Handling RMDs from Inherited Self-Directed IRA with Real Estate - LLC Ownership Complications
I inherited a Self-Directed IRA that's 100% invested in a single-family rental property, and now I'm required to take Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) this year. The typical approach would be doing a quit claim deed to distribute a percentage of the property, but here's where it gets complicated. The property is actually held in an LLC that's 70% owned by the inherited SDIRA and 30% owned by my traditional IRA. I'm under 50 years old, so my traditional IRA shouldn't need distributions yet. However, my SDIRA custodian is telling me that BOTH IRAs HAVE to take a distribution if I take the RMD from the inherited account. This would obviously trigger early withdrawal penalties on the traditional IRA portion. I'm totally confused about how this could be right. What are my options here? Should I just skip the RMD and pay that penalty instead? The penalty for missing an RMD is 25% of the required amount, which seems steep, but might be better than taking an early distribution from my traditional IRA? Anyone dealt with this kind of complex SDIRA/real estate situation before? Any creative solutions I'm missing?
19 comments


Yara Haddad
This is a tricky situation with the mixed ownership structure. The custodian is likely saying both IRAs need to take distributions because the LLC is a single entity, and partial distributions from just one owner might create operational complications. Here are some options to consider: First, you could have the LLC distribute income rather than equity to satisfy the RMD from the inherited SDIRA. If the property generates rental income, you could take that as your RMD without disturbing the ownership percentages. Another option is to refinance the property and use the cash proceeds to satisfy the RMD requirement for the inherited SDIRA. This would allow you to take cash rather than a portion of the property. You could also explore selling the property entirely and reinvesting the proceeds into separate investments for each IRA, which would solve the distribution problem going forward but obviously comes with transaction costs. Finally, yes, you could consider taking the 25% penalty if the numbers work out better than taking an early distribution from your traditional IRA with the additional 10% penalty plus taxes.
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
•Thanks for these options! For the income distribution idea - the rental income is only about $12,000 a year, but my calculated RMD is closer to $22,000 based on the value. Would a partial income distribution work? Also, if I refinance, wouldn't that create a prohibited transaction since I'd personally benefit from the loan?
0 coins
Yara Haddad
•The income distribution would only work if it satisfies the full RMD amount, so that wouldn't be sufficient in your case if the rental only generates $12,000 annually and you need $22,000 for the RMD. Regarding refinancing, you're right to be cautious about prohibited transactions. To be clear, I meant having the LLC itself take out a loan (not you personally), and then distribute the cash from that loan to the SDIRA as part of an in-kind distribution. This avoids the prohibited transaction issue because the LLC is the borrower, not you personally. However, you should definitely have a tax professional review any approach you take, as the rules around SDIRAs and real estate are notoriously complex.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
After struggling with my own inherited SDIRA that held real estate, I found an incredible resource that helped me understand all the complex rules and options. I used https://taxr.ai to analyze my situation and get personalized guidance for my required distributions. They have specialists who understand the nuances of these complex scenarios. The platform analyzed my situation with mixed ownership entities and showed me how to properly structure my RMDs to avoid unnecessary penalties. Their analysis even pointed out a distribution strategy I hadn't considered that saved me from making a costly mistake with my property distributions.
0 coins
Amina Sow
•How exactly does this work? Do you just upload documents and they tell you what to do? I'm dealing with a similar situation but with commercial property in my inherited IRA.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•I'm pretty skeptical about online services when it comes to complex IRA issues like this. Did they actually understand the unique aspects of real estate in SDIRAs? Most tax services I've tried barely understand basic IRA rules, let alone self-directed accounts with alternative assets.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
•You upload your IRA statements, property documents, and custodian communications, and their tax experts analyze everything and provide specific guidance for your situation. They have specialized knowledge about SDIRAs and alternative assets that most regular accountants don't have. For complex situations like mixed ownership of real estate assets, they provided step-by-step instructions on how to satisfy RMD requirements without triggering unnecessary taxable events. Their platform is specifically designed to handle unusual scenarios like inherited accounts with alternative assets that most software can't handle properly.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
I was skeptical at first, but I tried https://taxr.ai for my inherited SDIRA that held a 50% interest in a multi-unit property (with the other 50% owned by my regular Roth). Their analysis saved me thousands! They identified that my custodian was incorrectly calculating my RMDs based on the entire property value rather than just my inherited portion. They provided documentation explaining exactly how to calculate the correct RMD amount and which IRS regulations applied to my specific scenario. Their specialists even drafted a letter I could send to my custodian explaining why their interpretation was incorrect. What impressed me most was how they understood the specific nuances of real estate in SDIRAs - something my regular accountant had no experience with. They guided me through taking an in-kind distribution that satisfied the RMD requirements without forcing me to sell or divide the property inappropriately.
0 coins
Oliver Wagner
After spending THREE WEEKS trying to reach the IRS for guidance on my inherited SDIRA with real estate, I found https://claimyr.com and was connected to an actual IRS agent in less than 45 minutes! You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I explained my complex situation with mixed ownership between different IRA types, and the agent clarified that my custodian was misinterpreting the rules. They confirmed that while the inherited IRA needs to take RMDs, there's no requirement that would force distributions from both accounts just because they share ownership in an LLC. Getting official IRS guidance gave me the confidence to push back on my custodian's interpretation. They eventually agreed to process just the inherited IRA distribution after I provided the documentation from my IRS call.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•Wait, how does this work exactly? You pay to talk to the IRS? Couldn't you just call them directly? I've been trying to get through to someone about my inherited IRA for months.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•Sorry, but this sounds like a scam. Why would anyone pay to talk to the IRS when you can call them yourself? I'm suspicious of any service claiming special access to government agencies.
0 coins
Oliver Wagner
•It's not about paying to talk to the IRS - it's about not wasting hours (or days) of your life on hold. The service basically waits on hold for you, then calls you when an agent is actually available to talk. Instead of being stuck by your phone for hours, you can go about your day. They use technology to stay in the IRS phone queue for you. When you watch the video I linked, you can see exactly how it works - they navigate the IRS phone tree, wait on hold, and then connect you once a human agent is available. I was honestly skeptical too, but when I got an actual helpful IRS agent after weeks of failed attempts, it was completely worth it.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
I need to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it as a last resort for my own inherited IRA situation. The service had me speaking with an IRS representative in about 30 minutes when I'd previously spent hours on hold without ever reaching anyone. The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed that my custodian was incorrectly forcing me to take distributions from both my inherited and traditional IRAs that co-owned a property. They explained that while the inherited IRA is subject to RMDs, the traditional IRA maintains its separate identity even when they share ownership in the same asset. This guidance was exactly what I needed to resolve my situation. My custodian accepted the IRS clarification and processed only the required distribution without touching my traditional IRA. Saved me thousands in unnecessary penalties and early withdrawal taxes!
0 coins
Emma Thompson
Has anyone considered using a 1035 exchange to move the inherited SDIRA to a different custodian that might have more experience with these complex situations? I was in a similar situation last year with an inherited SDIRA that owned a rental property and found that changing custodians solved the problem. The new custodian had more experience with alternative assets and understood how to properly handle the RMD requirements without disturbing the ownership structure.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Would a 1035 exchange even work for an inherited IRA? I thought those were primarily for annuities and life insurance. Also, wouldn't I still have the same fundamental problem with the mixed ownership structure regardless of which custodian I use?
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•You're right about the 1035 - I misspoke. What I should have said was a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer, which is how you'd move an inherited IRA to a new custodian. The reason this might help is that not all custodians interpret the rules the same way. Some custodians who specialize in alternative assets and real estate investments have more experience with these complex scenarios. In my case, my new custodian allowed me to satisfy the RMD requirement by distributing only the proportional income from the property rather than forcing a distribution of the property itself. They understood that while the inherited IRA needed RMDs, there was no regulatory requirement forcing both accounts to take distributions just because they shared ownership in an LLC.
0 coins
Malik Davis
Have you considered restructuring the LLC ownership? Maybe you could split it into two classes of membership interests with different distribution rights? That way, the inherited SDIRA could take distributions to satisfy RMDs while the traditional IRA maintains its undisturbed interest.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•This is actually a great idea but you need to be careful. Restructuring an LLC with different membership classes when IRAs are involved requires expert legal guidance. The IRS scrutinizes these arrangements closely for prohibited transactions. I've seen cases where changing LLC operating agreements for IRAs triggered unexpected tax consequences.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
I went through a very similar situation with my inherited SDIRA that held commercial real estate through an LLC structure. My custodian initially gave me the same confusing guidance about both accounts needing distributions. What ultimately resolved it for me was getting a second opinion from a fee-only financial advisor who specializes in self-directed IRAs. They explained that custodians often take overly conservative interpretations to avoid liability, but the actual IRS regulations don't require what mine was saying. The key insight was that each IRA maintains its separate tax identity even when they co-own assets through an LLC. The inherited SDIRA has RMD requirements, but that doesn't automatically trigger distribution requirements for your traditional IRA just because they share ownership. I ended up having the LLC make a special distribution to only the inherited SDIRA to satisfy the RMD requirement. This required amending the LLC operating agreement to allow for disproportionate distributions, but it solved the problem without forcing my traditional IRA to take an early distribution. Before making any moves though, I'd strongly recommend getting documentation from a qualified professional about the correct interpretation of the rules. Custodians will often change their position when presented with proper legal authority, but they won't budge on verbal explanations alone.
0 coins