< Back to IRS

Yara Sayegh

Downsides of registering as C-Corp but electing S-Corp tax status for startups?

I'm in the process of starting a small tech business that I plan to bootstrap for the first year or two before seeking outside investment. From what I understand, most VCs prefer startups to be structured as C-Corps since it simplifies share distribution and tax matters when bringing in investors. My question is: **are there any drawbacks to initially registering as a C-Corp but electing to be taxed as an S-Corp during our self-funding phase (maybe 1-2 years), then switching back to C-Corp taxation when we bring in outside investors?** I'm trying to balance the tax advantages of an S-Corp in the early stages (avoiding double taxation) with the eventual need to have a structure that's attractive to VCs. Would this approach create any complications or unintended consequences I should be aware of? Has anyone here done something similar with their startup?

NebulaNova

•

This is a common strategy many founders consider, but there are several important things to understand. First, to clarify: you don't "register as a C-Corp and elect S-Corp taxation." You would form a corporation under state law, and the default federal tax classification is C-Corp. You'd then file Form 2553 to elect S-Corp status. Later, you'd revoke that S election to return to C-Corp status. The main downsides to consider: 1) S-Corps have strict ownership limitations (max 100 shareholders, only one class of stock, no foreign investors). 2) Revoking your S election creates a "deemed liquidation" for tax purposes, potentially triggering tax liabilities. 3) S-Corps must maintain a calendar tax year, while C-Corps can choose a fiscal year. 4) Switching back and forth creates additional accounting complexity and costs.

0 coins

Thanks for that explanation! When you mention the "deemed liquidation" for tax purposes, can you explain a bit more about what that means practically? Would I be hit with a big tax bill just for switching from S to C status? Also, would there be a mandatory waiting period before I could switch back to S-Corp status if things didn't work out with investors?

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

The "deemed liquidation" doesn't mean you'll automatically face a huge tax bill. What happens is the IRS treats it as if the S-Corp distributed all its assets to shareholders, who then contributed them to the new C-Corp. If the fair market value of your company assets exceeds their tax basis, this could create taxable gain. For early startups with limited assets or even losses, this may have minimal impact. If you revoke S status, you generally cannot re-elect it for 5 years without IRS permission. This is a significant restriction that prevents companies from frequently switching to optimize taxes. The permission isn't automatically granted, so it's not something to rely on as a fallback plan.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

I just went through this exact dilemma with my SaaS startup last year! After struggling to understand all the tax implications, I found https://taxr.ai incredibly helpful. It analyzed my financial projections and specific situation, then gave me a clear breakdown of how each structure would affect my taxes during both bootstrap and investor phases. What surprised me was learning about the built-in gains tax that applies when converting from S to C status if your company has appreciated significantly. For me, the timing of the switch became really important based on our growth trajectory and valuation. The tool provided scenarios showing exactly when the switch would be most tax-efficient.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

How does taxr.ai handle the analysis when you have intellectual property involved? We have some patents pending and I've heard IP can complicate the tax situation when switching entity types. Did your situation involve any IP considerations?

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Is it actually legit? I've tried so many "tax helpers" that just give generic advice you could find on any accounting blog. Does it actually look at YOUR specific numbers and give personalized recommendations? Or is it just another glorified quiz that spits out templated responses?

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

It actually handles IP considerations really well. When I uploaded our financial data, I included notes about our proprietary technology, and the analysis specifically addressed potential IP valuation issues during a transition. It recommended documenting fair market value of the IP before any conversion to minimize tax exposure. For your question about legitimacy, it's definitely not a generic quiz. You upload actual financial statements and tax returns, and it runs real calculations with your numbers. I could see exactly how different decisions would impact my specific tax liability - with actual dollar amounts based on our revenue, expenses, and growth projections. It was way more detailed than anything I'd found before.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it was a game-changer for our startup's tax planning. We were about to structure as an LLC with S-Corp election, but the analysis showed we'd save nearly $28,000 over three years using the C-Corp/S-election strategy with a timed conversion to full C-Corp status before our Series A. The platform flagged specific timing issues with our stock option plans that would have created major headaches during conversion. It also identified some state-specific considerations for Delaware corps operating in California that our original accountant completely missed. Worth every penny for the clarity it provided!

0 coins

Anyone else finding it IMPOSSIBLE to get definitive answers from the IRS about entity conversions? I've been trying to clarify some questions about our S-Corp to C-Corp conversion for weeks. Called the business tax line 14 times now and either get disconnected or told the wait is 3+ hours! I finally tried https://claimyr.com and watched their demo (https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c) - they actually got me connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes. The agent confirmed that our particular situation qualified for an exception to the 5-year waiting period rule if we needed to switch back to S status. Just thought I'd share since entity conversion questions often require official clarification beyond what general tax advice can provide.

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? Do they somehow get you to the front of the IRS phone queue? That seems impossible given how the IRS phone system operates. Does it cost money?

0 coins

Sorry, but this sounds fishy. The IRS doesn't give "exceptions" easily and certainly not through a phone call. Any IRS agent worth their salt would tell you to get a written determination letter. I'd be very cautious about making business decisions based on a phone conversation that isn't documented.

0 coins

It's not about skipping the line - they use an automated system that continuously redials and navigates the IRS phone tree for you. When they finally get through, you get a call back and are connected with the agent. You don't have to sit on hold for hours. Regarding documentation, you're absolutely right that a phone conversation isn't the final word. The agent walked me through the process of requesting a Private Letter Ruling for our specific scenario, which is the official written determination. The call saved me from submitting an incomplete PLR request that would have been rejected. They outlined exactly what documentation we needed to include with our submission.

0 coins

I was extremely skeptical about Claimyr but tried it out of desperation after our accountant couldn't get clear guidance on a built-in gains issue with our S to C conversion. Not only did I get through to a knowledgeable IRS representative, but they helped identify a specific subsection of the tax code that applied to our situation. The guidance led us to file Form 8832 with specific elections that our accountant hadn't considered. Saved us from making a costly mistake in our transition timing. I've become a convert - sometimes you really do need to speak directly with the IRS, and waiting 3+ hours on hold just isn't feasible when you're running a business.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

One thing nobody has mentioned yet - fundraising implications. I chose C-Corp with S election for my first startup, and when we went to raise our seed round, we had complications. Some potential investors (particularly angel funds structured as partnerships) were hesitant because S-Corp status would force K-1 income onto their tax returns. We ended up revoking our S election right before closing the round, but it created unnecessary paperwork and delays. If you're SURE you'll be seeking VC funding within 1-2 years, consider whether the temporary tax benefits of S status are worth the conversion headaches.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Thanks for sharing your experience! Did you face any issues with the timing of revoking your S election? I've heard there might be optimal times during the fiscal year to make the switch. Also, did you experience any unexpected costs during the conversion process that I should budget for?

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Timing definitely matters. We revoked our S election mid-year which created some accounting complexity with a partial-year S-Corp return and partial-year C-Corp return. In retrospect, doing it at year-end would have been cleaner. As for unexpected costs, the biggest ones were accounting fees for handling the more complex tax filings and legal fees for updating our shareholder agreements. Our accountant charged about $2,800 for the additional work, and legal fees were around $4,000. We also needed to update our capitalization table and stock certificates, which wasn't expensive but took more time than expected. Budget at least $7-8K for a smooth transition.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Has anyone here actually kept S-Corp status even after raising VC funding? I'm wondering if there's a way to structure things to keep the tax benefits for founders while accommodating investor requirements.

0 coins

In theory, you could create a two-entity structure - an S-Corp for operations that pays management fees to a C-Corp holding company where investors put their money. But honestly, it's overly complicated and most serious VCs will run away from this setup. The legal and accounting overhead usually erases any tax benefits. We tried something similar and abandoned it after our Series A investors balked at the complexity.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today