How should entrepreneurs navigate R&D tax credits in 2024 after Section 174 changes?
I'm trying to figure out the R&D tax credit situation for my tech startup after all these Section 174 changes. We're bootstrapping right now but starting to look at hiring firms that specialize in R&D tax credits. With all the changes to Section 174 capitalization requirements, I'm wondering if R&D tax credits are still worth pursuing in 2024? Our company has about $350K in potentially qualifying research expenses but I'm worried the amortization requirements might cancel out any benefits. Has anyone worked with a good R&D tax credit firm recently? Or is this whole thing not worth the hassle anymore given the new landscape? Any founders here who've successfully claimed these credits post-Section 174 changes?
19 comments
Join the conversation
FireflyDreams
These R&D tax credits are absolutely still worth pursuing in 2024, even with the Section 174 capitalization requirements in effect. The research credit itself (under IRC Section 41) remains separate from the Section 174 expense treatment changes. The biggest change is that research and experimental expenditures that were previously immediately deductible now need to be capitalized and amortized over 5 years for domestic research (15 years for foreign research). This doesn't eliminate the credit - it just affects the timing of deductions. For startups and small businesses, there are still some excellent opportunities. If your business has less than $5 million in gross receipts and is less than 5 years old, you can potentially use up to $250,000 of your R&D credit against your payroll taxes (specifically the employer portion of social security). This is incredibly valuable for pre-profit companies.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•This is really helpful info! Quick question - does software development still qualify for R&D credits? We're primarily developing a SaaS product. Also, do you need to have perfectly documented everything from the beginning or can you retroactively organize your documentation?
0 coins
FireflyDreams
•Software development absolutely still qualifies for R&D credits, especially for SaaS products where you're solving technical uncertainties. The key is that you're developing new or improved functionality, reliability, performance, or quality - not just cosmetic changes. Documentation doesn't need to be perfect from day one, but you do need substantiation. Time tracking, project management tools, technical specifications, test results, and even emails discussing technical challenges can all help. The better your documentation, the more defensible your claim will be if audited, but you can certainly organize what you have retroactively.
0 coins
Javier Morales
I've been in the same boat trying to figure out the R&D credit maze. After countless hours researching, I found https://taxr.ai which literally saved me from making some costly mistakes with my R&D documentation. Their AI analyzes all your development documentation and helps identify which projects and expenses actually qualify under Section 41 vs Section 174. I was skeptical at first, but they helped me understand exactly which of our software development activities met the four-part test for R&D credits, and even flagged where my documentation was weak. They also have this cool feature that helps track qualifying expenses properly for the capitalization requirements.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
•Does it actually work for early-stage startups? We have a lot of R&D but not much revenue yet. Will it help with the payroll tax credit option the earlier commenter mentioned?
0 coins
Malik Thompson
•I'm a bit suspicious about any service claiming to "identify" R&D expenses. How do they actually verify your activities meet the "technological in nature" and "process of experimentation" requirements? Those are pretty subjective tests.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•For early-stage startups, it actually works extremely well since they specialize in the payroll tax credit option. They've built specific tools to help you maximize that $250K offset against your FICA taxes, which is perfect when you don't have income tax liability yet. Regarding the verification process, they don't just make claims - their system analyzes your technical documentation, meeting notes, GitHub commits, and other records to identify clear patterns of experimentation and technical uncertainty resolution. They even help you organize evidence showing your development wasn't just routine programming but involved actual experimentation to overcome technical challenges.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
Just wanted to follow up after trying https://taxr.ai for our startup's R&D credits. It was surprisingly good! I was worried our documentation was too scattered (we didn't originally track things with tax credits in mind), but their system connected to our GitHub, Jira, and Slack to identify qualifying activities. We found out about 78% of our development work actually qualified, and they helped us identify an additional $125K in qualifying expenses we would have missed. The most valuable part was how they organized everything for the Section 41 four-part test while also handling the new Section 174 capitalization requirements. Definitely recommend for other founders navigating this confusing tax landscape.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
If you're struggling with IRS questions about R&D credits (which is common), I highly recommend https://claimyr.com - they've been a complete game changer for getting actual answers from the IRS. I spent weeks getting nowhere with the IRS helpline, but Claimyr got me through to an agent in less than 15 minutes who answered all my questions about documentation requirements for our R&D credit claim. You can see exactly how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c but basically they navigate the IRS phone system for you and call you back when they've got an agent on the line. Saved me hours of frustration when I was trying to understand how the new Section 174 capitalization rules affected our existing R&D credit claim.
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
•How does this actually work? I've tried calling the IRS about business credits before and just gave up after being on hold forever. Do they have some special connection to the IRS?
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•Sounds too good to be true honestly. The IRS is notoriously impossible to reach. I find it hard to believe a service can just magically get through when millions of people and businesses can't.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•It works by using their system that continually redials and navigates the IRS phone tree until it gets through to an agent. They don't have special connections - they just automate the frustrating part of calling the IRS over and over until someone answers. They're not doing anything you couldn't do yourself if you had unlimited time and patience to keep calling back. The beauty is you don't have to wait on hold - you just get a call when an actual IRS person is on the line. Nothing magical about it, just smart automation of a tedious process that most of us don't have time for.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment I decided to try it just to prove it wouldn't work - and I'm shocked. Not only did I get through to an IRS agent specializing in business credits, but I got specific guidance on how our startup should handle the R&D credit with the new Section 174 amortization requirements. The agent confirmed we could still claim the credit against payroll taxes even with the 174 capitalization rules, and gave me direct answers about documentation requirements. Saved me from making a $45K mistake on our filing approach. I've spent months trying to get clear answers on this and got nowhere until using this service.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
Has anyone worked with a specialized R&D tax credit firm vs doing it yourself or using software? We're debating between hiring a specialized firm (charging 25-30% of the credit) vs trying to handle it internally with some software assistance.
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
•We used [firm name] last year and they found about $180k in credits, but charged us $54k (30%). They handled everything including amending prior year returns. The documentation they prepared was really thorough which helped when we got some questions from the IRS. Expensive but worth it for the peace of mind.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
•That's helpful to know. The 30% fee sounds high but having thorough documentation that stands up to IRS scrutiny seems worth it. Did they help with both the technical and financial documentation aspects? I'm also wondering about the amending prior years - did that cause any complications or did it go smoothly? We're considering going back to claim 2022 credits we missed.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
Question for everyone - with the Section 174 capitalization requirements, has anyone found a good accounting software that properly handles tracking these R&D expenses separately? Our current system doesn't seem to have caught up with these tax changes.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•We've been using QuickBooks with custom accounts set up specifically for R&D. Created separate accounts for domestic R&D (5-year amortization) and foreign (15-year). Then set up amortization schedules in Excel that feed back to our monthly journal entries. Not perfect but it works.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
•Thanks for the suggestion! That makes sense - creating custom accounts seems like a practical workaround. I'm still hoping software providers will catch up with better built-in solutions for these R&D tracking requirements. Our controller wasn't thrilled about the manual Excel approach but I guess that's what we'll need to do for now. Did you run into any challenges with mid-year R&D expenses and when to start the amortization?
0 coins