IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Zoe Walker

•

Don't make this more complicated than it needs to be! Here's the simple version: 1) If anyone in the household has a regular medical FSA, nobody in the household can contribute to an HSA 2) If the FSA is limited to just dental/vision, then HSA is still allowed 3) If the FSA is "post-deductible" (only kicks in after meeting deductible), HSA is still allowed I went through this whole mess last year. Ended up having my wife decline her FSA so I could max out my HSA since the HSA has better long-term benefits (investment options + no "use it or lose it" rule).

0 coins

Elijah Brown

•

But what about dependent care FSAs? Those are for childcare costs not medical right? Do those also make you ineligible for an HSA?

0 coins

Zoe Walker

•

No, dependent care FSAs have absolutely no impact on HSA eligibility! They're completely separate because they cover childcare expenses, not medical expenses. You can absolutely have a dependent care FSA and an HSA at the same time without any problems. The rules only apply to healthcare FSAs that could potentially overlap with what an HSA covers. Dependent care is a whole different category in the tax code.

0 coins

Just wanted to add another perspective for folks dealing with this FSA/HSA household issue - timing matters a lot for your decision! If you're currently in a situation where your spouse has a regular FSA that's disqualifying you from HSA contributions, don't forget that you can make changes during your spouse's next open enrollment period. Most companies have open enrollment in the fall for the following year's benefits. Also worth noting: if your spouse has a qualifying life event (like job change, birth of child, etc.), they might be able to switch from a regular FSA to a limited purpose FSA mid-year, which could open up HSA eligibility for you sooner than waiting for the next enrollment period. The key is planning ahead since these accounts have different contribution deadlines. HSA contributions can be made up until the tax filing deadline (usually April 15th), but FSA elections are typically locked in during open enrollment and can't be changed without a qualifying event. One strategy that worked for my family: we calculated the total tax savings from both scenarios (spouse FSA + my regular health plan vs. spouse limited FSA + my HSA) and found the HSA route saved us about $800 more per year, especially since we can invest HSA funds for long-term growth.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of strategic planning I wish I'd known about earlier! I'm curious about the investment aspect you mentioned - can you really invest HSA funds like a retirement account? My employer's HSA just seems like a regular savings account with a debit card. Also, when you calculated the $800 savings, did that include the potential investment growth from the HSA or just the immediate tax benefits? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the hassle of having my husband switch his FSA during the next enrollment period.

0 coins

One important consideration that hasn't been fully addressed is the potential impact on your business insurance and workers' compensation coverage. When you formally employ your spouse, you may need to update your business liability insurance and potentially add workers' compensation coverage depending on your state requirements. I learned this the hard way when I started employing my husband in my electrical contracting business. Some states exempt spouses from workers' comp requirements, but others don't, and your insurance company will want to know about any employees for liability purposes. Also, regarding the $750 weekly salary - make sure you're budgeting for the employer taxes on top of that amount. You'll be paying the employer portion of Social Security (6.2%) and Medicare (1.45%), plus any state unemployment taxes. So factor in roughly an additional 8-10% on top of her gross wages for your actual employment costs. The tax savings are definitely real though. We've saved several thousand dollars annually by properly structuring my husband's employment versus just taking all the business income as self-employment earnings. Just make sure you're compliant with all the employment law requirements in addition to the tax considerations.

0 coins

Nora Bennett

•

Great point about the insurance considerations! I hadn't thought about workers' comp requirements varying by state. Do you know if there's an easy way to find out what the specific requirements are for spouse employment in different states? I'm in Texas and want to make sure I'm covering all my bases before setting this up. Also, when you mention budgeting for the additional 8-10% in employer taxes, does that percentage stay consistent regardless of the salary amount, or does it change as wages increase? I want to make sure I'm calculating the true cost accurately when deciding on my wife's compensation level.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

For Texas specifically, spouses are generally exempt from workers' compensation requirements, but you should verify this with the Texas Department of Insurance or your insurance agent to be absolutely sure. Each state handles this differently - some require coverage for all employees regardless of family relationship, while others have spousal exemptions. Regarding the employer tax percentage, it does stay fairly consistent but there are some wage base limits to be aware of. Social Security tax (6.2%) applies to the first $160,200 in wages for 2023, and Medicare (1.45%) applies to all wages with no limit. There's also an additional 0.9% Medicare tax on wages over $200,000. For most small business situations like yours, you're looking at a consistent 7.65% in FICA taxes. State unemployment taxes vary by state and your experience rating, but in Texas, the rate typically ranges from 0.31% to 6.31% on the first $9,000 of wages per employee. So your total employer tax burden will likely be around 8-9% for most wage levels, which should help you budget accurately for your wife's compensation.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

I've been through a similar situation with my consulting business and wanted to share a few practical tips that made the process smoother for us. First, regarding the $750 weekly salary - that's definitely reasonable for the work you're describing. Just make sure you document her specific duties clearly. We created a simple job description that outlined tasks like client communication, scheduling, bookkeeping assistance, and transportation support. This documentation proved valuable when our accountant filed our taxes. One thing that really helped us was setting up a separate business checking account specifically for payroll if you don't already have one. It makes tracking much cleaner and shows clear separation between personal and business expenses. We also started having my wife track her hours on a simple timesheet - nothing fancy, just dates, hours worked, and brief task descriptions. The health insurance angle is worth pursuing too, but don't overlook other potential fringe benefits. We set up a small office space in our home that's exclusively for business use, and my wife's workspace is part of that home office deduction. Just remember that consistency is key - once you start treating her as an employee, you need to maintain that arrangement throughout the tax year. The IRS looks favorably on legitimate business arrangements that are consistently applied and properly documented.

0 coins

Brian Downey

•

This is really solid practical advice! I'm just starting to research this topic for my own business and the timesheet documentation point is particularly helpful. Quick question - when you mention setting up a separate business checking account for payroll, do you mean in addition to your regular business account, or are you suggesting replacing the main business account? I currently just have one business checking account and I'm wondering if I need to complicate things by adding another one, or if I can just track the payroll expenses clearly within my existing account structure.

0 coins

Fidel Carson

•

I've been through this exact scenario with multiple PE investments over the past few years, and I can share what's worked for me. The annualized income installment method on Schedule AI is definitely your best bet, but there are a few key strategies that can help maximize your chances of penalty relief. First, for the timing issue - while partnerships technically "earn" income throughout their tax year, the IRS has been increasingly reasonable about K-1 situations where the actual amounts are genuinely unknowable until you receive the forms. I've successfully allocated December year-end partnership income to Q1 when I could document that valuations and audits prevented earlier disclosure. Second, consider the "cascading" approach on Schedule AI - start by calculating what your penalty would be if you allocated all K-1 income to Q4, then recalculate allocating it to Q1 based on when you actually received the information. The IRS allows you to use whichever method results in the lowest penalty. Third, proactively file Form 843 with your return including a detailed timeline of when you contacted partnerships requesting estimates and their responses (or lack thereof). I've found that showing you made good faith efforts to obtain information during the year significantly strengthens your reasonable cause argument. The system definitely feels stacked against individual investors dealing with PE K-1s, but with proper documentation and use of the annualized method, you can usually get most or all penalties abated. The key is being thorough with your paperwork and consistent in your approach across all partnerships.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful advice, especially the "cascading" approach you mentioned! I hadn't thought about calculating the penalty both ways and using whichever method results in lower penalties. Quick question about the Form 843 documentation - when you say you included a timeline of contacting partnerships for estimates, did you literally reach out to each partnership during the year asking for projections? I'm wondering if I should start doing this proactively for next year, even though I suspect most won't provide anything useful. It sounds like having that paper trail of "I tried but they couldn't/wouldn't help" is really valuable for the reasonable cause argument. Also, have you ever had the IRS push back on allocating December year-end partnership income to Q1, or have they generally been accepting of that approach when you have proper documentation?

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Yes, I do proactively reach out to my partnerships, usually in September and December, asking for year-end estimates or projections. You're absolutely right that most won't provide anything concrete - I'd say maybe 1 out of 5 actually gives useful numbers. But the key is documenting these attempts. I keep emails showing I requested estimates and their responses (usually something like "we can't provide reliable estimates until our audit is complete" or "valuations are still in process"). Even non-responses are valuable - I follow up after a week or two and note when partnerships don't reply to estimate requests. Regarding IRS pushback on Q1 allocation for December year-end partnerships, I've never had them challenge it when I have proper documentation showing the income amount was genuinely unknowable in Q4. The IRS seems to distinguish between partnerships that could reasonably provide estimates (like operating businesses) versus PE funds dealing with complex valuations. One tip: when reaching out to partnerships, specifically ask about their timeline for providing estimates and when they expect to have final numbers. Include this in your documentation. It helps show that the delay wasn't due to your lack of planning but rather the nature of these investments. This approach has worked well for me across multiple years and various fund types.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

I've been dealing with K-1 penalty issues for years with my PE investments, and one thing that's helped me is understanding the difference between "actual knowledge" versus "constructive knowledge" of income for Schedule AI purposes. The IRS generally recognizes that with private equity, you don't have actual knowledge of your income until you receive the K-1, even if the partnership's tax year ended earlier. This is different from, say, rental income where you know month by month what you're earning. A few practical tips from my experience: 1) Keep a log throughout the year of any attempts to get information from your partnerships - even informal conversations at annual meetings where you ask about expected distributions. 2) When filing Schedule AI, include a brief statement with each partnership explaining why the income amount was unknowable until you received the K-1 (e.g., "Income dependent on year-end valuations completed in Q1"). 3) Consider the "prior year safe harbor" calculation first - sometimes it's better to just pay 110% of last year's tax (if your AGI was over $150K) and avoid the whole penalty calculation altogether. The annualized income method definitely works, but it requires careful documentation. The IRS has been reasonable in my experience when you can show you made good faith efforts to comply but were genuinely limited by information availability.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

This distinction between "actual knowledge" and "constructive knowledge" is really important - thank you for explaining that! I'm dealing with my first year of PE K-1s and had no idea this was even a consideration for Schedule AI. Your point about keeping a log throughout the year is smart. I wish I had started doing that this year, but I'll definitely implement it going forward. For this year's filing, I'm wondering if I can still document my situation effectively even though I didn't proactively reach out to the partnerships. I literally had no idea these distributions were coming until the K-1s showed up in March. The prior year safe harbor would have been great, but unfortunately my income jumped so dramatically this year that 110% of last year's tax doesn't even come close to covering what I owe. Looks like Schedule AI is my best option at this point. One question about your statement approach - do you include these explanations directly on Schedule AI, or do you attach them as a separate document with your return?

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Just wanted to add - don't forget about state taxes too! In Pennsylvania (where you mentioned you live), you'll need to file a PA Schedule C with your state return as well. Pennsylvania doesn't recognize LLCs as separate from their owners for tax purposes, similar to federal treatment for single-member LLCs. Also, depending on your local municipality, you might need to file a local business tax return or get a business privilege license. Some PA cities and townships have these requirements even for small side businesses. Might be worth checking with your local government office.

0 coins

This is important! I'm in PA too and was surprised when I got a letter from my township about needing a business privilege license for my side gig. The fee wasn't much ($50) but they can charge penalties if you operate without one.

0 coins

Great question! I went through this exact same situation when I started my consulting LLC alongside my teaching job. A few additional points that might help: Since you're already employed as a high school counselor with taxes withheld, you might want to consider increasing your withholding at your main job rather than making quarterly payments. You can adjust your W-4 to have extra tax withheld to cover the tax liability from your LLC income - this is often easier than remembering to make quarterly payments. Also, don't underestimate your deductible expenses! Beyond the obvious ones like mileage and startup costs, consider things like: - Professional liability insurance (if you get it for your coaching) - Continuing education related to your coaching specialty - Office supplies (even if it's just notebooks and pens for client sessions) - Professional memberships or certifications - Business meals with potential clients (50% deductible) One more tip: Keep detailed records of your time and activities. Since coaching can sometimes blur the line between business and personal development, having clear documentation of your business activities will be helpful if you're ever audited. The Schedule C filing is straightforward, especially with TurboTax, but don't hesitate to consult a tax professional if your income grows significantly or your situation becomes more complex.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

This is incredibly helpful advice! I'm actually in a very similar situation - just started an LLC for my freelance writing business while keeping my full-time job. The tip about adjusting W-4 withholding instead of quarterly payments is brilliant - I hadn't thought of that approach but it makes so much more sense than trying to calculate and remember quarterly deadlines. I'm definitely going to look into professional liability insurance now that you mention it. Do you have any recommendations for where to get coverage for coaching/consulting businesses? Also, I'm curious about the business meals deduction - does that apply even for initial consultation meetings where you're not yet working with the client? Thanks for mentioning the documentation aspect too. I've been pretty casual about record-keeping but realize I need to get more systematic about tracking everything business-related.

0 coins

Jean Claude

•

Before you proceed with the withdrawal, I'd strongly recommend getting a professional tax consultation to review your specific situation. The 5-year rule for conversions can be tricky, and there might be some nuances in your particular case that could affect the penalty calculation. One thing to consider is the timing of your withdrawals. If you're going to take money out anyway, you might want to wait until January 2028 when your 2023 conversion will have satisfied its 5-year requirement. That could save you 10% on $6,000 ($600 in penalties). Also, make sure you understand exactly how much of your account balance represents conversions versus any potential earnings. Your brokerage should be able to provide detailed statements showing the breakdown, which will be crucial for accurate tax reporting on Form 8606. The penalty math is straightforward but painful - 10% on any conversion amounts withdrawn before their respective 5-year periods expire. Given that you're looking at potentially $1,450 in penalties on the full $14,500, exploring other financing options (personal loan, credit line, etc.) might be worth comparing against the total cost of early withdrawal.

0 coins

Lauren Wood

•

This is excellent advice about timing the withdrawal strategically. Waiting until January 2028 to avoid the penalty on that $6,000 from 2023 could make a huge difference if you can manage it financially. I'm also curious - when you mention getting detailed statements from the brokerage showing the breakdown, do most major brokerages automatically track this conversion vs earnings information? Or is this something you typically need to request specifically? I want to make sure I have all the documentation I'd need before making any moves. The comparison to other financing options is really eye-opening too. Even a higher-interest personal loan might be cheaper than losing that retirement contribution space forever, especially when you factor in decades of missed tax-free growth.

0 coins

The timing strategy mentioned by Jean Claude is really smart, but I wanted to add that you should also check if your brokerage offers any short-term lending options against your IRA balance. Some major brokerages like Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard offer securities-based lending where you can borrow against your retirement account value without actually withdrawing the funds. This could potentially let you access the cash you need while avoiding the early withdrawal penalties entirely. The interest rates are usually much lower than personal loans (often 3-5% depending on the amount), and you keep your retirement funds invested and growing. Obviously you'd want to be careful about the risks of borrowing against investments, but for a temporary financial crunch, it might be a much better option than paying 10% penalties plus losing that contribution space forever. Worth calling your brokerage to see what lending options they have available.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

This is a fantastic suggestion about securities-based lending! I had no idea that was even an option with retirement accounts. The 3-5% interest rate sounds way more manageable than the 10% penalty plus losing all that future growth potential. Do you know if there are any restrictions on what you can use the borrowed funds for? And how does the approval process typically work - is it based on your credit score or primarily on the account value? I'm wondering if this could be a viable option for someone in a financial crunch who might not qualify for traditional personal loans. Also curious about the repayment terms - are these typically structured like a line of credit where you can pay it back over time, or do they expect faster repayment?

0 coins

Prev1...665666667668669...5643Next