How should my S-Corp K-1 income be classified: Passive versus Nonpassive on Schedule E?
I was going through my 2024 tax prep and noticed something odd when looking at last year's return. My accountant (EA) categorized all my S-Corp K-1 income as passive income on my 1040 Schedule E. That seems wrong to me since I'm literally the only employee of my S-Corp, and I'm the one actively doing all the work for my clients. Nothing "passive" about that! I've been profitable every year (no losses), so I'm wondering if this misclassification actually matters for last year's return. Can I just have him fix it going forward for this tax year? Or is this something I need to correct? Also, I noticed that classifying my income as passive seems to have affected my Form 8960 (Net Investment Income Tax). If my income should have been nonpassive, then it looks like it should have been excluded from this calculation, which means I probably overpaid. In that case, I'm thinking I might need to file an amended return anyway. Anyone dealt with this issue before? How important is getting the passive vs. nonpassive classification right for an S-Corp owner who's actively involved in the business?
20 comments


NebulaKnight
This is definitely something you should address. As the only employee actively participating in the S-Corp, your income should almost certainly be classified as nonpassive income on your Schedule E. The IRS has specific rules about this - when you materially participate in the business (which it sounds like you clearly do), the income should be nonpassive. The misclassification does matter even though you didn't have losses. As you correctly identified, passive income is subject to the Net Investment Income Tax (3.8%) on Form 8960 if your income is above certain thresholds. Nonpassive income from an S-Corp where you materially participate should not be subject to this tax. You should consider filing an amended return (Form 1040-X) for the previous year to correct this error and potentially get a refund for the overpaid NIIT. The statute of limitations for claiming a refund is generally 3 years from the filing date, so you likely still have time.
0 coins
Dylan Wright
•Thanks for the clear explanation! So if I'm understanding correctly, this classification error might have cost me an extra 3.8% in taxes that I shouldn't have paid? That's definitely worth fixing. Do you think I should use the same EA to prepare the amended return, or is this mistake a sign I should find someone new who specializes in small business taxation?
0 coins
NebulaKnight
•The 3.8% NIIT would only apply if your modified adjusted gross income was above the threshold ($200,000 for single filers or $250,000 for married filing jointly). If you were above those thresholds, then yes, you likely paid 3.8% on income that should have been exempt from that tax. Regarding your EA, everyone makes mistakes. It might be worth having a conversation with them first about this issue. If they acknowledge the error and explain how they'll prevent it in the future, you could continue with them. However, if they're defensive or don't seem knowledgeable about S-Corp taxation, it might be time to find someone who specializes in small business taxation. S-Corps have some nuances that not all tax preparers are equally familiar with.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
After dealing with similar S-Corp classification issues, I found an amazing service called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped clear up all my confusion. I uploaded my K-1 and other tax documents, and their AI system immediately flagged the passive vs. nonpassive classification issue on my Schedule E. What I really liked was that they explained exactly why my S-Corp income should be classified as nonpassive since I materially participate in the business. They even calculated the potential tax difference and helped me determine if filing an amended return made financial sense based on the overpaid NIIT. Their system showed me the specific IRS regulations that apply to S-Corp owners and material participation tests. Made me feel way more confident when discussing the issue with my tax preparer!
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•This sounds interesting - can taxr.ai actually help with filing the amended return too? Or just identify issues? I've got a similar situation with my husband's S-Corp and want to make sure we're not overpaying.
0 coins
Ava Rodriguez
•I'm curious about this service... how does it work with more complex situations? Like if you have multiple K-1s from different entities or if you have both passive and nonpassive activities? My tax situation gets pretty complicated.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
•They don't file the amended return for you, but they provide a detailed report that explains exactly what needs to be fixed, which you can either implement yourself or give to your tax preparer. The report includes references to the relevant tax code sections, which is super helpful when explaining why changes are needed. For complex situations with multiple K-1s or mixed activities, that's actually where I found them most valuable. Their system analyzes each entity separately, applies the correct material participation tests, and helps determine which income streams should be passive vs. nonpassive. It can handle partnerships, S-Corps, and even rental properties with special tax elections. They also flag when you might qualify for the active real estate professional exemption.
0 coins
Ava Rodriguez
Just wanted to follow up that I tried taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here. Wow, it actually caught several issues with my tax return beyond just the passive/nonpassive classification! I have three different business entities (two S-Corps and an LLC), and it correctly identified that one of my S-Corps should have been nonpassive income while my limited partnership interest was correctly classified as passive. It even flagged that my tax preparer had missed some eligible home office deductions because I work from home for one of my businesses. The documentation it provided made it super easy to talk to my CPA about these issues. No more feeling confused when trying to explain tax concepts I only partially understand. Definitely worth checking out if you have any S-Corp or business income classification questions.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
After dealing with a similar Schedule E classification issue, I was trying to reach the IRS to get clarification on the passive vs nonpassive rules. Spent HOURS on hold and kept getting disconnected. Then I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) - they have this service that gets you through to an actual IRS agent without the endless hold times. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was skeptical, but they got me through to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes! The agent confirmed that as an active S-Corp owner who materially participates in the business, my income should definitely be classified as nonpassive on Schedule E. They also explained the process for filing an amended return to recover the NIIT I'd overpaid. Honestly saved me so much frustration compared to the usual IRS phone nightmare.
0 coins
Zainab Khalil
•Wait, how does this actually work? Is it some kind of premium line to the IRS? I didn't think there was any way to jump the queue with government agencies.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•This sounds like BS honestly. Nobody can magically get through to the IRS faster. They probably just auto-dial repeatedly and charge you for the privilege. How much does this service cost? I bet it's not cheap.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
•It's not a premium line - they basically handle the waiting for you. Their system keeps calling and navigating the IRS phone tree until they get through to an agent. When an agent answers, they call you and connect you directly. You don't have to sit on hold for hours. The best part is that it's not just for tax questions. I used it again when I needed to verify some information about my payment plan. The IRS actually has surprisingly helpful agents if you can ever reach them. And yes, they can answer questions about passive vs. nonpassive income classification - they walked me through the material participation tests and confirmed that daily involvement in an S-Corp typically qualifies as nonpassive activity.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
OK I need to admit I was totally wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself because I've been trying to reach the IRS for WEEKS about my amended return status. I was absolutely shocked when they got me through to an IRS agent in about 12 minutes. I've NEVER been able to get through that quickly on my own - usually I waste an entire afternoon on hold only to get disconnected. The IRS agent was able to check the status of my amended return and also confirmed what others have said here - that S-Corp income is nonpassive when you materially participate in the business (which basically means you're regularly involved in operations). She explained that this misclassification is actually pretty common and worth fixing through an amended return because of the NIIT implications. Guess I shouldn't have been so quick to dismiss something just because it sounded too good to be true!
0 coins
Connor Murphy
Just to add some specifics around "material participation" since that's the key factor for passive vs nonpassive classification: There are 7 tests for material participation, and you only need to meet ONE of them: 1. You work 500+ hours in the activity during the year 2. You do substantially all the work in the activity 3. You work 100+ hours and no one else works more than you 4. The activity is a "significant participation activity" and you work 100-500 hours 5. You materially participated in 5 of the last 10 years 6. The activity is a personal service activity and you materially participated in any 3 prior years 7. Based on facts and circumstances, you participate regularly, continuously, and substantially As the only employee in your S-Corp, you almost certainly meet multiple tests. This is why your income should be nonpassive.
0 coins
Dylan Wright
•This is super helpful! Given these tests, I definitely qualify under multiple criteria. I easily put in more than 500 hours (probably closer to 2,000), and I'm obviously doing substantially all the work since I'm the only employee. When my EA classified the income as passive, do you think this was just a simple oversight/mistake, or is there something more complex that I'm missing? Is there ever a case where an S-Corp owner who's the only employee would want their income classified as passive?
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•This was almost certainly just a mistake. There's rarely a situation where an active S-Corp owner would benefit from having their income classified as passive. The main exception would be if you had significant passive losses from other investments that you couldn't otherwise use (since passive losses can only offset passive income). But even then, it's questionable whether you could legitimately classify your active S-Corp income as passive if you clearly materially participate. Most likely, your EA either checked the wrong box or made an assumption without asking about your level of participation in the business. It's definitely worth bringing this up and getting it corrected, especially because of the NIIT implications you mentioned.
0 coins
Yara Haddad
Has anyone actually gone through the process of amending a return for this specific issue? I'm in a similar situation but wondering if the hassle of amending is worth it. How long did it take to get your refund for the overpaid NIIT?
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
•I did this last year for the exact same issue. Filed Form 1040-X along with a corrected Schedule E and Form 8960. Took about 16 weeks to process (the IRS is slow with amendments), but I got back over $5,400 from the NIIT I shouldn't have paid on my S-Corp income. If your overpayment is significant, it's definitely worth the hassle. The hardest part was explaining to my original tax preparer why we needed to reclassify the income - he kept insisting it didn't matter!
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
I went through this exact same situation a couple years ago! My tax preparer had been classifying my S-Corp income as passive for THREE years before I caught it. Like you, I'm the sole owner-employee doing all the work - there was nothing passive about it. The material participation tests that Connor mentioned are key here. Since you're the only employee, you almost certainly qualify under multiple tests, especially the "substantially all the work" test (#2) and likely the 500+ hours test (#1) as well. I ended up filing amended returns for all three years I was eligible to amend (you have 3 years from the original filing date). The total NIIT refund was substantial - over $12,000 combined. Each amended return took about 4-5 months to process, but it was absolutely worth it. One tip: when you meet with your EA about this, bring documentation showing your hours worked and level of involvement in the business. Even though it should be obvious that you materially participate, having records helps support the classification change. Also, make sure they understand this affects both your Schedule E AND your Form 8960 calculation. Don't let them brush this off as "not important" - the NIIT savings alone make it worth correcting, and you want to make sure it's done right going forward.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•Wow, $12,000 in NIIT refunds over three years - that really puts the impact in perspective! I'm definitely going to push forward with amending at least last year's return. Quick question about the documentation you mentioned - what kind of records did you use to show your hours and involvement? I don't have formal timesheets since it's just me, but I do have client billing records, email timestamps, and my business calendar that would show daily activity. Would that type of documentation be sufficient to demonstrate material participation? Also, did you end up switching tax preparers after discovering they'd been making this mistake for multiple years?
0 coins