IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This is really eye-opening! I had no idea the IRS made such a clear distinction between personal gifts and compensation-related gift cards. I'm a volunteer coordinator at a local food bank and we've been giving out $25 grocery store gift cards to our regular volunteers as thank-you gestures. Now I'm wondering if we've been handling this wrong tax-wise. Should we be issuing 1099s to volunteers who receive these cards? And if we switch to giving out branded items like t-shirts or water bottles instead, would that avoid the taxation issue entirely? I want to make sure we're not putting our volunteers in an unexpected tax situation like what happened to the original poster. Also, for volunteers who might receive multiple small gift cards throughout the year that add up to over $600 total - are we required to track and report that cumulative amount?

0 coins

Yes, you should definitely be tracking and reporting those gift cards! If any volunteer receives $600+ in gift cards during the year, you're required to issue them a 1099-NEC. Even if individual cards are small, the IRS looks at the total annual amount per person. Switching to branded items like t-shirts or water bottles would likely avoid this issue entirely, as those qualify as de minimis fringe benefits and promotional items. Just make sure they're relatively low value and have your organization's logo/name on them. I'd recommend consulting with your organization's accountant or tax advisor to review your current practices and maybe establish a policy going forward. It's better to get ahead of this now than deal with potential reporting issues later!

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

As someone who's dealt with similar volunteer gift card situations, I can confirm that your nonprofit handled this correctly. The IRS is very clear that gift cards = cash equivalents = taxable compensation, regardless of whether you're volunteering or being paid. What might help for future reference is understanding the volunteer expense deduction angle that others mentioned. You can potentially deduct unreimbursed expenses directly related to your volunteer work - things like mileage (currently 14 cents per mile for volunteer work), supplies you purchased for projects, even uniforms if required. These deductions can help offset some of that unexpected tax liability from the gift cards. One strategy I've seen work well is for volunteers to politely ask organizations to consider non-cash appreciation instead - like recognition certificates, small branded items, or even just a nice thank-you event with refreshments. These alternatives let nonprofits show appreciation without creating tax complications for their volunteers. Keep good records of any volunteer-related expenses you incur - they might be more valuable as deductions than you realize, especially now that you have additional income to offset!

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I had no idea about the volunteer mileage deduction - 14 cents per mile could actually add up to a decent amount over the year. Do you know if there are any other volunteer-related deductions that people commonly miss? I'm thinking about things like parking fees when volunteering downtown, or even work clothes that I only wear for volunteer activities? Also, regarding the "thank-you events with refreshments" idea - would those meals be considered taxable benefits too, or do they fall under a different category? I'm trying to understand where the line is between taxable and non-taxable appreciation gestures.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for this incredibly helpful discussion! As someone who's been paralyzed by this decision for weeks, reading through all these experiences has been a huge relief. I'm in a very similar situation to the original poster - used standard mileage for my first three years, and this year had some major repairs that would make actual expenses more beneficial. I was terrified that I'd be "locked in" to whatever method I chose, but it's clear now that since I started with standard mileage, I have the flexibility to optimize each year. The key insight about tracking the "deemed depreciation" from standard mileage years is something I never would have thought of on my own. I'm definitely going to create a spreadsheet to track my vehicle's adjusted basis going forward so I don't run into problems later. One follow-up question - for those who have switched methods multiple times, do you find that tax software handles the basis calculations automatically, or do you have to manually input the adjustments? I'm using TurboTax and want to make sure I'm doing this correctly.

0 coins

Alana Willis

•

Great question about tax software! I've been using TurboTax for years and unfortunately it doesn't automatically calculate the basis adjustments when switching between methods. You'll need to manually track your vehicle's adjusted basis in a separate spreadsheet. What I do is keep a simple worksheet with: original vehicle cost, total "deemed depreciation" from standard mileage years (using the IRS depreciation tables for each year's standard rate), and the resulting adjusted basis when I switch to actual expenses. Then I manually enter that adjusted basis into TurboTax's depreciation section. The good news is once you set up the tracking system, it's pretty straightforward to maintain year over year. Just make sure to save your calculations with your tax records since this is exactly the kind of documentation the IRS would want to see if they ever question your vehicle deductions.

0 coins

I've been following this discussion closely as I'm in almost the exact same boat as the OP. Used standard mileage for my consulting business for the past two years, and this year I had a $3,200 engine repair that would make actual expenses much more advantageous. What really helped clarify things for me was finding the specific IRS Revenue Procedure that addresses this - Rev. Proc. 2010-51. It explicitly states that if you use the standard mileage rate in the first year you place the vehicle in service for business use, you can choose to use either the standard mileage rate or actual expenses in any subsequent year. The key calculation everyone's mentioning about "deemed depreciation" is found in the annual IRS notices that update the standard mileage rates. For example, for 2023 the depreciation component was 28 cents per mile, 2022 was 27 cents per mile, etc. You multiply your business miles for each year by that year's depreciation component to get your total deemed depreciation. One thing I learned from my tax preparer is to document your reasoning for switching methods each year. While not required, having a brief note in your files explaining why actual expenses were more beneficial (major repairs, lower mileage year, etc.) can be helpful if the IRS ever questions the frequent method changes. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it's made this decision much less stressful!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful information! Thank you for mentioning Rev. Proc. 2010-51 - I've been searching for the specific IRS guidance on this and that's exactly what I needed. The fact that it explicitly states you can choose either method in subsequent years if you started with standard mileage removes all the uncertainty I had. Your point about documenting the reasoning for switching is smart too. Even though it's not required, having a paper trail showing why actual expenses made more sense (like your $3,200 engine repair) seems like good practice for something that could potentially be scrutinized. I'm going to create a simple worksheet tracking my deemed depreciation using those annual depreciation components you mentioned. Do you happen to know where the IRS publishes those annual breakdowns of what portion of the standard rate represents depreciation? I want to make sure I'm using the official numbers.

0 coins

Brian Downey

•

As someone who's been through multiple IRS audits with my small electrical contracting business, I can confirm that simple, consistent documentation is absolutely key for cash labor payments. The most important thing is treating these payments as legitimate business expenses on your Schedule C, which you can definitely do even when paying from your personal account. I keep a basic log with: date, worker name (or "day laborer #1" if unknown), work performed, amount paid, and job site. Takes 30 seconds per entry. One critical point many miss: even though you don't need 1099s for payments under $600 per person, you should still try to get basic contact info when possible. I learned this when the IRS asked me to provide worker details during an audit - having at least a name and phone number (even if it's disconnected later) shows you're operating legitimately rather than just making up expenses. The biggest red flag for auditors is when cash labor expenses seem too round or convenient. Keep your records detailed and realistic - if you paid someone $85 for helping load a truck, record $85, not $80 or $100. The specificity actually helps establish credibility.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I needed to hear! The point about keeping specific amounts rather than rounding to convenient numbers is something I never would have thought about, but it makes perfect sense from an audit perspective. I'm curious about your experience with getting worker contact info - do you find that most day laborers are willing to provide at least a name and phone number? I've been hesitant to ask for too much information since these are usually quick, informal arrangements, but having some basic details does seem like it would add legitimacy to the records. Also, when you mention "day laborer #1" for unknown workers, do you try to add any other identifying details like physical description or how you found them (hardware store parking lot, referral, etc.)? I'm wondering how much detail is helpful versus overkill for documentation purposes.

0 coins

Oliver Brown

•

Most day laborers are actually pretty willing to give basic info if you explain it's just for your business records - I'd say about 80% will provide at least a first name and phone number. The key is asking casually while you're paying them, not making it feel like an interrogation. For the "day laborer #1" situations, I do add location details like "hardware store parking lot - Home Depot on Main St" or basic description like "tall guy, red baseball cap, spoke Spanish." It's not about identifying them personally, but showing the IRS these were real people doing real work, not fictional expenses. One thing that's helped me is explaining to workers that I'm not reporting anything about them to the government - I'm just keeping records for my own business taxes. That usually puts them at ease. The ones who are really hesitant about giving info are often fine with just a first name, and honestly that's better than nothing for your documentation.

0 coins

Reading through all these responses has been really eye-opening! I had no idea so many other small business owners were dealing with the exact same cash payment documentation challenges. The consensus seems clear: keep simple, consistent records of all cash payments regardless of amount, document where the cash came from (ATM withdrawals, etc.), and treat these as legitimate business expenses on Schedule C even when paying from personal accounts. I'm definitely going to implement several suggestions from this thread: 1. Start using a simple spreadsheet with date, amount, worker description, and work performed 2. Keep ATM receipts that correspond to payment dates 3. Try the contractor acknowledgment form idea for any workers I use more than once 4. Record specific amounts (like $85) rather than rounding to convenient numbers The advice about getting at least basic contact info when possible makes sense too - even just a first name and general description shows these were real workers, not made-up expenses. Thanks everyone for sharing your real-world experiences! This is exactly the kind of practical guidance that's impossible to get from IRS publications alone.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

This thread has been so helpful for me as a new landscaping business owner! I was honestly panicking about whether I was doing everything wrong with my cash payments to day workers. It's reassuring to know that other small business owners face the same challenges and that the solution isn't as complicated as I thought it would be. The tip about using voice recordings on your phone to capture payment details immediately is genius - I'm definitely going to try that. I've been trying to remember details later and sometimes forgetting exactly what work someone did or the exact amount I paid them. One question I still have: if I'm just starting out and my record-keeping from earlier this year was pretty messy, is it worth going back and trying to reconstruct those records from bank statements and memory? Or should I just start fresh with a good system going forward and do my best to document what I can remember for this year's taxes?

0 coins

I've been through this exact same situation with tax1099.com! Filed my 1099-NECs in early March and while federal acceptance was lightning fast (about 36 hours), my California state filing took almost 7 weeks to show as accepted. I was pulling my hair out thinking something went wrong. What really helped was calling tax1099.com's support line directly - they were able to look up my submission and confirm it had been successfully transmitted to the state. The rep explained that California's FTB system processes 1099s in large batches and they don't send acceptance confirmations until the entire batch is reviewed. During peak season (January-April), these batches can sit for weeks. The key thing to remember is that your filing deadline obligation was met when you successfully e-filed, regardless of when the state sends the acceptance. Your contractors are good to go with the copies you provided them - they don't need any government confirmations to file their taxes. Hang in there, it will eventually come through!

0 coins

Mila Walker

•

This is so reassuring to hear! I'm in almost the exact same boat - federal went through super quick but California has been radio silent for weeks. I didn't know you could actually call tax1099.com to check on the transmission status. That's brilliant! I've been just staring at my dashboard hoping for updates. Going to call them first thing Monday morning to at least confirm my filing made it to the state. Thanks for sharing your experience - definitely makes me feel less crazy about this whole situation!

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

I'm dealing with this exact same issue right now! Filed through tax1099.com about 5 weeks ago for my freelance business and while the federal side was accepted within 2 days, my California state filing is still showing "processing." It's been driving me absolutely nuts because I keep second-guessing whether I did something wrong. Reading through all these comments has been such a relief - it sounds like this is completely normal for California's system. I had no idea that some states are still doing manual reviews in 2025! That explains so much about why it takes forever. I'm definitely going to try calling tax1099.com's support to at least confirm my filing made it to the state successfully. And I'll stop refreshing my email 20 times a day waiting for that acceptance notification. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - misery loves company but it's also really helpful to know this isn't just me!

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

Has anyone considered just not donating? I refuse to participate in my hospital's campaign and haven't faced any actual consequences. Lots of uncomfortable moments and guilt trips, but nothing that affects my job performance reviews.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

I tried that at my previous healthcare job and while there were no "official" consequences, I definitely noticed I was suddenly excluded from certain committees and professional development opportunities. Nothing they could ever be called out for, but the favoritism toward "team players" who donated was pretty obvious.

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

That's concerning but not surprising. I've been fortunate that my direct manager is equally annoyed by the pressure tactics and runs interference for our department. Maybe that's why I haven't seen negative effects. I've found that being direct but polite works well - "I support causes that are personally meaningful to me and prefer to keep my charitable giving private." Hard for them to argue with that without looking really bad.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

I work in healthcare administration and can confirm what others have said about the participation metrics being key. What I haven't seen mentioned yet is that many non-profit healthcare systems also use employee giving data for their Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) reports, which they're required to file every three years to maintain tax-exempt status. High employee participation rates help demonstrate "community support" and can justify certain executive compensation packages to the IRS. The optics of having your own workforce donate back to the organization looks great on paper when regulators review whether the hospital deserves continued tax exemptions. One thing that helped me was asking HR for the specific breakdown of where donations go. At my hospital, I discovered that a significant portion goes to employee hardship funds and continuing education scholarships, which made me feel better about participating. But the pressure tactics are still inappropriate regardless of how the money is used. If you do decide to participate, remember that payroll-deducted donations should show up correctly on your W-2, and you can still claim them as itemized deductions on your personal taxes if that benefits you more than the standard deduction.

0 coins

This is really helpful context about the CHNA reports - I had no idea employee giving could factor into tax-exempt status reviews! That adds another layer to why they're so aggressive about these campaigns. I'm curious about the executive compensation angle you mentioned. Are you saying that high employee donation rates can actually help justify higher executive pay to the IRS? That seems like it would create some perverse incentives for leadership to pressure staff even more. Also, great point about asking for the breakdown of where donations go. I think part of my frustration comes from the vague "supporting our mission" messaging without specifics about actual programs or beneficiaries.

0 coins

Prev1...931932933934935...5643Next