


Ask the community...
One area that hasn't been mentioned yet is state and local tax (SALT) consulting. With the increasing complexity of multi-state tax issues and the SALT cap limitations, there's huge demand for professionals who understand tax compliance and enforcement from the government perspective. I transitioned from being an IRS Agent to a SALT practice at a regional CPA firm about 18 months ago. While my federal experience didn't directly translate to state tax rules, my understanding of audit procedures, documentation requirements, and government enforcement priorities gave me a significant advantage. State tax departments often model their audit processes after IRS procedures, so your institutional knowledge is incredibly valuable. The work involves helping multi-location businesses navigate compliance across different states, handling state tax audits, and advising on nexus issues. Many of the skills you've developed - analyzing complex tax situations, working with business records, and understanding audit risk factors - apply directly to state tax work. What's particularly appealing about SALT is that it's one of the fastest-growing areas in tax due to the Wayfair decision and remote work complications. The demand far exceeds the supply of qualified professionals, which means excellent job security and strong salary growth potential. My compensation increased by about 55% from my IRS salary, and I'm seeing consistent raises as I build expertise in this specialized area. If you're looking for something that leverages your federal tax background while offering new challenges and growth opportunities, SALT consulting is definitely worth considering!
This is fascinating! I hadn't even considered SALT consulting as an option. The remote work angle is particularly interesting - I've been dealing with a lot of questions from taxpayers about nexus issues since the pandemic started, but always from the federal enforcement side. I'm curious about the learning curve for state tax rules. Did you find it overwhelming to learn multiple state tax codes after being so focused on federal law, or was the audit experience transferable enough that picking up the state-specific rules wasn't too difficult? Also, do you primarily work with one or two states, or do you need to stay current on tax law changes across many different jurisdictions? The salary increase you mentioned is really encouraging too. I'm definitely going to start researching SALT practices in my area. Thanks for bringing up this option - it sounds like it could be a perfect fit for someone wanting to leverage their IRS background while branching into new areas!
Great question, Emma! As someone who's been considering a similar transition, I wanted to add another perspective that hasn't been covered yet - working for enrolled agents (EAs) or tax resolution firms that specifically handle IRS representation cases. Your 7 years of audit experience gives you incredible insight into how the IRS actually operates internally - the timelines, procedures, and what really catches an agent's attention during an audit. This knowledge is extremely valuable to firms that represent taxpayers before the IRS. I've been researching this path myself and found that many EA firms and tax resolution companies specifically recruit former IRS employees because clients feel more confident knowing their representative understands the system from the inside. The work typically involves helping taxpayers with audits, appeals, collection issues, and offer in compromise applications. The salary ranges I've seen are typically 40-60% higher than federal pay, and many of these firms offer performance bonuses based on successful case resolutions. Plus, if you ever want to become an enrolled agent yourself, your IRS experience gives you automatic qualification to skip the EA exam. Some firms also offer the flexibility to work remotely or have hybrid schedules, which can be appealing after years of government bureaucracy. It might be worth looking into some of the larger national tax resolution firms as well as local EA practices in your area. Your audit background would be their biggest selling point to potential clients who are facing IRS examinations.
You should check your state laws about mistaken payments. In most states, there are specific procedures for handling misdirected tax payments. The fact that you paid in cash makes it harder to trace, but you still have a receipt showing you made a payment. Try searching "[your state] tax payment correction" or "erroneous tax payment refund [your state]" to find the specific procedures. Most state tax departments have forms specifically for this purpose.
This is important! Also, make sure you're looking at the correct level of government. Property taxes are usually handled at the county or municipal level, so you want to look for county procedures rather than state procedures in most cases. Each county might have slightly different rules for handling misapplied payments.
I'm really sorry you're going through this - $21,000 is a huge amount to have tied up in someone else's tax bill! This kind of administrative error is more common than people think, especially when there are common names involved. One thing I'd strongly recommend is getting everything in writing from the tax office about what happened. Ask them to provide a written statement confirming that your payment was applied to another Jeff Anderson's account in error, including the date of payment, amount, and the property tax account it was applied to. This documentation will be crucial if you need to escalate. You should also request a written explanation of their policies for handling misapplied payments. Most government entities are required to have procedures for this exact situation - they can't just say "too bad" and keep your money. If they claim they don't have such procedures, that's actually a red flag that you need to escalate to higher authorities. Don't let them brush you off! A $21,000 error is significant enough that it should get supervisor attention. If the front desk staff won't help, keep asking to speak to managers until someone takes responsibility for finding a solution.
Has anyone else run into issues with their premium tax credit calculation changing mid-year? I set up my S-corp reimbursement based on my initial APTC amount, but then my estimated income changed, and suddenly I'm getting a different credit amount. Do I need to adjust my reimbursements retroactively?
I had this happen last year - don't adjust retroactively. Just change your reimbursement amount going forward based on your new out-of-pocket cost. When you file your taxes, it'll all get reconciled anyway. Your S-Corp should only ever reimburse you for what you actually paid out of pocket at the time, regardless of how the credit amount fluctuates.
That makes sense, thank you. I was worried I'd have to go back and redo all my bookkeeping for the past few months, which would be a nightmare. I'll just adjust the reimbursement amount going forward based on what I'm actually paying now.
This is exactly the kind of complex situation where getting professional guidance is crucial. I went through something similar last year with my S-Corp and learned the hard way that the timing of when you report income versus when you receive reimbursements can really matter. One thing I'd add to the great advice already given - make sure you're coordinating with your accountant on the timing of any income adjustments that might affect your APTC eligibility. If your S-Corp income fluctuates significantly during the year (which is common), it can impact both your premium tax credit amount and how much you should be getting reimbursed. Also, keep detailed monthly records of exactly what you paid out-of-pocket versus what the APTC covered. This documentation becomes really important at tax time when you're reconciling everything on Form 8962. The IRS wants to see that there's no double-dipping between the business deduction and the personal tax credit. Have you considered doing a mid-year projection with your accountant to see which approach (taking APTC monthly vs. claiming it all at tax time) would work better for your specific income situation?
This is really helpful advice about coordinating with an accountant on timing. I'm actually dealing with exactly this situation right now - my S-Corp income has been all over the place this year, and I'm worried about how that's going to affect my APTC reconciliation. You mentioned keeping detailed monthly records of out-of-pocket payments versus APTC coverage. Do you have any specific format or system you'd recommend for tracking this? I've been kind of haphazard about it so far, and I'm realizing that's probably going to bite me at tax time. Also, when you say "mid-year projection," are you talking about formally updating your income estimate with the marketplace, or just doing internal calculations to decide on strategy? I'm hesitant to keep updating my marketplace application because I'm afraid it'll trigger more paperwork or audits.
I feel your pain on this fiscal year deadline confusion! I went through the exact same thing with my small manufacturing business a couple years ago. The September 15th deadline for June 30 fiscal year corporations is one of those weird exceptions that catches so many people off guard. Since you're already past the September 15, 2024 deadline for your first year, here's what I'd recommend based on my experience: 1. File immediately - don't wait another day. The failure-to-file penalty is 5% of unpaid tax per month and stops growing once you file, even if you still owe money. 2. Include a reasonable cause letter with your return explaining the confusion about fiscal year deadlines. I did this and the IRS accepted it as reasonable cause for a first-time filer. 3. Look into First-Time Penalty Abatement if you have a clean compliance history. You can request this after filing by calling the IRS or including a letter with your return. 4. For next year, set up proper reminders for your September 15 deadline, and consider filing Form 7004 for an automatic extension to March 15 if you need more time. The good news is that this type of deadline confusion is actually pretty common for new corporations with fiscal years, and the IRS recognizes it as reasonable cause. Don't let the stress paralyze you - just get that return filed ASAP and deal with any penalties after the fact. You've got options to reduce or eliminate them.
This is such solid advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and the reasonable cause letter approach gives me hope. Quick question - when you included the reasonable cause letter with your return, did you attach it as a separate document or incorporate the explanation directly into the return itself? Also, did you end up owing any penalties after the IRS reviewed your case, or did they waive everything based on the reasonable cause? I'm trying to set realistic expectations for what might happen when I finally get my late 1120 filed. The stress of this whole situation has been keeping me up at night, so it's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the same thing and came out okay on the other side!
I can totally relate to this fiscal year confusion! As someone who's helped many small business owners navigate these deadlines, the June 30 fiscal year exception trips up almost everyone initially. Since you missed the September 15, 2024 deadline, here's my recommended action plan: **Immediate Steps:** 1. File your Form 1120 THIS WEEK - seriously, don't wait another day 2. Include a reasonable cause statement explaining the fiscal year deadline confusion 3. Pay any taxes owed to minimize failure-to-pay penalties **Penalty Relief Options:** - First-Time Penalty Abatement (if you have clean compliance history) - Reasonable cause relief for the deadline confusion - The IRS is generally understanding about fiscal year filing confusion for new corporations **Going Forward:** - Mark September 15 in your calendar for future years - Consider filing Form 7004 next year for automatic extension to March 15 - Set up quarterly estimated payment reminders (Oct 15, Dec 15, Mar 15, Jun 15) The failure-to-file penalty (5% per month) is way steeper than failure-to-pay (0.5% per month), so getting that return filed immediately should be your top priority. Once filed, you can work on penalty abatement. Don't beat yourself up over this - the fiscal year deadline rules are genuinely confusing, and you're definitely not the first business owner to get caught by this!
This is such helpful and practical advice! I really appreciate you laying out the immediate action steps so clearly. The fact that the failure-to-file penalty is 10x steeper than failure-to-pay (5% vs 0.5% per month) really puts things in perspective - I need to stop overthinking and just get this filed. Your point about the IRS being understanding about fiscal year confusion for new corporations is really reassuring. I've been spiraling thinking I'm going to face massive penalties, but it sounds like there are legitimate paths to penalty relief if I act quickly and explain the situation properly. Quick question about the reasonable cause statement - should I keep it brief and factual, or provide more detail about how I researched the deadlines and got confused by all the April 15th information online? I want to strike the right tone without sounding like I'm making excuses. Thanks again for taking the time to share such detailed guidance - this is exactly what I needed to hear to finally stop procrastinating and get this done!
Daniel White
This is such a timely question - I just went through this exact same situation with a deck replacement last fall! Based on my experience and what I learned from my CPA, here are a few additional considerations: **Timing matters for your records**: Since you mentioned paying half now and half upon completion, make sure to get itemized invoices for both payments. The IRS likes to see a clear paper trail, and having detailed invoices (not just cancelled checks) makes everything cleaner if you ever need to prove the expense. **Consider the "betterment" test**: The fact that you're upgrading to composite materials is actually really important here. The IRS looks at whether you're making the property "better" than it was before, and composite vs. pressure-treated wood clearly passes that test. This helps distinguish your project from a simple repair. **Don't forget about disposal costs**: If your contractor is charging separately for hauling away the old deck materials, that cost can also be added to your basis as part of the improvement project. It's all part of the cost of putting the new deck in place. One last tip - create a simple spreadsheet now with columns for date, description, amount, and vendor. Update it as you make payments and add any related costs (permits, site prep, etc.). Future you will thank present you for staying organized! Good luck with the project - composite decking is such a game-changer compared to the old wood maintenance nightmare!
0 coins
Derek Olson
ā¢This is really helpful advice, especially the point about the "betterment" test! I hadn't thought about framing it that way, but you're absolutely right that upgrading from pressure-treated to composite clearly makes the property better than before. That's a great way to think about the improvement vs. repair distinction. The spreadsheet idea is brilliant too - I'm definitely going to set that up before I start making payments. Better to be over-organized than scrambling to find receipts years from now when I sell the house. One quick question about the disposal costs - should those go on the same line as the main deck project in my records, or track them separately? I want to make sure I'm categorizing everything correctly for future reference. Thanks for sharing your real-world experience with this - it's so much more valuable than just reading the IRS publications!
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
ā¢For the disposal costs, I'd recommend keeping them on the same line as the main deck project in your spreadsheet, but in a separate column or as an itemized note. Something like "Deck Replacement - $20,000 materials/labor, $2,000 disposal" so it's clear they're all part of the same improvement project. The IRS views disposal of the old structure as a necessary part of installing the new one, so it all gets lumped together as one capital improvement. Think of it like demolition costs - they're not separate from the project, they're just a required step to complete it. Your spreadsheet might look like: Date: 4/15/25 Description: Composite deck replacement (incl. disposal) Amount: $22,000 Vendor: ABC Contracting Notes: $20K deck, $2K disposal, permits #XYZ This way everything is clearly connected but you have the detail breakdown if needed. Much easier than trying to remember what each payment was for several years down the road!
0 coins
Lourdes Fox
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is keeping detailed photos throughout the entire process! I just completed a similar deck replacement project and my tax advisor emphasized the importance of visual documentation at every stage. Take photos of: - The deteriorated condition of your old deck (showing why repair wasn't feasible) - The demolition process - The new construction materials being delivered - Work in progress shots - The completed project This creates a complete visual timeline that supports your improvement classification. I organized mine in a folder labeled "2025 Deck Replacement" with dates in the filenames. It's incredibly helpful to have this visual proof that you completely replaced the structure rather than just fixing parts of it. Also, since you're planning to stay in the house for 10+ years, consider starting a "Home Improvements" binder now with sections for each major project. Include all contracts, receipts, permits, photos, and any correspondence with contractors. When you eventually sell, you'll have everything organized in one place instead of hunting through years of files. The composite decking choice is excellent - we did the same upgrade and the difference in maintenance is incredible. No more annual staining! That alone helps justify the improvement classification since you're enhancing both the value and functionality of the property.
0 coins
Logan Scott
ā¢This is such excellent advice about photo documentation! I'm definitely going to start taking pictures right away, even before the contractor begins work. The idea of creating a visual timeline makes so much sense - it's like building a case file for why this had to be a full replacement rather than repair work. I love the suggestion about starting a "Home Improvements" binder now. That's going to save me so much hassle down the road. I'm already dreading trying to find all this paperwork in 10 years when I sell! Quick question - do you think it's worth taking photos of the materials themselves when they're delivered? Like shots of the composite decking boxes/labels to show the quality of materials used? Or is that overkill? I want to be thorough but don't want to go overboard with the documentation. Thanks for the tip about the maintenance benefits too - I hadn't really thought about how the reduced upkeep requirements further support the improvement argument. That's a great point!
0 coins