Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Honest opinion - for a truly single-member S-corp with no employees, TaxBandits is good but I'd also seriously consider just using a full-service bookkeeper who specializes in small S-corps. I tried the DIY route with TaxBandits for a year and while it worked fine, I found I was spending too much of my valuable time figuring out payroll calculations. I now pay a bookkeeper about $150/month who handles all my S-corp bookkeeping, payroll, and tax filings. She uses TaxBandits on the backend actually, but handles all the calculations and submissions. For me, the time savings was worth the extra cost. The big payroll companies (Gusto, ADP, etc.) are definitely overkill for a single-member S-corp though. They're designed for businesses with multiple employees and have features you'll never use.
That's actually a really good point. Do you have any tips for finding a bookkeeper who specializes in S-corps? I've found that a lot of general bookkeepers don't really understand the specific requirements.
I'm in exactly the same situation with my single-member S-corp! After reading through all these responses, I'm leaning toward trying TaxBandits first since the cost seems reasonable at around $150-180/year. The quarterly payroll schedule makes sense for cash flow too. One question I haven't seen addressed - how do you all handle the actual payroll tax deposits? Do you just calculate them yourself and pay online through EFTPS, or does TaxBandits help with that part? I'm worried about missing deposit deadlines since I know the penalties can be steep even for small amounts. Also, has anyone tried combining TaxBandits with QuickBooks for the record keeping side? I'm already using QB for my regular business bookkeeping, so I'm wondering if there's a good workflow that connects the two.
Great question about payroll deposits! TaxBandits doesn't handle the actual deposit payments - you'll need to make those yourself through EFTPS (Electronic Federal Tax Payment System). For a single-member S-corp, you're typically looking at monthly or semi-weekly deposits depending on your payroll amounts, but with smaller amounts you might qualify for quarterly deposits. The key is setting up EFTPS in advance and marking all the deposit deadlines on your calendar. I use a simple spreadsheet to track when deposits are due based on my payroll schedule. The IRS has clear guidelines on their website about deposit schedules. As for QuickBooks integration, I've found it works well to run payroll calculations in QB and then use those numbers in TaxBandits for the actual form filing. QB can generate the payroll reports you need, and then you just transfer those amounts into the TaxBandits forms. It's not seamless integration, but it creates a good paper trail for your records.
Join the conversation
Wait, no one's mentioned the tax trap with refinancing! If you took cash out and didn't use that money for rental property improvements, that portion of interest isn't deductible as a rental expense! Say you owed $150k, refinanced for $200k, and used that extra $50k for personal expenses - the interest on 75% of your loan is rental expense but 25% is personal. Easy to mess this up.
Is that really true? I thought mortgage interest on rental properties was always deductible regardless of what you did with the cash out. That's different from primary residences where you have the whole mortgage interest deduction limitations.
Thanks for pointing this out! I actually didn't take any cash out in my refinance - just lowered the interest rate and reset the term. The loan amount was almost identical to what I owed before, just with a slightly better rate. So luckily I don't need to worry about this particular issue, but it's definitely good to know for future reference!
Great question about refinancing costs! I went through this exact situation last year and it's definitely confusing at first. From my research and experience, you're on the right track. The $3,100 in loan origination fees and points should be amortized over the life of your new loan - so if it's a 30-year loan, you'd deduct about $103 per year ($3,100 ÷ 30 years). The remaining $4,100 in closing costs (attorney fees, title search, recording fees, etc.) can typically be deducted as ordinary rental expenses in 2024. Just make sure to review your closing statement line by line since some fees might have specific rules. One tip: if you refinanced mid-year, remember that you can only deduct the portion of the amortized costs that corresponds to the months the loan was active in 2024. So if you closed in July, you'd only deduct 6/12 of that annual $103 amount for 2024. The fact that your tax software is handling the origination fees and points correctly is a good sign - it sounds like you're set up properly!
This is really helpful! I'm new to rental property taxes and just refinanced my duplex last month. Quick question - when you say "review your closing statement line by line," are there any specific fees that commonly get miscategorized? I'm looking at mine now and there are so many different charges, I want to make sure I don't accidentally put something in the wrong bucket.
Join the conversation
I've been practicing tax law for over 15 years and see this exact scenario constantly. Your instincts are absolutely correct - the G Wagon situation is a textbook audit magnet regardless of the weight classification. Here's what many people miss: The IRS doesn't just look at GVWR when evaluating luxury vehicle deductions. They examine the totality of circumstances, including vehicle choice, claimed business use percentage, and whether the specific vehicle capabilities are truly necessary for the stated business purpose. For construction companies, I've seen successful defenses of luxury SUV purchases only when clients could demonstrate specific business needs - like transporting high-end clients to job sites, navigating particularly challenging terrain that standard vehicles couldn't handle, or using the vehicle for marketing purposes with extensive business branding. Your client claiming "100% business use" on a G Wagon is essentially painting a target on his tax return. Even if technically compliant under Section 179 rules, the IRS has won numerous cases by challenging the business necessity and actual usage patterns of luxury vehicles in trades where standard work vehicles would suffice. I'd strongly recommend having him document specific business justifications beyond just "it's heavy enough" before making any purchase decision. The tax savings aren't worth years of audit headaches.
This legal perspective is incredibly valuable! As someone new to this community, I'm wondering about the documentation threshold you mentioned. When you say clients need to demonstrate "specific business needs" - what level of documentation typically satisfies the IRS in these luxury vehicle cases? For example, if a construction company owner claims they need the G Wagon for client site visits, would they need contracts showing high-end residential projects, photos of difficult terrain access, or something more comprehensive? I'm trying to understand where the line is between legitimate business justification and what the IRS would consider pretextual reasoning. Also, have you seen cases where business owners successfully defended luxury vehicle purchases by structuring the ownership differently - like leasing through the business versus outright purchase, or having specific business use agreements in place?
Great question about documentation thresholds! From what I've seen in audit cases, the IRS expects comprehensive evidence that goes far beyond just claiming client visits or difficult terrain. For high-end residential projects, they'd want to see signed contracts specifically requiring luxury transportation, client testimonials about vehicle expectations, and documentation of competitor practices in similar markets. Photos of terrain access need to be paired with evidence that standard 4WD vehicles actually failed to access these sites, not just that the G Wagon might perform better. The most successful defenses I've witnessed included detailed business plans showing how the luxury vehicle was part of a broader marketing strategy, with measurable client acquisition results tied to the vehicle's image. One client successfully defended a Range Rover purchase by documenting $500k+ in new contracts directly attributed to the professional image the vehicle projected during client meetings. Regarding ownership structure - leasing can sometimes provide more flexibility in documentation since lease payments are generally easier to deduct than depreciation, but it doesn't eliminate the business use requirement. The IRS still scrutinizes whether the vehicle choice is reasonable for the business purpose regardless of how it's financed. Bottom line: if your client can't write a compelling business case that would convince a skeptical judge why a G Wagon is necessary (not just preferable) for construction work, the deduction won't survive an audit.
As a newcomer to this community, I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm facing a similar decision with my consulting business. The consensus here seems clear that a G Wagon for construction work would be extremely difficult to defend in an audit, but I'm curious about a related question. What about service-based businesses that genuinely need to transport clients? I run a high-end consulting firm where we regularly take C-suite executives to site visits and client meetings. Our current vehicle situation is limiting our ability to compete with larger firms who arrive in luxury vehicles. Would the business necessity argument be stronger for client-facing service businesses versus trade/construction companies? I'm specifically looking at vehicles like the BMW X7 or Mercedes GLS - still luxury SUVs over 6,000 lbs, but potentially more defensible given the nature of client entertainment and professional image requirements in consulting. I realize this might warrant its own thread, but given the excellent tax law expertise I've seen in this discussion, I thought it might be valuable to explore how industry type affects the business necessity analysis for luxury vehicle deductions. Any insights from the tax professionals here would be greatly appreciated!
Welcome to the community! Your consulting scenario is actually much more defensible than the construction G Wagon situation. Client-facing service businesses have significantly stronger business necessity arguments for luxury vehicles, especially when competing for high-value contracts where professional image directly impacts revenue. For your BMW X7 or Mercedes GLS consideration, you'd want to document several key factors: client contracts that specify or expect luxury transportation, evidence of lost business opportunities due to inadequate vehicles, and competitive analysis showing industry standards for client transportation in your market segment. The IRS recognizes that certain industries have legitimate image requirements. I've seen successful defenses for luxury vehicles in consulting, real estate, financial services, and other client-facing businesses where the vehicle choice directly supports revenue generation. The key is demonstrating that the luxury features serve a business purpose beyond personal preference. For your documentation, maintain records of: client meetings where the vehicle was used, contracts won/lost that may relate to professional presentation, mileage logs showing client transportation versus personal use, and any client feedback about your firm's professional image. Industry publications or competitor analysis showing luxury vehicle use as standard practice in your consulting niche would also strengthen your position. The business necessity test is much easier to meet when you can show direct correlation between vehicle choice and client acquisition/retention in professional services versus construction trades.
This is exactly the kind of nuanced analysis that's been missing from some of the earlier discussion! @Madison King makes excellent points about industry-specific business necessity requirements. As someone new to this space, I m'really appreciating how the community breaks down these complex scenarios. The distinction between a construction company claiming they need a G Wagon versus a consulting firm needing luxury client transportation is significant from both a business logic and audit defense perspective. @Abby Marshall - one additional consideration for your consulting firm might be exploring certified pre-owned luxury vehicles. You could potentially get the professional image benefits at a lower cost basis, which reduces both your financial risk and the potential scrutiny from claiming massive depreciation deductions. A 2-3 year old BMW X7 or Mercedes GLS might achieve the same client-facing objectives while presenting a more reasonable expense profile if questioned. The documentation suggestions about tracking client contracts and competitive analysis are spot-on. Having quantifiable business outcomes tied to professional image requirements would make your case much stronger than the typical I need "this for business justification we" see challenged so often.
Join the conversation
That letter definitely points to an identity verification hold on your account! When the IRS can't process transcript requests and specifically directs you to the Identity Theft hotline (800-908-4490), it usually means their fraud detection system flagged something that needs manual review - not necessarily actual identity theft, just extra verification needed. After 9 months of waiting, this is actually progress because now you have a clear next step. I'd call that number ASAP - they'll tell you exactly what documents you need to verify your identity and get your return moving again. Before calling though, definitely try taxr.ai to decode your transcript if you can access it. It'll break down all those confusing codes in plain English so you know what's actually happening with your return. Having that info will make your conversation with the IRS way more productive. Don't stress too much - identity verification issues are super common and totally fixable once you provide whatever documentation they need. Your refund should start moving again after that! 🤞
This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I needed! I was getting really worried about the identity theft angle, but you're right that it's probably just their system being extra cautious. Nine months of waiting has been absolutely brutal, so I'm actually relieved to finally have a concrete next step to take. Definitely calling 800-908-4490 first thing tomorrow morning. And yeah, I'm going to check out taxr.ai before I call - seems like literally everyone here recommends it for understanding transcripts. Thanks so much for breaking this down in a way that actually makes sense! 🙏
That letter is definitely a red flag for identity verification issues! When the IRS can't process your transcript request and specifically mentions the Identity Theft hotline, it usually means there's a verification hold on your account that needs to be resolved. The 9-month delay combined with this letter suggests your return is stuck in their identity verification system. I'd absolutely call 800-908-4490 first thing tomorrow morning - don't put this off because these cases can drag on for months if not handled quickly. They'll be able to tell you exactly what documentation you need to verify your identity and get your return moving again. The "identity theft" language sounds scary, but it could just be their automated fraud detection being overly cautious. Before you call though, I'd recommend trying taxr.ai to analyze your transcript if you can access it. It decodes all those confusing codes and gives you a clear picture of what's happening with your return, which will help you have a much more productive conversation with the IRS rep. This is frustrating but totally fixable once you get through their verification process. Hang in there! 💪
CosmicCruiser
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of timing with your documentation. Since you already donated the records, you're actually in a good position legally - the IRS allows appraisals to be done up to the tax filing deadline, not just before donation. However, I'd strongly recommend starting your documentation process ASAP while the donation is still fresh in your memory. Try to recreate as much detail as possible from that video you took - even general categories like "approximately 200 classic rock albums from the 70s" or "50+ jazz records from the Blue Note era" can help establish reasonable valuation ranges. Also, don't forget that your friend who advised you on the collection could potentially serve as a witness to the collection's general quality and scope. While they're not a certified appraiser, their knowledge could support your valuation methodology if questions arise. The IRS appreciates when taxpayers can demonstrate they made good-faith efforts to determine fair market value using reasonable methods. One last tip: if your total charitable contributions for the year (including this donation) exceed 20% of your adjusted gross income, there are additional limitations to consider. Most people don't hit this threshold, but with a collection worth thousands, it's worth checking.
0 coins
Keith Davidson
•This is really helpful timing information! I'm in a similar situation with a large donation I made recently. You mentioned the 20% AGI limitation - could you clarify how that works exactly? Is that 20% of your AGI for just charitable contributions, or does it include all itemized deductions? And if you do exceed that threshold, do the excess contributions just disappear or can they be carried forward to future years? I want to make sure I understand this correctly before I spend too much time on documentation.
0 coins
Mateo Martinez
•@Keith Davidson The 20% limitation applies specifically to charitable contributions, not all itemized deductions. For most charitable donations to qualified organizations like Goodwill, you can deduct up to 50% of your AGI in a single year. However, for certain types of property donations like (capital gain property ,)the limit can be 30% or 20% depending on the specifics. The good news is that if you exceed these limits, the excess charitable contributions can be carried forward for up to five years! So unlike regular itemized deductions that are use "it or lose it, charitable" contribution carryforwards give you multiple chances to use them when your income is higher or you have fewer deductions in future years. For a vinyl record donation to Goodwill, you d'typically be under the 50% AGI limit unless it s'an absolutely massive collection. But it s'definitely worth calculating, especially if you have other significant charitable donations in the same tax year. The carryforward provision makes it worthwhile to document everything properly even if you can t'use the full deduction immediately.
0 coins
Mae Bennett
Based on my experience helping clients with similar situations, I'd add that documentation is really your best friend here, even after the fact. Since you have that video of the drop-off, try to go through it frame by frame if possible and make notes about what you can identify - specific artists, album titles, box sets, etc. One approach that works well is creating a "reconstruction inventory" where you list everything you can remember about the collection, organized by categories. For example: "Approximately 150 classic rock albums (Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Rolling Stones era), mostly from original pressings 1970s-1980s, condition ranging from VG to VG+, estimated value $8-12 each." This shows the IRS you made a good faith effort to be accurate and reasonable. Also worth noting - if any of the records were limited editions, colored vinyl, or had any unique characteristics that you can remember, definitely document those separately. Things like "Original White Album pressing with poster intact" or "Blue Note jazz pressings from 1960s" can justify higher individual valuations and show you understand the collectibles market. The key is being conservative but reasonable. It's better to slightly undervalue than to be aggressive and trigger scrutiny. Your friend's input could actually be valuable here too - maybe ask them to write a brief letter describing the general quality and scope of the collection they advised you on.
0 coins
KingKongZilla
•This is excellent practical advice! The "reconstruction inventory" approach sounds much more manageable than trying to remember every single record. I'm wondering though - when you mention asking the friend to write a letter about the collection, does that letter need to follow any specific format or include particular information to be useful for IRS purposes? Also, you mentioned being conservative with valuations to avoid scrutiny. Is there a general rule of thumb for what might be considered "too aggressive" - like if I'm valuing common albums significantly above typical Discogs sold prices, or is it more about the total dollar amount of the deduction that raises red flags? I really appreciate the frame-by-frame video review suggestion. I didn't think about going through it that carefully, but you're right that even partial identification of the collection could really strengthen the documentation.
0 coins