IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just a quick tip from someone who deals with railroad retirees regularly: make sure you're accounting for any supplemental annuity payments they might receive separately. These aren't always clearly described by clients but they're reported in box 14 of the RRB-1099 and are fully taxable. The simplified method doesn't apply to this portion. I find many preparers miss this and it can lead to underreporting of taxable income.

0 coins

Omar Fawzi

•

Thank you for this tip! Is there anything special I need to enter in my software for the supplemental annuity, or do I just add it as additional taxable income from the pension?

0 coins

You should enter it as additional taxable pension income, but make sure you're not applying the simplified method calculation to this portion. Most tax software has separate entry fields for fully taxable pension income versus partially taxable amounts that need the simplified method. Just be careful not to mix them together.

0 coins

Has anyone had experience with clients who worked for both railroad and non-railroad employers? My client worked 15 years for CSX and then another 20 for a private company with a separate pension. Its getting confusing to figure out which rules apply to which benefits.

0 coins

I've had several clients like this. You need to treat each pension separately. The railroad benefits follow RRB rules with the Tier 1/Tier 2 distinction, while the private company pension follows regular IRS rules for qualified plans. You'll have both an RRB-1099 and a regular 1099-R. Don't combine them when doing the simplified method calculations.

0 coins

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - check if your Roth IRA is less than 5 years old. There's a 5-year rule that applies even to contribution withdrawals in some cases. If you established your first Roth IRA less than 5 years ago, that could potentially be why the distribution is being coded as taxable. Also, did you ever do a Roth conversion from a Traditional IRA? Those converted amounts have different 5-year rules for each conversion. The ordering rules say contributions come out first (tax-free), then conversions (potentially taxable if within 5 years), then earnings.

0 coins

Thank you for mentioning this! I've actually had my Roth since 2018, so it's been over 5 years. And I've never done any conversions - all of my contributions were direct to the Roth IRA. Based on what everyone is saying, it really sounds like Fidelity just coded the 1099-R incorrectly. I'll contact them tomorrow to request a corrected form with the right distribution code. In the meantime, I'll fill out Form 8606 Part III to document that these were contribution withdrawals and therefore not taxable. This has been super helpful!

0 coins

Glad to hear your account meets the 5-year requirement! That definitely makes things simpler. When you call Fidelity, specifically ask them to issue a corrected 1099-R with distribution code J in Box 7, which indicates an early distribution from a Roth IRA with no known exception. This is the correct code for withdrawal of contributions. Even if they take a while to issue the correction, go ahead and file with Form 8606 as you mentioned. If the IRS questions it, you'll have documentation showing these were return of contributions. Good luck!

0 coins

I work at a financial firm (not Fidelity) and this happens ALL THE TIME. The problem is that the default code our systems use for distributions under age 59½ is code 1, and someone has to manually change it to code J for Roth contribution withdrawals. Many times the customer service rep processing the distribution doesn't properly code it. Pro tip: Next time you request a distribution, specifically tell them you're withdrawing only contributions and ask them to use code J on the 1099-R. Document who you spoke with and when. If they still get it wrong, request a corrected 1099-R right away.

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

Is there any penalty to the financial institution for issuing incorrect 1099s? Seems like they should be more careful since this directly impacts people's taxes!

0 coins

There's no direct penalty to financial institutions for most 1099 errors unless they're systemic or intentional. The IRS recognizes that mistakes happen, which is why there's a process for issuing corrected forms. However, firms can face penalties for late filing or intentional misreporting. The bigger issue is that most large institutions use automated systems to generate these forms, and special situations like Roth contribution withdrawals often require manual intervention to code correctly. While annoying for customers, it's generally viewed as an administrative error rather than something that would trigger penalties.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

I've used both TurboTax Business and TaxAct for my S-Corp returns over the past few years. Here's my honest breakdown: TurboTax Business: - More thorough "interview" process that asks about every possible deduction - Better integration if you also use QuickBooks - Generally more expensive - Can be overwhelming with too many questions TaxAct: - More straightforward interface - About half the price - Fewer "hand-holding" features - Better for those who already know what deductions they want to take If this is your first year, and you have a tax advisor to back you up, I'd probably recommend TaxAct. Save the money and just consult your advisor on specific questions. The S-Corp 1120S isn't actually that complicated if your books are in order.

0 coins

Does either software handle the K-1 distributions properly? That's the part that always confuses me with my S-Corp.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

Both handle K-1s fine in my experience. TurboTax is a bit more detailed in explaining what each K-1 box means and how it will impact your personal return. TaxAct handles them correctly but with fewer explanations. The key with K-1s in either software is understanding that the income/loss flows through to your personal return. Make sure your S-Corp distributions are properly categorized - this is where people often make mistakes. Neither software will stop you if you're taking distributions that are significantly higher than your reasonable salary, which can be a red flag to the IRS.

0 coins

Has anyone tried Drake Tax Software for S-Corps? My CPA uses it and suggested I might want to try the prosumer version for my small S-Corp.

0 coins

I use Drake for my tax preparation business and it's excellent for professionals, but their small business version is not as user-friendly as TurboTax or TaxAct for non-professionals. It's powerful but assumes a higher level of tax knowledge. If your CPA is willing to give you some guidance, it might work well since you'd be using the same platform they use. But if you're completely on your own, I'd stick with TaxAct which strikes a better balance between cost and usability for S-Corp 1120S forms.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

From my experience as someone who's done both, here's my take: if your situation includes self-employment, multiple states, or unusual deductions, pay a professional the first year. Ask lots of questions, take notes, and then next year you can probably DIY it using what you learned. I paid $375 to a CPA when I first started freelancing, and she found deductions I never would have known about. The next year, I used TurboTax Self-Employed ($120ish) and felt confident because I knew what to look for. The first professional return becomes your template for future years.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

Do you think there's a dollar threshold where it becomes worth it? Like if OP is only making $13k from delivery work, maybe the deductions won't add up to enough to justify the professional fees?

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

There's not a strict dollar threshold - it's more about complexity than income amount. Even with "only" $13k in delivery income, there are potentially thousands in deductions at stake. Mileage alone at 65.5 cents per mile adds up fast for delivery drivers. If you drove 5,000 miles for deliveries, that's over $3,200 in deductions right there. The multi-state situation is another complexity factor regardless of income. Each state has different rules about what income is taxable for part-year residents. A good preparer might find state-specific credits or deductions that software might miss, especially if you don't know to look for them.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

Has anyone used H&R Block? They're running a special for $195 for self-employed returns. Wondering if they're any good for this kind of situation or if they're basically just using the same software I could buy myself?

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

Avoid H&R Block for anything complicated. They're fine for super basic returns, but for self-employment and multi-state, you're usually getting someone with minimal training who just plugs info into their software. I made this mistake and they missed several deductions a real CPA later found for me. You're better off with either good software you run yourself or an actual CPA/EA.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

One thing that seriously confused me with backdoor Roth conversions was understanding why the 1099-R shows the full amount as taxable when it shouldn't be if you made non-deductible contributions. Tax software doesn't automatically know your contribution was non-deductible. That's why Form 8606 is so important - it's where you tell the IRS "Hey, I already paid tax on this money, don't tax me again!" If you're struggling with the software interface, sometimes it helps to read through the actual Form 8606 instructions on the IRS website first, then go back to the software. The actual form is more straightforward than how some tax apps present it.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

This is so true! I was panicking when I saw my 1099-R showing the entire distribution as taxable. I almost paid thousands in unnecessary taxes before realizing I needed to complete Form 8606.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Warning: Don't forget that if you have ANY other traditional IRA funds (including SEP or SIMPLE IRAs), you'll get hit with the pro-rata rule when doing backdoor Roth conversions. This catches a lot of people by surprise. For example, if you have $50,000 in a traditional IRA from an old 401k rollover, and you add $6,000 non-deductible for a backdoor Roth, you can't just convert the $6,000 and call it non-taxable. The IRS considers all your IRA funds as one pool, so only about 10.7% of your conversion would be non-taxable.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Oh wow, I didn't realize this! Thankfully I don't have any other traditional IRA funds, but this is really important info. Does this also apply if my spouse has traditional IRA funds or are those treated separately?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Good news - your spouse's IRAs are completely separate for pro-rata calculations. The IRS treats each individual's IRA accounts as their own pool, so your backdoor Roth conversion won't be affected by anything your spouse has in their traditional IRAs. That's one of the few areas where the IRS is actually taxpayer-friendly in these calculations! Just make sure you each file your own Form 8606 if you're both doing backdoor Roth conversions.

0 coins

Prev1...33913392339333943395...5643Next