Can someone confirm my understanding about section 1250 and 1231 property gains on K-1?
I'm dealing with a cross-border situation and trying to make sense of a U.S. tax return that's way outside my usual wheelhouse. I received a K-1 for a U.S. corporation that shows both an unrecaptured section 1250 gain and a net section 1231 gain. I'm confused about whether the unrecaptured section 1250 gain is actually included within the net section 1231 gain amount or if they're completely separate. Let me try to explain with some numbers to make it clearer. Say there's a property with a current tax basis of $135,000, original cost of $202,000, and it was sold for $270,000. Would the partnership report the full $135,000 gain in Box 10 (section 1231) and $67,000 in Box 9c (unrecaptured 1250)? Or would they report just $68,000 in Box 10 and $67,000 in Box 9c? Also, if a K-1 allocates an unrecaptured section 1250 gain to me, where exactly would I see this reflected on the tax return? Really appreciate any help from someone who knows U.S. partnership tax reporting better than I do!
20 comments


Aisha Mahmood
The unrecaptured section 1250 gain is actually a subset of the section 1231 gain, not separate from it. This often causes confusion even among U.S. tax practitioners! In your example with a property having a tax basis of $135,000, original cost of $202,000, and selling price of $270,000: The partnership would report the total gain of $135,000 as a section 1231 gain in Box 10. Then, the portion that represents depreciation recapture ($67,000 in your example) would be separately stated in Box 9c as unrecaptured section 1250 gain. This separate reporting is necessary because the unrecaptured section 1250 gain is taxed at a maximum rate of 25%, while the remaining section 1231 gain might qualify for preferential capital gains rates. When you prepare the tax return, the unrecaptured section 1250 gain will flow to the Schedule D and then to the "Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain Worksheet" in the Schedule D instructions.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•Thanks for explaining that! So just to be sure I understand - if the property was sold for exactly the original cost ($202,000 in the example), would there still be a section 1250 gain of $67,000 reported in Box 9c, with a section 1231 gain of $67,000 in Box 10? Or would we see $67,000 in 9c and $0 in Box 10 since there's no gain beyond recapturing the depreciation?
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•If the property sold for exactly the original cost ($202,000), there would be a $67,000 total gain (selling price of $202,000 minus adjusted basis of $135,000). This entire $67,000 would be reported as a section 1231 gain in Box 10, and the same $67,000 would also be reported as unrecaptured section 1250 gain in Box 9c. You wouldn't report $0 in Box 10, because the total gain of $67,000 is still a section 1231 gain. Box 9c is essentially telling you what portion of your Box 10 gain is subject to the 25% maximum tax rate rather than the lower capital gains rates.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
After struggling with some complex K-1s from real estate partnerships, I started using https://taxr.ai to help interpret these forms correctly. Their service analyzed my K-1s and explained exactly how the section 1231 and 1250 gains work together. Saved me hours of research and potentially costly mistakes! The tool clearly showed me how the unrecaptured section 1250 gains relate to section 1231 gains and explained the tax rate differences. It even highlighted which specific line items would flow to which forms on my tax return. Really helpful for visualizing these complex interactions.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•Does it actually work for cross-border situations like OP mentioned? I'm in a similar position dealing with US K-1s but filing in another country and wondering if the tool can handle international tax implications.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
•I'm intrigued but skeptical. How exactly does the system know how to interpret the K-1 correctly? Are there actual tax professionals reviewing these documents or is it just running some automated analysis?
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•For cross-border situations, I found it surprisingly helpful as it breaks down each K-1 item and explains the underlying U.S. tax concepts, which gives you the information needed to determine the treatment in your home country. The detailed explanations of each line item helped me understand the proper classification under my country's tax system. The system uses a combination of AI and tax professional review for complex documents. When I uploaded my K-1s, the system first provided an automated analysis, then for questions that weren't straightforward, they had a tax professional review and provide additional guidance. The explanations include references to relevant IRS publications and tax code sections.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
I wanted to follow up after trying taxr.ai for my cross-border K-1 issues. It actually worked really well! The system broke down each K-1 item with clear explanations of the U.S. tax treatment, which helped me figure out how to report everything correctly in my home country. For my section 1250/1231 confusion specifically, they provided a detailed walkthrough with examples that made the relationship between these sections crystal clear. They even explained which worksheets I needed to complete and gave me step-by-step guidance. Definitely helped me avoid some significant reporting errors on both sides of the border.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
After hours on hold trying to get someone at the IRS to explain these K-1 allocations, I finally used https://claimyr.com to get through to a real person. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was connected to an IRS representative in about 20 minutes (vs the 2+ hours I'd wasted previously). The agent walked me through exactly how section 1231 and 1250 gains are related and confirmed that the unrecaptured section 1250 gain is included within the total section 1231 gain amount, not separate from it. Huge relief to get official confirmation!
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•How does this service actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you or what? Seems weird that you could pay someone else to wait on hold.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•Yeah right. The IRS agents I've talked to barely understand basic tax questions, let alone complex partnership issues with section 1250 recapture. I seriously doubt they gave you any useful information on this topic.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•The service basically uses an automated system to navigate the IRS phone tree and wait on hold for you. When an agent finally picks up, you get a call connecting you directly to them. So you don't waste hours listening to the hold music - you just get a call when a human is actually available. You'd be surprised about IRS agents. While some are definitely not helpful, I got connected to someone in the partnership division who clearly knew their stuff. I specifically asked for someone familiar with partnership returns when the initial agent picked up, and they transferred me to a specialist. Not all agents are created equal - the key is getting to the right department.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After that skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I had some unrelated tax questions I needed answered. The service actually worked exactly as described - I got a call back when an IRS agent was on the line, saving me about 2 hours of hold time. When I asked about the section 1231/1250 issue out of curiosity, I was transferred to a specialist who confirmed everything that was said here about how the unrecaptured section 1250 gain is a subset of the section 1231 gain. They even emailed me some relevant pages from IRS Publication 544 that explained it clearly. Sometimes being proven wrong is actually a good thing!
0 coins
Mei Chen
One thing to remember that I didn't see mentioned yet - if you have net section 1231 gains, they're treated as long-term capital gains, but if you had net section 1231 losses in any of the previous 5 years that haven't been "recaptured," your current year section 1231 gains are treated as ordinary income to the extent of those prior unrecaptured losses. This is separate from the unrecaptured section 1250 gain issue. The 5-year lookback rule can really trip people up, especially in cross-border situations where you might not have been tracking this previously.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•Is that really relevant to OP's question though? Seems like they're just trying to understand if the 1250 gain is part of the 1231 gain amount on the K-1, not the recapture of prior 1231 losses.
0 coins
Mei Chen
•You're right that it's not directly addressing the main question about how the amounts are reported on the K-1, but I mentioned it because the OP said they're a Canadian tax practitioner trying to understand a U.S. return. In cross-border situations, understanding the complete picture of how section 1231 gains are characterized is important. The 5-year lookback rule affects the ultimate tax treatment of the non-recaptured portion of the section 1231 gain, which could be relevant when determining how to classify these gains under Canadian tax rules. But you're correct that it doesn't address the specific K-1 reporting question.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
Just wanted to add that you should also check if there's a Form 8825 attached to the K-1 or partnership return. This form often breaks down the real estate income and deductions in more detail, including showing accumulated depreciation which can help you verify the section 1250 recapture calculation. Also, since you mentioned you're a Canadian tax practitioner, remember that the Canada-US tax treaty might affect how these gains are ultimately taxed if the partnership owns property in Canada, or if Canadian residents are partners in the US partnership.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Good point about Form 8825. Whenever I'm reviewing partnership returns, that's one of the first supporting forms I look for since it gives much more detail than what's shown on Schedule K-1 alone.
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread! As someone who's dealt with similar cross-border partnership issues, I wanted to add a practical tip that might help others in similar situations. When reviewing K-1s with both section 1231 and unrecaptured section 1250 gains, I always reconcile the numbers back to any available depreciation schedules or fixed asset records. The unrecaptured section 1250 gain should never exceed the total accumulated depreciation taken on the property, and it should also never exceed the total section 1231 gain reported. For cross-border practitioners like the OP, I'd also recommend keeping detailed records of these characterizations since some jurisdictions have different rules for depreciation recapture vs. capital gains treatment. Understanding the U.S. characterization is the first step, but then you need to determine how your home country's tax system treats each component. One last thing - if you're dealing with multiple properties or complex partnership structures, consider requesting a breakdown from the partnership showing how they calculated the section 1250 recapture. Most partnerships should be able to provide this detail if asked.
0 coins
The Boss
•This is really helpful advice, especially the point about reconciling back to depreciation schedules. As someone new to U.S. partnership taxation, I'm wondering - when you say "requesting a breakdown from the partnership," is this something that's commonly provided, or do you typically have to push for it? I'm working on a similar situation and want to make sure I'm getting all the information I need to properly classify these items under my local tax rules. Also, do you have any recommendations for resources that explain how different countries typically treat U.S. section 1231/1250 gains? I'm finding it challenging to navigate the interaction between U.S. source characterization and foreign tax treatment.
0 coins