K1 Income: Determining if Real Estate Partnership Income is Passive or Nonpassive
I've been investing in several real estate properties through partnerships and receive K1s each year. I'm trying to figure out if I should classify this income as passive or nonpassive on my tax return. From what I understand, income is only considered nonpassive if I "materially participate" in managing the properties. I've looked at the IRS rules for material participation, and honestly, it doesn't seem like what I do would qualify. I'm basically just an investor. What's confusing me is that a friend of mine is in very similar real estate partnerships, and their accountant has been listing all their income as nonpassive. This allows them to count losses against their ordinary income (like from their job), which seems like a huge advantage. Is this something their accountant is doing because they know some "gray area" in the tax code that I don't? Are they taking a risk with audits? Or am I missing something important about how K1 income from real estate partnerships should be classified? I want to make sure I'm doing this right but also not missing out on potential tax benefits.
19 comments


Jasmine Hancock
The distinction between passive and nonpassive income on K1s is often misunderstood, so your confusion is totally normal. You're right that the key factor is whether you "materially participate" in the activity. For real estate partnerships, material participation generally means you spend 500+ hours per year involved in operations, or 100+ hours with no other participant spending more time than you. If you're just an investor without significant involvement in day-to-day operations, your income would typically be classified as passive. The reason this matters: passive losses can only offset passive income, while nonpassive losses can offset ordinary income (like your wages). This is why your friend's situation seems advantageous - they're able to use real estate losses to reduce their overall tax bill. That said, there are special rules for real estate professionals who spend 750+ hours annually in real estate activities. They can treat rental activities as nonpassive if they meet certain requirements. There's also a special allowance that lets you deduct up to $25,000 in passive rental losses against nonpassive income if you "actively participate" (a lower threshold than material participation) and your modified AGI is under $100,000.
0 coins
James Maki
•Thanks for the detailed explanation! I definitely don't spend anywhere close to 500 hours on these properties. The partnerships handle all the management. I might spend maybe 10-20 hours per year reviewing documents and attending occasional meetings. Does this mean my friend's accountant might be incorrectly classifying their income? Or could there be something about their level of involvement that I'm not aware of? Also, what's the difference between "active participation" and "material participation"?
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•Your level of involvement definitely sounds passive based on what you've described. The 10-20 hours per year reviewing documents and attending meetings wouldn't meet the material participation threshold. Your friend's situation could be different for several reasons. They might actually be more involved than you realize, they might qualify as a real estate professional, or they could be taking advantage of the special $25,000 allowance I mentioned if their income is under the threshold. It's also possible their accountant is being aggressive with the classification, which could be risky in case of an audit. The difference between "active participation" and "material participation" is substantial. Active participation is a much lower threshold - it just requires making management decisions like approving tenants, setting rental terms, or approving capital expenditures. Material participation is much more rigorous, requiring significant time commitment or meeting one of the seven specific tests the IRS has established.
0 coins
Cole Roush
I went through exactly the same confusion with my K1s last year! Eventually I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and uploaded my K1 forms there. It actually analyzed my specific situation and explained that based on my level of involvement, my income was passive. The tool even showed me the exact IRS regulations that applied to my case. What was really helpful is that it also explained the "grouping election" option I had never heard about before, which lets you group certain activities together to potentially meet material participation tests. Might be worth checking out if you're stuck on this - especially since the passive vs nonpassive distinction can make a huge difference in your tax liability.
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
•I'm in a similar situation and considering using this. How exactly does it determine your level of involvement? Did you have to answer questions about how much time you spend on the properties? And did it actually help you save on taxes compared to what you were doing before?
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
•I'm a bit skeptical. How can a tool possibly know if you "materially participated" in a business? Doesn't the IRS use a hours-based test for that? Unless you're tracking your hours somewhere, I don't see how uploading a K1 would tell you anything about passive vs nonpassive.
0 coins
Cole Roush
•It asks you a series of questions about your involvement after analyzing your K1 - things like how many hours you spend on different activities, whether you're the only person performing certain services, and if you've participated for 3+ years. Based on your answers, it applies the IRS material participation tests to your specific situation. For me, it actually confirmed I'd been reporting correctly as passive, but it explained a grouping election that would let me combine my real estate activities with my property management business. This changed everything since I could then meet the material participation threshold for the combined activities, allowing me to deduct losses against ordinary income. Ended up saving about $7,800 in taxes this year.
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
Wow, I just tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and I'm honestly impressed. I've been in 3 different real estate partnerships for years and always reported everything as passive because that's what my previous accountant did. The tool analyzed my K1s and asked about my specific involvement in each partnership. Turns out I actually DO materially participate in one of them according to test #3 (I participate over 100 hours and no one else participates more). I had no idea! This means I can treat that partnership as nonpassive and use those losses against my regular income. For my other two partnerships, it confirmed they're correctly classified as passive. Super helpful to understand the distinction and know I'm filing correctly now.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
If you're struggling to get through to the IRS to ask about this passive/nonpassive question, I'd recommend Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I spent WEEKS trying to get through to an IRS agent about a similar K1 question last year. It was impossible - kept getting disconnected or waiting for hours. I found this service that actually gets you through to an IRS agent quickly - you can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They called me back when I was connected to an agent, and I finally got clear guidance on my specific situation. The agent explained exactly how the passive activity rules applied to my partnership interests.
0 coins
Rachel Tao
•How does this actually work? I've been trying for months to reach someone about partnership tax questions. Does it actually get you to someone who can help with complex K1 questions or just general IRS representatives?
0 coins
Derek Olson
•This sounds too good to be true. The IRS phone lines are notoriously understaffed. How could a third-party service possibly get you through faster than calling directly? Sounds like they're just charging for something you can do yourself if you're persistent enough.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
•It works by using an algorithm to navigate the IRS phone tree and stay on hold for you. When an actual agent comes on the line, they call you and connect you. It's the same IRS agents you'd eventually reach if you called yourself - they just handle the waiting part. Yes, they do connect you to representatives who can handle complex K1 questions. I specifically got help with passive activity rules for my partnership interests from the agent I spoke with. They transferred me to the right department once I explained my situation.
0 coins
Derek Olson
I have to admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway since I was desperate to resolve a question about my K1 partnership income being incorrectly classified. I was connected to an IRS tax specialist in under an hour when I'd previously spent 4+ hours on hold multiple times without ever reaching anyone. The agent actually walked me through the material participation tests in detail and confirmed that two of my partnerships should indeed be passive while one could qualify as nonpassive based on my level of involvement. Saved me from potentially making a big mistake on my return and getting flagged for audit. Sometimes it's worth admitting when you're wrong about something!
0 coins
Danielle Mays
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is the real estate professional status. If you qualify as a real estate professional (750+ hours in real estate activities and more than half your working time), you can treat ALL your real estate activities as nonpassive if you materially participate in them. That might be what your friend is doing - if they or their spouse qualifies as a real estate professional, they can deduct those losses against other income. It's completely legitimate if they meet the requirements.
0 coins
James Maki
•That's interesting! Neither my spouse nor I would qualify for that since we both have full-time jobs outside of real estate. Could my friend's accountant be classifying them as a real estate professional incorrectly? What happens if you claim that status but don't actually meet the requirements?
0 coins
Danielle Mays
•If they're claiming real estate professional status without meeting the requirements, they're taking a significant risk. The IRS often targets this area for audits specifically because it can generate large tax savings. If audited and found to be incorrectly classified, they would have to reclassify all that income as passive, potentially resulting in significant additional taxes, interest, and possibly penalties. They would need to have documentation proving they spent the required hours on real estate activities. It's also worth noting that even if they don't qualify as real estate professionals, they might be using the $25,000 special allowance for active participants with income under $100,000, or they might have other passive income sources that allow them to use the losses.
0 coins
Roger Romero
Has anyone used grouping elections for their K1s? I've heard this can help with meeting material participation tests by combining multiple activities.
0 coins
Anna Kerber
•Yes, I've used grouping elections for my real estate partnerships. Basically, if you have multiple similar activities (like several rental properties or partnership interests), you can elect to group them together as one activity for the purpose of the material participation tests. This was a game-changer for me because individually I didn't meet the material participation threshold for any single property, but when grouped together my hours easily exceeded 500 per year. Made all my real estate income nonpassive, which allowed me to offset my W-2 income with property depreciation.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•Thanks for explaining that! So if I have 3 different real estate partnerships that are all similar investments, I could potentially group them together? Do I need to file anything special with the IRS to make this election?
0 coins