IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I completely feel your pain on this one! I actually just went through the exact same situation last month and was pulling my hair out over it. Here's what I discovered after way too much research: Technically yes, all interest income should be reported regardless of amount. But here's the key thing that saved my sanity - check your December bank statements FIRST before you start the nightmare of adding up 12 months per account. Most banks show "YTD Interest Earned" or something similar right on your year-end statement. I had 6 accounts earning practically nothing and thought I'd be stuck doing math for hours. Turned out each December statement had the total right there - took me maybe 15 minutes total instead of the hours I was dreading. The reality is your $3.42 in total interest would result in maybe 50-80 cents in actual tax depending on your bracket. We're literally talking about pocket change in every sense. While banks don't send 1099-INT forms for amounts under $10 (so the IRS doesn't automatically know about it), I personally went ahead and reported mine just for complete peace of mind. The audit risk for such tiny amounts is essentially zero - the IRS focuses on much bigger fish. But if you're like me and prefer to sleep well at night knowing you're 100% compliant, the December statement approach makes it way less painful than you'd expect!

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

This is such a relief to read! I've been procrastinating on my taxes for weeks because I kept thinking about having to hunt through all those statements. The December statement tip is a game-changer - I just checked one of my accounts online and you're absolutely right, it shows "Interest Paid YTD: $0.73" right at the bottom of the December statement. I feel silly for not thinking of this sooner, but I guess when you're stressed about tax compliance, you don't always think of the simplest solutions first. Your point about it being 50-80 cents in actual tax really puts the whole thing in perspective too. I was getting worked up over what's essentially the cost of a piece of gum! I think I'll follow your approach and just gather the YTD totals from all my December statements and report everything properly. Better to spend 15 minutes being compliant than keep losing sleep over whether I'm handling this correctly. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's so helpful to know others have been through this exact same frustration!

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

I just want to add another perspective here - I'm a CPA and see this question come up all the time with clients. While everyone's correctly pointing out that all interest is technically taxable, there's something important to consider about materiality. The IRS Publication 17 doesn't set a minimum threshold, but their own internal procedures focus audit resources on cases with substantial underreporting. For context, the average cost of processing a return exceeds what the government would collect on a few dollars of unreported interest. That said, if you want to be fully compliant (which I always recommend), here's the easiest approach: Most online banking platforms have a "Tax Documents" or "Year End Summary" section where you can download a summary showing total interest earned, even if it's under the 1099-INT threshold. This eliminates the need to hunt through individual statements. One more practical tip: if you're using tax software, there's usually a line for "Interest income not reported on Form 1099-INT" where you can just enter your total. The software handles the rest. Bottom line: The peace of mind from proper reporting is worth the minimal effort, especially when you know the right shortcuts to gather the information quickly.

0 coins

I'm a tax attorney and wanted to add some perspective on the legal requirements here that might help strengthen your position with MGM. Under IRS regulations (specifically Reg. 1.6041-1(e)), payers like MGM are required to furnish copies of information returns "upon written request" from the payee. This isn't just a courtesy - it's a legal obligation. If you go the certified letter route (which I highly recommend), I'd suggest including specific language that references their legal obligation under Section 6041 and remind them that failure to provide required tax documents could result in penalties. Sometimes mentioning the regulatory framework gets faster action than just asking nicely. Also, don't forget that you have the right to file a complaint with both the Nevada Gaming Control Board AND the IRS if MGM continues to be unresponsive. The IRS takes payer non-compliance seriously, and casinos definitely don't want regulatory scrutiny over tax document issues. The IRS transcript approach others have mentioned is excellent for getting the actual reported amount, but you may still want the physical W2G for your records and to avoid any potential matching issues during IRS processing. Keep pushing on multiple fronts - your persistence will pay off!

0 coins

Ella Lewis

•

This is exactly the kind of authoritative legal perspective I was hoping to see in this discussion! As someone who's been struggling with MGM's unresponsiveness, having the specific regulatory citations (Section 6041 and Reg. 1.6041-1(e)) to include in my certified letter gives me much more leverage than just making a general request. I really appreciate you clarifying that this is a legal obligation, not just a courtesy. I've been feeling like I'm somehow being unreasonable by continuing to pursue this, but knowing there are actual regulatory requirements makes me feel much more confident about escalating through proper channels. The dual complaint strategy (Nevada Gaming Control Board AND IRS) is particularly smart. I hadn't considered that the IRS itself might be interested in payer non-compliance issues. MGM probably gets audited regularly, so they definitely wouldn't want additional regulatory attention over something as basic as providing duplicate tax documents. One quick question - when you mention "potential matching issues during IRS processing," are you referring to situations where my filed return might not perfectly match what MGM reported, even if I use the IRS transcript for the exact amount? I want to make sure I understand all the potential complications here so I can address them proactively. Thanks for bringing the legal framework perspective to this discussion - it's incredibly helpful for those of us dealing with unresponsive casinos!

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

I've been following this thread with great interest as I'm dealing with a similar W2G issue from Foxwoods. The collective advice here has been incredibly comprehensive - from the IRS transcript requests to the certified letter approach with specific regulatory citations. What I find most valuable is how this thread evolved from basic suggestions to professional-level legal and tax guidance. The combination of the taxr.ai service recommendation for immediate document retrieval, Claimyr for phone assistance, and the formal regulatory complaint process gives multiple pathways to resolution. For anyone still reading through this thread, I'd recommend prioritizing the strategies in this order based on urgency: 1) IRS transcript request for the exact amount, 2) taxr.ai or similar document retrieval service if available for your casino, 3) certified letter with regulatory citations to corporate headquarters, and 4) gaming board complaint as backup pressure. The key insight from the tax professionals here is that this situation is actually quite common and there are established procedures for handling it. Don't let casinos make you feel like you're asking for something unreasonable - providing duplicate tax documents is literally their legal obligation under federal regulations. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise and experiences. This thread should be bookmarked by anyone dealing with casino tax document issues!

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

I've been in this exact situation as a business consultant who travels frequently! Your $245 luggage purchase is absolutely deductible at the business use percentage. Since you're using it primarily for work (90% business vs 10% personal), you can deduct about $220. The key factors working in your favor: - Clear business necessity (monthly client site visits) - Reasonable cost ($245 is well within "ordinary and necessary" limits) - Honest usage tracking (90/10 split rather than claiming 100% business use) My advice: Keep that receipt, document that you replaced broken luggage needed for work travel, and start a simple log tracking business vs personal trips going forward. A basic spreadsheet with date, destination, and business purpose works perfectly. One important check: verify with your employer whether they have any luggage reimbursement policy. If they don't cover luggage purchases, you're clear to deduct the business portion. Just make sure you don't accidentally double-dip by getting reimbursed AND claiming a tax deduction. Your monthly travel pattern actually strengthens your case since it demonstrates ongoing business necessity rather than a one-time purchase. This should be a straightforward legitimate business expense deduction.

0 coins

KylieRose

•

This is such a comprehensive breakdown - thank you! I'm relatively new to handling business expenses and this kind of step-by-step guidance is exactly what I needed. The point about documenting that I replaced broken luggage for work travel is really smart - I hadn't thought about establishing that clear business necessity narrative. I'm curious about the employer reimbursement check you mentioned. If I ask HR about luggage policies and they say they don't currently have one but might consider adding it in the future, does that affect my current deduction? Since I already purchased the luggage out-of-pocket with no expectation of reimbursement, I assume I'm still good to claim the business percentage, but want to make sure I'm thinking about this correctly. Also really appreciate the reassurance about the monthly travel pattern helping rather than hurting. I was worried that frequent business travel might somehow look suspicious, but it sounds like it actually supports the business necessity argument. Makes total sense when you put it that way!

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

Your $245 luggage purchase is definitely a legitimate business deduction! As someone who's been handling business travel expenses for several years, I can confirm that luggage used primarily for work travel absolutely qualifies as an ordinary and necessary business expense. Since you're using it 90% for business travel (monthly client visits), you can deduct approximately $220 of the $245 cost. The key is being honest about the business vs personal usage split - the IRS much prefers realistic percentages over people trying to claim 100% business use for mixed-use items. A few practical tips: - Keep your receipt and note that you replaced worn-out luggage needed for required work travel - Start tracking your trips going forward (simple spreadsheet with date, destination, business purpose works great) - Your monthly client visits actually strengthen your case by showing consistent business necessity Make sure to check with your employer about any luggage reimbursement policies. If they don't cover luggage purchases, you're all set to claim the business percentage. Just avoid double-dipping if they do offer reimbursement. The $245 cost is very reasonable and well below any "lavish or extravagant" thresholds the IRS might question. Your situation sounds like a textbook example of a legitimate business expense deduction. Keep good records and you should have no issues!

0 coins

This has been such a helpful thread! As someone who's completely new to business expense deductions, I really appreciate getting insights from people with actual experience rather than just generic online advice. The consensus is pretty clear that my $245 luggage purchase qualifies for a business deduction at 90% ($220), and I feel much more confident about claiming it now. The tips about documentation have been invaluable - I'll definitely keep that receipt, note the business necessity (replacing broken luggage for required monthly client travel), and start that spreadsheet tracking system everyone's mentioned. I'm also relieved to hear that being honest about the 90/10 business/personal split is the right approach rather than trying to claim 100% business use. That makes total sense and seems much safer from an audit perspective. I'll check with HR about any luggage reimbursement policies just to be thorough, but since this seems like such a standard business expense scenario, I'm optimistic everything will be straightforward. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - this has been incredibly educational!

0 coins

Anita George

•

I'm also going through a similar situation after my recent divorce and this entire thread has been incredibly reassuring! Like so many others here, I was completely puzzled by those "TP Tax Figures (Reduced By IRAF per Computer)" entries on my tax transcripts and was worried they indicated hidden retirement accounts my ex never disclosed. Reading through all the explanations from tax professionals and community members who've been through this has been such a relief. Learning that these are just standard IRS internal processing codes rather than secret accounts has completely changed my focus from trying to decode mysterious abbreviations to actually investigating real documents. The systematic approach everyone has outlined - starting with Form 4506-T to request wage and income transcripts, then looking specifically for Form 5498s (IRA contributions) and W-2 Box 12 codes (401k contributions) - gives me a clear roadmap instead of feeling lost in financial detective work. What really resonates with me is how many newly divorced people end up in this exact same confused state when we suddenly have to understand financial documents we never dealt with during marriage. The community support here has been amazing for turning what felt like an impossible mystery into a manageable process. I'm planning to create my IRS online account this week and request transcripts for all our marriage years. Thank you to everyone who shared their expertise and experiences - it's so helpful to know there's a logical path forward!

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

I'm also navigating post-divorce finances and this discussion has been absolutely invaluable! Like so many others here, I was completely bewildered by those "TP Tax Figures (Reduced By IRAF per Computer)" entries and was convinced they revealed hidden retirement accounts. It's such a relief to learn from all the tax professionals and experienced community members that these are simply routine IRS processing codes, not secret accounts. The clear action plan everyone has provided - requesting Form 4506-T for wage and income transcripts and systematically reviewing them for Form 5498s (IRA contributions) and W-2 Box 12 codes (401k contributions) - transforms what seemed like an impossible investigation into manageable steps. What strikes me most is how common this confusion is among newly divorced individuals who suddenly find themselves responsible for understanding financial documents that were previously handled by their spouse. The community support here has been extraordinary in turning individual bewilderment into collective knowledge. I'm planning to establish my IRS online account this week and submit transcript requests for all our marriage years. The timeline guidance about online requests typically taking 5-10 business days is really helpful for setting expectations. Thank you to everyone who transformed their challenging experiences into practical guidance for the rest of us - having this systematic approach makes tackling post-divorce financial questions feel so much more achievable!

0 coins

Just wanted to add my experience with the ADP mobile app navigation since I struggled with this too. The menu structure can be confusing, but here's the exact path I used: 1. Open ADP mobile app 2. Tap "Myself" at the bottom 3. Scroll down to "Pay & Taxes" section 4. Tap "Tax Withholdings" 5. Look for "Federal" or "Update W-4" 6. Tap "Update" or "Edit" The key thing I learned (the hard way) is that maximizing your take-home pay doesn't necessarily mean claiming full exemption. You can increase your allowances or use the "Additional amount to withhold" field in reverse by putting a negative number if your payroll system allows it. Also, keep detailed records of whatever you do. If you're going through financial hardship, consider speaking with a tax professional about estimated tax payments so you don't get hit with a huge bill next April. Sometimes paying a small amount quarterly is better than owing thousands later with penalties and interest.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I've been looking for the exact navigation steps. One question - when you mention putting a negative number in the "Additional amount to withhold" field, does that actually work in ADP? I've heard mixed things about whether payroll systems accept negative values there. Also, totally agree about keeping records - I learned that lesson the hard way a few years ago when I had to reconstruct my withholding changes for the IRS.

0 coins

Great question about the negative values! In my experience, most ADP systems won't accept negative numbers in the "Additional amount to withhold" field - it'll either give you an error or just ignore the negative sign. What I meant was more about using that field strategically along with adjusting your filing status and allowances to minimize withholding. For example, if you're single but claim "Married filing jointly" status with higher allowances, you might not need to mess with the additional withholding field at all. The combination of filing status changes and allowance adjustments can significantly reduce your withholding without needing to claim full exemption. But you're absolutely right about keeping records - I actually keep screenshots of all my W-4 changes in ADP, along with notes about why I made each change. Makes tax time so much easier when you can show exactly what you did and when.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

I've been through this exact situation and wanted to share what worked for me. First, be really careful about claiming full exemption - the IRS has strict rules about this and you could face penalties if you don't qualify. You can only claim exempt if you had zero tax liability last year AND expect zero this year. For the ADP mobile app, here's the path that worked for me: Go to "Myself" → "Pay & Taxes" → "Tax Withholdings" → "Federal" → "Update." The interface isn't super intuitive but it's there. Instead of full exemption, consider maximizing your allowances or claiming "Married" filing status even if you're single (this reduces withholding). You can also look into adjusting the values in Step 4 of the W4 form within ADP. One thing that really helped me was understanding that I could significantly reduce my withholding without going fully exempt. I went from having $400+ taken out per paycheck to only about $50 by adjusting my filing status and allowances properly. Still kept me compliant but gave me the cash flow I needed during my tough financial period. Just remember - whatever you reduce now, you might owe later, so try to set aside something if you can for next tax season. Good luck getting through this rough patch!

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

This is really solid advice! I'm dealing with a similar financial crunch right now and was also considering going fully exempt, but after reading all these responses I think adjusting allowances is definitely the safer route. Quick question - when you changed your filing status to "Married" while being single, did you run into any issues later when filing your actual tax return? I'm worried about creating complications down the road even if it helps my cash flow now. Also, how did you figure out the right number of allowances to claim? I don't want to go too far and end up owing a huge amount next April. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who actually went through this successfully!

0 coins

Prev1...682683684685686...5643Next