


Ask the community...
Has anyone used TurboTax to figure this out? I'm in literally the same situation (26, lived with parents most of 2024, made under the threshold) and the software keeps giving me conflicting answers about my status when I try different paths.
I used TurboTax last year for a similar situation. The trick is to answer the dependent questions very carefully. When it asks "Did someone provide more than half your support?" make sure you're calculating TOTAL support correctly. Housing, food, utilities, medical expenses, education, etc. all count as support, not just direct cash they gave you.
I went through this exact situation two years ago! The key thing that helped me was creating a detailed support calculation spreadsheet. I tracked everything - rent value for the months I lived with my parents, groceries they bought, utilities, even car insurance they paid. What surprised me was that the "fair rental value" of living at home was way higher than I expected - like $800/month in my area. When I added up ALL the support (not just cash), my parents had definitely provided more than half my total support for the year, even though I was working. The good news is you have options here. Even if you qualify as a Qualifying Relative, your parents can choose not to claim you if that works better for your family's overall tax situation. But as others mentioned, you'd still need to check the box saying you CAN be claimed. I ended up having my parents claim me because their tax savings were bigger than what I would have gotten filing independently, and they shared some of that savings with me. My advice: sit down with your parents, calculate the actual numbers for both scenarios, and make the decision that benefits your family most overall.
Has anyone else had their stimulus checks garnished for child support? I'm worried that if I file now to get the past stimulus money, it might all go to my back child support instead of to me. Really need this money for rent.
I was in a very similar situation - divorced and hadn't filed since 2018 due to complications with my ex's business documentation. Here's what I learned after finally getting caught up: You can absolutely still claim the stimulus payments! The key deadlines people mention are for the original automatic payments, but there's no deadline for claiming them as Recovery Rebate Credits when you file your returns. You have 3 years from the original filing deadline to file and get refunds. A few important things I wish I'd known earlier: - File your returns in chronological order (2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, etc.) - The stimulus payments are claimed on specific years: 2020 return for first two payments, 2021 return for the third - If you're due refunds (which you likely are with the stimulus credits), there are no late filing penalties - Keep detailed records of everything since you'll be mailing paper returns The whole process took me about 6 months to complete, but I ended up getting back over $4,000 in stimulus money plus additional refunds I wasn't expecting. Don't let the overwhelm stop you - start with gathering your documents for 2018 and work forward. You've got this!
I think everyone is missing that this is actually a Schedule C issue, not really an LLC issue. Since a single-member LLC is a disregarded entity, you're filing a Schedule C with your personal return. The real question is: can you deduct these business expenses on Schedule C when they're indirectly increasing your W-2 income rather than generating Schedule C income? The answer is complicated. You'd need to prove you have a legitimate business (not a hobby) with a clear profit motive. The fact that you intend to eventually serve these clients directly might help establish that. But I think there's a more immediate problem: the expenses you're incurring need to be ordinary and necessary for YOUR business. If your business doesn't have income yet, the IRS might question how these expenses are necessary for a non-existent business rather than just supporting your employment.
That makes sense. So what if OP restructured to have the LLC provide marketing services directly to their employer? Would that create a cleaner separation and establish the LLC as a legitimate business with its own income stream?
That's a really smart suggestion. Having the LLC bill the employer directly for marketing services would create a much cleaner business structure and establish legitimate business income. It would transform the arrangement from "personal expenses that indirectly help employment income" to "business providing services for payment." This would also help with the profit motive issue since the LLC would have a clear revenue stream from day one, even if expenses initially exceed that income. The IRS is much more comfortable with businesses that have some income but operate at a loss initially, versus businesses with zero income and only expenses. @Mia Roberts - you might want to discuss this restructuring option with your employer and accountant. It could solve most of the tax issues while keeping the same economic arrangement.
I've been following this discussion and want to add something important that hasn't been mentioned yet - the timing of when you claim these losses matters a lot for audit risk. If your LLC shows losses for multiple consecutive years with no income, that's going to raise red flags with the IRS's automated systems. They have algorithms that flag returns with unusual patterns, and a Schedule C showing only expenses year after year is definitely unusual. Beyond the hobby loss rules everyone's discussing, you also need to consider the "material participation" requirements if your LLC activities are considered passive. Since you're not actively running a separate business but rather supporting your W-2 role, the IRS might classify this as a passive activity, which has its own set of rules for deducting losses against other income. I'd strongly recommend implementing the suggestion about having your LLC bill your employer directly for marketing services. Even if it's just covering part of your current expenses, having some legitimate business income from day one will make your tax position much stronger and reduce audit risk significantly. Also, make sure you're keeping detailed records of how each marketing expense connects to specific business activities and potential future income. The IRS will want to see that these are genuine business expenses, not personal expenses disguised as business deductions.
One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure to check if Colombia has any specific inheritance tax or reporting requirements that could affect the timing or structure of the inheritance. Some countries require certain paperwork to be filed before assets can be transferred to foreign heirs. Also, since you're dealing with beachfront property, consider whether there might be any restrictions on foreign ownership in Colombia that could complicate the inheritance process. Some countries have limitations on non-residents owning coastal property. It might be worth consulting with a Colombian attorney or tax advisor who specializes in cross-border inheritances to make sure everything is handled properly on both sides. The last thing you want is to have compliance issues in Colombia that could delay or complicate receiving the inheritance, especially when you're trying to plan for US reporting requirements. Good luck with everything - foreign inheritance can be complicated but it sounds like you're being proactive about understanding the requirements!
This is such a great point about checking Colombian requirements! I'm actually in a similar situation with a potential inheritance from my grandmother in Brazil, and I found out there are specific bureaucratic steps that have to be completed in Brazil before any assets can be transferred to US heirs. The process can take months or even years depending on the complexity of the estate and local court requirements. It's definitely worth getting ahead of this early, especially since you mentioned it's a "potential" inheritance - understanding the Colombian side now could save a lot of headaches later. Also, regarding the foreign ownership restrictions on coastal property - that's something I hadn't even thought about but makes total sense. Some countries have constitutional restrictions on foreign ownership of beachfront land that could significantly complicate things. Thanks for bringing up these important points that go beyond just the US tax implications!
Just wanted to add another perspective on the timing aspect that might be helpful. When my father-in-law passed away in the Philippines, we discovered that the fair market value for US tax purposes is determined on the date you actually receive the inheritance, not when the person passes away or when the will is read. This ended up being important because there was about an 18-month delay between his death and when we actually received the property due to Philippine probate procedures. The property value had increased significantly during that time, which pushed us over the $100k threshold for Form 3520 reporting. So even though your husband's estimated share is currently around $80k, if there are delays in the Colombian inheritance process and the property appreciates in value, you might end up crossing that reporting threshold by the time you actually receive it. It might be worth keeping track of the property's value over time and having a plan for Form 3520 filing just in case. Better to be prepared than caught off guard if the inheritance ends up being larger than expected when it's finally received.
Kai Santiago
I'm confused about something - if we're paying our state taxes anyway, why does it matter whether we can deduct them or not? Like we still have to pay them either way right? Sorry if this is a dumb question, I'm new to this tax stuff.
0 coins
Lim Wong
•Not a dumb question at all! The deduction matters because it reduces your federal taxable income. Let's say you pay $40,000 in state taxes. With the $10,000 SALT cap, you can only deduct $10,000 of that from your federal taxable income. But if the cap expires, you could deduct the full $40,000, which means you're paying federal tax on $30,000 less income. If you're in the 35% federal bracket, that's a savings of about $10,500 ($30,000 × 35%). So yes, you still pay the state taxes either way, but the question is whether the federal government lets you reduce your federal taxes based on what you paid to your state.
0 coins
Anita George
This is such an important topic that doesn't get enough attention! I've been dealing with this exact situation in Massachusetts where our state income tax plus property taxes put us way over the $10k SALT cap. One thing I'd add to the discussion is that even if the SALT cap expires as scheduled, there's no guarantee it won't come back in some form. The revenue loss from unlimited SALT deductions is significant - around $80 billion annually according to some estimates. Given federal budget pressures, I wouldn't be surprised if we see some kind of compromise, maybe a higher cap like $25k instead of unlimited deductions. For planning purposes, I'm assuming the best case scenario (full expiration) but also preparing for the possibility that some limitation remains. It's worth running projections for both scenarios, especially if you're making decisions about major purchases or timing of deductible expenses.
0 coins