IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Mateo Sanchez

•

Went through this exact process last filing season. Submitted my 4800C on February 8th and got my refund on March 2nd, so just over 3 weeks. The key was making sure I submitted EXACTLY what they asked for - no more, no less. I made the mistake of sending too much documentation the first time (thought I was being helpful) and they rejected it and made me resubmit. The second time I followed their instructions to the letter and it went through without issues. Hope this helps and good luck!

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

Did you get any kind of notification when they accepted your documentation, or did you just suddenly see your refund status change?

0 coins

AstroAce

•

I can confirm this is accurate. I had a similar experience where I initially provided additional supporting documents thinking it would expedite my verification, but it actually delayed the process. When I resubmitted with precisely what was requested, my verification was completed much more quickly.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

Just went through this process myself - submitted my 4800C on February 28th and refund hit my account yesterday (March 8th), so about 8 business days for me. I think timing might depend on how backed up they are when you submit. One thing that helped was checking my account transcript on the IRS website rather than just relying on WMR - it showed the verification hold codes and when they were cleared, which gave me a better sense of what was actually happening behind the scenes. The transcript updated about 2 days before WMR finally showed "approved" status. Hang in there - it's definitely nerve-wracking but they seem to be processing these more efficiently than in previous years.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Wow, 8 business days is incredibly fast! I'm jealous - I'm on day 6 since submitting mine and still nothing. Thanks for the tip about checking the account transcript instead of just WMR. I didn't even know that was a thing! Do you access that through the same IRS website or is it a different portal? Also wondering if the type of documentation required makes any difference in processing time - I had to submit both identity verification AND income verification documents.

0 coins

Don't panic! Form 1462 usually means there's a discrepancy or missing information in your filing. Since you have your confirmation number, that's great evidence you did file. I'd recommend calling the IRS practitioner priority line if you can get through - sometimes it's just a processing delay on their end. Also make sure to respond within the timeframe they give you (usually 30 days) with copies of your return and that confirmation number. Keep everything organized and document all your communications with them!

0 coins

This is really solid advice! I've been dealing with IRS notices for years and documentation is everything. @Mateo Hernandez is spot on about the practitioner priority line - it s'way faster than the regular taxpayer line if you can get through. Also want to add that if you re'still stressed about understanding what s'going on, that taxr.ai tool others mentioned is actually legit - I used it last month when I got a CP2000 notice and it broke down exactly what the IRS was looking for. Worth the dollar just for peace of mind!

0 coins

I went through something similar last year! The key thing is not to panic - Form 1462 is actually pretty common and usually just means there was a processing issue on their end. Since you have your confirmation number, you're in good shape. Make sure to respond promptly with a copy of your original return, that confirmation number, and a cover letter explaining you already filed. I'd also suggest getting your account transcripts from the IRS website to see what they have on file - sometimes that gives you clues about what went wrong. The whole process took about 6-8 weeks for me to resolve, but it worked out fine in the end!

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

This is really reassuring to hear! 6-8 weeks sounds manageable. Quick question - when you got your account transcripts, did you have to wait for them to mail them or were you able to access them online right away? I'm wondering if I should try to get those before I send my response to see what's showing up on their end.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

@Amelia Cartwright You can access your transcripts online immediately if you can verify your identity through the IRS website! Just go to irs.gov and look for Get "Your Tax Record -" you ll'need your SSN, filing status, and either a credit card/mortgage/auto loan account number to verify. Way faster than waiting for them to mail it. Definitely recommend checking what they have on file before you send your response - it might show exactly where the disconnect happened!

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

Great thread everyone! As someone who's been through this exact process, I wanted to add one more perspective that might help newcomers like Andre. The key thing to remember is that this initial complexity is a one-time setup cost. Yes, the W-9 and NR301 forms seem daunting at first, and tracking multiple transfer agents can feel overwhelming, but once you get everything properly documented, the ongoing maintenance is minimal. I'd also suggest starting a simple tax folder (physical or digital) specifically for your Canadian investments. Keep copies of all your forms, correspondence with transfer agents, and quarterly dividend statements showing the withholding amounts. This saved me hours during tax season when I needed to complete Form 1116 for the foreign tax credit. One thing I learned the hard way: if you're planning to expand your Canadian holdings over time, submit the NR301 forms for new positions as soon as you buy them, rather than waiting to see how much dividend income they'll generate. Even a small dividend payment at 25% withholding instead of 15% adds up over time. The investment in time and paperwork upfront really pays off in the long run, both in terms of proper tax treatment and peace of mind that you're handling everything correctly!

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

This is such valuable advice, Grace! I really appreciate you emphasizing that this is mostly a one-time setup process - that definitely helps put the initial complexity in perspective. Your point about creating a dedicated tax folder is spot on. I've already started getting overwhelmed just trying to keep track of which forms I need to submit and to whom. Having everything organized from the beginning will definitely save headaches later. The tip about submitting NR301 forms immediately for new positions is particularly helpful. I was thinking I'd wait to see how the dividends looked before bothering with the paperwork, but you're absolutely right that even small amounts add up over time when you're paying 25% instead of 15%. Thanks to everyone in this thread - as a complete newcomer to Canadian dividend investing, this discussion has been incredibly educational and has given me a clear roadmap for getting everything set up properly with Vanguard. I feel much more confident about moving forward now!

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

As someone who's been navigating Canadian dividend taxation for the past few years, I can definitely relate to your confusion! The good news is that once you understand the process and get the proper documentation in place, it becomes much more manageable. You're absolutely right that both the US and Canada will want to tax your Canadian dividends, but the US-Canada tax treaty helps prevent excessive double taxation. Here's what you need to know: **Forms you'll need:** - **W-9**: Submit this to Vanguard to certify you're a US person for tax purposes - **NR301**: This goes to the transfer agents of your Canadian companies to claim treaty benefits and reduce withholding from 25% to 15% **Key points:** 1. Don't wait - submit these forms as soon as you start investing in Canadian stocks, as it can take 1-3 dividend payment cycles for the reduced withholding to take effect 2. The NR301 forms go to individual transfer agents (not Vanguard), so you'll need a separate form for each Canadian company or their transfer agent 3. Keep detailed records of all Canadian taxes withheld - you'll need this for Form 1116 (Foreign Tax Credit) on your US return **Pro tip:** Start with your largest Canadian positions first to get comfortable with the process, then tackle the smaller holdings. Many companies share the same transfer agents, so it's not always one form per stock. The foreign tax credit on your US return will help offset the Canadian taxes withheld, effectively preventing true double taxation. While the initial setup takes some effort, it's definitely worth it to ensure you're not overpaying taxes on your Canadian dividend income!

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Has anybody ever been audited for messing this up? My husband and I accidentally both contributed to dependent care FSAs at different jobs last year (about $4000 each) and I'm freaking out now reading this thread.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

Don't panic, but you should address this. The IRS can identify this issue because employers report FSA contributions on your W-2s (usually in box 10). You should file Form 2441 with your tax return to report all dependent care benefits received. The excess contribution (anything over the $5,000 household limit) would need to be included as taxable income on your Form 1040. You'll calculate this on Form 2441. It's not necessarily an audit trigger if you self-correct, but ignoring it could potentially flag your return.

0 coins

I'm a tax preparer and see this mistake ALL the time! Just to reinforce what others have said - the $5,000 dependent care FSA limit is definitely per household when you're married filing jointly, not per person. What I tell my clients is to think of it this way: the IRS doesn't care which spouse's employer plan you use or how you split it between accounts. They only care about the total household contribution not exceeding $5,000. One practical tip: if you do split contributions between both spouses' FSA accounts, make sure you coordinate your reimbursement claims carefully. You don't want to accidentally submit the same daycare receipt to both accounts for reimbursement - that would be claiming the same expense twice, which is definitely not allowed. Also, keep excellent records of all your childcare expenses throughout the year. You'll need them not just for FSA reimbursements, but also to properly calculate any additional tax credit you might be eligible for on the amounts above your FSA contributions.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm new to navigating FSAs and had no idea about the coordination issue with reimbursements. Quick question - if we do split our $5,000 between both our FSA accounts (like $2,500 each), do we need to notify our employers about this split, or do they automatically know to coordinate the limits? I want to make sure we don't accidentally go over the household limit when we're setting up our elections for next year.

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

•

This discussion has been incredibly thorough and helpful! As someone who's been lurking and learning from everyone's experiences, I wanted to add a perspective from the operational side. I went through this exact decision with my S-Corp two years ago and chose the capital contribution route based on advice similar to what's been shared here. Looking back, it was absolutely the right call. The administrative burden of tracking loan payments, interest calculations, and maintaining proper documentation would have been a nightmare for a small business trying to focus on growth. One practical tip that helped us: we created a simple spreadsheet tracking each shareholder's capital contributions by date and amount. This became invaluable when we needed to calculate basis for taking losses and when our accountant prepared our K-1s. Having that clean paper trail made tax season much smoother. Also, regarding the officer compensation question @db958ca6c97e raised - the IRS generally looks at what similar positions pay in your industry and geographic area. We used salary surveys from trade associations and looked at job postings for comparable roles. Your accountant should be able to help establish reasonable ranges, but documenting your research process is key if you're ever questioned. The peace of mind from avoiding loan documentation complexities and audit risks has been worth more than any theoretical tax savings we might have gotten from the loan structure. Sometimes the simplest approach really is the best!

0 coins

Tyler Lefleur

•

This is exactly the kind of real-world validation I needed to hear! It's reassuring to know that someone who actually went through this decision is happy with choosing capital contributions two years later. The spreadsheet idea for tracking contributions is brilliant - such a simple solution that I bet will save headaches down the road. I'm definitely going to set something like that up regardless of which route we ultimately choose. Your point about focusing on business growth rather than administrative complexity really hits home. As a startup, we need to be spending our time building the business, not wrestling with loan documentation and interest calculations that might not even hold up under IRS scrutiny anyway. Thanks for sharing the practical tip about officer compensation research too. It sounds like having documented justification for salary decisions is just as important as getting the capital structure right from the start. This whole thread has convinced me that capital contributions are the way to go for our situation. The consistency of advice from people with actual experience is pretty compelling - sometimes the boring, simple approach really is the smart approach!

0 coins

Taylor To

•

This has been an absolutely fantastic discussion! As someone who's been wrestling with this exact same S-Corp decision, I can't thank everyone enough for sharing their real-world experiences and insights. After reading through all the comments, I'm convinced that capital contributions are the right approach for most startup S-Corps. The consistent theme from people who've actually been through audits, dealt with the administrative burden of loan documentation, and navigated the complexities years later is pretty clear - the simplicity and reduced risk of capital contributions usually outweigh any theoretical tax advantages of shareholder loans. What really resonates with me is @6bb6940cd7ca's point about focusing on business growth rather than administrative complexity. When you're trying to build a company, the last thing you need is to be bogged down with loan documentation, interest calculations, and audit risks that could blow up later. The practical tips shared here are gold - from the spreadsheet tracking system to the importance of documenting officer compensation decisions. It's this kind of operational insight that you just can't get from generic tax advice articles. For anyone else facing this decision, this thread is basically a masterclass in S-Corp capital structure considerations. The consensus from people with actual experience seems overwhelming: keep it simple with capital contributions, document everything properly, and focus your energy on growing the business rather than managing complex loan structures that might not even survive IRS scrutiny. Thanks again to everyone who shared their experiences - this community is incredibly valuable for navigating these business challenges!

0 coins

This thread has been such a goldmine of practical advice! As someone just starting to navigate S-Corp decisions, I'm really grateful for all the detailed experiences everyone has shared. What strikes me most is how the people who actually lived through audits, loan documentation headaches, and multi-year administrative burdens are all saying the same thing - capital contributions are usually the smarter choice for startups. That kind of consistent real-world feedback is way more valuable than theoretical tax advice. I especially appreciate the operational insights like the spreadsheet tracking system and the point about focusing energy on business growth rather than complex loan structures. When you're bootstrapping a startup, every hour spent on unnecessary administrative complexity is an hour not spent building your business. The cautionary tales about inadequately documented loans being reclassified during audits really drove the point home for me. It sounds like the IRS scrutinizes these arrangements heavily, and the potential for "repayments" to be reclassified as taxable distributions is genuinely scary. For anyone else reading this thread later, the consensus seems clear: document your capital contributions properly, keep detailed records, establish reasonable officer compensation, and don't try to get too clever with loan structures unless you have the resources to maintain them perfectly. Sometimes boring and simple really is the best strategy! This community is amazing for sharing this kind of practical wisdom. Thanks everyone!

0 coins

Prev1...901902903904905...5643Next