< Back to IRS

Genevieve Cavalier

K1 statement issued by previous employer but they refuse to pay distributions - what can I do?

So I'm in a really frustrating situation right now. My husband worked for this investment firm for about 7 years before leaving in 2022. Out of nowhere, in January 2023, they sent him a bunch of Schedule K-1 forms for tax years 2015-2021. The forms show his ownership interest in the company and that he's entitled to about $48,000 in distributions according to the K-1s. Here's the problem - they're refusing to actually pay him the money shown on the K-1s! They claim that even though he has these partnership distributions on paper, there was some "internal agreement" that he wouldn't actually receive the cash. But nothing like that was ever signed or even discussed during his employment. We've already had to pay taxes on this "phantom income" for those years, which has cost us almost $13,000 out of pocket. The company basically told him "too bad" when he asked about getting the actual distributions. Has anyone dealt with something like this? Do we have any recourse? Is there a way to force them to pay what's legally shown on the K-1 statements? Or do we at least have a way to recover the taxes we've paid on income we never received?

Ethan Scott

•

This is unfortunately more common than you'd think with partnerships and LLCs. The K-1 shows your husband's share of the partnership's income regardless of whether distributions were actually made. This is called "phantom income" in tax circles. You have a few options here. First, check if there was an operating agreement or partnership agreement your husband signed when joining the company. These agreements often specify how and when distributions are made, and sometimes do include clauses about reinvesting profits rather than distributing them. If there was no such agreement limiting distributions, you may have a legal claim to the funds. Partnership law generally entitles partners to distributions to at least cover the taxes on allocated income. You should consult with an attorney who specializes in business/partnership law. In the meantime, make sure to keep detailed records of all the K-1s and any communications with the company about this issue. This documentation will be crucial whether you pursue legal action or need to demonstrate to the IRS why these funds were never received.

0 coins

Thanks for responding! We've looked through every document he ever signed with them and there's nothing about reinvesting profits or withholding distributions. He was technically a "limited partner" according to the K-1s, if that makes any difference? The company is basically saying it was "understood" that these were paper profits only, but how can something that important be just "understood" and not written down anywhere? It feels so unfair to pay taxes on money we never got.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

Being a limited partner doesn't automatically mean distributions can be withheld without documentation. Limited partners have fewer management rights, but they still have economic rights to distributions unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing. Without a written agreement restricting distributions, the "understanding" they're claiming is questionable at best. Partnership law in most states requires that, at minimum, partners receive enough distributions to cover taxes on their allocated income. This is basic protection against exactly the situation you're describing.

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

After my divorce last year, I got hit with a similar K-1 issue from my ex-husband's business. I spent weeks trying to figure it out before I found this AI tool that seriously saved me. It's called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it analyzes your tax docs to figure out if there are inconsistencies or if you have legal standing. I uploaded all the K-1s and some of our communication with the company, and it identified specific partnership laws that applied to my situation. The analysis showed that without specific written agreements, the company couldn't legally withhold distributions while still allocating income on a K-1. It even generated a formal letter I could send to the company citing the relevant legal provisions. The whole experience was super straightforward, and it saved me from having to pay a lawyer thousands just to tell me if I had a case or not. Might be worth checking out for your situation!

0 coins

How does this actually work? Like do you just upload documents and it tells you what to do? Does it connect you with actual tax attorneys or is it just software analyzing things?

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. I had a somewhat similar issue with K-1s from a real estate investment, and the "rules" were buried in a 60-page partnership agreement that most software would miss. Does this actually catch those kinds of details?

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

It works by analyzing the documents using AI that's been trained on tax laws and regulations. You upload whatever documents you have - K-1s, agreements, emails - and it identifies the relevant laws and potential issues. It doesn't just look at the forms themselves but interprets the situation based on everything you provide. It doesn't connect you with attorneys directly, but it gives you detailed analysis that helps you understand if you need one and what specifically to ask them about. In my case, it caught several nuances about partnership tax law that I wouldn't have known to look for.

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

I was really skeptical about using an AI tool for something as complicated as partnership tax issues, but after that last thread I decided to try taxr.ai with my K-1 problem. Honestly, I'm shocked at how helpful it was. The system immediately identified that my real estate partnership was allocating income without making required tax distributions - which was buried in section 48.3 of our agreement! It generated a detailed explanation of why this violated both the terms of our own agreement and state partnership laws. I forwarded the analysis to our partnership manager, and within two weeks, they issued the missing distributions with a lame excuse about "accounting oversight." No lawyer fees, no drawn-out battle - just clear documentation of my rights that they couldn't argue with. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with K-1 issues.

0 coins

Santiago Diaz

•

If you've tried addressing this directly with the company and they're still refusing, you might need to get the IRS involved. But calling the IRS is an absolute nightmare these days - I spent 3+ hours on hold last month only to be disconnected. I ended up using this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) which basically holds your place in the IRS phone queue and calls you back when an agent is about to answer. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c When I finally got through, the IRS agent explained that in situations with phantom income on K-1s, I could file Form 8082 (Notice of Inconsistent Treatment) to dispute how the partnership reported certain items. This might help with future K-1s if they continue this pattern. They also suggested that this might actually be a legal issue rather than just a tax issue, but getting their perspective helped me understand my options.

0 coins

Millie Long

•

How much does this Claimyr thing cost? The IRS phone system is the absolute worst, but I'm always suspicious of services that claim to make it easier.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

I don't think the IRS can actually help with this. They just make sure you pay taxes on whatever's reported on the K-1. They don't care if the company never gives you the money - that's a legal dispute between you and the company, not a tax issue. Sounds like a waste of time.

0 coins

Santiago Diaz

•

The cost varies depending on which IRS department you need to reach, but it's way less than what my time is worth sitting on hold for hours. Their website shows the current rates for different departments. I thought the same thing initially, but the IRS actually does deal with partnership tax issues quite frequently. While they can't force the company to pay distributions, filing Form 8082 creates an official record of the dispute and can sometimes trigger correspondence from the IRS to the partnership. Plus, in my case, the agent provided information about potential tax relief options that might apply if I could document that I never received the income reported on my K-1.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

I was completely wrong about the IRS not being able to help with K-1 issues. After seeing the Claimyr recommendation, I decided to try it instead of spending another afternoon on hold. Got connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes (instead of the 3+ hours I waited last time). The agent walked me through filing Form 8082 to flag the inconsistency between reported income and actual distributions. They also explained that I might qualify for tax relief under the "phantom income" provisions if I could document the company's refusal to distribute funds. Most importantly, they sent me specific IRS guidance on partnership taxation that I could reference in communications with the company. Just having that official documentation completely changed the tone of my conversations with the partnership's accountant. This actually seems like a path to resolution now instead of just going in circles with the company.

0 coins

Debra Bai

•

You might want to check if your husband's employment contract or separation agreement has any clauses about partnership interests or deferred compensation. I had a similar issue where my K-1 showed profits but the company refused to pay, claiming I had forfeited my economic rights when I left. Turned out there was language in my separation agreement that I didn't fully understand about "maintaining paper interests solely for tax allocation purposes." My attorney said this was their sneaky way of keeping me on the books as a partner while eliminating my right to actual distributions. Also worth checking if there were capital contribution requirements that weren't met. Some partnerships require partners to contribute capital proportionate to their profit percentages, and if those contributions weren't made, they can sometimes legally withhold distributions.

0 coins

We went through his separation agreement again after reading your comment, and there's nothing about "paper interests" or anything like that. It just has standard language about returning company property and maintaining confidentiality. The really frustrating part is that we asked for clarification about his partnership status when he left, and they said everything would be "wrapped up" within 60 days. Then nothing for almost a year until these K-1s showed up!

0 coins

Debra Bai

•

That's good news that there's nothing sketchy in the separation agreement! If they explicitly told you everything would be "wrapped up" and then issued K-1s later, you should save any emails or documentation of those conversations. In my experience, some companies try to have it both ways - they want to allocate income to former partners for their own tax benefits while not distributing the cash. Without specific documentation allowing this, it's generally not legal. The fact that they didn't address this at his departure and then surprised you with K-1s later strengthens your case.

0 coins

Has anyone mentioned the statute of limitations here? The IRS generally has a 3-year statute of limitations for auditing returns. If these K-1s were for 2015-2021 but only issued in 2023, some of those years might be outside the normal assessment period. You might want to check if you need to file amended returns for those older years. If you do, you'll be paying taxes on income from 7+ years ago, which seems crazy unfair.

0 coins

Laura Lopez

•

The statute of limitations starts when you file the return, not when the income was earned. So if they just received these K-1s in 2023 and are filing amended returns now, the 3-year clock starts now. Also, for substantial underreporting of income (which this would be), the statute extends to 6 years. And if the IRS can claim there was any kind of fraud (not saying there was), there's no statute of limitations at all.

0 coins

Donna Cline

•

This is a really complex situation that unfortunately highlights how partnership taxation can create unfair outcomes for individual partners. Based on what you've described, it sounds like you may have strong legal grounds to pursue the distributions. The key issue here is that partnership tax law generally requires that if income is allocated to a partner (as shown on the K-1), there should be corresponding economic rights to that income. The fact that there's no written agreement limiting distributions and that the company told your husband everything would be "wrapped up" when he left actually works in your favor. A few immediate steps I'd recommend: 1) Document everything - save all K-1s, emails, and any communications about this issue, 2) Consider consulting with a business attorney who specializes in partnership disputes (many offer free consultations), and 3) Look into whether your state has specific protections for partners against phantom income situations. You might also want to contact your state's bar association for referrals to attorneys who handle partnership tax disputes on contingency - meaning they only get paid if you recover funds. Given that you're owed $48,000, this could be worth pursuing legally even after attorney fees. Don't give up on this. Companies can't just allocate income for their tax purposes while keeping all the cash without proper documentation allowing it.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today