Intangibles and Form 926 Reporting - How to Handle Non-Cash Transfers?
I'm in corporate tax and hit a roadblock with Form 926 reporting. My company does tons of reportable 926 transactions yearly. We've always focused only on cash transfers exceeding $100,000 over a 12-month rolling period to foreign corps. But I just noticed the Form 926 instructions changed to include more specifics about transfers of intangibles. From what I can tell, there's no $100,000 value threshold requirement for intangibles like there is for cash. Can anyone point me to good guidance on how/when to report intangibles for Form 926? Two scenarios I'm struggling with: 1) Our company sends an employee to work at a Japanese company for a quarter. Instead of paying us, the Japanese company gives us 15% equity in their private business. No cash involved, and we don't have a valuation for the equity. Does this trigger Form 926 reporting? 2) We provide technical "know-how" to a German company and get 10% equity in their private subsidiary in return. No cash exchanged, and we don't know the subsidiary's value. Is this 926 reportable? Would really appreciate some insights from anyone who's dealt with this!
20 comments


Anastasia Fedorov
This is a great question about a tricky area. The Form 926 reporting requirements for intangibles are indeed different from cash transfers. First, it's important to understand that transfers of intangibles to foreign corporations generally ARE reportable regardless of dollar value. The $100,000 threshold applies specifically to cash and tangible property, but not to intangibles like services, know-how, patents, etc. For your examples: 1) The employee services provided to the Japanese company in exchange for equity would likely be reportable. The services of your employee represent an intangible asset being transferred to a foreign corporation, and the equity received is consideration. 2) The technical know-how provided to the German company is almost certainly reportable. Know-how is specifically mentioned in the instructions as a type of intangible property subject to reporting. For valuation purposes, you'll need to make a good faith effort to determine the fair market value of the equity received. If precise valuation is difficult, you should document your methodology and use the best available information. Look at Section 367(d) of the tax code and related regulations for more guidance - they specifically address transfers of intangibles to foreign corporations.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
•Thanks for the info. Quick question - if we can't determine a reasonable value for the equity, are we still required to file the 926? Also, is there any de minimis exception for smaller transfers of intangibles that I'm missing?
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
•Yes, you're still required to file Form 926 even if determining a precise value is challenging. The reporting obligation isn't contingent on having an exact valuation. You should use whatever information is available to make a reasonable estimate and document your approach. There isn't a de minimis exception for intangibles like there is for cash transfers. The regulations essentially treat all transfers of intangibles to foreign corporations as reportable events, regardless of value. This reflects the IRS's heightened concern about outbound transfers of intellectual property and other intangibles.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
I've been using taxr.ai lately for exactly these kinds of international tax reporting questions, and it's been super helpful. I had a similar issue with Form 926 reporting for some software licensing arrangements with our foreign subsidiaries. I uploaded our transaction documents and the 926 instructions to https://taxr.ai and it analyzed everything together, highlighting the specific sections about intangible property transfers that applied to our situation. The tool even provided references to relevant tax code sections and regulations that our tax team hadn't considered. What I really liked was how it identified the reporting requirements for different types of intellectual property transfers and pointed out the differences between cash thresholds and intangible reporting. Saved me hours of research and probably kept us from making a filing mistake.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•Does it work with other international forms too? We struggle with 5471s and 8992s as well. And can it handle complex partnership structures or is it mainly for corporate stuff?
0 coins
Nia Jackson
•Sounds interesting but how is it better than just asking my tax advisor? I pay them enough already, wouldn't they know this stuff?
0 coins
Zara Rashid
•Yes, it definitely works with other international forms! I've used it for 5471 category determinations and GILTI calculations on 8992. It's particularly useful for identifying which schedules you need to complete based on your specific facts. The tool has a pretty comprehensive knowledge of most international reporting requirements. It handles both partnership and corporate structures. I've used it for analyzing tiered partnerships with foreign partners, and it correctly identified the Form 8865 reporting requirements that applied to our situation. It's also good at spotting when attribution rules create unexpected filing obligations.
0 coins
Luca Romano
After struggling with similar Form 926 questions, I tried out taxr.ai that someone mentioned here and it was honestly really helpful. I uploaded our equity exchange agreements and some background info on our foreign entities, and it quickly identified which transactions needed reporting. The tool highlighted specific language in the regulations about "transfers of property" including intangibles and pointed out that Section 367(d) treats these transfers differently. It also provided guidance on how to document our valuation methodology for the equity we received. What really impressed me was how it connected our specific fact pattern to relevant rulings and revenue procedures I hadn't found in my research. Ended up filing 926s for all our intangible transfers regardless of value based on the analysis, and I feel much more confident in our position now.
0 coins
NebulaNova
For anyone dealing with IRS forms like 926, one of the most frustrating parts is getting clarification when the instructions are unclear. I tried calling the IRS international tax line multiple times and couldn't get through. Then I found https://claimyr.com which basically holds your place in the IRS phone queue and calls you when an agent is available. You can check out how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I used it to connect with someone in the international division who specifically handles 926 questions. Took about 3 hours (instead of me waiting on hold), but I finally got clear guidance on our intangible reporting situation. The agent confirmed what others have said - intangibles don't have a dollar threshold for 926 reporting requirements.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
•How does this service actually work? Do they just sit on hold for you? Seems too good to be true considering how impossible it is to reach the IRS these days.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•I'm skeptical. I've been told by IRS agents completely wrong information in the past. Did they actually seem knowledgeable about Form 926 specifically? Most agents I've spoken with barely understand basic forms let alone international reporting.
0 coins
NebulaNova
•The service basically uses technology to hold your place in the IRS phone queue. They have systems that navigate the IRS phone tree and wait on hold, then when an agent picks up, they connect the call to your phone. You're not talking to Claimyr representatives - you're talking directly to IRS agents, just without the hold time. The key is that they connected me with the international tax division specifically. You're right that not all IRS agents understand the complex international forms. The agent I spoke with clearly worked with 926 forms regularly and was able to cite specific sections of the regulations. They confirmed that intangible transfers require reporting regardless of value and walked me through the Section 367(d) implications.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
I have to admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since we've been having trouble with some foreign reporting questions. It connected me with an IRS international division specialist in about 2.5 hours (while I went about my day). The agent actually knew Form 926 inside and out and confirmed that ALL intangible transfers need to be reported regardless of value. She even emailed me some internal guidance they use for reviewing these forms. For the specific scenarios like yours with equity exchanges, she explained that you need to make a reasonable valuation effort, but even if the value is uncertain, you still need to file the form to disclose the transaction. She emphasized that penalties for not filing are significant even if no tax is due. Definitely worth reaching out to get an official take on your specific situation!
0 coins
Aisha Khan
Just to add to what others have said - we've been dealing with this exact issue for years. The 926 instructions can be confusing, but we've taken the position that ALL transfers of intangibles to foreign corps require reporting, regardless of value. Our documentation approach is to: 1) Identify any intangible transfer (services, know-how, IP, etc.) 2) Document a reasonable valuation approach 3) File the 926 with appropriate descriptions For your equity exchange situations, I'd suggest including a statement explaining the difficulty in precise valuation but showing a good-faith effort to comply with reporting requirements. Better to over-report than risk the penalties.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
•Do you include a formal valuation study with your 926 filings? Or just internal documentation? Our auditors are pushing for third-party valuations for similar transactions but that seems excessive for just reporting purposes.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
•We don't typically include formal third-party valuations for Form 926 reporting alone. We prepare internal documentation that shows our methodology for estimating fair market value based on available information. For significant transactions, we might reference comparable transactions or apply basic valuation techniques, but it's not at the level of a formal valuation study. That said, if the transaction has other tax implications beyond just 926 reporting (like if it might trigger Section 367 gain recognition), then we do consider getting more formal valuations. The key is demonstrating a good-faith effort to comply with the reporting requirements and having a reasonable basis for the numbers you're using.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
I think people are overcomplicating this. The regulations are actually pretty clear if you look at Section 1.6038B-1(b)(2)(i)(B). All transfers of property to foreign corporations generally need to be reported, regardless of value. The $100,000 de minimis exception only applies to certain types of transfers. For intangibles specifically, the regs tie into Section 936(h)(3)(B) which broadly defines intangibles to include practically anything of value that's not tangible or a financial asset. Your examples are 100% reportable - employee services and know-how both qualify as intangibles under these definitions.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
•The regulations may seem "clear" to you but they're not to most of us. Different IRS agents interpret them differently too. Last year we had one agent tell us no reporting needed for similar transactions, then got a different answer this year.
0 coins
Diego Chavez
This is exactly the kind of complex international tax situation where getting multiple perspectives is crucial. I've been following the discussion here and wanted to add that we faced similar challenges with our Form 926 reporting last year. What helped us was creating a comprehensive checklist for all our cross-border transactions. We now flag ANY transfer of services, know-how, or other intangibles to foreign entities for 926 analysis, regardless of the dollar amount involved. For your specific scenarios: 1) The employee services to the Japanese company - definitely reportable. We had a similar situation where we provided consulting services in exchange for equity, and our tax counsel confirmed this triggers 926 reporting. 2) The technical know-how transfer - also clearly reportable under the intangibles provisions. One practical tip: document everything contemporaneously. When we receive equity in exchange for intangibles, we prepare a memo at the time explaining our valuation approach, even if it's based on limited information. This has been helpful when the IRS has questions later. The penalties for not filing can be severe ($10,000 plus additional penalties), so when in doubt, we file. It's better to over-report than face the consequences of missing a required filing.
0 coins
Toot-n-Mighty
•This is really helpful advice about the documentation approach. I'm curious - when you prepare those contemporaneous memos for equity exchanges, do you typically get any kind of independent validation of your valuation methodology? Or is it mainly based on your internal analysis? We're trying to balance thoroughness with practicality, especially for smaller transactions where the cost of formal valuations might be disproportionate.
0 coins