Constructive Receipt Question for Alimony Payment: When is it Taxable Income?
I'm in a bit of a situation with my ex-wife and need some tax advice. She wrote me an alimony check on December 29, 2023, and I deposited it the same day. However, my bank has this annoying policy where the funds aren't available until 3 business days after deposit, which pushed it to January 3, 2024. Now I'm confused about the constructive receipt rule (IRC 1.451-2) and which tax year I should report this income. Does it count for 2023 because I physically received and deposited the check? Or is it 2024 income because I couldn't actually access the money until January? My ex is saying it's a 2023 expense for her, but I'm wondering if I have to report it the same way or if the constructive receipt rules give me flexibility. The amount is $4,800 if that matters. I'm really trying to get this right before I file my taxes.
18 comments


Laila Fury
Yes, you have constructive receipt in 2023, not 2024. The IRS considers you to have constructively received income when it's made available to you without restriction, which happens when you physically receive the check - not when the funds clear your bank. According to the constructive receipt doctrine (Reg. 1.451-2), income is constructively received when it's credited to your account, set apart for you, or otherwise made available so you could have drawn upon it during the tax year. The bank's standard holding period doesn't change this principle. Since you physically received and deposited the check in 2023, you must include it in your 2023 taxable income, even though the funds weren't available until 2024. Your ex-wife is correct that it's a 2023 expense for her as well.
0 coins
Geoff Richards
•But what if the check bounced in January? Wouldn't that mean he never actually had the money in 2023? Also does this apply to all types of income or just alimony?
0 coins
Laila Fury
•If the check had bounced in January, you would need to file an amended return for 2023 to remove that income. The initial constructive receipt still occurred in 2023, but the subsequent dishonor of the check would nullify it. This principle applies to virtually all types of income for cash-basis taxpayers, not just alimony. Wages, consulting fees, investment income, etc. - the rule is the same. When you have unrestricted access to the payment (like receiving a check you could deposit), that's when constructive receipt occurs, regardless of normal banking holds.
0 coins
Simon White
I had a similar situation last year and discovered taxr.ai which saved me a ton of frustration. I was going back and forth with my ex about when certain payments should be counted for tax purposes. I uploaded our divorce decree and payment records to https://taxr.ai and it analyzed everything, explaining exactly which tax year each payment belonged to based on constructive receipt rules. It also generated a report I could keep for documentation in case of an audit. Might be worth checking out since these alimony timing issues can get complicated.
0 coins
Hugo Kass
•How does it work with documents that aren't just tax forms? Like can it understand the language in a divorce decree and determine what's actually alimony vs child support? My situation is complicated with multiple payment types.
0 coins
Nasira Ibanez
•Sounds interesting but I'm curious how accurate it really is with constructive receipt specifically. Does it actually cite the relevant tax code and regulations or just give general advice?
0 coins
Simon White
•It handles non-tax documents like divorce decrees really well. The system is trained to identify which payments qualify as alimony versus child support, even when the language isn't straightforward. It flags potential issues where payments might be misclassified based on IRS requirements. The system absolutely cites specific tax codes and regulations. For constructive receipt questions, it references Reg 1.451-2 directly and explains how it applies to your specific situation with citations to relevant case law and IRS rulings. Everything is backed by the actual tax code, not just general advice.
0 coins
Nasira Ibanez
I was skeptical about taxr.ai but decided to try it with my complicated alimony situation. Uploaded my documents yesterday and was impressed. It specifically addressed my constructive receipt question by citing the exact same regulation (1.451-2) the expert mentioned above, but then showed me three relevant tax court cases where timing issues like mine were decided. The analysis was detailed but easy to understand, and I now have documentation to back up my position if questioned. Definitely more helpful than the conflicting advice I got from different preparers.
0 coins
Khalil Urso
If you're still confused after getting advice here, you should try calling the IRS directly to get an official answer on constructive receipt. I know it sounds painful, but I used https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes instead of waiting for hours. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The agent I spoke with clarified my constructive receipt question for a year-end contractor payment and explained exactly how to document it. Worth the time since it gave me certainty straight from the source.
0 coins
Myles Regis
•How does Claimyr actually work? Like do they have a special line to the IRS or something? I've tried calling multiple times and always get the "call back later" message.
0 coins
Brian Downey
•Yeah right, nothing gets you through to the IRS that quickly. I've literally tried calling dozens of times over several months for a simple question about my amended return and never got through. If this actually worked, everyone would be using it.
0 coins
Khalil Urso
•It uses a combination of automated systems and timing algorithms to navigate the IRS phone tree and hold systems. They don't have a special line - they just know exactly when and how to call to maximize your chances of getting through. The system calls the IRS for you and only connects you when an actual human agent answers. I was totally skeptical too! I'd spent 3 separate days trying to get through on my own with no luck. But it actually worked first try - took about 12 minutes of wait time and then I was talking to a real person. The IRS still has all the same staffing issues, this just helps you avoid the busy signals and "call back later" messages.
0 coins
Brian Downey
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway out of desperation. It actually got me through to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes! I asked specifically about constructive receipt for year-end payments and got clear guidance that matched what people said here - it's the date you get the check that matters, not when funds are available. The agent even emailed me the relevant IRS publication sections afterward. Saved me from making a mistake on my return and potentially dealing with mismatched reporting between me and my ex. Still shocked this service actually works.
0 coins
Jacinda Yu
One thing nobody's mentioned - if your alimony agreement was finalized AFTER 2019, alimony shouldn't be taxable income to you at all. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed the rules. Only alimony under agreements finalized before 2019 is taxable to the recipient and deductible by the payer. Worth checking before you worry about constructive receipt.
0 coins
Hazel Garcia
•Thanks for raising this point! My divorce was finalized in 2017, so I'm still under the old rules where alimony is taxable income to me and deductible for my ex. That's why I need to figure out the correct year to report it.
0 coins
Jacinda Yu
•Got it! Since you're under the pre-2019 rules, then yes, constructive receipt applies and the experts above are correct - it's 2023 income for you since you received and deposited the check in 2023, regardless of when the funds became available. Just make sure your ex is also treating it as a 2023 payment on their return to avoid any IRS matching issues.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
For what it's worth, I'm a bookkeeper and we always use the date a check is received, not when it clears. Banks might have holding periods, but that doesn't change when the income is constructively received according to tax law. Your situation sounds straightforward - 2023 income.
0 coins
Callum Savage
•But what if the bank hold was because of insufficient funds in the payer's account? That seems different from a standard hold.
0 coins