IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm a former IRS auditor and want to add something important that hasn't been addressed - the lookback period for trust audits. When trustees commingle funds like your sister has done, it can trigger what we call "expanded examination scope" if the IRS decides to audit the trust. Normally, trust audits focus on the current tax year, but when we see commingled accounts and poor record-keeping, we often expand the review to cover all years since the trustee took control. This means your sister could face scrutiny of every transaction since your mom passed away, not just this tax year's activities. The IRS has specific procedures for reconstructing trust accounting when records are inadequate, and it's not a process trustees want to go through. We typically require forensic accounting of all personal and trust transactions during the audit period, which is expensive and time-consuming. From your description, your sister may not realize that her "shortcut" approach could expose the entire trust administration to enhanced scrutiny. The fact that she's been dismissive of proper procedures would be a red flag to any examining agent. My advice: document your attempts to get proper accounting in case you ever need to show the IRS that you tried to ensure compliance. If this trust gets audited and you can demonstrate that you requested proper documentation as a beneficiary, it shows you were acting in good faith even if the trustee wasn't following best practices.

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

This thread has been incredibly enlightening - thank you to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise. As someone who's currently dealing with executor duties for my grandmother's estate, I'm realizing how many potential pitfalls there are when proper procedures aren't followed from the start. The point about "expanded examination scope" from the former IRS auditor is particularly sobering. It really drives home that cutting corners on documentation isn't just about current tax year compliance - it can expose the entire administration period to scrutiny. What strikes me most is how this situation illustrates the importance of education for trustees. Many family members who suddenly find themselves in trustee roles don't realize they're taking on significant legal and financial responsibilities. They think they're just "handling family business" when they're actually administering a legal entity with strict compliance requirements. For anyone else in a similar situation: the consensus here seems clear that beneficiaries have both the right and responsibility to request proper documentation. It's not about being difficult - it's about protecting everyone involved and ensuring the trust is administered according to the creator's intentions. Brian, I hope your weekend conversation goes well. You now have a wealth of specific, actionable advice from people who've been through similar situations and professionals who deal with these issues regularly.

0 coins

Sienna Gomez

•

You've really hit the nail on the head about trustee education being such a crucial gap. Reading through everyone's experiences here, it's clear that many family members step into these roles without understanding the legal complexity involved. They're thinking "I'm just distributing mom's money to the kids" when they're actually running a separate legal entity with tax obligations and fiduciary duties. What's been most valuable to me as someone new to all this is seeing how the professionals and experienced beneficiaries have provided such specific, actionable guidance. The combination of collaborative approaches, formal documentation requests, and understanding the various liability exposures gives people like Brian (and me) a real roadmap for protecting everyone's interests. The former IRS auditor's perspective about expanded examination scope was genuinely eye-opening - I had no idea that poor record-keeping could trigger scrutiny of the entire administration period. That alone should motivate any trustee to get their documentation house in order immediately. I'm bookmarking this entire discussion as a reference guide. The step-by-step advice, sample language for requests, and explanation of legal rights creates a comprehensive resource for anyone dealing with similar trust administration concerns. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their expertise and experiences.

0 coins

Don't panic, Diego! While you can't get a retroactive extension, you're not completely out of options. The most important thing right now is to file your return immediately - every day you wait, the failure-to-file penalty keeps growing. Here's your action plan: 1) File your 2024 tax return ASAP using whatever method is easiest for you (tax software, paper, or a tax professional). 2) Pay as much as you can afford right now, even if it's not the full amount - this will reduce the failure-to-pay penalty and interest charges. 3) Once you get your penalty notice from the IRS, look into First Time Penalty Abatement if you've been compliant for the past 3 years. The failure-to-file penalty is typically 5% of your unpaid taxes per month (up to 25%), so time is really of the essence. If you end up owing a refund, there's actually no penalty for filing late - only if you owe money. Job changes and moves are stressful, and while the IRS doesn't typically consider these "reasonable cause," focusing on damage control now is your best bet. You've got this!

0 coins

@CosmicCommander This is really helpful advice! I'm also dealing with a late filing situation and wondering - when you mention paying "as much as you can afford right now," do you mean I should estimate what I owe and send a payment with my return, or should I wait until I actually file to see the exact amount? I'm worried about overpaying or underpaying if I try to estimate.

0 coins

@Logan Greenberg You should definitely wait until you actually prepare your return to know the exact amount you owe - don't try to estimate and send a payment beforehand. When you file your return (whether through tax software or paper), you'll see exactly how much you owe in taxes. At that point, pay whatever amount you can afford along with your return submission. If you can't pay the full amount, don't let that stop you from filing! The failure-to-file penalty is much worse than the failure-to-pay penalty. You can always set up a payment plan with the IRS afterward for any remaining balance. The key is getting that return filed ASAP to stop the failure-to-file penalty from growing.

0 coins

Diego, I totally understand the panic you're feeling right now! I was in almost the exact same situation two years ago - completely forgot about the extension deadline due to a cross-country move and job change. Here's what I learned: You're right that you can't get a retroactive extension, but don't despair. The most crucial thing is to file your return immediately. I mean TODAY if possible. Every single day you wait, that failure-to-file penalty keeps climbing at 5% per month. When I finally filed (about 3 weeks late), I owed around $1,800 in taxes. The penalty ended up being around $270, but here's the good news - since I had a clean filing record for the previous years, I was able to get the entire penalty waived through First Time Penalty Abatement. You just have to request it after you get your penalty notice from the IRS. The process was actually pretty straightforward: filed my return, got the penalty notice about a month later, called the number on the notice, and requested First Time Penalty Abatement. They approved it within a few weeks and I only had to pay the small amount of interest that had accrued. Don't let the stress paralyze you into waiting longer - just get that return filed and then deal with any penalties afterward. You've got options!

0 coins

Has anyone figured out if wash sale rules apply differently between the reported and unreported basis sections? I day trade sometimes and have positions that fall into both categories depending on when I first bought in.

0 coins

Wash sale rules apply equally to all securities regardless of whether the basis is reported to the IRS or not. The distinction is only about reporting requirements, not about how tax rules are applied. When you have numerous trades, it gets complicated because your broker might correctly identify wash sales within their platform, but they won't catch wash sales between different brokerages or accounts. That's why many active traders end up with discrepancies and have to make adjustments on their tax returns.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I've been dealing with this exact issue and was getting so frustrated trying to understand why my brokerage statements looked different from what they were sending to the IRS. One thing I'd add is that if you have dividend reinvestment plans (DRIPs), those can create additional complications in the unreported basis section. I had shares that I bought directly through a company's DRIP program back in 2009, and when I transferred them to my current broker, they ended up in the "not reported to IRS" section even though my broker could see all the purchase history. The key thing I learned is to keep meticulous records of EVERYTHING - not just your original purchase confirmations, but also all dividend reinvestment transactions, stock splits, spinoffs, and any corporate actions. These events can significantly affect your cost basis, and if your broker isn't reporting the basis to the IRS, you need to be able to prove your calculations if questioned. I've started using a simple spreadsheet to track all my transactions across different brokerages and account types. It's been a lifesaver for reconciling these split 1099-B forms at tax time.

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed advice I needed! I'm dealing with a similar DRIP situation from years ago and had no idea that dividend reinvestments could complicate the basis reporting. Your point about keeping records of corporate actions is spot on - I just realized I probably don't have documentation for a stock split that happened in 2010 on some shares I still hold. Do you happen to know if there's a way to reconstruct that historical information if you don't have the original records? I'm worried about having to report basis without being able to properly account for splits and dividends over the years. The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I'm definitely going to start doing that going forward to avoid this headache next year!

0 coins

Has anyone dealt with the "14 day rule" along with the family rental situation? I'm planning to use my rental property occasionally throughout the year (less than 14 days) while also renting to my nephew. Not sure if this complicates the 80% FMV requirement.

0 coins

The 14-day rule still applies, but it makes documentation even more important. If you use the property yourself for 14 days or less (or 10% of the days it's rented, whichever is greater), you can still treat it as a rental property assuming you're charging at least 80% FMV to your nephew. Just make sure you keep extremely detailed records of exactly which days you personally used the property. The IRS scrutinizes family rentals with personal use much more carefully. Document everything!

0 coins

Thanks for the input! That makes sense about the documentation. I'll be sure to keep a detailed calendar of when I use the property versus when my nephew is there. Definitely don't want to trigger any red flags with the IRS!

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

Something else to keep in mind is that the IRS also looks at the terms of your rental agreement when determining if it's a legitimate rental. Even if you're charging 80% of FMV, if your lease agreement with your family member is too informal or doesn't include standard rental terms (like security deposits, maintenance responsibilities, eviction clauses), the IRS might still question whether it's truly a rental arrangement. I'd recommend drafting a formal lease agreement that you'd use with any tenant - specify the monthly rent, security deposit requirements, who's responsible for utilities and maintenance, lease duration, and termination conditions. Treat it like a business transaction even though it's family. This documentation will support your position that it's a legitimate rental if you're ever audited. Also, make sure you're actually enforcing the lease terms. If you let your family member skip payments or don't follow through on lease provisions, that could undermine your argument that it's a true rental property.

0 coins

This is excellent advice about the formal lease agreement! I hadn't thought about how the informality of the arrangement could work against me. You're absolutely right that even at 80% FMV, the IRS could still question the legitimacy if it doesn't look like a real rental business. I'm curious - what happens if a family member does miss a payment or two? Obviously we'd want to avoid that, but life happens. Is there a certain threshold where occasional missed payments wouldn't jeopardize the rental classification, or does any leniency automatically make it look like personal use? Also, do you know if the security deposit needs to be at market rate too, or just the monthly rent? I was thinking of asking for a smaller deposit since it's family, but now I'm wondering if that's a mistake.

0 coins

Thank you all for sharing your experiences with FIRPTA delays - this thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm now at the 7-week mark since submitting my 8288-B, so still within the official 90-day window but clearly that doesn't mean much based on everyone's actual timelines. A few follow-up questions based on what I've learned here: 1. For those who received interest payments, did the IRS send any advance notice about the interest calculation, or does it just show up with the refund check? 2. Has anyone tried both the congressional inquiry route AND one of the callback services mentioned? I'm wondering if combining approaches might be more effective. 3. @Raul Neal - as an attorney handling these cases, have you noticed any patterns in terms of which applications get processed faster? For example, does the dollar amount of withholding seem to matter, or certain types of properties? I'm trying to decide whether to be proactive now or wait closer to the 6-month mark before taking additional steps. Given that I potentially have $75K+ tied up for many months, the interest will help but I'd obviously prefer to have access to my money sooner rather than later.

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

Welcome to the FIRPTA waiting club! I just went through this process myself and can answer a couple of your questions: 1. The IRS doesn't send advance notice about interest - it just appears as a separate line item on your refund check. You'll get a 1099-INT form the following tax season if the interest exceeds $10. 2. I didn't try congressional inquiry, but I did use one of the callback services after 9 months of waiting. It was honestly a game-changer - got connected to someone who could actually see my file and explain the delay (missing signature on one of my supporting docs that nobody had told me about). From my experience, being proactive around the 4-5 month mark seems reasonable, especially with that amount of money involved. The 90-day timeline is completely meaningless right now. I'd suggest getting your documentation perfectly organized now so you're ready to act quickly if you need to submit clarifications later. Also keep detailed records of all your submission dates - you'll need them for the interest calculation verification. Good luck! The wait is frustrating but at least the interest does provide some compensation for the IRS basically getting a free loan of your money.

0 coins

I wanted to add some additional context about FIRPTA interest calculations that might be helpful for everyone dealing with these delays. I work in tax compliance and have processed quite a few of these cases. The interest rate is actually updated quarterly by the IRS and published in Revenue Rulings. For 2024, the rates have ranged from about 7% to 8% depending on the quarter. The calculation is done on a daily compounding basis, which means the longer the delay, the more significant the interest becomes. One thing I haven't seen mentioned here is that if you end up owing additional tax when you file your return (beyond what was withheld), the IRS will also charge you interest on any underpayment. So while they pay you interest for delays in processing your withholding certificate, they'll also charge interest if you didn't have enough withheld initially. Also, regarding the 45-day rule mentioned earlier - this applies specifically to refunds of overwithholding after a withholding certificate is approved. If your certificate is denied or if you don't apply for one, different interest rules apply. The key is making sure your 8288-B application is as complete and accurate as possible from the start to avoid the documentation reset issues others have mentioned. For anyone still waiting, keep detailed records of all correspondence and submission dates. You'll need these to verify the interest calculation when your refund finally arrives.

0 coins

Prev1...652653654655656...5645Next