< Back to IRS

Dmitry Sokolov

Can I offset my S-Corp profits with rental losses under Sec 469?

Hey tax pros, I'm trying to wrap my head around Section 469 and could use some guidance on offsetting business income with rental losses. Here's my situation: I own 100% of an S-Corporation that's having an extremely profitable year for 2024. Earlier this year, I had the chance to purchase the building where my S-Corp operates, so I created a separate real estate LLC that I own 100%. My S-Corp is the only commercial tenant in the building, though there's also a residential house on the property that I live in as my primary residence. Both my S-Corp and I personally pay rent to my real estate LLC at fair market rates. The real estate LLC has triple-net leases with both me and the S-Corp. I'm planning to have a cost segregation study done for the property, but it would generate significant losses that would likely be suspended for 10+ years under passive activity rules. What I'm trying to figure out is: Can I somehow group the rental activity with my S-Corp business to create an "appropriate economic unit" under Section 469 to offset my S-Corp income with the real estate losses? I've read there are provisions allowing this but I'm not familiar enough with this section of the tax code. Am I missing something here? Is this approach feasible? Any insights would be appreciated!

Based on your situation, you're dealing with what's known as self-rental property rules under Section 469. When you rent property to a business you materially participate in (like your 100% owned S-Corp), the rental income is generally not considered passive - it's recharacterized as nonpassive income. However, the interesting part is that while rental income gets recharacterized as nonpassive, rental losses typically remain passive under these self-rental rules. This creates a one-sided situation that can be frustrating for taxpayers. That said, there are indeed grouping elections under Section 469 that might help in your situation. You may be able to group your rental activity with your S-Corporation if they form an "appropriate economic unit" based on factors like geographical location, interdependence, and common control. If properly grouped, the rental activity could potentially be considered part of your non-passive S-Corp business. Keep in mind this is a complex area of tax law, and the appropriateness of grouping depends on specific facts and circumstances. The IRS scrutinizes these arrangements carefully.

0 coins

Thanks for the insight! Question - if OP chooses to make this grouping election, is it something that's done once and permanent, or can they change it later if circumstances change? Also, would the fact that part of the property is their personal residence complicate this strategy?

0 coins

Once you make a grouping election, it generally must be followed consistently in future years unless the IRS Commissioner permits a regrouping. This typically only happens when the original grouping was clearly inappropriate or if there's a material change in circumstances. The personal residence aspect does complicate things. You would need to allocate expenses between the business portion and personal residence portion of the property. Only the business portion would be eligible for grouping with the S-Corp activities. The personal residence portion would be treated separately under personal residence rules, not rental activity rules.

0 coins

I used taxr.ai for a situation really similar to this last year and it was super helpful. I also own an S-Corp and bought property through an LLC and was trying to figure out how to handle the tax situation. I uploaded all my lease agreements and property documentation to https://taxr.ai and they analyzed everything and walked me through the Section 469 grouping rules. They showed me exactly how to structure things to optimize my tax situation based on the specific allocation percentages and my level of participation. What was cool is they caught some nuances in the regulations that my previous accountant had missed about how the self-rental rules applied in my specific case. It saved me a ton of research time and gave me confidence I was doing things right.

0 coins

How exactly does it work? Do they just give you generic advice or do they actually look at your specific documents? I've been burned by "AI tax tools" before that just spit out general information I could have found on Google.

0 coins

Curious about this too. Did they help you with the actual grouping election paperwork or just tell you what to do? I need someone to help me with the actual filing part because my CPA is expensive af and takes forever to respond.

0 coins

They actually do analyze your specific documents - that's what makes it different from just chatting with an AI. You upload your lease agreements, entity documents, and other relevant papers, and they extract the important details to give you personalized guidance. For the grouping election specifically, they provided me with guidance on exactly how to document it with my tax return. They explained I needed to attach a statement with my return that identifies the activities being grouped and the factors relied on to show they form an economic unit. They didn't file it for me, but gave me the exact template to use and what information needed to be included.

0 coins

Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai for my S-Corp/rental property situation. I was skeptical about another tax tool but this was actually really helpful. I uploaded my operating agreements, leases, and property info and got specific analysis about my situation with Section 469. They confirmed I could make a grouping election but pointed out something important - if I grouped the activities and later sold the property, I might not qualify for the Section 1231 treatment I'd want on the sale. They suggested a different approach involving documenting my material participation in the real estate activity separately, which actually worked better for my situation. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with complex business/rental scenarios like this.

0 coins

I was in a similar situation last year with multiple entities and rental properties. After weeks of trying to get through to the IRS for clarification on grouping elections (seriously, I'd be on hold for HOURS), I finally tried Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and got through to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes. They have this system that basically waits on hold for you and calls when an agent is available. You can watch how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed that grouping my S-Corp with my rental LLC was acceptable as long as I could demonstrate they formed an appropriate economic unit AND I was materially participating in both. They also warned me that the fact that my personal residence was on the same property could create complications, so I needed to be very clear about allocations.

0 coins

Wait this actually works? I've been trying to get through to the IRS for months about passive activity loss questions. How much does it cost? And do they actually get you to someone who can answer complicated tax questions or just the frontline reps?

0 coins

Sounds scammy tbh. Why would they be able to get through when nobody else can? The IRS phone system is the same for everyone, there's no "secret backdoor" to skip the line.

0 coins

Yes, it absolutely works! They use an automated system that does the waiting for you, then calls you once they have an IRS agent on the line. It's like having someone else sit on hold instead of you. You generally get connected to the same IRS representatives everyone else does, but the huge advantage is you don't waste hours of your life on hold. In my experience, if the first-line rep can't answer your question, they're usually willing to transfer you to someone with more specialized knowledge - especially if you're polite and have your questions well prepared.

0 coins

I owe everyone an apology - I was super skeptical about Claimyr but tried it out of desperation after sitting on hold with the IRS for 2+ hours trying to get clarity on Section 469 grouping rules. It actually worked exactly as advertised. Got a call back in about 25 minutes and was connected directly to an IRS representative. I explained my situation with the S-Corp and rental property, and while the first person couldn't answer all my questions, they transferred me to someone in the business tax department who was knowledgeable about passive activity rules. The agent confirmed that grouping is allowed but emphasized how important proper documentation is. They said the biggest mistake people make is not attaching a detailed statement with their return explaining the factors they relied on to establish the grouping as an appropriate economic unit. Definitely saved me hours of frustration - wish I'd known about this service years ago.

0 coins

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - have you considered making a Section 469(c)(7) real estate professional election instead of grouping? If you can qualify as a real estate professional by spending 750+ hours on real estate activities and more time on real estate than any other business, your rental activities aren't automatically passive. This might be a better approach than grouping, especially if you're actively managing the property. The documentation requirements are different but might be more straightforward in your case.

0 coins

I hadn't considered the real estate professional route! Do you know if the time I spend managing just this one property would be enough to qualify? I'm pretty hands-on with it, but I'm not sure if I hit 750 hours just on this single property.

0 coins

The 750-hour requirement applies to all your real estate activities combined, not just one property. However, you also need to spend more time on real estate activities than any other trade or business. Given that you're running an S-Corporation that's "very profitable," I suspect you're spending significant time on that business. If you spend more time working in your S-Corp than you do on real estate activities, you wouldn't qualify as a real estate professional regardless of whether you hit the 750-hour threshold. The grouping election is probably still your best option, especially since there's a clear economic connection between the S-Corp and the real estate LLC in your case.

0 coins

Has anyone tried using the relatively new safe harbor for rental real estate under Section 199A? It might not solve the passive activity loss issue directly, but it could provide a qualified business income deduction that offsets some of the S-Corp income.

0 coins

That's a completely different section of the tax code dealing with the QBI deduction. OP is specifically asking about offsetting income with losses under Section 469, not getting a deduction on the rental income. The 199A safe harbor doesn't help convert passive losses to nonpassive.

0 coins

Another consideration for your grouping election - make sure you're prepared to defend the "appropriate economic unit" determination if the IRS challenges it. The regulations under 469(c)(7)(A) list five factors they consider: similarities and differences in types of business, extent of common control, geographical location, interdependencies between activities, and extent of common ownership. In your case, you have strong arguments for several factors: common control (you own 100% of both), geographical location (same property), and interdependence (the S-Corp depends on the real estate for its operations). The fact that your S-Corp is the primary tenant actually strengthens the interdependence argument. One tip: when you file the grouping statement with your return, be very specific about which factors you're relying on and provide concrete details. Don't just say "common control and geographical location" - explain that you have 100% ownership of both entities and that the S-Corp operates exclusively from the LLC-owned property under a triple-net lease arrangement. Also keep detailed records of your material participation in both activities. The IRS may scrutinize whether you're truly materially participating in the rental activity or if it's just passive ownership.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the documentation aspect - when you mention keeping detailed records of material participation in the rental activity, what specific types of records would be most compelling to the IRS? I'm thinking things like maintenance logs, tenant communications, property management decisions, but are there other activities that would strengthen the case for material participation in a single-property rental scenario?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today