


Ask the community...
Your friend needs to act fast - the longer he waits, the worse this gets. I've seen similar cases where foreign LLC owners thought they could just ignore US tax obligations, and it rarely ends well. First, he absolutely needs to find out his current status. The IRS transcript request is the fastest way - he can get it online or by fax. If penalties have already been assessed, interest is accruing daily at around 8% annually. Regarding just walking away - this is a terrible idea. Even if he's not planning to return to the US, the IRS has increasing cooperation with foreign tax authorities. Argentina has tax information exchange agreements with the US. Plus, if he ever wants to do business with US entities again or travel here, unpaid tax debts will follow him. The smart move is voluntary disclosure with a reasonable cause statement. For a first-time filer who genuinely didn't understand the requirements, there's a good chance of getting significant penalty relief. But he needs professional help - this isn't a DIY situation given the amounts involved. Don't let him panic into making a decision he'll regret for decades. The IRS would rather have someone in compliance than chase uncollectable debt overseas.
This is excellent advice. I've been following this thread because I'm dealing with a similar situation with my German business partner's LLC. The key point about Argentina having tax information exchange agreements with the US is something people often overlook - it's not like he can just disappear into the void. @52aa668d89da You mentioned voluntary disclosure with reasonable cause - do you know if there's a specific timeframe where this approach works best? Like, is there a point where waiting too long makes the IRS less likely to accept reasonable cause arguments? Also, for anyone else reading this - the daily interest accrual point is crucial. Even if you think you can negotiate the penalties down, that interest keeps building while you're figuring things out.
I went through something very similar with my French business partner's LLC last year. The $25k per year penalties are no joke, but there are definitely options before considering just walking away. For checking penalty status without physical mail access, your friend should immediately request IRS transcripts online at irs.gov. He'll need to verify his identity, but this will show exactly what's been assessed against the LLC. The transcript will include any penalties, notices, and payment history. Regarding just not paying - this is really risky even for foreign nationals. The IRS has been getting much more aggressive about international collections, especially with LLCs that have US bank accounts or assets. They can freeze those accounts, file liens, and as others mentioned, tax treaties mean this could follow him internationally. The better path is definitely voluntary disclosure with a strong reasonable cause statement. I've seen cases where penalties were reduced by 70-90% when the taxpayer came forward proactively. Key factors that helped: demonstrating good faith effort to comply, showing it was due to unfamiliarity with US tax law rather than willful neglect, and having a clear plan for future compliance. He should also consider whether the LLC actually had reportable transactions - sometimes the penalties can be challenged if there were truly no reportable events, though this is fact-specific. Get professional help ASAP - the interest meter is running and early action makes all the difference in penalty abatement requests.
This is really helpful perspective from someone who's actually been through it. The 70-90% penalty reduction you mentioned gives me hope for similar situations. One question - when you say "reportable transactions," are you referring specifically to transactions between the foreign owner and the LLC, or does this include things like the LLC paying regular business expenses? I'm trying to understand if having minimal business activity might actually help reduce the penalty exposure in some cases. Also, did your French partner end up needing to file amended personal returns as well, or was this purely a business-level issue? Trying to get a sense of how complex this gets beyond just the Form 5472.
This is a common situation that many people organizing informal fundraisers face. The key thing to understand is that the IRS cares more about the economic substance of transactions than the technical flow of funds. Since you're acting as a conduit rather than the beneficial owner of the money, you generally won't owe taxes on these funds - but you need to be prepared to prove that. Here's what I'd recommend: 1. Keep detailed records of every incoming Venmo transfer with donor names and amounts 2. Document the purpose of the fundraiser (emails, social media posts, etc.) 3. Get a receipt from the charity showing the final donation amount and date 4. If you receive a 1099-K from Venmo, you can file Form 1040 with an explanation that these were pass-through funds, not income For the person receiving the final transfer, they should also document that this was collected money being donated on behalf of others, not a personal gift from you. They'll be able to claim the charitable deduction, but ethically they might want to coordinate with the original donors about this. The cleanest approach for future fundraisers would be to have people donate directly to the charity or use a platform designed for this purpose, but your current setup isn't uncommon and can be handled properly with good documentation.
This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the Form 1040 explanation you mentioned - do you just write a letter and attach it, or is there a specific form or line where you'd note that the 1099-K amounts were pass-through funds? I want to make sure I handle this correctly if I end up in a similar situation.
For the Form 1040 explanation, you would typically attach a statement to your return explaining the discrepancy. You'd report the 1099-K amount as "Other Income" on Schedule 1, then subtract the same amount as "Other Adjustments" with a note like "Funds collected as agent for charity - not taxable income." Alternatively, some tax preparers recommend including a detailed statement explaining that you were acting as a conduit/agent and that the funds were immediately transferred to the intended charity. The key is creating a clear paper trail that shows you never had beneficial ownership of the money. Just make sure you have all the documentation @StarStrider mentioned - without proper records, the IRS might not accept your explanation that these were pass-through funds rather than income to you.
Great question! I had a similar situation when I organized a fundraiser for our local food bank last year. One thing that helped me sleep better at night was creating a simple spreadsheet tracking every donation - date received, donor name (if they were comfortable sharing), amount, and any notes from the Venmo transaction. I also sent a group message to all the donors explaining that the final donation would be made by [person's name] but was funded by everyone's contributions. This way there was transparency about who would be claiming the tax deduction, and some donors were able to make direct donations to get their own receipts if they preferred. The person who made the final donation should definitely keep the charity's receipt, but consider asking the charity if they can provide a letter acknowledging that the donation came from a group fundraising effort. Some organizations are willing to do this, which helps document the true source of the funds. Also worth noting - if this becomes a regular thing you do, you might want to look into becoming a registered fundraiser in your state, as some states have requirements for people who regularly collect charitable donations on behalf of others.
This is such a thoughtful approach! The transparency with donors about who would claim the deduction is really smart - I hadn't thought about that aspect. I'm curious about the registered fundraiser requirement you mentioned. Do you know what the threshold typically is for when that becomes necessary? Like if someone does one fundraiser a year versus multiple, or is it based on dollar amounts? I'd hate to accidentally violate state requirements while trying to help a good cause.
This is definitely unemployment fraud and you should absolutely not do this. I work in tax preparation and see the aftermath of these situations regularly. The IRS and state unemployment offices have sophisticated cross-referencing systems that will catch discrepancies between your unemployment claims and tax filings. When you file your 2025 taxes claiming a newborn dependent born in December, but also received unemployment benefits during that same period for being "laid off," that's going to trigger automatic flags in the system. The timeline will be obvious - you can't be actively seeking work while in the hospital giving birth and caring for a newborn. Beyond the fraud issue, there are legitimate options you should explore first. Many people don't realize that short-term disability insurance often covers pregnancy and childbirth recovery. Check your employee benefits package - you might already have this coverage. Also, some states have temporary disability insurance programs that provide partial wage replacement during recovery from childbirth. If your employer is genuinely experiencing financial hardship and can't provide paid leave, they should be honest about that rather than suggesting illegal workarounds. There may be legitimate ways to structure unpaid leave with partial income replacement through proper channels. Document everything about these conversations and consult with an employment attorney if needed. Your employer putting you in this position is problematic on multiple levels.
As someone new to this community, I really appreciate seeing all these detailed responses about such an important issue. This thread has been incredibly educational - I had no idea how sophisticated the cross-referencing systems are between unemployment and tax filings. @de30959ad4b5 Your point about the automatic flags when filing taxes with a newborn dependent during the same period as unemployment claims is particularly eye-opening. It seems like the technology makes it almost impossible to get away with this kind of fraud, even if someone wanted to try. The consensus here seems clear that what the employer is suggesting is absolutely not worth the risk. I'm curious though - for someone in Carmen's situation, what would be the best first step? Should she start by checking her current benefits package for short-term disability, or would it be better to contact an employment attorney first to document these problematic conversations with her employer? Thanks to everyone for sharing their knowledge and experiences. This kind of information could save someone from making a very costly mistake.
As someone who's dealt with similar employer pressure in the past, I want to emphasize how important it is to trust your instincts here. You already know this feels wrong, and you're absolutely right to be concerned. What your employer is suggesting isn't just risky - it's a federal crime. Unemployment fraud can result in criminal charges, hefty fines, and having to repay benefits with penalties and interest. The fact that they're explicitly telling you to lie about your pregnancy makes this even more serious. I'd recommend taking these steps immediately: 1. Document everything - follow up any verbal conversations with emails "confirming what we discussed" 2. Review your employee handbook and benefits package for any short-term disability coverage 3. Research your state's pregnancy/disability benefits programs 4. Consider consulting with an employment attorney, especially since your employer is pressuring you to commit fraud Remember, a good employer should be helping you find legitimate solutions, not asking you to break the law. The fact that they've suggested this before shows a pattern of problematic behavior that could put other employees at risk too. Your financial needs during maternity leave are valid and important, but there are legal ways to address them. Don't let your employer's "solution" jeopardize your future financial security and legal standing.
Just to add a potentially useful resource - publication 556 "Examination of Returns, Appeal Rights, and Claims for Refund" has detailed information about the limitations on refund claims. The key section for your case would be the "Time for Filing a Claim for Refund" portion. Also look into "protective claims" which are sometimes allowed even after limitations periods have passed if there were special circumstances. Not sure if your situation qualifies, but worth investigating. If you filed during COVID, there were also special extensions to some filing deadlines that might potentially apply to your situation. The IRS issued several notices extending various deadlines.
Thank you for these suggestions. I'll definitely look into publication 556 and the protective claims option. My filing in 2021 was during COVID, so I'll also research if any of those special provisions might apply to my situation. Do you think it would be worth hiring a tax attorney for a $75K issue like this? Or should I try working through IRS channels first?
For $75K, I would absolutely consult with a tax attorney who specializes in IRS disputes - many offer free initial consultations. Try to find someone who has specific experience with statute of limitations issues and refund claims. You should simultaneously pursue IRS channels since there are strict time limits on certain appeals. Start with a formal written request for reconsideration that clearly lays out why you believe the statute of limitations shouldn't apply in your case. Be extremely specific about timelines, payment designations, and any COVID-related provisions that might apply. The Taxpayer Advocate Service can also be extremely helpful as a third option - they're designed to help with exactly these kinds of issues where standard IRS procedures have resulted in unfair outcomes.
I'm really sorry you're going through this - $75K is an enormous amount to lose to a technicality. While the statute of limitations rules are unfortunately strict, there might be some avenues worth exploring given the amount involved. One thing that stands out to me is that you consistently elected to keep overpayments with the IRS rather than taking refunds - this shows a clear pattern of intending to maintain credit balances for future tax obligations. Some courts have distinguished between different types of payments and credits in similar cases. Have you looked into whether any of the COVID-related relief provisions might apply to your timeline? The IRS issued numerous deadline extensions and special procedures during 2020-2021 that could potentially affect limitation periods. Also, consider whether there were any IRS processing delays or errors that contributed to this situation. If you can document that the IRS failed to properly process your returns or apply your payments in a timely manner, that might provide grounds for an exception. Given the amount involved, I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax attorney who specializes in statute of limitations cases before accepting this outcome. Many offer free consultations and could quickly assess whether you have viable options for recovery. Don't give up yet - $75K is worth fighting for, and there are specialized advocates who deal with exactly these types of IRS disputes.
This is such a frustrating situation, and I really feel for you dealing with this bureaucratic nightmare. The fact that you were being responsible by keeping money with the IRS instead of taking refunds only to potentially owe later makes this even more maddening. I'm curious - when you say you've been doing this pattern for years of rolling over overpayments, do you have documentation of previous years where this worked without issue? If the IRS accepted and applied these credit elections in prior years without problems, that might help establish that their current interpretation is inconsistent with their own past practices. Also, have you requested a complete account transcript for all the relevant years? Sometimes there are processing entries or notes in the IRS system that aren't visible to frontline agents but could be crucial for an appeal. The transcript might show exactly how and when they handled your payments, which could reveal processing errors or inconsistencies. One more thought - if you can demonstrate that following the IRS's own guidance led to this situation (like if their forms or publications suggested that credit elections would preserve your funds), that might be grounds for arguing they should be estopped from enforcing the strict limitation period against you. Definitely agree with the attorney recommendation - $75K is absolutely worth professional help, especially since there may be procedural deadlines for appeals that you can't afford to miss.
Camila Castillo
Quick warning about cashing old bonds - the bank teller might not know how to handle them properly! When I cashed my old EE bonds, the first bank I went to reported the ENTIRE amount as interest on my 1099-INT, not just the interest portion. It was a huge headache to fix. Make sure whoever cashes them understands the difference between the principal (what you paid for the bond) and the interest (what you earned). The 1099-INT should only show the interest amount.
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
ā¢This happened to me too! I ended up having to file an amended return because the bank reported it wrong. Such a pain. I recommend going to a larger bank branch where they handle bonds more frequently.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
Just to add another perspective here - if you're dealing with multiple old bonds from different years, it might be worth keeping detailed records of when you cash each one. I had EE bonds from 1991, 1992, and 1993 that I found all at once, and when I cashed them in 2023, the bank lumped all the interest together on one 1099-INT. This created some confusion because technically each bond had different interest calculation periods and rates. I ended up having to request separate documentation from the Treasury to show the breakdown for my records. Not a huge deal, but something to be aware of if you're in a similar situation with multiple bond years. Also seconding what others said about those 1992 bonds likely being done earning interest - definitely get them cashed sooner rather than later!
0 coins
TommyKapitz
ā¢That's really helpful advice about keeping detailed records! I actually have bonds from 1991, 1992, and 1994 that I found in the same box, so this is exactly the situation I'm dealing with. Did you have any trouble with the IRS accepting your tax return when the 1099-INT amounts were all lumped together like that? I'm worried about potential discrepancies if I need to show different calculation periods for each bond year. Also, how long did it take to get the separate documentation from Treasury? I'm hoping to get this sorted before next tax season.
0 coins