< Back to IRS

Dylan Hughes

Complete Breakdown of Payroll Taxes by State - What's Coming Out of Your Paycheck?

Hey everyone, I'm trying to put together a comprehensive list of state payroll taxes that employees actually see deducted from their paychecks across different states. I'm not interested in what employers have to pay - just what gets taken out of workers' wages directly. For example, I recently learned that in Washington state, employees have to pay a 0.58% long-term care insurance payroll tax (unless they opted out at some point). And I know California has State Disability Insurance (SDI) and Personal Income Tax (PIT) that come straight out of paychecks. I'm hoping to compile a straightforward table like: | State | Employee Payroll Tax Rate | Tax Type(s) | |-------|---------------------------|-------------| | California | ~3% | State Disability Insurance, Personal Income Tax | | Texas | 0% | None | | Washington | 0.58% | Long-term care insurance tax | | Etc... | ? | ? | I've looked at some employer tax calculators but they only show what businesses pay, not what employees have withheld. Has anyone put together something like this? Or can people share what gets taken out in your state?

NightOwl42

•

I work as a payroll specialist and can help break this down. Employee-paid state payroll taxes fall into a few main categories across states: State income tax is the big one - 41 states plus DC impose this (rates vary widely based on income). Then there are the special state programs like CA's SDI (1.1% for 2025, up to the wage limit), NJ's temporary disability insurance, and WA's long-term care as you mentioned. The challenge with creating a simple table is that state income tax isn't a flat percentage - it varies by income level, filing status, and allowances claimed. Only a handful of states have flat-rate income taxes. For specialty taxes withheld from employees, here are some major ones: - California: SDI (1.1% in 2025) - New Jersey: Unemployment/Disability/Family Leave (combined ~1.1%) - New York: Disability/Paid Family Leave (~0.5% combined) - Massachusetts: Paid Family and Medical Leave (0.38%) - Washington: Paid Family Leave (0.4%) + Long-term care (0.58%) - Rhode Island: TDI/SDI (1.1%) - Hawaii: TDI (0.5%) Is there a specific reason you're looking for this information? There might be better resources depending on what you're using it for.

0 coins

Thank you for this breakdown! I recently started working remotely and my company allows me to live anywhere in the US. I'm trying to figure out which states would be most tax-friendly for my situation. Do you know which states have zero state income tax AND zero additional payroll deductions? I know Texas is one, but what about Florida or Nevada?

0 coins

NightOwl42

•

Seven states have no income tax: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and Wyoming. New Hampshire only taxes interest and dividend income, not wages. Among these, none have mandatory employee-paid disability or family leave programs, so your paycheck wouldn't have state-level deductions beyond the federal ones (Social Security, Medicare, etc.). Washington state has no income tax but does have those other payroll taxes I mentioned. If pure tax minimization is your goal, those seven states would be your best bet, though remember to consider overall cost of living and local taxes too.

0 coins

Dmitry Ivanov

•

I've been using taxr.ai to help me figure out my multi-state tax situation and it's been a huge help with questions like this. I was working remotely between California and Nevada last year and was totally confused about which state taxes applied to me. The site has a document analyzer that breaks down exactly which state-specific deductions apply based on your residency situation and income level. Check out https://taxr.ai if you're dealing with any complicated state tax scenarios. They have state-specific calculators that show exactly what's coming out of your paycheck, and the difference between states was honestly shocking to me. You can upload pay stubs or W-2s and it tells you if you're having the right amount withheld too.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Does this actually help with figuring out which states have the lowest tax burden specifically for payroll taxes? I'm considering moving to Florida but want to make sure I understand all the implications first. My company is based in New York if that matters.

0 coins

Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical of these tax tools. How accurate is it for comparing states? I moved from California to Texas last year and my take-home pay increased a lot, but there were some weird transition issues with my final CA paycheck. Would this have helped with that?

0 coins

Dmitry Ivanov

•

It absolutely helps with comparing state tax burdens. You can create scenarios with the same income in different states and see the exact payroll tax impact. For your NY company/FL residency situation, it would show that you'd be subject to FL rules (so no state income tax) as long as you're physically working in Florida. The state comparison feature is actually what I found most valuable. For the CA to TX transition, it would have flagged that your final CA paycheck should only include CA taxes for the days you physically worked in California that pay period. Many employers get this wrong and the tool shows exactly what should have been withheld vs what actually was.

0 coins

Just wanted to update everyone - I tried taxr.ai after posting my skeptical comment and it was actually really helpful! I uploaded my final California paycheck and discovered my employer had withheld California income tax for the entire month even though I had moved to Texas mid-month. The site generated a letter I could send to payroll showing exactly how the withholding should have been calculated based on my actual work location days. I also ran a comparison between staying in Texas versus potentially moving to Colorado, and it showed me I'd lose about 4.5% of my paycheck to state income tax in Colorado. The breakdown of all state-specific deductions was super clear and helped me decide to stay put for now. Definitely worth checking out if you're comparing states or have a multi-state situation.

0 coins

Zainab Ali

•

After struggling to get through to my state tax agency for weeks about a withholding issue, I finally used Claimyr to connect with a real person at the tax department. If you're dealing with state payroll tax questions that need official answers, https://claimyr.com can get you through to a human at most state tax agencies without the typical 2+ hour wait times. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c In my case, I had moved from New York to Pennsylvania mid-year and my employer was still withholding NY taxes. Needed to find out exactly what forms to file to get it fixed and get a refund for the incorrect withholding. The service got me through to a NY tax rep in about 10 minutes when I had previously spent hours on hold.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Wait, how does this even work? Do they have some special access to tax agencies that normal people don't? I've been trying to reach someone at the California tax board about an SDI overpayment for weeks with no luck.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

This sounds like a scam honestly. No way they can magically get through phone lines faster than anyone else. Plus you're probably paying a fortune for something you could do yourself with enough patience.

0 coins

Zainab Ali

•

They use a technology that navigates phone trees and waits on hold for you. When an actual human answers, your phone rings and you're instantly connected. It's not "special access" - they're just automating the painful waiting part. For California specifically, they absolutely can help with the FTB and EDD (who handles SDI issues). The service does have a cost, but considering I was spending hours of my workday on hold, it was worth it to me. You're paying to get those hours of your life back, and in my case, I needed urgent answers to correct my withholding before another incorrect paycheck was processed.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

I need to apologize for my skeptical comment. After waiting on hold with the California EDD for 3 hours yesterday (and eventually getting disconnected), I decided to try Claimyr as a last resort for my SDI question. I honestly expected it to be a waste of money, but they got me through to an EDD representative in about 15 minutes. The rep confirmed that my employer had been withholding SDI at an incorrect rate and helped me file for a refund of the excess withholding. I also learned that California has a wage base limit for SDI ($153,164 for 2025) and once you hit that, they should stop withholding - my employer hadn't been doing that either. So my skepticism was completely wrong, and I'm actually getting money back now. Sometimes it's worth paying for a service when the alternative is hours of frustration.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

Here's my contribution to your state-by-state comparison. In Oregon, we have: - State income tax (ranges from 4.75% to 9.9% depending on income) - Transit taxes in some areas (TriMet in Portland area is 0.7967%, Lane County is 0.77%) - Statewide transit tax (0.1%) - Starting July 2025, we'll also have Oregon Paid Leave (1% of wages, shared between employer and employee) The transit taxes really sneaked up on me when I moved here. They don't sound like much but it adds up!

0 coins

Do you know if any other states have these local transit taxes taken directly from paychecks? I've never heard of this before.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

Several states allow for local payroll taxes - Ohio has municipal income taxes that can be quite high (2%+ in some cities). Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky have local income taxes in some cities too. New York has NYC income tax. What makes Oregon's transit taxes unique is they're specifically earmarked for public transportation rather than general municipal funds. I don't know of other states with this specific structure, but local payroll taxes definitely exist in many forms across different states. They're often overlooked in these comparisons but can significantly impact your take-home pay.

0 coins

Paolo Romano

•

Don't forget about Colorado's new Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FAMLI) program that started withholding in 2023. Employees pay 0.45% of wages (matched by most employers). This isn't on most state comparisons yet since it's relatively new. Also worth noting that some states with no income tax make up for it with higher property taxes (looking at you, Texas) or sales taxes. So while your paycheck might be bigger, your overall tax burden might not be that different depending on your spending and housing situation.

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

That's such a good point about property taxes. I moved from California to Texas thinking I'd save a ton in taxes, but my property tax bill is nearly triple what I paid in CA for a similar value home! My paycheck is bigger but my monthly expenses aren't actually lower because of this.

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

This is exactly the kind of information I've been looking for! I'm a tax preparer and constantly get questions from clients about state payroll taxes, especially those who work remotely or are considering relocating. One thing to add to your list: Connecticut has a 0.5% employee contribution for their Paid Family and Medical Leave program that started in 2022. Also, Vermont will be implementing a similar program in 2025 with employee contributions. For your table format, you might want to consider separating income tax from other payroll taxes since income tax rates are progressive in most states and depend on income level. Maybe something like: | State | Income Tax | Other Employee Payroll Taxes | |-------|------------|------------------------------| | California | Progressive 1-13.3% | SDI 1.1% | | Texas | None | None | | Washington | None | Paid Family Leave 0.4%, Long-term Care 0.58% | The challenge is that many of these specialty programs are brand new (last 5 years) and constantly changing rates, so any table would need frequent updates. But having this consolidated would be incredibly valuable for people making relocation decisions!

0 coins

Sophia Russo

•

This is really helpful! As someone new to understanding state tax differences, I'm wondering - when these new programs like Vermont's 2025 implementation happen, do employers automatically start withholding or do employees need to do something? I'm potentially moving to Vermont next year and want to make sure I understand what to expect on my first paycheck there. Also, do you know if there's a good resource to track when states are adding new payroll tax programs? It seems like there are a lot of changes happening recently with paid family leave programs spreading to more states.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Great question! When new payroll tax programs are implemented, employers are legally required to start withholding automatically - employees don't need to take any action. Your Vermont employer will handle the withholding setup before your first paycheck under the new program. For tracking upcoming changes, I recommend checking the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) website - they maintain updates on state-level employment benefit legislation. The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) also publishes alerts about new state payroll requirements. Most state labor departments will also post implementation timelines on their websites at least 6-12 months in advance. You're right that there's been a wave of paid family leave programs lately - about 12 states have implemented or are implementing these programs since 2019. It's definitely something to factor into relocation decisions since these can add 0.4-1% to your payroll deductions depending on the state.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

Thanks for starting this thread! As someone who recently went through a multi-state move, I can contribute some specific numbers for Minnesota and Wisconsin that might help your table. Minnesota employees pay: - Progressive state income tax (5.35% to 9.85% depending on income) - No additional state-specific payroll deductions currently Wisconsin employees pay: - Progressive state income tax (3.54% to 7.65% depending on income) - No additional state-specific payroll deductions currently What's interesting is that both states are currently considering paid family leave programs similar to what other states have implemented, so this could change in the next few years. One thing I'd suggest for your table is adding a "Last Updated" column since these programs are changing so frequently. Also, you might want to note whether the rates have wage caps - for example, California's SDI stops at $153,164 in wages for 2025, so high earners effectively pay a lower percentage. Are you planning to include local payroll taxes too? Some cities have their own income taxes that come out of paychecks (like NYC's 3.078-3.876% city income tax) which can be significant.

0 coins

LordCommander

•

This is such a comprehensive breakdown! I'm actually in the process of researching state taxes for a potential job offer in Minneapolis, so your Minnesota info is perfectly timed. The suggestion about including wage caps is brilliant - I hadn't realized that some of these payroll taxes stop at certain income levels. That could make a huge difference for someone comparing job offers at different salary ranges. Your point about local taxes is really important too. I've been focusing so much on state-level differences that I completely overlooked city taxes. NYC's additional 3%+ would definitely change the calculation for someone comparing a New York job to other states. Do you know if there are other major cities with significant local payroll taxes like that? Also, are there any good resources for tracking when states like Minnesota and Wisconsin might implement their paid family leave programs? It sounds like this landscape is changing so quickly that timing a move could really impact your long-term tax situation.

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

This is an incredibly valuable resource you're building! As a payroll administrator for a multi-state company, I deal with these variations daily and it's honestly one of the most confusing aspects of our system. A few additions to help complete your picture: **Delaware**: State income tax (2.2% to 6.6%) plus a small unemployment tax that employees pay in some circumstances **Maryland**: State income tax (2% to 5.75%) - but here's the kicker, most counties also have local income taxes ranging from 2.25% to 3.2% that come right out of paychecks **Illinois**: Flat 4.95% state income tax, no additional payroll deductions currently **Indiana**: Flat 3.23% state income tax, plus some counties have additional local income taxes What I find most challenging is that many employees don't realize these specialty programs often have maximum wage bases. So someone making $200k might actually have a lower effective rate on some of these taxes compared to someone making $50k, which can skew comparisons. For your table format, you might consider color-coding states by total potential payroll tax burden ranges (Low: 0-3%, Medium: 3-7%, High: 7%+) to make it easier for people to quickly identify their best options. The details matter, but sometimes people just need to know "is this state going to cost me significantly more or less than where I am now?" One warning though - make sure to note that this is employee-paid only, because I constantly get questions from people who find employer tax information and think that's coming out of their paycheck too!

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

This is incredibly helpful, Leslie! The color-coding suggestion is brilliant - that would make it so much easier for people to get a quick overview before diving into the details. I've been getting overwhelmed trying to compare all these different rates and programs. Your point about the wage base caps is really eye-opening. I hadn't considered that higher earners might actually have lower effective rates on some of these taxes. That definitely changes how you'd evaluate a job offer at different salary levels. The Maryland county tax situation sounds particularly complex - are there any other states where local taxes are that significant? And do you know if there's a reliable way to look up local tax rates by county/city, or is that something people just have to research individually for each area they're considering? Also, I love your warning about employee vs employer taxes. I've definitely seen some confusing information online that mixed those up. It sounds like having that distinction clearly marked would save a lot of confusion.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly enlightening! I had no idea the state payroll tax landscape was this complex. I'm currently living in Georgia and considering a remote job opportunity that would let me relocate anywhere in the US. From what I'm gathering here, Georgia has a progressive state income tax (1% to 5.75%) with no additional state payroll deductions currently. But reading through all these responses, I'm realizing I need to factor in not just state income tax, but also these newer paid family leave programs, local taxes, and even property tax differences as some of you mentioned. The timing aspect is particularly interesting - it sounds like several states are in the process of implementing new programs that could change the calculations significantly. For someone planning a move in 2025-2026, should I be researching what's in the pipeline for different states, or just focus on current rates? Also, I'm curious about one thing that hasn't been mentioned much - are there any states that are moving in the opposite direction? Like eliminating or reducing payroll taxes? Or is the trend pretty much universally toward adding more programs and deductions? Thanks to everyone who has contributed specific numbers and insights - this is exactly the kind of real-world information that's impossible to find in a single resource anywhere else!

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Great question about future trends! From what I've observed, you're absolutely right that the trend is generally toward adding programs rather than eliminating them. Most states implementing paid family leave are doing so with bipartisan support since these programs are popular with voters. For your 2025-2026 timeline, I'd definitely research what's in the pipeline. Vermont's program starts in 2025, and several other states have legislation in various stages. The implementation timelines are usually announced 1-2 years in advance, so you can plan accordingly. One thing to consider - states that are early adopters of these programs often have higher initial rates that get adjusted down as the programs mature and build reserves. So moving to a state right as they launch a new program might mean higher initial withholdings. As for states reducing taxes, it's pretty rare for payroll taxes specifically, though some states have reduced income tax rates recently. The political reality is that once these benefit programs are established, they're very difficult to roll back. @d8b0dab8a774 Have you looked into whether your potential remote employer has any restrictions on which states you can work from? Some companies limit remote work to states where they already have payroll systems set up, which could narrow down your research significantly.

0 coins

Lucas Bey

•

This is such a valuable discussion! I work in HR and constantly get questions about state tax differences from our remote employees. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned yet is that some states have reciprocity agreements that can complicate the picture. For example, if you live in Pennsylvania but work in New Jersey (even remotely for a NJ-based company), you might not owe NJ income tax thanks to their reciprocity agreement. But the specialty payroll taxes like disability insurance don't always follow the same rules. Also, I wanted to highlight something for anyone considering Washington state - while they don't have state income tax, their long-term care tax (WA Cares) is pretty unique. You can opt out if you have private long-term care insurance, but you have to do it during specific enrollment periods and provide proof of coverage. Once you opt out, you can never opt back in, even if you lose your private coverage later. For the original poster's table, you might want to add a column for "Special Considerations" to capture things like opt-out provisions, reciprocity agreements, and wage caps. These details can significantly impact someone's actual tax burden beyond just the basic rates. Has anyone dealt with the complexities of changing state residency mid-year while working remotely? The apportionment rules can get pretty complicated depending on where your employer is based versus where you're physically working.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

This is such an important point about reciprocity agreements! I had no idea that these specialty payroll taxes might not follow the same rules as income tax reciprocity. That could really complicate things for remote workers. The Washington state long-term care opt-out situation sounds particularly tricky - having to make a permanent decision during specific enrollment periods with no ability to opt back in later seems like something that could really catch people off guard. Do you know if other states with similar programs have those same restrictions, or is Washington unique in that aspect? Your suggestion about adding a "Special Considerations" column is brilliant. There seem to be so many nuances beyond just the basic rates that could significantly impact someone's decision. Things like reciprocity rules, opt-out deadlines, wage caps, and implementation timelines for new programs. I'm curious about your question on mid-year residency changes too. If someone moves from California to Texas mid-year while working remotely for a California company, how do the apportionment rules typically work? Does it depend on where you're physically located when you do the work, or does the company's location matter more for payroll tax purposes? @429185180290 Thanks for bringing up these complexities - this is exactly the kind of real-world insight that makes this discussion so valuable!

0 coins

Beth Ford

•

This has been such an enlightening thread! I'm a tax attorney who specializes in multi-state issues, and I wanted to add a few important clarifications and additional states to help complete your comprehensive list. **Additional State Payroll Taxes to Consider:** **Connecticut**: 0.5% Paid Family and Medical Leave (employee portion) **Rhode Island**: 1.2% Temporary Disability Insurance + 1.1% Temporary Caregiver Insurance **New York**: ~0.5% for Disability Benefits Law + Paid Family Leave combined **Massachusetts**: 0.68% Paid Family and Medical Leave (increased for 2025) **Critical Points Often Overlooked:** 1. **Multi-state workers**: If you work remotely for an out-of-state employer, you generally pay taxes based on where you physically perform the work, NOT where your employer is located. However, some states have "convenience rules" (like NY) that can override this. 2. **Partial year residents**: When you move mid-year, most states prorate based on the actual days of residency/work location, but the calculation methods vary significantly. 3. **Reciprocity limitations**: As Lucas mentioned, reciprocity agreements typically only apply to income taxes. Disability, family leave, and unemployment taxes usually follow the work location state regardless of reciprocity. For your table format, I'd strongly recommend separating this into two tables: one for income tax ranges and another for mandatory payroll programs with specific rates. The mixing of progressive income taxes with flat-rate specialty taxes makes comparison difficult. Also worth noting: several states are currently debating paid family leave legislation for 2025-2026 implementation, including Michigan, Ohio, and Iowa. The landscape is definitely shifting rapidly!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,195 users helped today