< Back to IRS

Andrew Pinnock

Dealing with the Excess Business Loss limitation on Form 461 - any workarounds?

Has anyone dealt with this Excess Business Loss limitation in real life? I'm looking at Form 461 for the first time and it seems like a complete money grab by the IRS for tax years 2018-2025. I've got a small business that had a rough year with some major expenses, and now I'm being told I can't fully deduct all my losses? The limitation seems designed just to delay legitimate deductions and force me to carry them forward. Does anyone have creative (but legal) ideas on how to minimize the impact of this limitation? Any tax authority references or professional advice would be super helpful. I'm trying to avoid having to spread these deductions over multiple years if possible!

I've worked with Form 461 quite a bit since it was introduced. The Excess Business Loss limitation can certainly feel frustrating, but it's important to understand what it's actually doing. For those unfamiliar, Form 461 limits non-corporate taxpayers from using more than $289,000 (for 2023 MFJ) or $144,500 (single) of net business losses to offset other income. Any "excess" losses get carried forward as a Net Operating Loss (NOL). Some legitimate planning strategies: 1) Timing of income and deductions is crucial - you might accelerate income into a loss year or defer some deductions to a more profitable year. 2) Review your business expenses carefully - some might be better classified as investment expenses not subject to the limitation. 3) If married, consider if filing separately might benefit your specific situation. Be very careful about any "aggressive" strategies - the IRS is well aware of attempts to circumvent this limitation.

0 coins

Alexis Renard

•

Thanks for the explanation. The 289k limit seems high tho? Can you clarify something - if I have W2 income of $120k and business losses of $150k, would the excess business loss rules limit my deductions? Or does it only kick in at much higher loss amounts?

0 coins

In your example with $120k W2 income and $150k business losses, you'd still be under the threshold, so you wouldn't trigger the limitation. The excess business loss rules only kick in when your total business losses exceed your business income plus the threshold amount ($289,000 for MFJ or $144,500 for single filers in 2023). The limitation is primarily targeting high-income taxpayers with significant business losses. For most small business owners with moderate income and losses, you likely won't hit these thresholds. But always good to be aware of it, especially if you're having an unusually large loss year.

0 coins

Camila Jordan

•

I discovered a great resource that helped me understand and handle my excess business loss situation. After struggling with Form 461 and feeling frustrated about my deduction limitations, I found https://taxr.ai which analyzes all your documents and explains exactly how the excess business loss rules apply to your specific situation. The tool reviewed my Schedule C, Form 461, and previous returns and showed me exactly where I was missing opportunities. It found a classification error where some of my expenses could actually be considered investment expenses instead of business expenses, which helped avoid the limitation. The AI actually walks you through each part of the form and suggests adjustment strategies specific to your situation.

0 coins

Tyler Lefleur

•

Does it work with partnership income too? My issue is that I have a K-1 with large losses and my accountant says I'm hitting this limitation. Would taxr.ai help with more complex business structures beyond just Schedule C?

0 coins

I'm skeptical about any tool claiming to find "workarounds" for tax laws. How does it actually suggest legal ways to minimize this limitation without venturing into gray areas? The IRS designed these rules specifically to prevent certain deduction strategies.

0 coins

Camila Jordan

•

Yes, it absolutely works with K-1 income and partnership structures. It analyzes all your business-related forms including Schedule E, K-1s, and can identify planning opportunities specific to pass-through entities. It's especially helpful with the aggregation rules that apply to multiple businesses. Regarding the legality concerns, the tool doesn't suggest any gray area tactics. It focuses on proper classification of expenses, timing strategies, and entity structure planning - all completely legitimate approaches recognized by tax professionals. It's not about "tricking" the system but understanding how to properly apply the rules to your specific situation.

0 coins

Tyler Lefleur

•

I wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after my question above. I decided to give it a try with my complex partnership situation, and it was surprisingly effective! It analyzed my K-1s and identified that some of my losses were actually from activities that could be classified differently. The tool showed me how the passive activity rules interact with the excess business loss limitations and suggested documentation I needed to support material participation in certain activities. This literally saved me about $18k in deductions that would have otherwise been limited and carried forward. It also mapped out a 3-year strategy for handling the remaining loss carryforwards in the most tax-efficient way.

0 coins

Max Knight

•

I've been battling with the IRS for months trying to get clarification about my excess business loss situation. After 14 attempts to reach someone who actually understood Form 461, I was ready to give up. Then I found https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c and honestly couldn't believe it would work. But wow - they got me connected to an actual IRS agent who specialized in business losses in under 45 minutes! I finally got clear guidance on how the carryforward works with my specific situation and confirmation that my approach to allocating some expenses to investment activities (not business) was acceptable. Saved me from making a decision that might have triggered an audit.

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

Wait, how does this actually work? They somehow get you to the front of the IRS phone queue? I've been trying to reach someone about my Form 461 for weeks without success.

0 coins

This sounds too good to be true. The IRS phone system is deliberately designed to be impossible to navigate. I find it hard to believe any service can magically connect you to specialized agents who can actually help with complex issues like excess business loss limitations.

0 coins

Max Knight

•

It works by using their system that continuously redials and navigates the IRS phone tree for you. When they finally get through to a representative, they call you and connect you directly. You don't have to sit on hold for hours - you just get a call when they've reached a human. I was skeptical too, but the reality is they're not doing anything you couldn't theoretically do yourself if you had unlimited time to keep calling and navigating the phone system. What makes it valuable is that they handle all that frustration for you. And yes, I specifically asked for someone familiar with business loss limitations, and after a brief hold, they transferred me to someone who actually understood Form 461 in detail.

0 coins

I need to follow up on my skeptical comments earlier. After waiting on hold with the IRS for 3+ hours multiple times with no success, I broke down and tried Claimyr. Within 40 minutes, I was speaking with an IRS representative who actually helped clarify my excess business loss questions. The agent confirmed that my approach to separating certain activities from business to investment classification was valid, and gave me specific guidance on how to document it properly to avoid issues if audited. This was after my own accountant gave me uncertain advice about Form 461. Having that official clarification directly from the IRS gave me the confidence to file without constant worry about an audit. I'm still shocked at how well it worked after my weeks of failed attempts.

0 coins

One strategy I've found helpful is to carefully review your business structure. The excess business loss limitation applies to pass-through entities, so in some situations, it might be worth exploring if an S-Corp election could benefit you. The salary you pay yourself as an S-Corp owner isn't subject to the same limitation calculations. Also, remember that rental real estate losses are generally considered passive and are calculated separately from active business losses under Section 469, which interacts with the excess business loss rules. If you qualify as a real estate professional, this could potentially help with the overall limitation.

0 coins

Jayden Hill

•

I thought about the S-Corp route, but doesn't the K-1 income from the S-Corp still count as business income for Form 461 purposes? Seems like you'd still hit the limitation, just through a different entity structure. Am I missing something about how this would help?

0 coins

You're right that the K-1 income from an S-Corp still counts as business income for Form 461. The potential benefit comes from salary planning. As an S-Corp owner, you must take a reasonable salary, which is W-2 income, not business income. This creates a planning opportunity where you can structure the balance between salary (not subject to excess business loss limitations) and business income/loss. For some taxpayers, this provides more flexibility, especially if you have multiple businesses or income sources. It's definitely not a magic solution and depends entirely on your specific situation. The real estate professional status strategy is often more impactful for those with significant rental activities.

0 coins

LordCommander

•

Anyone actually know when this limitation expires? I thought it was set to end after 2025 but heard rumors Congress might extend it. Has anyone seen anything definitive about the future of Form 461?

0 coins

Lucy Lam

•

The excess business loss limitation was originally created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to be temporary through 2025. But you're right to be concerned - Congress extended it before (during COVID) and could definitely do so again given budget concerns. I haven't seen any official proposals to extend it beyond 2025 yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if it happens.

0 coins

The timing aspect that Brianna mentioned is really crucial and often overlooked. I've found that bunching expenses into non-loss years while accelerating income into loss years can significantly help manage the Form 461 limitation. One specific strategy that worked for me: if you're expecting a profitable year next year, consider deferring some December equipment purchases or repairs to January. Conversely, if you have any outstanding receivables or can accelerate some 2025 income into 2024 (when you're already hitting the loss limitation), that can help balance things out. Also worth noting - the limitation applies at the taxpayer level, not per business. So if you have multiple businesses, profitable ones can offset losses from others before you hit the threshold. This is where proper business structure planning really matters. The key is looking at this as a multi-year tax planning opportunity rather than just dealing with the current year limitation. It's frustrating, but with proper planning, you can minimize the cash flow impact of having deductions pushed to future years.

0 coins

Ellie Kim

•

This is really helpful advice about the timing strategies! I'm dealing with my first year hitting the Form 461 limitation and hadn't thought about the multi-year planning approach. Quick question - when you mention accelerating 2025 income into 2024, are there any specific methods that work well for service-based businesses? I'm worried about creating cash flow issues by pushing too much income into an already difficult year, even though I understand the tax benefit.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today