< Back to IRS

MoonlightSonata

Creating a state tax apportionment file for multi-state operations - need guidance

So my company has recently expanded to multiple states and I've been tasked with creating our first-ever state apportionment file. Up until now, we didn't need to worry about this since all our operations were in just one state. I'm particularly concerned about handling the payroll portion correctly since we have a lot of work-from-home employees scattered across different states. I know this affects how income gets allocated between states for tax purposes. To be honest, I'm feeling pretty overwhelmed by this whole project. I've never done anything like this before, and I'm not even sure where to start or what exactly needs to be included. Does anyone have experience with creating multi-state apportionment files? Any tips, templates, resources, or advice would be incredibly helpful! I'm trying not to panic but this feels like a huge responsibility and I don't want to mess it up.

I've worked with state apportionment for about 8 years now. Don't worry too much - it's definitely manageable once you understand the basics! For most companies, apportionment typically involves three factors: property, payroll, and sales (though many states have moved to single-sales factor). For your WFH employees, the general rule is that their wages count toward the payroll factor in the state where they physically perform the work (their home state), not where your company is headquartered. You'll need to track the total compensation paid to employees in each state. Start by creating a spreadsheet with all states where you have nexus (physical presence, economic activity, etc.). Then for each state, track: 1. Property: Value of tangible property in each state 2. Payroll: Total compensation paid to employees working in each state 3. Sales: Revenue from customers in each state Check each state's specific rules as they vary significantly. Some states use different weighting for these factors, and some have moved to sales-only formulas. The AICPA has some good resources on this, and most tax software providers offer templates. Would that help get you started?

0 coins

Thank you so much for the breakdown! This is incredibly helpful. I think I understand the basic concept now. For our WFH employees, do I need to track exactly how many days they worked in each state? We have some people who split time between two states. Also, for the sales factor, is that based on where our customer is located or where our services are performed? We provide mostly digital services if that makes a difference.

0 coins

For employees who split time between states, yes, ideally you should track the days worked in each state. Many companies have employees complete a work location log or use a digital tracking system. This becomes especially important for higher-paid employees since the tax impact is greater. For digital services, most states source sales based on where the benefit of the service is received - typically where your customer is located rather than where you perform the work. However, some states have different rules for digital products and services, so you'll need to check the specific rules for each state where you have customers. Some states use market-based sourcing (where customers receive benefit) while others use cost of performance (where you do the work). This is probably the most complex part of apportionment, so don't hesitate to get state-specific guidance if needed.

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

After struggling with multi-state apportionment for my company last year, I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) to be a complete game-changer. We had employees in 14 different states, and I was losing my mind trying to keep track of all the different state rules and requirements. Their system helped me analyze our payroll data to correctly determine state-by-state allocation for our remote workers. It even flagged potential issues with certain states that had special sourcing rules I wasn't aware of. What I liked most was how it integrated with our existing payroll and accounting systems to pull the data automatically rather than me having to manually compile everything. For someone just starting with apportionment like you are, it could save a ton of headaches, especially with the WFH employee situation which gets complicated quickly.

0 coins

Luca Ricci

•

Does it handle all states? We're especially concerned about California and New York since they seem to have their own unique requirements for everything tax-related. And how does it handle temporary work situations? Like if someone normally works in our office but spent 2 months working remotely from another state?

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these kinds of services. How much manual work did you still have to do? My experience with "automated" tax tools is they still require tons of manual adjustments and verification. Did you find that was the case?

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

It handles all 50 states plus DC, with specific rule sets for the more complex states like California, New York, and Massachusetts. It was particularly helpful with California's market-based sourcing rules which are notoriously complicated. For temporary work situations, that's actually one of its strengths. You can input temporary assignments or travel periods, and it will properly allocate those days to the correct states. This was crucial for us because we had several employees who spent a few weeks or months in different locations. Regarding the manual work - I was skeptical too initially. There is some setup required, but it's mostly front-loaded. You do need to verify the data imports correctly and make occasional adjustments, especially for unusual situations. But compared to the fully manual spreadsheets I was using before, it reduced my workload by about 80%. The time I spent on verification was far less than the time I previously spent on data entry and calculation.

0 coins

I was definitely skeptical about taxr.ai when I first heard about it, but after our company expanded to 8 states last year, I decided to give it a try. I'm actually surprised by how well it worked for our apportionment needs. The documentation analysis feature saved me countless hours - it automatically extracted relevant information from our payroll reports and categorized compensation by state. What impressed me most was how it handled our complex situations with contractors in multiple states and employees who relocated mid-year. It flagged several potential nexus issues I hadn't even considered, which potentially saved us from future audit headaches. Setup took about a day, but considering the weeks I spent on this process manually the year before, it was absolutely worth it.

0 coins

If you're struggling with getting answers from state tax departments about apportionment rules (which I found to be a nightmare), I highly recommend using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I wasted days on hold trying to get clarification from several state revenue departments until a colleague suggested this service. They got me connected with actual state tax department representatives in a fraction of the time I was spending. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. For California, I was on hold for 3+ hours on my own, but with Claimyr I got through in about 15 minutes. This was essential for getting written clarification on how to handle our remote workers who frequently travel between states. Each state has slightly different policies, and having official guidance saved us from making costly assumptions.

0 coins

Yuki Watanabe

•

How exactly does this work? I don't understand how they can get you through faster than just calling directly. The hold queues are the hold queues, right?

0 coins

This sounds too good to be true. The IRS and state tax departments are notoriously understaffed. I've literally spent entire days on hold. Are you sure this isn't just paying for someone else to wait on hold for you?

0 coins

It works by using an automated system that calls and navigates the phone tree, then stays on hold for you. When a representative finally answers, you get a call connecting you directly to them. So you don't have to stay on the line during that entire hold time - you can keep working on other things. It's not that they have some special access to skip the queue - they're just taking the burden of waiting off your plate. Their system sits in the hold queue so you don't have to. For state tax departments specifically, I found it invaluable because these calls often require very specific information exchanges. Unlike general tax questions, apportionment issues usually need written documentation or specific guidance that only the state tax authority can provide. When you're juggling multiple states with different rules, this saved me hours of productivity.

0 coins

I need to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I tried it for reaching the Massachusetts Department of Revenue about some confusing apportionment rules for digital services. Instead of wasting my entire afternoon on hold, I got a call back in about 40 minutes connecting me directly to a representative. I was able to get written clarification on exactly how to handle our software subscription revenue for apportionment purposes. The time savings was substantial - I used those hours to actually work on our apportionment calculations instead of listening to hold music. I've since used it for New York and California tax departments too, and it's been consistently reliable. For anyone dealing with multi-state tax issues, it's definitely worth considering.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Don't forget about the importance of documenting your apportionment methodology! This saved us during a state audit. Create a written policy explaining: 1. How you're classifying different types of revenue 2. Your methodology for tracking employee work locations 3. How you're valuing and assigning property to each state 4. Any special circumstances or exceptions We made the mistake of not doing this initially, and when California audited us, we had to reconstruct our reasoning after the fact, which was much harder to defend. Having a consistent, documented approach from the start would have saved us a lot of trouble. Also, consider setting calendar reminders for states with different filing deadlines - they're not all the same!

0 coins

This is really good advice - I hadn't even thought about documenting the methodology, just the actual calculations. Do you have any examples or templates of what this documentation should look like? Did you create a formal policy document?

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

We created a formal policy document that was about 10 pages long. It wasn't anything fancy - just a Word document with clear sections explaining each part of our methodology. We included specific examples of how we classified different revenue streams and handled various employee situations. The most important sections were the ones explaining our rationale for more complex decisions, like how we determined where the benefit of our services was received for market-based sourcing states. We also included references to specific state regulations or guidance we relied on. Our auditor specifically commented that having this documentation made the process much smoother. It demonstrated that we had given careful thought to our approach rather than just making arbitrary decisions. I don't have a template I can share, but I'd suggest structuring it by factor (property, payroll, sales) and then by state for any special rules you're applying.

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

•

Quick tip from someone who learned the hard way: Make sure your accounting software is set up to track sales by customer location! We had to manually go back through thousands of transactions because our system wasn't capturing state data correctly. If you're using QuickBooks or similar, you might need to customize some fields. Make sure you're capturing: - Customer's billing address state - Customer's shipping address state (if applicable) - Physical location where services are performed - Where the benefit of your service is received (for market-based states) This will save you SO much time when preparing your apportionment calculations. Trust me, doing this retroactively is a complete nightmare.

0 coins

ThunderBolt7

•

What software did you end up using? We've been struggling with this exact issue. Our accounting system wasn't designed with state apportionment in mind, and we've been using a cobbled-together system of Excel sheets and manual adjustments that's becoming unmanageable.

0 coins

As someone who's been through this exact same situation, I completely understand that overwhelming feeling! Multi-state apportionment can seem daunting at first, but breaking it down into manageable pieces really helps. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given is to start by identifying which states you actually have nexus in - don't assume you need to file everywhere you have customers or employees. Some states have minimum thresholds for economic nexus, and the rules vary significantly. For your remote employees, I'd recommend creating a simple tracking spreadsheet right away. Have each employee log their work location daily or weekly - even a basic Google Form can work. The key is starting this process now rather than trying to reconstruct it later. Also, don't try to perfect everything in year one. Focus on getting the basic framework right and being consistent in your approach. You can refine your methodology as you gain experience. Most importantly, consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in multi-state issues for your first year - it's worth the investment to establish a solid foundation. You've got this! The fact that you're asking these questions now shows you're taking the right approach.

0 coins

This is such reassuring advice! I really appreciate you acknowledging how overwhelming this feels - it helps to know I'm not the only one who's felt this way. The nexus point is particularly helpful because I was worried I might be overthinking which states we actually need to deal with. I love the idea of starting with a simple tracking system now rather than trying to be perfect from day one. That takes some pressure off! Do you have any recommendations for finding a tax professional who specializes in multi-state issues? I'm not sure how to tell if someone really has the expertise we need versus just general tax knowledge. Also, when you say "focus on getting the basic framework right," what would you consider the most critical elements to nail down first?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,894 users helped today