out was how it flagged that my options trading strategy would likely qualify for trader status with the IRS, which opened up some tax advantages I didn't know about. The system recommended an LLC with S-corp election in my case, with specific reasoning tied to my state's tax laws and my projected income levels. I expected some generic advice, but this was tailored to my specific situation. I've been wasting so much time trying to piece together information from different sources, and this consolidated everything I needed to make a decision. Definitely wish I'd found this months ago!

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

If you're considering trading as a business entity, you should also know about the Claimyr service at https://claimyr.com which helped me resolve a huge tax issue when the IRS flagged my business deductions after I switched from an LLC to a C-corp. I was on hold with the IRS for HOURS over multiple days trying to get clarity on my situation. With Claimyr, I got through to an actual IRS agent in under 25 minutes! You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - they basically navigate the phone system for you and call when an agent is ready. The agent explained exactly what documentation I needed to prove my investment business was legitimate and not just trying to deduct personal investment losses. Their system saved me from what would have been a $7,800 tax assessment because I was able to talk to someone who actually understood the differences between investment losses and business expenses for different entity types.

0 coins

How does this service actually work? Do they just keep calling the IRS until they get through? I'm confused about how they can guarantee getting through when the IRS phone lines are notoriously busy.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

There's no way this is real. I've tried EVERYTHING to get through to the IRS about my business tax issue. Nobody can magically skip the queue - the IRS doesn't work that way. Sounds like a scam to get desperate people's money.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

They don't just keep manually calling - they use technology that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent finally picks up, you get a call letting you know an agent is on the line. It's basically an automated hold system that waits in line for you. This isn't about skipping the queue at all. You're still waiting your turn, but their system is doing the waiting instead of you sitting there with a phone to your ear for hours. I was skeptical too, but when you're facing potential tax penalties and can't get through to resolve them, it's worth trying. The time I got back to actually run my business instead of listening to hold music was worth every penny.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

I have to publicly eat my words about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I was so desperate with my ongoing IRS issue that I tried it anyway. I figured worst case, I waste a little money. Within 35 minutes, I was talking to an actual IRS representative who helped clarify the exact requirements for documenting my trading activities as a business. The agent explained why my C-corp was getting flagged for review (turns out I was using the wrong business activity code) and walked me through how to fix it. What would have taken me days of redial attempts took less than an hour. For anyone dealing with entity selection for trading/investing, definitely get proper guidance from the IRS directly if you can. The right structure makes a massive difference in audit risk, not just tax rates.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

One thing nobody's mentioned yet is the Accumulated Earnings Tax that C-corps face if they retain too much profit without a business purpose. Since you mentioned wanting to reinvest rather than distribute profits, this could become an issue if your C-corp builds up substantial retained earnings. The IRS might question why you're accumulating earnings instead of paying dividends, and could impose an additional tax. There's a presumptive threshold (about $250k) where this can trigger scrutiny, though you can justify higher retained earnings if you have legitimate business needs. An LLC doesn't face this issue since profits are taxed at the individual level regardless of whether they're distributed.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Can you explain more about this Accumulated Earnings Tax? I've never heard of it but might be in a similar situation with my business. Is there a way to document plans for the retained earnings to avoid this tax?

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

Yes, you can document specific plans for using the accumulated earnings to avoid the tax. The IRS looks for "reasonable needs of the business" - things like expansion plans, equipment purchases, research and development, or contingency funds for specific business risks. The key is having a concrete plan, not just a vague notion of "future growth." Documentation is crucial - board meeting minutes approving a specific expansion plan with estimated costs, for example. For an investment business, you could document plans to make specific types of larger investments that require accumulated capital. Just be aware that "investing in the market" isn't typically considered a reasonable business need since that's what investment companies do by default.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

My accountant pointed out something important that hasn't been mentioned yet - if you form a C-corp just for investing, you might run into the Personal Holding Company (PHC) tax issue. This is a punitive tax (currently 20%) on undistributed income for closely-held corporations where passive income (like from investments) makes up more than 60% of gross income. This is specifically designed to prevent people from using corporations as tax shelters for investment income. So if investment is your primary activity in the C-corp, you might face this additional tax burden.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

That's concerning and something I hadn't come across in my research. Between this PHC tax and the Accumulated Earnings Tax mentioned above, it sounds like there are multiple ways the IRS can penalize a C-corp used primarily for investments. Would an LLC taxed as an S-corp help avoid these specific issues while still potentially reducing self-employment taxes?

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Exactly - the LLC taxed as an S-corp would avoid both the PHC tax and Accumulated Earnings Tax issues completely. S-corps are pass-through entities, so there's no concept of "undistributed earnings" at the corporate level to tax. The S-corp approach can help reduce self-employment taxes because you can split your income between salary (subject to SE tax) and distributions (not subject to SE tax). Just be careful - your salary must be "reasonable" for the services you provide. For an investment business where your active participation might be limited, this benefit could be minimal since most of your income might be considered passive already and not subject to SE tax regardless of structure. Talk to your accountant about the "material participation" tests for your specific situation to determine whether your investment activities would qualify as active or passive income.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today