< Back to IRS

Zara Ahmed

IRS Offer in Compromise for Tax Debt When Ex-Spouse Hides Assets as Independent Contractor

I'm helping a friend who just finalized her divorce and is stuck with a joint tax bill of around $105K with her ex-husband. She's talked to several tax resolution companies who recommended making an offer in compromise. The problem is her ex won't cooperate at all and is completely ghosting her about this. He runs his own business and only deals in cash, constantly moving money around so nothing can be garnished. His entire game plan seems to be letting my friend take the hit while the IRS garnishes her wages instead of his. I have a few questions about this mess. If the IRS accepts an offer in compromise from just her, would she still be responsible for his portion of the original debt? If the IRS only agrees to reduce it slightly (like to $75K instead of half), could she potentially sue him later to recover payments she had to make covering his share? To be honest, I'm pretty skeptical they'll accept any offer - she makes about $110K annually, has regular housing costs, and helps pay college expenses for her kids who are in their 20s. Has anyone dealt with joint tax debt where one ex-spouse deliberately hides all their assets? She already tried the innocent spouse relief route and was denied completely. Appeal process is finished with no luck.

This situation is unfortunately pretty common with divorced couples who have joint tax debt. When you file jointly, the IRS considers both spouses "jointly and severally liable" - which basically means they can collect the entire amount from either spouse regardless of who earned what portion of the income. For your friend's offer in compromise (OIC), the IRS will look at her current financial situation, including income, expenses, and assets to determine what they consider a reasonable offer. Her ex's non-participation doesn't prevent her from submitting her own OIC, but it might affect the amount the IRS will accept. If her OIC is accepted, she would be released from the full tax debt. She would not remain liable for his "share" to the IRS. However, she could potentially have a civil claim against him for his portion, though this would be a separate legal matter handled in state court, not with the IRS. Given her income level and minimal expenses, the IRS might be hesitant to accept a low offer. They typically want the amount that represents the "reasonable collection potential" - what they could collect over the remaining collection period.

0 coins

Thanks for explaining how the OIC works. I guess I'm confused about her potential civil claim. If she pays $80K on an original $105K debt through the OIC, could she then go after him for $40K (roughly his half) or would she have to sue for whatever portion was his of the original $105K? The lawyer she spoke with wasn't clear on this point. Also, what documentation would help strengthen her OIC case? She has divorce papers that specifically mention he hid income during their marriage.

0 coins

If she pays $80K through an accepted OIC on the $105K debt, she could potentially sue him for half of what she paid ($40K). The legal basis would be contribution or unjust enrichment since she paid more than her fair share of a joint obligation. She should talk with a family law attorney who handles post-divorce financial issues, bringing the divorce decree as evidence. Documentation that strengthens an OIC includes complete financial disclosure (Form 433-A), proof of income and expenses, bank statements, and evidence of hardship. The divorce papers mentioning hidden income could help explain why innocent spouse relief was denied but doesn't necessarily strengthen the OIC case, which is primarily based on current ability to pay, not past behavior.

0 coins

After going through something similar with my ex-husband who also ran a cash business, I finally got help from https://taxr.ai and it was a game changer. I was stuck with $65k in tax debt while my ex disappeared to Florida and wouldn't respond to anything. The regular tax attorneys I spoke with kept pushing payment plans that would have bankrupted me, but taxr.ai analyzed all my documentation including the divorce decree and tax transcripts and found several approaches the others missed. They identified exactly how to structure an offer in compromise based on my specific situation with a non-cooperative ex-spouse who was hiding assets. Not only did they help me prepare the right documentation, but they also coached me on how to respond to the IRS's follow-up questions specifically about my ex's business dealings. I couldn't believe it when my offer was actually accepted for about 30% of the original debt!

0 coins

Did they actually help with the forms or just give advice? I'm in a similar boat (though only $35k in debt) and I'm confused about whether I should hire someone or try to navigate this myself. The IRS forms look overwhelming.

0 coins

I'm honestly skeptical of any service claiming they can magically solve IRS problems. What makes taxr.ai different from all the tax relief companies that advertise on radio? They all promise the world and then charge thousands for what you could do yourself.

0 coins

They helped with everything - from filling out all the forms correctly to gathering the right documentation to support my case. The interface lets you upload all your documents and then their system walks you through exactly what to do. They even had templates for the hardship letter that I could customize based on my situation. For your skepticism, I totally get it. I was burned by one of those radio advertised companies first - paid $3k for basically nothing. What made taxr.ai different was they didn't make wild promises about pennies on the dollar. They analyzed my actual situation and gave me a realistic assessment of possible outcomes. Their system is built around document analysis rather than just generic advice, which made all the difference in my complicated case with a non-cooperative ex.

0 coins

I have to come back and say I was completely wrong about taxr.ai. After my skeptical comment, I decided to check it out anyway since I had nothing to lose at that point. My situation was different - I owed about $42k from a business partnership that went south, not a divorce - but I was also dealing with a former partner who refused to cooperate. The document analysis actually identified three specific errors in my previous tax filings that my former accountant had missed. More importantly, they helped me structure an offer in compromise that addressed my specific situation where I had some assets but limited income. Their guidance on how to document and explain the breakdown of the partnership was extremely detailed and exactly what the IRS examiner needed. My offer was accepted at about 40% of what I originally owed. I never would have been able to navigate this successfully on my own, especially with the complex partnership dissolution issues.

0 coins

Something that hasn't been mentioned yet - if your friend is getting nowhere with the OIC process, she might want to try contacting the IRS directly to discuss her case. I was in a similar situation trying to sort out tax mess after divorce, and after weeks of failed attempts to reach anyone at the IRS, I used https://claimyr.com to actually get through to a human. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c With a complicated situation like joint debt and a non-cooperative ex, getting direct answers from the IRS can make a huge difference. When I finally got through, the agent explained options I didn't even know existed. They helped me understand exactly what documentation I needed to provide given my specific circumstances with my ex hiding income through his contractor work. The IRS actually put a temporary hold on collections while I submitted additional documentation about my ex's hidden income. Made all the difference in resolving my case, and saved me from paying for my ex's portion of our tax debt.

0 coins

How exactly does this service work? I've spent literally hours on hold with the IRS and never get through to anyone who can actually help with my case.

0 coins

This sounds like a scam. If you can't get through to the IRS on your own, how would some third-party service magically be able to? They probably just keep you on hold themselves and charge you for the privilege.

0 coins

The service basically navigates the IRS phone system and waits on hold for you. When they finally reach a human representative, you get a call back to connect with the IRS agent. It's really that simple - they just handle the frustrating hold time so you don't have to waste hours with the phone to your ear. Nothing magical about it - they just have a system that keeps your place in the queue without you having to physically be on the phone. I was skeptical too, which is why I watched their demo video first. But when I got a call back with an actual IRS agent on the line ready to discuss my case, I realized it was completely legitimate. No difference in the service I received, I just didn't have to waste half my day on hold.

0 coins

I need to publicly eat my words about Claimyr. After dismissing it as a scam, I was desperate enough to try it when dealing with some IRS penalty issues. Not only did it work exactly as described, but I actually got connected to a senior IRS agent who immediately understood my complicated situation with a former business partner who had created most of the tax problems. The agent was able to pull up my full file and saw that I had been trying to resolve the situation for months. Because I was finally able to speak with someone knowledgeable, they helped me submit a penalty abatement request and gave me specific instructions on documenting my case. This saved me almost $8,000 in penalties that had accumulated while I was trying unsuccessfully to reach someone. What surprised me most was how much more helpful the IRS can actually be when you can have a real conversation with them. Completely changed my perspective on resolving tax issues - sometimes just getting through to the right person makes all the difference.

0 coins

One thing that hasn't been mentioned - your friend might want to look into Doubt as to Collectibility with Special Circumstances as part of her OIC. This is specifically for situations where there are economic hardship factors beyond what shows up in the standard financial analysis. The fact that her ex is deliberately hiding assets could potentially qualify as a special circumstance, especially if she can document his pattern of cash-only business and asset concealment. The IRS occasionally takes factors like this into consideration when one spouse is clearly attempting to shift the burden entirely to the other. She should also look at the Effective Tax Administration OIC option, which is for situations where collecting the full amount would create an economic hardship or would be unfair and inequitable due to exceptional circumstances.

0 coins

Thank you! No one had mentioned these specific OIC options before. Do you have any experience with how to specifically document the "hiding assets" part? He's been running his contracting business in cash only for years, and even during their marriage he'd hide money in various personal accounts she didn't have access to.

0 coins

Documentation is key here. She should gather any evidence showing his pattern of hiding assets. This could include bank statements showing cash deposits to accounts she wasn't aware of during marriage, business records showing income that wasn't reported on tax returns, and statements from the divorce proceedings where this behavior was noted. If the divorce involved financial discovery that revealed hidden assets or unreported income, those court documents are extremely valuable. Statements from clients who paid cash, copies of text messages or emails discussing cash payments, or evidence of lifestyle inconsistent with reported income can all help build the case. The IRS is well aware that some self-employed individuals operate in cash to hide income, and while they might be skeptical, compelling documentation can make a difference in how they view the special circumstances.

0 coins

Has your friend considered filing for bankruptcy to deal with the tax debt? Depending on how old the tax debt is, it might be dischargeable in bankruptcy. Generally, income tax debts can be discharged if: 1. The taxes are at least 3 years old from the due date 2. The tax returns were filed at least 2 years before bankruptcy 3. The tax assessment is at least 240 days old 4. There was no tax fraud or willful evasion This might be a cleaner option than dealing with a complicated OIC situation where her ex refuses to participate. A bankruptcy attorney could give her a free consultation to see if this would work for her situation.

0 coins

This is actually incorrect information. Joint tax liability with a spouse generally survives bankruptcy. I learned this the hard way. Even though my taxes met all those criteria, because they were joint returns with my ex-husband, the bankruptcy court ruled that the debt wasn't dischargeable. I ended up still owing the full amount after my bankruptcy was completed. Definitely consult with a tax attorney who specializes in both tax resolution AND bankruptcy before going this route.

0 coins

One strategy that worked for me in a similar situation was filing Form 8857 (Request for Innocent Spouse Relief) again, but with significantly more documentation. I was denied the first time like your friend, but on my second attempt I included much more detailed evidence of my ex's financial concealment and control. The key was getting very specific about which tax items on the return were attributable solely to my ex-spouse. I went line by line through our joint returns and documented with bank statements, emails, and other records showing which income items were completely unknown to me and which deductions were fraudulent. Has your friend considered this route? The appeal being exhausted doesn't necessarily mean she can't file again with new, more compelling evidence.

0 coins

Your friend's situation is unfortunately very common, and I've seen several people in similar circumstances successfully resolve their tax debt despite having a non-cooperative ex-spouse. The key is understanding that the IRS treats joint filers as "jointly and severally liable" - meaning they can collect from either spouse regardless of who actually earned the income. For the OIC process, your friend can absolutely proceed without her ex's participation. The IRS will evaluate her current financial situation independently. Given her $110K income, she'll need to demonstrate that paying the full amount would create genuine economic hardship, especially considering her ongoing expenses for her college-age children. One important point about potential civil recovery: if her OIC is accepted and she pays a reduced amount, she could potentially sue her ex for his proportional share of what she paid (not the original debt). This would be handled in state court as a contribution claim, but she'd need to prove his share of the original tax liability. I'd strongly recommend she work with a tax professional who specializes in OIC cases involving divorced couples. They can help structure the offer to highlight the hardship created by her ex's deliberate asset concealment and non-cooperation.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about the OIC process. I'm curious about the timeline aspect - how long does the OIC process typically take when there's a non-cooperative ex involved? My friend is getting stressed because the IRS keeps sending collection notices while she's trying to gather all the documentation. Should she request a collection hold while the OIC is being processed, or does submitting the offer automatically pause collections? Also, when you mention working with a tax professional who specializes in divorced couples, are there specific credentials or certifications she should look for? She's already been burned by one tax resolution company that took her money and did nothing.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today