ITIN application confusion - received CP565 approval then CP567 rejection for my spouse
I'm in a weird situation with my wife's ITIN application and hoping someone can help me make sense of this. My wife is a nonresident alien and I'm a US citizen, so we applied for her ITIN to file married filing jointly for 2024. We did everything by the book - went through an acceptance facility, got copies of documents properly certified, submitted the W-7 form along with our original tax return and a certified copy of her passport. In late June, we received a CP565 (approval letter) with her assigned ITIN. Great news, right? Then in early July, our 2024 tax return was processed and the IRS deposited our refund directly to our bank account. But now, just a couple weeks later, we received a CP567 (rejection letter) saying they rejected her ITIN application for one of these reasons: - No completed/signed tax return included - She wasn't listed on the tax return - She was listed as a dependent but not claimed for any tax benefit None of these apply to our situation at all! We definitely included a complete tax return where she was listed as my spouse for MFJ filing. The IRS guidance says we need to complete a new W-7, include documentation proving identity and foreign status, send a federal tax return, and include a copy of the rejection notice. I'm completely baffled since they already APPROVED the ITIN, PROCESSED our return using that ITIN, and PAID our refund. Are we good to go despite this rejection letter? Or is something seriously wrong? I've tried calling but the wait times are ridiculous (4+ hours on hold). Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
19 comments


Ryan Kim
This is actually a pretty common issue with ITIN applications, though definitely frustrating! What's happening is a timing/processing disconnect between different IRS departments. When you first submitted the W-7 with your tax return, the ITIN department approved the application and issued the CP565. Then your return was processed using that newly issued ITIN. But somewhere along the way, there was likely a clerical error or system glitch that triggered the automated CP567 rejection notice. Since your return was already processed and your refund issued using the assigned ITIN, you're most likely fine. The ITIN is already in the IRS system and functioning correctly as evidenced by your processed return. I would recommend taking these steps to be safe: 1. Keep both the CP565 and CP567 notices in your records 2. Check your IRS transcript online to confirm the return was indeed processed with your spouse's ITIN 3. No need to submit a new W-7 at this point as the ITIN is already working in the system The IRS computer systems sometimes send automated notices that contradict previous actions. In this case, the approval and processing of your return take precedence over the later rejection notice.
0 coins
Zoe Walker
•Thanks for the detailed response. But what about future tax returns? Will we run into problems next year if we use the ITIN that was first approved then rejected? Also, is there any way to confirm that the ITIN is still valid without waiting on hold forever?
0 coins
Ryan Kim
•For future tax returns, you should be able to use the ITIN without issues since it's clearly active in the IRS system as demonstrated by your processed 2024 return. The best way to confirm the ITIN is valid is to check your tax transcript through the IRS online portal at irs.gov/transcripts - this will show your processed return with the ITIN. If you want absolute confirmation without waiting on hold forever, you could also send a letter to the IRS ITIN Unit asking for clarification on the status, referencing both notices. Include copies of both the CP565 and CP567 notices. While this will take some time, you'll get a written response that you can keep for your records.
0 coins
Elijah Brown
I went through something really similar with my husband's ITIN last year. After a ton of research and stress, I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it was seriously a lifesaver for sorting through our contradictory IRS notices. I uploaded both the approval and rejection letters, and the service analyzed them to explain exactly what was happening with our case. Turns out we had the same issue - a system disconnect between IRS departments. Their analysis showed that since the return was processed with the ITIN, the ITIN was indeed valid despite the rejection notice. The site also gave me specific language to use when calling the IRS and pointed out exactly which paragraph in the IRM (Internal Revenue Manual) covered our situation. When I finally got through to an agent, I was able to reference the right policies and got confirmation that we didn't need to reapply. They even have this cool feature that lets you simulate different scenarios to see how the IRS might respond. Helped us plan for next year's filing too.
0 coins
Maria Gonzalez
•Does that service actually work with complicated international tax situations? I've got a similar issue but with my parents who live abroad. They're trying to claim the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion but got conflicting notices about their ITINs.
0 coins
Natalie Chen
•I'm pretty skeptical about third party services claiming to interpret IRS notices. How much does it cost? And isn't this just something the IRS should fix for free? It seems ridiculous that we have to pay extra just to understand their contradictory notices.
0 coins
Elijah Brown
•It definitely works well with international tax situations! The system has specific modules for foreign income, ITINs, and treaty benefits. I used it specifically for our ITIN/nonresident alien spouse situation and it identified the exact processing error that was happening. Regarding cost and skepticism, I totally get it. I was hesitant too. But after spending dozens of hours trying to figure it out myself and getting nowhere with IRS phone lines, it was worth it to get clear answers. They don't just interpret the notices - they actually explain the underlying processes that caused the contradiction and give you actionable steps. It saved me from unnecessarily reapplying for an ITIN that was already valid.
0 coins
Maria Gonzalez
Just wanted to update that I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here, and it was incredibly helpful for my parents' ITIN situation! We uploaded the conflicting notices and their tax documents, and the analysis showed exactly where the disconnect happened. Turns out one department had approved the ITINs but another department hadn't updated their system to recognize them as valid for the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion. The site generated a detailed letter we could send to the IRS explaining the situation and citing the relevant tax code. We followed their instructions and just got confirmation last week that everything is resolved! The ITINs are now properly linked to their accounts and we don't have to reapply. What would have probably taken months of back-and-forth with the IRS took just a couple weeks to fix. Definitely recommend if you're dealing with contradictory notices like this. Saved us so much stress!
0 coins
Santiago Martinez
Having dealt with similar ITIN issues, I've learned that trying to call the IRS directly is almost impossible these days. After 5 failed attempts (got disconnected after waiting 2+ hours each time), I tried Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and it was a game-changer. They have this system that holds your place in the IRS queue and then calls you when an agent is about to answer. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was able to actually speak with a real IRS agent who confirmed that when you have both an approval and rejection notice, the approval takes precedence if your tax return was successfully processed. The agent explained that the rejection notice was automatically generated before the system registered that your application had already been approved - just a system timing issue. They also made a note in the system that your spouse's ITIN is valid so you shouldn't have issues in future filings. Getting this clarification directly from an IRS agent gave me much more peace of mind than just assuming everything was okay.
0 coins
Samantha Johnson
•How does this Claimyr thing actually work? Seems too good to be true that they can somehow get you through the IRS phone lines when nobody else can. And don't they already have a callback system?
0 coins
Nick Kravitz
•I'm extremely suspicious of any service claiming to get you through to the IRS faster. Sounds like a scam. I'd rather wait on hold myself than give some random company my information. How do you know they're not recording your conversation with the IRS? Seems like a huge security risk.
0 coins
Santiago Martinez
•The service basically works by using automated technology to navigate the IRS phone system and wait in the queue for you. When they're about to connect to an agent, they call you and bridge the connection. It's not bypassing anything - you're still in the same queue as everyone else, but you don't have to personally sit on hold. The IRS callback system is hit or miss - sometimes it's not offered if queue volumes are too high, and sometimes the callbacks never come. This guarantees you actually get through. Regarding security concerns, they don't stay on the call or record anything. They literally just connect you directly to the IRS agent and drop off. I was skeptical too but researched them pretty thoroughly before using the service. They've been featured in major financial publications and have solid reviews. After trying unsuccessfully for weeks to reach the IRS myself, it was worth it to finally get answers.
0 coins
Nick Kravitz
I need to apologize and correct my skepticism about Claimyr. After getting nowhere with the IRS for THREE WEEKS trying to resolve my own ITIN issue, I reluctantly gave the service a try. Honestly, I was shocked when they actually got me through to an IRS representative within about 90 minutes. I would have been on hold for 5+ hours otherwise based on the estimated wait time. The IRS agent was able to look up both notices in their system and confirmed that when there's a CP565 approval followed by a CP567 rejection, and your return has already been processed with the ITIN, the approval is what matters. She explained it as a "system-generated error" where one department didn't communicate with another. She also put notes in my account about the valid ITIN so there shouldn't be issues for next year. I specifically asked about that after reading this thread. So yeah, I was completely wrong about the service. For anyone dealing with complex ITIN issues, getting direct confirmation from the IRS is definitely worth it instead of just hoping everything is fine.
0 coins
Hannah White
Accountant here - this kind of "left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing" situation happens all the time with the IRS, especially with ITIN processing. Here's what you need to know: 1. The CP565 (approval) followed by tax return processing is what matters here 2. The CP567 was almost certainly generated by an automated system that didn't check if an approval had already been issued 3. The fact that your refund was processed using the ITIN is concrete proof that the ITIN is valid in the IRS system For peace of mind, I would recommend keeping all documentation (both notices) indefinitely. Also, when you file next year, include a copy of the CP565 approval notice with your return. One additional step you might consider: request an "Account Transcript" through the IRS website for the tax year in question. This will show the ITIN being used successfully for processing and serve as additional documentation that everything is fine.
0 coins
Daniela Rossi
•Thanks so much for confirming. I actually did manage to get an account transcript yesterday and it shows our return was processed with her ITIN. So I guess we're good to go? Should I still call the IRS to have them put a note in our file about this, or is that unnecessary since the transcript shows everything was processed correctly?
0 coins
Hannah White
•Since your transcript shows the return was processed with the ITIN, you're definitely good to go. The transcript is actually better evidence than a note in your file, as it's an official record of successful processing. Calling the IRS to have them add a note is optional at this point. It won't hurt, but it's not strictly necessary since you have concrete evidence that the ITIN is functioning correctly in their system. If you do decide to call, be sure to reference both notices and the fact that your return was successfully processed with the ITIN.
0 coins
Michael Green
I just wanted to add that when you file next year, you might want to attach a cover letter explaining the situation along with copies of both the CP565 and CP567, plus a printout of your transcript showing the return was processed successfully. This creates a paper trail that will help if anyone questions the ITIN validity in the future. Also, keep in mind that ITINs expire if not used on a tax return for three consecutive years. So make sure to use it consistently, even if you're filing separate returns in some years. I've seen this exact issue at least 5 times with clients - contradiction between approval and rejection. In every case, when the return was processed with the ITIN, that trumped any rejection notice. The IRS systems just don't communicate well between departments.
0 coins
Mateo Silva
•Is it true that some ITINs have expiration dates based on when they were issued? I thought I read something about certain ranges of ITINs expiring regardless of use.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
•Yes, that's correct! The IRS implemented middle digit expiration rules for ITINs. ITINs with middle digits 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 have already expired and need to be renewed regardless of use. ITINs with middle digits 90, 91, 92, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 are set to expire at the end of 2024. You can check if your ITIN needs renewal by looking at the middle two digits. If it falls in those ranges, you'll need to submit Form W-7 with "Renewal" checked, even if you've been using the ITIN regularly. The renewal process is similar to the original application but you only need to prove identity (not foreign status again). This is separate from the "three consecutive years of non-use" expiration rule I mentioned earlier.
0 coins