


Ask the community...
Don't forget about state taxes! Depending on where you live, the state tax treatment of stock option exercises can vary significantly from federal treatment. Some states like California are particularly aggressive about taxing stock compensation. Also, if you moved between states during the year you exercised OR during the vesting period, you might need to apportion the income between states. I did an option exercise after moving from NY to FL and had to pay NY tax on the portion that vested while I was a NY resident, even though I exercised everything while living in FL.
Oh that's a great point! Does anyone know if you can get double-taxed by different states on the same stock option income? I moved from Massachusetts to Texas mid-year and exercised options that had been vesting for years.
You generally shouldn't get double-taxed, but you'll likely need to file returns in both states. Massachusetts would tax the portion that vested while you were a MA resident, and since Texas has no state income tax, you won't owe anything to Texas on that income. The key is apportioning the income correctly - you'll need to calculate what percentage of the total option value relates to the time you worked in MA versus TX. Most states have specific rules for this, often based on the ratio of days worked in each state during the vesting period. Make sure to claim a credit on your MA return for any taxes paid to other states (though since TX has no income tax, this won't apply here). You might want to consult a tax professional familiar with multi-state stock option issues since the apportionment calculations can get complex, especially if you had multiple option grants with different vesting schedules.
Great question about NQSOs! I went through something similar last year. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given - make sure you understand the timing of when you'll owe taxes versus when taxes were withheld. Even though your company withheld taxes at exercise, you might still owe additional taxes at filing time depending on your total tax situation for the year. The withholding rate companies use (often 22% federal) might not match your actual marginal tax rate, especially if the option exercise pushed you into a higher tax bracket. Also, keep detailed records of everything - not just for cost basis calculations, but because stock option reporting can sometimes trigger IRS notices if there are discrepancies between what your employer reports and what your broker reports when you eventually sell. Having your exercise confirmations, vesting schedules, and FMV documentation will save you headaches down the road. One last tip: if you're planning to exercise more options in the future, consider the timing carefully. Bunching exercises into certain tax years can help you manage your overall tax liability, especially if you expect your income to fluctuate year to year.
Has your son considered taking the mother back to court to update the custody agreement? If the actual situation doesn't match the legal documents, that's a problem for tax purposes. The IRS generally follows the custody agreement. If he can get the agreement modified to reflect reality (that the child lives with him/you most of the time), it would be much easier to legitimately claim the child on taxes going forward. Also, make sure to look into the Child Tax Credit and the Credit for Other Dependents. Depending on your income and situation, you might qualify for one of these if you're able to claim your granddaughter.
This is the most sensible advice. Tax issues aside, the custody agreement should reflect the actual living situation. If mom only has occasional visits, why does she have primary custody on paper? That needs to be addressed first.
I went through something very similar with my grandson a few years ago. The situation you're describing - where you're providing all the care but someone else has legal custody - is unfortunately common. Here's what I learned: The IRS uses what's called the "tie-breaker rules" when multiple people could potentially claim the same child. Generally, the parent with whom the child lived for the greater number of nights during the year gets to claim them. But when parents aren't living together, the custodial parent (according to the divorce decree or separation agreement) typically has the right to claim the child. However, there's an important exception: if you can prove that your granddaughter lived with you for more than half the year (183+ nights) and you provided more than half of her support, you might be able to claim her as a "qualifying relative" rather than a "qualifying child." My advice: Start documenting everything NOW for next year's taxes. Keep a detailed calendar of where she sleeps each night, save every receipt for her expenses, and get letters from her school, doctor, etc. showing your address as her primary residence. You might also want to consult with a tax professional who specializes in family situations like this - the rules can be tricky but there are often ways to make it work legally.
This is really helpful! I'm curious about the "qualifying relative" vs "qualifying child" distinction you mentioned. How exactly does that work? I thought grandchildren could only be claimed as qualifying children, not qualifying relatives. Also, would the grandmother need to meet any income requirements for the granddaughter to qualify as a qualifying relative? The IRS rules seem to have so many exceptions and special cases!
I went through something very similar last year when my LLC (taxed as partnership) dissolved. The key thing I learned is to make absolutely sure you have all your basis adjustments correct before claiming the loss. Don't just rely on what the final K-1 shows for ending basis - go back through all your previous K-1s and verify that you properly adjusted your basis for distributions, allocated losses, and any debt basis you might have had. I initially thought I had a $15k capital loss, but after going through everything carefully, it was actually only $8k because I had missed some distributions from earlier years. Also, if this was a business partnership (not just an investment), consider whether any portion of the loss might qualify as an ordinary loss under Section 1244 or as a business bad debt. The capital loss treatment is usually correct, but it's worth double-checking since ordinary losses can offset regular income without the $3k annual limit. One more tip - attach a statement to your return explaining the partnership dissolution and how you calculated your basis. It might help avoid questions later if the IRS reviews your return.
This is excellent advice about double-checking all the basis adjustments! I'm curious though - how do you determine if any portion might qualify as ordinary loss treatment? My dissolved partnership was involved in a small manufacturing business, so it wasn't just a passive investment. Would Section 1244 apply even if it was structured as a partnership rather than a corporation? I always thought Section 1244 was only for corporate stock losses.
You're absolutely right to question the Section 1244 application - that provision only applies to qualifying small business corporation stock, not partnership interests. I should have been more precise in my earlier comment. For partnerships, the ordinary loss treatment would more likely come under different provisions. If this was an active business partnership where you materially participated, you might be able to argue for ordinary loss treatment under the "abandonment" theory rather than treating it as a capital asset sale. This requires showing that the partnership interest became completely worthless and was abandoned. However, this is a complex area and the IRS scrutinizes these claims heavily. The safer and more straightforward approach is usually to treat it as a capital loss from disposition of the partnership interest, which is what most tax professionals recommend unless there are compelling facts supporting ordinary loss treatment. I'd suggest consulting with a tax professional if the loss amount is significant, since they can evaluate whether your specific facts might support ordinary loss treatment based on your level of participation and the nature of the business.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is timing considerations for when to actually report this loss. Since you received your final K-1 for the partnership's last tax year, make sure you're reporting the capital loss in the correct tax year - it should be the year the partnership actually terminated, not necessarily when you received the K-1. Also, if this partnership had any Section 754 elections in effect or if there were any special basis adjustments, those could affect your final basis calculation. These adjustments might not be clearly reflected on your K-1, so you may need to contact the partnership's former accountant to get a complete picture. For anyone in a similar situation, I'd also recommend getting a written confirmation from the partnership that it has fully dissolved and distributed all assets. This documentation could be valuable if the IRS ever questions whether the loss was truly from a complete disposition versus just a temporary suspension of operations.
Great point about the timing! I'm actually in this exact situation right now and wasn't sure which tax year to report the loss in. My partnership dissolved in December 2024 but I just received the final K-1 this month. So I should report the capital loss on my 2024 return, not 2025, correct? Also, regarding the written confirmation of dissolution - is there a specific format this should take, or would something like an email from the managing partner suffice? I want to make sure I have proper documentation but the partnership was pretty informal and I'm not sure they'll provide anything too official-looking. Thanks for mentioning the Section 754 elections too - I honestly have no idea if our partnership had any of those in place. This is all pretty overwhelming for someone who just thought they were making a simple investment a few years ago!
I'm in the exact same situation! Filed my amended return in early March for missed 1099-NEC income and just saw the TC 740 code appear on my transcript yesterday. I had no idea what it meant and was honestly worried something was wrong since I hadn't heard anything from the IRS in months. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly reassuring - it's such a relief to know that this code is actually good news and means they're actively processing my amendment. The complete radio silence from the IRS during this process is honestly maddening. It's 2025 and they still can't send a simple "we received your amendment and it's being processed" notification? Based on everyone's timelines here, it looks like I'm right on track at about 11 weeks since filing. Really appreciate everyone sharing their specific experiences - makes this anxiety-inducing waiting game so much more manageable when you know the silence is actually normal (even though it absolutely shouldn't be). Now I know to watch for that TC 290 code in the coming weeks. Thanks for creating this thread - saved me from spiraling into worry mode!
I'm so glad you found this thread too! I was in the exact same boat a few months ago - filed an amendment for missing 1099-NEC income and then just... nothing. The silence from the IRS is absolutely brutal. When that TC 740 code finally appeared on my transcript, I had no clue if it was good or bad news until I started researching online. It's honestly ridiculous that we have to become amateur code breakers just to understand what's happening with our own tax returns. The IRS really needs to join the 21st century with their communication methods. But you're definitely on the right track - that 11-week timing for the TC 740 to appear is totally normal based on what everyone's shared here. Keep checking your transcript every couple weeks and you should hopefully see that TC 290 code soon. The waiting is the worst part, but once you see that 740, you know things are actually moving behind the scenes!
This thread has been so helpful! I'm dealing with a very similar situation - filed my amended return in late February for some missed 1099-NEC income and have been in complete radio silence mode with the IRS ever since. Just checked my transcript this morning and finally saw the TC 740 code appear! It's honestly mind-boggling that in 2025 we still have to play detective with these cryptic transaction codes just to figure out what's happening with our own tax returns. The IRS could easily send automated status updates, but instead they leave us all in the dark for months wondering if our paperwork got lost in some black hole. Reading through everyone's experiences and timelines here has been incredibly reassuring though. Sounds like I'm hitting the typical 12-week mark when this code usually shows up. Now I know to keep an eye out for that TC 290 code in the coming weeks. The waiting game is absolutely brutal, but at least I know my amendment is actually being processed instead of sitting in some forgotten pile somewhere. Thanks to everyone who shared their specific timelines and experiences - this community support makes such a stressful process so much more bearable! The fact that we all ended up here trying to crowdsource basic information about our tax returns really highlights how broken the IRS communication system is.
I'm so relieved to find this thread! I'm going through the exact same thing - filed my amended return in March for missing 1099-NEC income and just saw the TC 740 code pop up on my transcript this week. I was honestly starting to panic because I hadn't heard a single word from the IRS in over 3 months. It's absolutely infuriating that we have to become IRS code detectives just to understand basic information about our own tax situations. Like, how hard would it be for them to send one simple email saying "hey, we got your amendment and we're working on it"? Instead we get months of silence followed by mysterious numbers that could mean literally anything. But reading everyone's timelines here has been such a huge relief - sounds like hitting the TC 740 at around 12-13 weeks is totally normal. Now I know what to watch for next with that TC 290 code. This whole process is so stressful but at least knowing I'm on the right track helps a ton. Thanks for sharing your experience and for everyone else who's made this thread such a lifeline for people like us!
Kylo Ren
I'm confused about one thing - isn't there a household employee situation here? I thought if you're paying someone regularly to provide care in their home, they're not your employee but an independent contractor. But I've heard if they come to your house, they're a household employee and you need to pay Social Security/Medicare taxes (aka "nanny tax"). OP, does your sitter watch your child in her home or yours? This might affect what forms you need.
0 coins
Nina Fitzgerald
β’You're right about the distinction. If care is provided in the caregiver's home, they're generally considered self-employed/independent contractors. If in your home, they're typically household employees subject to employment taxes. For the Child and Dependent Care Credit specifically, you can claim it either way, but the reporting requirements differ. With an independent contractor (care in their home), you need their SSN/EIN for Form 2441. With a household employee, you need their SSN and should be paying employment taxes on their wages.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
β’Thanks for bringing this up! The care happens at her house - she has 3-4 kids there at a time. From what you're saying, that means she would be considered self-employed and I would need her SSN for the credit, but wouldn't have to worry about employment taxes. That's at least a bit simpler than I thought.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
As a healthcare worker myself, I completely understand the childcare challenges with evening shifts! Based on your situation, here are some practical steps you can take: Since the care is provided at her home with multiple children, she's an independent contractor (not your employee), which simplifies things - no employment taxes for you to worry about. For the Child and Dependent Care Credit, you'll need: 1. Her full name, address, and SSN/EIN for Form 2441 2. Documentation of payments (even if it's a log you create showing dates and amounts) Before claiming the credit, I'd strongly recommend having a conversation with your sitter about the tax implications. You could explain that: - She'll need to report this income (likely as self-employment) - She can deduct business expenses (portion of home used for childcare, utilities, supplies, meals for kids, etc.) - These deductions can significantly reduce her tax liability - She'll also earn Social Security credits and potentially qualify for other benefits Given how difficult it is to find reliable evening childcare, preserving your arrangement might be worth more than the tax credit if she's not willing to report the income. The credit could save you around $1,000-1,400, but finding new childcare for hospital shifts could be nearly impossible. Whatever you decide, document everything going forward - it'll make next year's taxes much easier!
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
β’This is really helpful advice! I appreciate you breaking down the steps so clearly. I'm leaning toward having that conversation with my sitter soon - you're right that the deductions might make it less scary for her. One question though - do you know if there's a deadline for when I need to get her SSN? I'm worried about approaching this topic too close to tax filing deadlines and putting pressure on both of us. Also, if she agrees to report the income, does that mean I need to issue her a 1099 for this year's payments? The point about preserving the childcare arrangement is so important. Finding someone reliable for evening shifts who my daughter actually likes has been the hardest part of this whole situation!
0 coins
QuantumLeap
β’Great questions! For timing, you actually have until you file your tax return to get her SSN - there's no earlier deadline. So you're not under immediate pressure, which is good for having a thoughtful conversation rather than a rushed one. Regarding the 1099-NEC, yes - since you paid her over $600 in a year for services, you're technically required to issue one by January 31st (for the previous tax year). However, many people in informal childcare arrangements don't realize this requirement. If you decide to get everything above board, you can still file a 1099-NEC even if it's late, though there may be small penalties. The key is approaching this as "let's figure out how to make this work for both of us" rather than "you need to start paying taxes because I want a credit." Emphasize that you value the care arrangement and want to find a solution that protects both of you. Maybe suggest she consult with a tax professional about the potential deductions - sometimes hearing it from a third party makes it feel less overwhelming. You might also mention that being "on the books" could help her if she ever wants to expand her childcare business or needs to show income for loans, etc. There can be unexpected benefits to legitimizing the arrangement beyond just taxes.
0 coins