IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion! As the original poster, this thread has been incredibly valuable in helping me understand the R&D tax credit landscape and evaluate whether to move forward with ABGi or similar services. A few key takeaways that really helped me: - The legitimate nature of these services and the "no upfront fee" model being standard - Real recovery amounts ($80k-$115k+) that show this could be worthwhile for our operation - Understanding that our prototype development and process improvement work likely qualifies as R&D - The importance of getting multiple quotes and comparing not just fees (20-35%) but also audit support - Reassurance that informal documentation can still support claims if it shows technical problem-solving @Nathan Rhodes - Thanks for reaching out directly! I'll definitely include ABGi in my evaluation process along with 2-3 other providers as recommended by others here. The professional perspective from @Daniel Rogers about ABGi being legitimate was helpful, and I appreciate you making yourself available. I'm planning to start the preliminary assessment process with multiple firms in the coming weeks. This discussion has moved me from skeptical to cautiously optimistic about the potential opportunity. I'll try to update this thread with how the process goes in case it helps other manufacturers facing similar decisions. Thanks again everyone for sharing your real experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical insight I was hoping to find!

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Sean, this has been such a helpful thread to follow! As someone new to understanding R&D tax credits, I really appreciate how everyone shared their actual experiences rather than just generic advice. What really struck me was learning how broad the definition of "research" is for manufacturing - I had no idea that troubleshooting production issues, custom tooling development, and process improvements could qualify. Like many others here, we've probably been leaving money on the table without realizing it. The range of recovery amounts people shared ($80k-$200k+) really shows the potential value, especially for companies that have been doing qualifying work for years without claiming credits. Even accounting for the service fees, those are significant amounts that could impact operations. I'm curious to hear how your preliminary assessments go with the different providers. It would be great to get a follow-up on what you learn about the differences between firms and whether the process is as straightforward as it sounds from the success stories shared here. Thanks for starting this discussion - it's exactly the kind of real-world insight that helps smaller manufacturers like us make informed decisions about these opportunities!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly enlightening! I'm a plant manager at a mid-sized manufacturing facility and we've also received outreach from several R&D credit firms recently, though not ABGi specifically. What really opened my eyes is understanding how many of our day-to-day activities could potentially qualify. We've spent considerable time over the past few years developing custom automation solutions, modifying existing equipment to handle new product lines, and troubleshooting integration challenges when we upgraded our quality control systems. Reading through everyone's examples, it sounds like much of this technical problem-solving work could qualify for R&D credits. The success stories here are compelling - seeing companies recover $80k-$200k+ makes this worth serious consideration. Our engineering team is constantly working on process improvements and solving technical challenges, but we've never thought of it as "research" in the tax sense. I'm particularly interested in the experiences with informal documentation since that describes our situation perfectly. Most of our engineering discussions and problem-solving happens organically, with decisions documented in emails or maintenance logs rather than formal project reports. Based on this discussion, I'm planning to reach out to multiple providers for preliminary assessments. The consensus about getting quotes from 2-3 firms and comparing their approaches (not just fees) seems like solid advice. Even if we only recover a portion of what others have found, it could significantly impact our operations budget. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical insight you can't find elsewhere!

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact S-Corp partnership accounting challenge for the past three years, and I've learned some hard lessons that might help others avoid my mistakes. The biggest trap I fell into initially was not understanding the difference between tax basis and book basis for partnership investments. Your QBO investment account tracks your financial/book investment, but for tax purposes, you also need to consider your share of partnership debt, which increases your tax basis but doesn't show up in your books. Here's my recommended approach for QBO setup: 1. Create separate accounts for each partnership investment (don't lump them together) 2. Set up corresponding income accounts that clearly identify the source (e.g., "K-1 Income - ABC Partnership") 3. Consider creating a "Due from Partnership" account for timing differences if distributions are consistently delayed For the journal entries, I always record the full K-1 income first, then separately record distributions as they're received. This keeps the accounting clean and makes year-end reconciliation much easier. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier: if your partnership has "guaranteed payments" to partners, these are treated differently than distributive share income. Guaranteed payments are deductible to the partnership and taxable to you, while regular K-1 income is not deductible to the partnership. Make sure you're coding these separately in QBO. Also, keep detailed records of all basis adjustments throughout the year. I maintain a simple Excel tracker alongside QBO that includes debt basis adjustments, loss limitations, and at-risk calculations. This has been invaluable during tax preparation and has saved my CPA hours of work reconstructing the information.

0 coins

This is incredibly thorough advice, Ethan! Your point about guaranteed payments vs. distributive share income is something I completely overlooked when I started dealing with partnership K-1s in my S-Corp. I've been treating them the same way, which probably explains some of the confusion I've had with my basis calculations. Could you share more details about your Excel tracker setup? I'm particularly interested in how you handle the debt basis adjustments since that seems to be where a lot of people (myself included) get tripped up. Do you update it monthly, quarterly, or just when you receive K-1 information? Also, when you mention creating a "Due from Partnership" account for timing differences, how do you handle that at year-end? Do you reverse it out, or does it carry forward if there are still outstanding distributions expected? I'm definitely going to implement your separate account structure - I've been lumping everything under one "Partnership Investments" account and it's made tracking individual partnership performance nearly impossible. Thanks for sharing these practical insights from your experience!

0 coins

Jibriel Kohn

•

As someone who's been through this exact headache with my S-Corp's partnership investments, I can't stress enough how important it is to get this right from the beginning. The journal entry approach that Keisha outlined is spot-on, but let me add a few practical tips that saved me a lot of grief. First, create a monthly close checklist that includes reviewing your partnership investment accounts. I used to only look at these at year-end and it was a nightmare trying to reconstruct what happened. Now I review the investment balance against my running basis calculation every month. Second, when you're setting up your QBO accounts, use descriptive names that include the partnership's name or your percentage ownership. Instead of just "Investment in LLC," use something like "Investment in ABC Partnership (30%)". This becomes crucial when you have multiple investments and need to track them separately for tax purposes. One thing that really helped me was setting up automatic recurring journal entries in QBO for estimated quarterly income if your partnership provides reasonable estimates. You can always adjust at year-end, but it smooths out your monthly financials and helps with cash flow planning. Also, don't forget about state tax implications - some states have different rules for how partnership income flows through S-Corps, so make sure your accountant is aware of all the partnerships when preparing your returns. The investment in time to get this system right upfront will pay dividends when tax season comes around. Trust me on this one!

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

This is such valuable advice, Jibriel! Your point about monthly close checklists really resonates with me. I'm relatively new to S-Corp accounting and have been making the mistake of only looking at these partnership investments when something seems "off" rather than proactively monitoring them. The descriptive naming convention you mentioned is brilliant - I can already see how that would eliminate confusion when pulling reports or trying to explain transactions to my CPA. Right now I have generic account names and constantly have to cross-reference notes to remember which investment is which. One question about your automatic recurring journal entries for estimated quarterly income - do you find that the partnership estimates are typically reliable enough to make this worthwhile? I'm concerned about creating more work if I have to constantly reverse and re-enter adjustments, but if the estimates are generally close, it seems like it would really help with monthly financial reporting. Also, your mention of state tax implications caught my attention. My S-Corp operates in multiple states and I hadn't even considered that the partnership income might be treated differently at the state level. Definitely something I need to discuss with my accountant before we get too deep into the year. Thanks for sharing these practical insights from your experience - it's exactly the kind of real-world guidance that's so hard to find in textbooks!

0 coins

19 Has your wife considered that the finance partner might be refusing these expenses because they're actually not legitimate business expenses? Just playing devil's advocate here. I've been in partnerships where one person thinks everything is a business expense when it's really more personal or questionable.

0 coins

1 That's a fair question. These are definitely legitimate - we're talking about industry conference registration fees, software subscriptions specifically for client work, and professional membership dues. All directly related to generating revenue for the business. The finance partner has openly said they're legitimate expenses but is limiting reimbursements due to "cash flow priorities.

0 coins

Alfredo Lugo

•

This is a frustrating but unfortunately common situation with S Corps. The key point everyone has touched on is correct - the TCJA eliminated personal deductions for unreimbursed employee business expenses, and S Corp owners are treated as employees for this purpose. What I'd suggest is framing this as a business decision rather than a personal tax issue. Those legitimate expenses (conference fees, software, professional memberships) are reducing the company's overall profitability when they're not properly recorded. Even if cash flow prevents immediate reimbursement, the S Corp should at least book these as business expenses and liabilities owed to your wife. This way the business gets the deduction (reducing everyone's K-1 income), and your wife has a documented claim for future reimbursement when cash flow improves. The current approach is essentially forcing all partners to pay higher taxes on phantom income while legitimate business costs go unrecognized. Maybe approach the finance partner with a proposal: "Let's at least record these properly in the books as business expenses, even if we can't cut checks immediately." This protects everyone's tax situation while acknowledging the cash flow constraints.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

This is excellent advice! I hadn't thought about framing it as protecting everyone's tax situation rather than just helping my wife. The idea of booking the expenses as liabilities makes a lot of sense - the business still gets the deduction benefit even without immediate cash outlay. I think our finance partner would be more receptive to this approach since it acknowledges the cash flow concerns while still handling the expenses properly from a tax perspective. Do you know if there are any specific accounting requirements for how these liability entries should be recorded?

0 coins

Laura Lopez

•

I'm currently going through this exact same situation and this thread has been a lifesaver! My transcript updated three days ago with code 846 and a refund date for this coming Monday, but WMR is still stuck on "processing" which has had me refreshing both constantly. Based on all the incredibly detailed information shared here, I've gone through the verification checklist: I only see the 846 code with no 841 or offset codes āœ“, my banking information was correct when filed āœ“, I called my bank and confirmed my account is in good standing āœ“, and I logged back into my tax software which shows direct deposit was selected with the right account details āœ“. The automated hotline tip (1-800-829-1954) has been really helpful too - I called yesterday and got confirmation of the same refund date as my transcript, which seems like a positive sign based on what others have shared. As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by how much technical knowledge everyone has shared about transcript codes, banking verification processes, and IRS procedures that you just can't find explained clearly anywhere else. The 3-deposit annual limit, the difference between code 846 and 841, the typical WMR update timeline - all of this has been invaluable for understanding what to expect. The waiting really is nerve-wracking when you're budgeting around that refund, but reading all these success stories from people with similar code patterns has given me so much more confidence. I'll definitely update everyone once my refund hits on Monday to add another data point to this amazing collection of experiences. Thank you to this community for making such a stressful process so much more manageable!

0 coins

@Laura Lopez Welcome to the community! Your systematic approach to verification is exactly what I d'recommend to anyone in this situation. It sounds like you ve'covered all the bases - the right codes, correct banking info, account verification, and even the automated hotline confirmation. That s'a really comprehensive check! As someone who s'been following this thread closely, your situation sounds very promising for direct deposit. Monday refund dates are common and reliable, so you should be all set. It s'incredible how much collective knowledge this community has shared - I ve'learned more about IRS processes from this one thread than from anywhere else! The waiting game is definitely the hardest part, but based on all the success stories here from people with your exact pattern, I m'confident you ll'get your direct deposit as scheduled. Looking forward to your positive update on Monday!

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

This thread has been absolutely incredible to read through! I'm a newcomer to this community and currently in the exact same boat - my transcript updated yesterday with code 846 and a refund date for next Thursday, but WMR is still showing "processing." Reading through everyone's detailed experiences has been so educational and reassuring. I had no idea about things like code 841 indicating paper checks, the 3-deposit annual limit, or how banking verification failures could trigger automatic switches to paper checks. This is the kind of technical knowledge you just can't find anywhere else! Like many others here, I've gone through the verification checklist: only seeing code 846 with no 841 or offset codes āœ“, banking information was correct when filed āœ“, called my bank to confirm account is in good standing āœ“, and even logged back into my tax software which confirms direct deposit was selected. One additional thing I wanted to mention - I work in IT and I've noticed that some banks actually update their online portals more frequently than others. For anyone obsessively checking like me, I've found that logging out and back into my bank account sometimes shows more current pending transaction information than just refreshing the page. The automated hotline at 1-800-829-1954 that several people mentioned is definitely worth calling for that extra peace of mind. I tried it this morning and getting the same refund date as my transcript was reassuring. The waiting really is the most stressful part when you're depending on that money for bills and rent! But this community's collective wisdom has made me feel so much more confident about what to expect. I'll absolutely update everyone once my refund hits next Thursday. Thank you all for sharing your knowledge and experiences - it makes such a difference for us newcomers navigating this process!

0 coins

Zainab Ali

•

This is such a comprehensive thread with excellent advice! I went through something very similar when my employer switched payroll systems earlier this year. My federal withholding jumped from about $195 to $290 per paycheck, and like many others here, I initially thought it would resolve itself. The W-4 data migration issue is incredibly common - in my case, the system had changed my filing status from "Married Filing Jointly" to "Single" and reset my dependents to zero. That single change was responsible for the entire withholding increase. What worked for me was taking screenshots of both my old and new pay stubs (focusing on the tax withholding breakdown), then emailing them to our payroll department with a clear explanation of the discrepancy. They were able to fix my W-4 information within 24 hours and adjusted my next two paychecks to account for the over-withholding from the previous month. For anyone still dealing with this: don't wait! Every paycheck you delay is money you're essentially loaning to the government interest-free. Most payroll teams are experienced with migration issues and can resolve them quickly once they have the proper documentation. The key is being proactive and providing clear evidence of the problem. This thread should honestly be bookmarked by anyone whose company is about to undergo a payroll system change. The patterns and solutions are remarkably consistent across everyone's experiences.

0 coins

This whole thread has been incredibly enlightening! As someone who's never experienced a payroll system migration before, I had no idea how common these W-4 data transfer issues are. The consistency in everyone's stories is remarkable - it seems like almost every migration results in filing status getting reset to "Single with zero dependents." What really stands out to me is how proactive communication with payroll departments seems to be the key to quick resolution. Your experience of getting it fixed within 24 hours and receiving retroactive adjustments gives me confidence that these aren't insurmountable problems, just frustrating administrative hiccups that need proper documentation to resolve. I'm bookmarking this thread for future reference - not just for myself, but to share with colleagues if they ever face similar issues. The step-by-step advice about taking screenshots, comparing old vs new pay stubs, and specifically asking about retroactive adjustments is invaluable. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions here!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding payroll migration issues! As someone whose company is planning to switch systems next month, I'm definitely going to be proactive about checking my W-4 information immediately after the first paycheck. The pattern everyone's described - federal withholding jumping from around 12% to 18% due to filing status defaulting to "Single with zero dependents" - seems almost universal with these system changes. It's honestly shocking that payroll systems don't have better safeguards to prevent this kind of data loss during migrations. I'm taking notes on the key steps everyone's recommended: 1. Take screenshots of pay stubs before AND after the migration for comparison 2. Check W-4 information in the new system immediately (filing status, dependents, additional withholding) 3. Contact payroll with documentation if there are discrepancies 4. Ask specifically about retroactive adjustments for migration errors The emphasis on acting quickly rather than hoping it resolves itself is really important. Several people mentioned losing hundreds of dollars over multiple pay periods by waiting, which is essentially giving the government an interest-free loan. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical advice that can save people a lot of money and frustration!

0 coins

Prev1...682683684685686...5644Next