< Back to IRS

Malik Jenkins

Comparing UK vs US tax rates - are we looking at the full picture?

I've been hearing a lot lately about how US taxes are supposedly much lower than UK taxes, with conservative British politicians pointing to this as the reason for America's stronger economic growth. But I'm not convinced we're comparing apples to apples here. First off, the UK tax system funds the National Health Service, which I think takes up around 25% of their budget. Meanwhile in the US, we handle healthcare through insurance premiums which aren't counted as "taxes" but still come out of our pockets. I used to live in Westchester County and commuted to Manhattan for work some years back. My tax situation was ridiculously complex - I paid Federal tax, New York State tax, NYC commuter tax, property tax in my township, and school district tax as well. When you add all these up, the "low tax America" story starts to look questionable. Has anyone seen a comprehensive comparison that actually accounts for all these differences? It seems like comparing headline tax rates without considering what they cover (or don't cover) isn't telling the whole story. I'm really curious if the "US tax advantage" holds up when everything is factored in properly.

You're asking a really good question that doesn't get addressed enough in these political discussions. Having lived and worked in both countries, I can tell you the comparison isn't straightforward. The headline income tax rates can be misleading. While the UK's top rate is higher (45% vs 37% federal in the US), you need to factor in state and local taxes in the US which can push combined rates to similar levels in high-tax states like California or New York. The biggest difference is definitely healthcare. UK residents pay higher taxes but get the NHS included. Americans pay lower taxes but then shell out thousands in health insurance premiums, deductibles, and copays. When you factor these in, many middle-class Americans are effectively paying "tax-like" mandatory expenses that match or exceed UK levels. Property taxes also tend to be much higher in many US locations compared to UK council tax. Plus the US has Social Security and Medicare taxes that function similarly to UK National Insurance contributions.

0 coins

That's interesting - do you have any rough numbers for what an "equivalent" income would look like after all mandatory expenses in both countries? Like if someone made $100k in the US vs £75k in the UK (roughly equivalent), what would they actually have left after all taxes AND healthcare costs?

0 coins

For a rough approximation, on a $100k income in a high-tax US state, you might pay $20-25k in federal taxes, $5-10k in state/local taxes, and $5-10k for decent health insurance (plus deductibles and copays). So you could easily be spending $35-45k on these combined expenses. In the UK, on a £75k income, you'd pay about £21k in income tax and national insurance contributions. While that's a higher percentage, you'd have no additional healthcare costs and usually lower property taxes. The actual disposable income often ends up being more comparable than the headline tax rates suggest.

0 coins

Hey there, I went through a similar rabbit hole when I was comparing tax situations between countries. I found an amazing tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that really helped break this down for me. It's like having a tax analyst compare different international scenarios without the ridiculous consulting fees. I uploaded some documents showing my US tax situation and some UK hypotheticals, and the analysis showed me that when you factor in healthcare costs, property taxes, and all the hidden fees, the effective "mandatory expense rate" was within 3-4% between the countries for my income level. The tool broke down all the components that aren't technically "taxes" but function the same way in terms of mandatory expenses.

0 coins

Does this tool actually handle international tax comparisons? I've been looking for something like this forever but most tax software is country-specific. Can it model things like what my situation would look like if I moved from the US to the UK?

0 coins

I'm skeptical about tools like this. How does it account for differences in benefits? Like, can it quantify the value of having the NHS vs. US healthcare? Or differences in public services quality? Seems like you'd need a ton of personal data to make this truly accurate.

0 coins

It absolutely handles international comparisons - that's actually one of its strengths. You can model hypothetical relocations and it shows what your tax situation would look like in different countries. It helped me when I was considering a job offer in London to see the real financial impact beyond just the salary numbers. The tool does account for benefits differences by calculating "equivalent expenses" - it doesn't just compare tax rates, but builds in models for healthcare costs, education expenses, retirement benefits and other government services. You're right that it requires some personal data to be accurate, but that's exactly why it works better than general comparisons you find in articles.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up! I was skeptical about taxr.ai but decided to give it a shot after spending hours with spreadsheets trying to figure out a potential relocation package. I'm actually impressed with how thorough it was. The analysis showed me that despite the UK having higher income tax rates, when you factor in what I'm paying for healthcare premiums, deductibles, and all the various local taxes in the US, the difference was much smaller than I expected - about 7% overall difference for my specific situation. What I found most helpful was how it broke down the "effective mandatory expense rate" rather than just looking at the taxes line on a paycheck. Definitely a more nuanced picture than what politicians present when they make these comparisons!

0 coins

I spent 8 months trying to reach the IRS for help with my international tax situation when I moved back from the UK. Calling 15+ times, waiting for hours, getting disconnected. Super frustrating. Finally found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and they got me connected to an actual IRS agent in under 45 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The agent was able to help me sort out how to properly report my UK pension and avoid double taxation issues. Saved me thousands in potential incorrect filing penalties. If you're dealing with complex international tax questions, being able to actually speak with the IRS rather than guessing is invaluable.

0 coins

How does this actually work? I thought the IRS phone lines were just impossible to get through regardless of what you do. Is this some kind of priority service or something?

0 coins

This sounds like a paid promotion. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS unless you're paying for some kind of shady service. I've always just had to wait like everyone else. I don't buy that this actually works.

0 coins

It's not a priority line or anything like that. They use technology to continually call the IRS and navigate the phone system for you. When they get through to an agent, they call you and connect you. It's basically outsourcing the frustrating hold time. Nothing shady about it - they're just automating the process of calling and waiting. I was skeptical too, but after months of trying myself, I was desperate. The service saves you from having to sit by your phone for hours. You just get a call when an actual human at the IRS is on the line.

0 coins

I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it because I had an international tax issue that needed resolving before a deadline next week. I was absolutely convinced it wouldn't work, but I got a call back in about 35 minutes with an actual IRS agent on the line. I nearly fell out of my chair. The agent helped me understand how to properly report foreign tax credits from my time working in the UK, which directly relates to this thread about UK vs US taxes. Turns out there are specific forms and treaties that prevent double taxation between the US and UK that I had no idea about. This saved me significant money and answered some of the exact questions about comparative tax burdens that we're discussing.

0 coins

The comparison between US and UK taxes also needs to account for VAT vs sales tax. UK VAT is a flat 20% on most purchases, while US sales taxes vary by state but are generally much lower (5-10%). This significantly affects cost of living. Also, UK tax system is much simpler. When I lived there, PAYE (Pay As You Earn) meant I never had to file a tax return for ordinary income. In the US, we all waste hours filing complex returns even for simple situations. That's a hidden "tax" on time that should count for something too!

0 coins

Good point about VAT! But don't forget that many essential items in the UK have reduced VAT rates (0% on food, for example). Also, does the US system account for gas taxes? I heard they're much higher in the UK, which is another hidden tax.

0 coins

You're absolutely right about the reduced and zero VAT rates in the UK for essentials - that's an important distinction I should have mentioned. Food, children's clothes, and books having 0% VAT does help offset the higher standard rate. Regarding gas taxes, yes, they are dramatically higher in the UK. Last time I checked, fuel duty plus VAT in the UK meant that taxes made up about 60% of the pump price, compared to around 20% in the US. This is another major "hidden tax" difference that affects overall cost of living but doesn't show up in income tax comparisons.

0 coins

Has anyone calculated how education costs factor into this? UK universities are now expensive but still generally cheaper than US ones. If you're paying $30k/year for each kid in college in the US vs £9k in the UK, that's effectively another "tax" on American families that doesn't show up in tax rate comparisons.

0 coins

Excellent point! I paid for kids through both systems. In the UK, my daughter's entire 3-year degree cost about £27,000 in tuition (3 years at £9,000). In the US, my son's 4-year degree at a state school cost nearly $100,000 just for tuition. Add living expenses and it's even more dramatic.

0 coins

This is such an important discussion that gets oversimplified in political rhetoric. I've been diving into this topic myself recently, and what strikes me most is how many "mandatory expenses" in the US function exactly like taxes but aren't labeled as such. Beyond healthcare premiums and higher education costs that others have mentioned, I've noticed that Americans often pay significantly more for basic services that are government-provided in the UK. Things like public transportation, childcare, and even basic financial services often require private payment in the US. For example, in many UK cities, you have robust public transport systems funded through taxes. In most US cities, you're essentially forced to own a car (with insurance, maintenance, gas taxes, etc.) - that's thousands in mandatory expenses that don't exist to the same degree in the UK. The retirement savings situation is interesting too. UK state pension plus workplace pensions mean less individual pressure to save huge amounts in 401(k)s. Americans effectively have to "tax" themselves extra to make up for less comprehensive social security. When you add up all these hidden mandatory expenses alongside actual taxes, I suspect the total burden is much more similar between the countries than the headline rates suggest.

0 coins

You've really hit the nail on the head with the transportation costs! I never thought about car ownership as essentially a "mandatory tax" but that's exactly what it is in most of America. Between car payments, insurance, gas, maintenance, and registration fees, I'm probably spending $8-10k per year just to get around - money that would go toward public transport taxes in the UK but gets counted as "personal expenses" here. The retirement point is fascinating too. I'm maxing out my 401(k) contributions at $23k per year because I know Social Security alone won't cut it. That's basically a self-imposed 15-20% "retirement tax" on top of everything else. Meanwhile, my friends in the UK seem less stressed about retirement savings because their system is more comprehensive from the start. It really makes you wonder if the "low tax" narrative is just accounting sleight of hand - moving mandatory expenses off the government balance sheet and onto individual budgets, then claiming victory on tax rates.

0 coins

This conversation has really opened my eyes to how misleading surface-level tax comparisons can be. I'm a financial planner, and I've seen firsthand how my clients struggle with the "hidden taxes" everyone's discussing here. What really gets me is the psychological impact too. In the UK system, you pay higher visible taxes but then you're basically done - healthcare is covered, education is more affordable, public transport exists. There's a certain peace of mind in that. Here in the US, even after paying your "lower" taxes, you're constantly worried about the next healthcare bill, whether you're saving enough for retirement, if your kids will graduate with crushing debt. It's like death by a thousand cuts - each expense seems reasonable in isolation, but they add up to create this constant financial anxiety that you don't capture in simple tax rate comparisons. I've started telling my clients to think about their "total mandatory expense rate" rather than just their tax rate when making financial decisions. It's eye-opening when you realize that your effective rate of mandatory expenses (taxes + healthcare + transportation + education savings + retirement catch-up) might be 45-50% of income even in "low tax" America. The political rhetoric about tax rates completely misses this reality that ordinary families live with every day.

0 coins

This is exactly what I've been trying to articulate to people! As someone who's relatively new to understanding all this, your point about the "total mandatory expense rate" is brilliant. I never thought to calculate it that way, but when you frame it like that, it makes so much sense. I'm just starting my career and trying to figure out budgeting, and honestly, the constant uncertainty about healthcare costs and whether I'm saving enough for retirement is exhausting. Every financial decision feels like I'm playing defense against some future catastrophe that might bankrupt me. Your comment about "death by a thousand cuts" really resonates. It's not just the money - it's the mental energy spent researching health insurance plans, figuring out 401k allocations, comparing car insurance rates, etc. In the UK system, it sounds like a lot of that cognitive load is just... handled for you through the tax system. Do you have any rough guidelines for what that "total mandatory expense rate" should look like for someone just starting out? I'm trying to get a realistic picture of what I actually need to earn to have the lifestyle that the salary numbers suggest I should be able to afford.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today