


Ask the community...
Don't forget state taxes too! Depending on which state you live in, the rules might be different from federal. Some states are more aggressive about taxing foreign income or have different reporting requirements. I moved to California and was surprised that they wanted more documentation about my overseas accounts than the IRS did.
Wait really? What other states are strict about this? I'm in New York and now I'm worried I missed something on my state taxes for my overseas accounts.
California is probably the most aggressive in terms of worldwide income and documentation. New York is definitely up there too, though! New York State generally follows federal rules on foreign income but has its own audit procedures. Other states with relatively strict approaches to foreign income and assets include Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Minnesota. States with no income tax like Florida, Texas, or Nevada are obviously not an issue for this. If you're in New York, I'd recommend double-checking your state filing requirements, especially for any interest or investment gains from those foreign accounts after you became a NY resident.
This is really helpful information! I'm in a similar situation - moved from Germany to the US last year with about $15k in savings. One thing I want to add is that if you're transferring from Japan specifically, make sure you understand the US-Japan tax treaty provisions. The treaty can help prevent double taxation on certain types of income, but it's complex. Also, if you had any Japanese retirement accounts (like iDeCo or corporate pension plans), those have special reporting requirements that are different from regular bank accounts. The IRS considers many foreign retirement accounts as "foreign trusts" which have additional Form 3520 filing requirements beyond just the FBAR. I'd definitely recommend getting professional help if you have any retirement or investment accounts in Japan, not just regular savings accounts. The penalties for incorrect reporting on these can be severe.
This is such an important point about Japanese retirement accounts! I'm actually dealing with this exact situation right now. I had an iDeCo account from my time working in Tokyo and had no idea about the Form 3520 requirement until I started researching. The "foreign trust" classification seems really confusing - does this apply even if you've already closed the Japanese retirement account and transferred the funds? Or is it only while the account is still active? I'm worried I might have missed filing requirements from previous years when the account was still open. Also, do you know if there are any safe harbor provisions or ways to catch up on missed filings without getting hit with massive penalties? The forms look incredibly complex and I'm definitely going to need professional help, but I want to understand the basics before I go to a tax advisor.
@Mia Roberts The foreign trust rules are tricky with Japanese retirement accounts! From what I understand, the Form 3520 requirement applies while you re'a US tax resident and the foreign retirement account exists, regardless of whether you re'actively contributing. So yes, if you had the iDeCo account open while you were already a US person for tax purposes, you likely should have been filing Form 3520 for those years. The good news is that there are some relief procedures available. The IRS has streamlined filing procedures for people who missed foreign account reporting requirements, including the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures and Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures. These can help you catch up on missed filings with reduced or no penalties if you can show the non-compliance wasn t'willful. For closed accounts, you generally don t'need ongoing reporting, but you might still need to file for the years it was open while you were a US person. Definitely get professional help - this area of tax law is incredibly complex and the penalties for getting it wrong are steep. A tax attorney or CPA who specializes in international tax issues would be your best bet.
My husband is military and I handle our taxes every year. Last tax season, I was worried about the exact same thing! I called DEERS to get our 1095-B forms sent to us, but they were backlogged. We went ahead and filed anyway, just indicating we had full-year Tricare coverage. Our refund came through without any issues about three weeks later. The health insurance question is really just a formality now - they're not penalizing people anymore for not having coverage like they did a few years ago.
Just wanted to add my experience as someone who's been through this exact situation. I'm a veteran who transitioned from active duty to civilian life mid-tax year, so I had both Tricare and employer insurance coverage. When I filed through TurboTax, I simply selected that I had qualifying coverage for the full year and didn't attach any 1095 forms. My return was accepted immediately and I received my refund within the normal timeframe. The key thing to remember is that Tricare is explicitly recognized by the IRS as minimum essential coverage under the ACA. Even if you don't have your 1095-B form in hand (which seems to be a common issue based on other comments here), you can still file confidently knowing you had qualifying coverage. The IRS isn't going to reject your return over this - they're mainly concerned with accuracy in reporting income and deductions these days. For your small business situation, focus on getting those business expenses and deductions documented properly since that's likely where you'll see the biggest impact on your refund amount. The health insurance question is really just a checkbox at this point.
This is really helpful, especially the part about transitioning from military to civilian coverage mid-year. I'm actually in a similar boat - getting out of the service in a few months and was wondering how that would affect my tax situation. Did you have to do anything special to document the transition period, or was it really as simple as just checking the "had coverage all year" box? Also appreciate the tip about focusing on business deductions - that's probably where the real money is anyway!
@c9d0c47c24f4 Thank you for sharing your transition experience! As someone who's helped family members through similar situations, I'd add that if you do transition mid-year, keep documentation of your coverage dates just in case. While you likely won't need to submit it with your return, having records of when your Tricare ended and civilian coverage began can be helpful if the IRS ever has questions later. The transition timing usually doesn't complicate the filing process, but it's good to have that paper trail. And absolutely agree about focusing on those business deductions - that's where you'll see the real impact on your bottom line!
Has anyone actually been audited for vehicle deductions? I've been claiming my work van expenses for years and sometimes worry I'm doing it wrong.
I got audited in 2022 specifically about my truck deductions. Make sure you keep a mileage log if you're using standard mileage rate! I lost thousands in deductions because I didn't have proper documentation. They want dates, starting/ending mileage, and business purpose for each trip.
Great question! I went through this exact same situation with my delivery truck a couple years ago. Here's what I learned: Since your box truck is likely over 6,000 lbs (most are), you can take advantage of Section 179 deduction which allows you to deduct the full $85k purchase price in the first year, even though you're financing it. This is often better than mileage deduction for expensive commercial vehicles. Key things to remember: - You can deduct the INTEREST portion of your loan payments as a separate business expense - Keep detailed records of business vs personal use percentage - Make sure to have documentation showing the truck's weight rating (over 6,000 lbs avoids luxury auto limits) - Track your business miles anyway for backup documentation I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional since the depreciation rules can get complex, especially if you want to combine Section 179 with bonus depreciation. The savings on an $85k vehicle can be substantial if done correctly! Also keep receipts for all truck-related expenses (fuel, maintenance, insurance, etc.) since these are deductible regardless of which method you choose.
This is really helpful advice! I'm new to business vehicle deductions and had no idea about the 6,000 lb rule avoiding luxury auto limits. Quick question - when you say "combine Section 179 with bonus depreciation," how does that work exactly? Can you actually get more than the $85k purchase price back as deductions, or is it capped at what you paid? Also, for tracking business vs personal use percentage, do you need to keep a daily log or is there a simpler way to document this for the IRS?
Make sure you're considering the age factor in your conversion strategy. If you're under 59½ when you do the conversion and plan to access any of the converted funds within 5 years, you could face penalties on those withdrawals. Each conversion has its own 5-year clock for penalty-free access to the PRINCIPAL amount converted. This is separate from the 5-year rule for earnings.
I thought the 5-year rule only applied to earnings in a Roth, not to the converted amounts? So confused about Roth rules sometimes.
Actually, there are two separate 5-year rules for Roth IRAs that often get confused: 1. The 5-year rule for earnings: You need to wait 5 years from your first Roth contribution before you can withdraw earnings penalty-free (if you're under 59½). 2. The 5-year rule for conversions: Each conversion has its own 5-year waiting period before you can withdraw the converted principal penalty-free if you're under 59½. So if you convert $270k this year and are under 59½, you'd need to wait 5 years before accessing that specific converted amount without the 10% early withdrawal penalty. This is true even if you already have a Roth IRA that's older than 5 years. @Natalie Khan - This is definitely something to factor into your 3-year conversion timeline if you re'planning to access any of these funds before age 59½!
One additional consideration for your multi-year conversion strategy - don't forget about the impact on your Medicare premiums if you're approaching age 65 or already enrolled. The additional taxable income from your Roth conversions could push you into higher IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) brackets, which would increase your Medicare Part B and Part D premiums. These surcharges are based on your modified adjusted gross income from two years prior, so a large conversion in 2025 would affect your 2027 Medicare premiums. You might want to model different conversion amounts to see how they impact not just your current tax brackets, but also your future Medicare costs. Sometimes spreading the conversions over 4-5 years instead of 3 can help you stay below the IRMAA thresholds while still achieving your goal of converting to Roth.
This is such an important point that often gets overlooked! I'm 62 and planning to start Medicare in a few years, so this IRMAA consideration is really valuable. Do you know what the current income thresholds are for the different IRMAA brackets? I want to make sure I'm modeling this correctly alongside my conversion strategy. It seems like the Medicare premium increases could potentially offset some of the long-term benefits of the Roth conversion if not planned carefully. Also, is there any way to appeal or adjust these surcharges if your income changes significantly after the conversion years (like if you retire and have much lower income)?
Giovanni Rossi
Just to add another perspective on the timing issue - I'm an enrolled agent who helps clients with HSA compliance, and the IRS guidance is actually pretty reasonable on this. The key principle is that the expense must be for medical care that was recommended by a healthcare provider, but there's no requirement that you receive written documentation before making the purchase. What Paolo described - getting verbal recommendations from his doctor in September but not receiving the written letter until weeks later - is totally fine. The medical necessity existed when the doctor made the recommendation, not when the paperwork was completed. For the October 2023 items, as long as your doctor can truthfully state that those items were recommended during that timeframe for your medical condition, backdating the letter to reflect the actual treatment period is legitimate. The letter is documenting when the medical recommendation was made, not when the letter itself was written. Just make sure to keep detailed records including the original receipts, the letter of medical necessity, and ideally any notes about when your doctor first made these recommendations. If you're ever audited, the IRS will want to see that there's a legitimate medical basis for the expenses tied to specific dates.
0 coins
Tasia Synder
ā¢This is really reassuring to hear from a tax professional! I've been stressing about whether my timing was compliant, but it sounds like the IRS focuses more on the legitimacy of the medical recommendation rather than bureaucratic timing issues. Quick follow-up question - when you mention keeping detailed records, would it be helpful to also document the date when my doctor first verbally recommended the supplements? I have it in my phone notes from September, but wasn't sure if that kind of personal documentation adds any value for audit purposes, or if the formal letter is sufficient. Also, do you typically see issues with clients who have gaps between verbal recommendations and written documentation, or is this pretty standard in your experience?
0 coins
Jamal Brown
As someone who's dealt with HSA compliance issues myself, I can confirm that the timing flexibility everyone's mentioned here is accurate. I had a similar situation where my doctor recommended a TENS unit for chronic back pain but the written prescription took nearly a month to get due to office delays. What I learned from my HSA provider is that they care more about the medical legitimacy than the paperwork timing. The key is being able to demonstrate that a qualified medical professional actually recommended the expense for treating a specific condition, regardless of when you got the formal documentation. One practical tip I'd add - when you do get your letter of medical necessity, make sure it includes the specific medical condition being treated (like "hyperlipidemia" rather than just "health purposes"). The more specific the medical justification, the stronger your documentation will be if questions ever come up. Your September fish oil situation should be completely fine, and the backdated letter for your October 2023 items is standard practice as long as your doctor can verify those recommendations were actually made during that timeframe. Don't stress too much about it - HSA audits are relatively rare, and when they do happen, the IRS is mainly looking for obvious abuse rather than paperwork timing issues.
0 coins
NightOwl42
ā¢Thanks for sharing your experience with the TENS unit situation! That's a great point about being specific with medical conditions. I'm actually dealing with a similar documentation challenge right now - my doctor recommended some specialized ergonomic equipment for my carpal tunnel syndrome, but the letter he provided just says "for wrist support" which seems pretty vague. Should I go back and ask him to revise it to specifically mention "carpal tunnel syndrome" or "median nerve compression"? I want to make sure I'm covered if there's ever an audit, especially since these items were pretty expensive ($300+ for the ergonomic keyboard and mouse setup). Also, did your HSA provider give you any guidance on what level of medical detail they expect in these letters, or do they pretty much accept anything that comes from a licensed physician?
0 coins