< Back to IRS

Anastasia Sokolov

How to Report Taxes for Silent Partner in Real Estate Sale When Not On Deed

I'm in a tricky tax situation and looking for advice from anyone who's been through something similar. About 8 months ago, I purchased a residential property with the intention of fixing it up and renting it out. The property is only in my name on the deed, but I have a verbal agreement with a friend to split everything 50/50 (purchase costs, renovation expenses, and eventual profits). Well, we finished the renovations last month, but instead of renting it out as originally planned, we got an offer we couldn't refuse and decided to sell. The sale just closed, and now I'm trying to figure out the tax reporting situation. We never formed an official partnership - just a handshake agreement. No rental income was ever received, so there's no depreciation recapture to worry about. I'm confused about how to handle this for tax purposes. Do I: 1) Report the full sale on my tax return (Form 4797 or Form 8949) and then deduct a 50% payment as an expense, issuing a 1099-MISC to my friend? 2) Report the entire sale on my tax return, calculate the taxes due, and then give my friend 50% of the net proceeds after taxes? Would this then be considered a gift from me to him? We're not in the house flipping business - this was just a one-time opportunity that came our way. Any advice on the cleanest way to handle this would be greatly appreciated!

Sean O'Connor

•

Your situation is what's commonly called an "undocumented partnership" or "silent partner arrangement" in real estate. Since there was an agreement to share profits despite only one name being on the deed, the IRS would likely view this as an informal partnership. The cleanest approach would be option 1 - report the full sale on your return, then issue a 1099-NEC (not MISC) to your partner for their 50% share. This treats the arrangement as what it essentially was - a business arrangement where you're distributing profits. The 1099-NEC is appropriate since you're paying them for their partnership role in the venture. Don't go with option 2 (claiming all profits yourself and giving them money after taxes). This creates problems because your friend wouldn't be paying their fair share of taxes, and it misrepresents the actual arrangement to the IRS. It's not a gift - it's a business distribution. One important note: since you never rented the property, this would likely be treated as a short-term capital gain if held less than a year. The 1099 should reflect their portion of the profit (proceeds minus purchase price and renovation costs), not just 50% of the gross sales price.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

Thanks for this info - very helpful. Question though: wouldn't issuing a 1099-NEC suggest that the silent partner was providing services rather than capital? I thought 1099-NECs were for contractors/service providers, not investment partners? Wouldn't this be more of a 1099-MISC Box 3 (Other Income) situation since they're essentially receiving investment income?

0 coins

Sean O'Connor

•

You raise a good point about the distinction. The 1099-NEC is primarily for services rendered as an independent contractor, while investment income typically falls under different reporting requirements. For an informal partnership arrangement like this, you're right that a 1099-MISC with Box 3 (Other Income) might be more appropriate since the partner contributed capital rather than services. Alternatively, some tax professionals might suggest filing a simple partnership return (Form 1065) even for a one-time deal, which would distribute Schedule K-1s to both partners, clearly documenting the profit-sharing arrangement.

0 coins

Luca Conti

•

I went through something almost identical last year and found the best solution using taxr.ai https://taxr.ai to analyze my specific situation. I had a verbal agreement with my brother-in-law on a property flip, only my name on the deed, and we weren't sure how to handle the taxes. The service helped me understand that we had what's called a "joint venture" for tax purposes, even without formal documentation. They suggested filing Form 1065 (partnership return) with Schedule K-1s for both of us, which perfectly documented our profit sharing and gave us both the correct tax basis. This was actually cleaner than the 1099 route because it properly allocated the capital gains to each of us rather than one person claiming all the sale and then "paying" the other. Their document analysis confirmed this was the right approach for our specific situation, which saved us both money and prevented potential audit flags. The whole process took less than 48 hours to get clarity.

0 coins

Nia Johnson

•

How does taxr.ai actually work? Do you need to upload all your documents or just describe the situation? I'm in a somewhat similar situation except I'm the silent partner, and my friend who's on the deed isn't sure how to handle the taxes. Would like to suggest a solution that works for both of us.

0 coins

CyberNinja

•

Does taxr.ai also help with determining the correct basis for each partner? In my situation, I put in 60% of the cash but my partner did most of the renovation work (sweat equity). We're selling next month and I'm trying to figure out how to properly account for everything.

0 coins

Luca Conti

•

The service works by analyzing whatever documents you upload related to your tax situation. In my case, I uploaded our informal agreement text messages, property deed, renovation receipts, and closing statement. They have tax pros who review everything and provide detailed guidance specific to your situation. Yes, they absolutely help with determining correct basis calculations. That's actually one of the most valuable parts of the service. They helped us properly account for both cash contributions and non-cash contributions (like your partner's sweat equity). They'll explain how to document and value the renovation work your partner did so both cash and labor are accounted for in the basis calculations.

0 coins

Nia Johnson

•

Just wanted to follow up - I ended up trying taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here and it was exactly what we needed. Uploaded our text messages where we agreed to the partnership, bank transfers showing my investment, and the property documents. Got a detailed analysis explaining that we had what's called a "tax partnership" even without formal paperwork. They recommended filing Form 1065 and issuing K-1s to properly allocate the capital gains between us. This saved us from my friend reporting all the income and issuing me a 1099, which would have resulted in higher overall taxes. The most valuable part was their detailed explanation of how to correctly calculate our respective basis in the property, considering that I contributed cash while my friend handled the purchasing and selling process. Much clearer than what we found googling around!

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

If you've tried calling the IRS to get guidance on partnership reporting, you know it's nearly impossible to get through. I spent 3+ hours on hold multiple times trying to clarify a similar situation. Finally used Claimyr https://claimyr.com and got connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes who clarified everything. There's a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent confirmed that informal partnerships should ideally file Form 1065 even for one-time deals like yours, but also explained the alternative reporting methods if you don't want to go that route. Having an actual IRS opinion on record was huge for my peace of mind before filing. The agent also explained that if you don't file as a partnership, the 1099 approach works but creates more complicated reporting and potentially higher overall taxes compared to proper partnership reporting with K-1s. Getting official guidance directly from the IRS helped me make the right decision.

0 coins

How does this Claimyr service actually work? I'm very skeptical about anything claiming to get through to the IRS quickly when their phone lines are notoriously jammed. Is this legit or just another way to collect fees?

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

Did the IRS agent actually give you specific guidance on your situation? Every time I've called (when I could get through), they refuse to give any "tax advice" and just refer me to a publication. Would be amazing if they actually answered a specific question like this.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

The service uses call technology to continuously dial and navigate the IRS phone system until it gets through, then calls you to connect. It's essentially automated hold-waiting. When I used it, I got the text notification about 20 minutes after signing up, and was connected directly to an agent without having to go through the phone tree again. The agent was actually quite helpful with specific guidance. You're right that they won't give "tax advice" officially, but they will clarify how to properly apply tax rules to specific scenarios. In my case, they explained the proper filing options for informal partnerships and the implications of each. I made sure to phrase my questions as "how to comply with reporting requirements" rather than asking what would save me the most money. That approach got me clear, specific answers about Form 1065 vs. alternative reporting methods.

0 coins

I need to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After seeing it mentioned here, I decided to try it despite my skepticism. I had been trying to get through to the IRS for WEEKS about an informal partnership situation similar to the original poster's. Got connected to an IRS representative in about 25 minutes (compared to my previous failed attempts waiting 2+ hours and getting disconnected). The agent walked me through the proper way to report an undocumented partnership and confirmed that filing Form 1065 was the correct approach rather than the 1099 method I was considering. What impressed me most was being able to get an official answer from the IRS rather than relying on internet advice. The agent even provided me with the specific publication sections that addressed my situation. Now I have confidence that I'm filing correctly and won't have issues down the road. Complete game-changer for getting tax questions answered.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

I think everyone is overlooking a simpler approach. This sounds like it might qualify as a "tenancy in common" situation rather than a partnership, especially if you never operated a business (like renting). In that case, each of you would just report your share of the gain on your own Schedule D. No need for partnership returns or 1099s. The fact that only one name is on the deed complicates things, but if you have documentation showing the original agreement to split everything 50/50, that should be sufficient to establish the tenancy in common. Would definitely recommend getting a tax pro's take on this specific to your situation, but wanted to mention this alternative that might be simpler than partnership reporting.

0 coins

Thanks for bringing up this option - I hadn't considered the tenancy in common approach. How would this work practically though? Since I'm the only one on the deed, I'll be receiving the 1099-S from the sale. Wouldn't the IRS expect my tax return to match that document?

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

You're right about the 1099-S issue - that's the main complication with this approach. Since you received the 1099-S for the full amount, you have two options: First, you could report the full amount on your Schedule D to match the 1099-S, but only report 50% of the gain (effectively giving your partner a 50% basis in the property). Your partner would then report their 50% of the gain on their Schedule D without a corresponding 1099-S. Or second, you could file a Form 1065 partnership return as others have suggested, which would properly allocate everything via K-1s. This creates more paperwork but makes the allocation clearer to the IRS. In either case, you'd want solid documentation of your original 50/50 agreement. If you go the Schedule D route, I'd include a statement with your return explaining the situation and why you're only reporting 50% of the gain despite receiving a 1099-S for the full amount.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Be careful about ignoring the partnership angle. I tried to treat a similar situation as just "helping a friend" and splitting profits, and ended up with an audit. Since there was a profit-sharing agreement, the IRS deemed it a partnership regardless of what we called it. Their position was that when two or more people join together to purchase/improve property with the intent to make money, that's a partnership for tax purposes - even without formal documentation. The safest approach is filing Form 1065 and issuing K-1s. If you really don't want to do that, at minimum document everything clearly and have a written explanation ready if questioned. Whatever you do, don't just have one person report everything and pay the other under the table - that's asking for trouble!

0 coins

MidnightRider

•

How bad was the audit? Did you end up owing a lot more in taxes or penalties? I'm in a somewhat similar situation but we've already reported it as one person taking all the gain and just giving the partner money (which we didn't report). Now I'm worried...

0 coins

You should definitely consider filing an amended return to properly report this as a partnership. The IRS has algorithms that flag situations where large sums are transferred between people around the time of asset sales - they're looking for exactly this kind of unreported income splitting. During my audit, they found the bank transfers between me and my partner and questioned why money was changing hands if we weren't in business together. I ended up owing additional taxes plus penalties and interest because they reclassified it as a partnership retroactively. The good news is that if you file an amended return voluntarily before they catch it, you'll typically only owe the additional taxes and interest - no penalties. Much better than waiting for them to find it. I'd strongly recommend talking to a tax professional about filing Form 1040X and the appropriate partnership documents.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now - bought a property with my cousin, only my name on the deed, verbal 50/50 agreement, and we just sold it. After reading through all these responses, I'm leaning toward filing Form 1065 and issuing K-1s. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the importance of documenting your agreement NOW if you haven't already. Even though the sale is complete, having a written record of your original 50/50 agreement (even if it's just an email or text message confirmation) will be crucial if the IRS ever questions the arrangement. Also, make sure you're both on the same page about which approach you're taking. My cousin and I initially had different ideas about how to handle this, and it could have created a mess if we'd filed inconsistent returns. The partnership route with K-1s ensures you're both reporting the same information in the same way. The Form 1065 might seem like overkill for a one-time deal, but it's actually the cleanest way to document what actually happened - two people investing together to make a profit. Better to do it right the first time than deal with complications later.

0 coins

CosmicVoyager

•

This is excellent advice, especially about documenting the agreement after the fact. I'm actually in a similar boat - just closed on a property sale with my business partner last week, and we had the same verbal 50/50 arrangement. Reading through this thread has been incredibly helpful. One question for you - did you end up needing to get an EIN (Employer Identification Number) for the partnership to file Form 1065? I've been trying to figure out if that's required even for a one-time partnership like this, or if we can use one of our SSNs. Also wondering about the timing - our sale closed in December, so I assume we'd need to file the partnership return by March 15th rather than April 15th? Completely agree about getting on the same page with your partner beforehand. We almost went down different paths until we had a proper conversation about it. The K-1 route definitely seems like the most transparent approach for everyone involved.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today