How to handle Section 179 Carryover - Can I delay using it until more beneficial?
I'm dealing with a Section 179 carryover situation and need some advice from those who've been through this. I purchased a heavy-duty truck for my business in 2023 with a Section 179 deduction of $58,234, but because my business had a loss that year, I couldn't use any of it. So now I have this carryover amount. For 2024 taxes, my business is doing better but still not great. According to my calculations, I could apply about $32,500 of the carryover this year, and still have around $25,700 to push to 2025. The problem is when I run the numbers through my tax software and include this year's portion of the carryover ($32,500) on my personal tax return from my K-1, it only reduces my tax liability by about $1,250. Seems like I'm not getting much bang for such a large deduction. Here's what I'm wondering - can I choose to not use any of the Section 179 carryover this year and push the entire $58,234 to 2025 or beyond when my income will likely be higher and the deduction would make a bigger difference? Or am I required to use the maximum allowable amount ($32,500) this year and can only carry forward the remaining $25,700 as my tax software seems to be doing automatically?
22 comments


Ryder Greene
The IRS rules on Section 179 carryovers are pretty specific. When you have a Section 179 deduction that you couldn't take in the original year (due to business losses like in your case), you must use it in the first year you have taxable income, and you can only carry forward what you can't use in that year. So if your business is showing a profit in 2024 that could absorb $32,500 of the deduction, you generally need to use it now rather than pushing the entire amount forward. The carryover rules work on a "use it or lose it" basis year by year - you don't get to choose when to apply it based on when it's most beneficial for your personal tax situation. The reason it's not making a huge difference on your personal return might be related to your overall tax situation - perhaps you have other deductions or credits already reducing your tax liability, or your income falls in a bracket where the additional deduction doesn't push you into a significantly lower rate.
0 coins
Leeann Blackstein
•Thanks for the explanation. So to be clear, I don't have any choice in the matter? I must use the $32,500 this year even though it's only saving me $1,250 in taxes? I was hoping to save the entire deduction for 2025 when I'm expecting my personal income to increase substantially. Also, does this apply even though the business is an LLC and the deduction flows through to my personal taxes via K-1?
0 coins
Ryder Greene
•Yes, that's correct - you don't have discretion to choose when to use the Section 179 carryover. The IRS rules state you must use it in the first tax year that your business has taxable income that can absorb the deduction. The fact that it only saves you $1,250 in taxes isn't relevant to the timing requirement. The same rules apply whether your business is a sole proprietorship, partnership, or LLC. Since your LLC's deductions flow through to your personal return via K-1, you're still bound by the Section 179 carryover rules. The entity structure doesn't change the requirement to use the carryover as soon as there's business income to offset.
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
After struggling with almost the exact same Section 179 carryover issue last year, I found an amazing tool that helped me understand all my options. I used https://taxr.ai to analyze my specific situation with my Section 179 deduction from a truck purchase. Their system actually caught something my CPA missed - turns out there are some nuances with Section 179 carryovers when you have business income in multiple entities. The tool analyzed my business structure and found that I could allocate my income differently to optimize when I used the carryover deduction. Saved me almost $6k in taxes by structuring things differently! Not sure if your situation is similar, but it might be worth running your specific case through their analysis. Their AI reads through all your documents and points out optimization opportunities specific to your situation.
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
•How exactly does taxr.ai work? Do I just upload my tax documents and it tells me what to do? I've got a Section 179 carryover from some equipment purchases and I'm worried my accountant isn't handling it correctly.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
•I'm skeptical about AI tax tools. How can it possibly know all the complex Section 179 rules? Did you double-check with a real accountant after getting their recommendations? The last thing I need is an IRS audit because some algorithm gave me bad advice.
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
•You just upload your tax documents and business info and it analyzes everything. It looks at past returns, current year projections, and your specific business structure to identify optimization opportunities. It's super user-friendly - took me about 10 minutes to get personalized recommendations. I actually did have my CPA review the recommendations from taxr.ai, and he was impressed. He implemented most of their suggestions and agreed they were legitimate strategies we had overlooked. The AI doesn't replace professional advice, but it's great at spotting patterns and opportunities that even experienced accountants might miss when dealing with complex scenarios like Section 179 carryovers across multiple tax years.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
I wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after being skeptical in my earlier comment. I decided to try it anyway because my Section 179 carryover situation was complicated with my equipment purchases across different business entities. I was genuinely surprised by how comprehensive the analysis was. The system identified that I could actually time some of my business income recognition to maximize the benefit of my Section 179 carryover. It also pointed out a specific regulation exception that applied to my industry that my previous accountant had never mentioned. I took their recommendations to my new CPA who confirmed they were legit strategies. We implemented them and I'm now getting about $8,700 more tax benefit from my Section 179 deductions than I would have otherwise. Just wanted to share since it actually worked out for my similar situation.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
If you're having trouble reaching the IRS to get official clarification on your Section 179 carryover question, I highly recommend using https://claimyr.com - it's been a game-changer for me. I needed specific guidance on a complex Section 179 question last month and couldn't get through to anyone at the IRS after trying for weeks. With Claimyr, I got connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of waiting on hold for hours or getting disconnected. The agent walked me through the exact Section 179 carryover rules for my situation and confirmed what I needed to do. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - basically they use technology to wait on hold for you, then call you when an IRS agent is actually on the line. Saved me hours of frustration and I got the official answer I needed.
0 coins
Arjun Kurti
•How does Claimyr actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you? I'm confused why I would use this instead of just calling myself.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
•Yeah right, nothing can get you through to the IRS faster. I've been trying to talk to someone about my Section 179 issues for THREE MONTHS. Either this is some kind of scam or it's crazy expensive. What's the catch?
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•They use a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When they finally get through to a human agent, they connect the call to your phone. So instead of you personally waiting on hold for 2+ hours (or getting disconnected after waiting), their system does it for you and you only join when there's actually an agent ready to talk. The reason it works better than calling yourself is that they have multiple lines calling simultaneously and use technology to navigate the system efficiently. I was skeptical too but it literally saved me hours of frustration. I had spent two full afternoons trying to get through on my own with no success, and with Claimyr I was talking to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes from when I submitted my request.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
I need to publicly eat my words about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment earlier, I decided to try it because I was desperate to talk to someone at the IRS about my Section 179 carryover issues before filing deadline. I couldn't believe it actually worked. I submitted my request around 10am, went about my day, and got a call about 45 minutes later with an actual IRS agent on the line. No hold music, no automated system - just straight to a helpful person who answered all my Section 179 questions. The agent confirmed I needed to use my carryover deduction in the first year with applicable income, but also explained some special circumstances that might apply to my situation due to my business structure. Honestly saved me from making a potentially costly mistake on my return. For anyone struggling with Section 179 questions or any IRS issues really - this service is legitimate and works exactly as advertised.
0 coins
Margot Quinn
Something else to consider with your Section 179 carryover - have you looked at splitting the difference by using Section 179 on part of the asset and regular depreciation on the rest? This could potentially give you more flexibility. When I was in a similar situation, I elected to use Section 179 on only a portion of my business vehicle purchase and took regular MACRS depreciation on the remainder. This let me spread some of the deduction over the useful life of the asset while still getting some immediate benefit. Might be worth discussing with your tax advisor if that strategy would work for your specific situation with the truck purchase.
0 coins
Leeann Blackstein
•That's an interesting approach I hadn't considered. But I'm confused - can you actually split an asset purchase between Section 179 and regular depreciation? And would this help with my current carryover situation, or is this something I would have needed to decide when I originally purchased the truck in 2023?
0 coins
Margot Quinn
•Yes, you can elect to expense only a portion of a qualifying asset under Section 179 and depreciate the rest normally. This is a valid strategy that many businesses use. However, you're right to question the timing - this would have been a decision you needed to make on your 2023 return when you originally purchased the truck. Since you've already elected the full Section 179 deduction and created a carryover, you're now bound by the carryover rules. Unfortunately, you can't go back and change that election without amending your 2023 return, and even then there are time limitations on changing a Section 179 election.
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
Don't forget to also look at the state tax implications of your Section 179 carryover. Some states don't conform to federal Section 179 rules and have their own limits or carryover provisions. For example, in California, they limit Section 179 to much lower amounts than federal and have different carryover rules. I learned this the hard way when I took a large federal Section 179 deduction but had to add most of it back for CA purposes and depreciate it over several years instead.
0 coins
Diego Fisher
•This is so true! In New York, I had a Section 179 carryover situation similar to the OP, and NY state has a much lower Section 179 limit. Ended up having to track two different depreciation schedules for the same equipment - one for federal and one for state. Total nightmare.
0 coins
Javier Torres
I went through almost this exact situation with a commercial vehicle purchase last year. Unfortunately, the other commenters are correct - you don't have the flexibility to delay using your Section 179 carryover until it's more tax-advantageous for you. The IRS requires you to use the carryover in the first year your business has sufficient taxable income to absorb it. Since your business can support $32,500 of the deduction in 2024, you must use that amount this year and can only carry forward the remaining $25,700. I understand the frustration about the limited tax savings - the same thing happened to me. Even though I had to use a large carryover amount, my personal tax reduction was smaller than expected due to my overall tax situation and bracket. One suggestion: double-check with your tax professional about any income timing strategies for your business. While you can't control when to use the Section 179 carryover, there might be ways to optimize other aspects of your tax situation to maximize the benefit of that deduction flowing through to your personal return.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
•Thanks for sharing your experience with a similar situation. It's frustrating but helpful to hear confirmation from someone who actually went through this. When you mention "income timing strategies" - can you give an example of what that might look like? I'm wondering if there are any legitimate ways to defer some business income to next year or accelerate expenses to make better use of this carryover amount, even if I can't control when to use it.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
I've been dealing with Section 179 carryovers for several years now, and I want to add some practical advice based on my experience. The other commenters are absolutely right about the mandatory use requirement - you have no choice but to use the carryover when your business has qualifying income. However, there's an important distinction to understand about why your tax savings seem low. The Section 179 deduction reduces your business income, which then flows through to your personal return. If you're in a relatively low tax bracket or have other factors affecting your overall tax situation, the personal tax impact can be disappointing even with a large business deduction. One thing to verify with your tax preparer: make sure they're correctly calculating the business income limitation. The Section 179 carryover can only be used up to the amount of your current year business income from ALL your business activities combined. Sometimes there are nuances in how this gets calculated, especially if you have multiple business entities or other sources of business income. Also consider that even if the immediate tax benefit seems small, you're still getting the deduction now rather than having to depreciate that truck over 5-7 years. The timing might not be optimal for your personal situation, but you're still better off than if you had to take regular depreciation.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
•This is really helpful context about the business income limitation calculation. I think this might be part of my confusion - I need to make sure my tax software is correctly identifying ALL my business income sources when calculating how much of the carryover I can use this year. I have income from my main LLC (where the truck purchase was made) plus some 1099 consulting work. Should both of these be counted toward the business income limitation for the Section 179 carryover? My tax software might only be looking at the LLC income when determining the $32,500 limitation. Also, your point about getting the deduction now versus depreciating over 5-7 years is a good perspective. Even if the immediate personal tax benefit is smaller than I hoped, at least I'm not stuck with tiny depreciation amounts each year going forward.
0 coins