IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Why is everyone making this so complicated? Just check "Married Filing Jointly" on both W-4s and be done with it. If you're worried about underwithholding, just put an extra $100 per paycheck in the additional withholding line on the higher income spouse's W-4. That's what my wife and I do (I make $150k, she makes $65k) and we always get a small refund.

0 coins

PixelPrincess

โ€ข

This is terrible advice. Just putting some random amount like $100 per paycheck could result in massive overwithholding or underwithholding depending on your specific situation. The W-4 is designed to be precise if you fill it out correctly.

0 coins

It's not "terrible advice" - it's practical advice that works for many people. I've been doing taxes for 20 years and found that most withholding calculators are overly complicated for simple situations like this. For a couple with just W-2 income and standard deductions, adding a flat additional amount on the higher earner's withholding is a straightforward approach that works well. The key is adjusting that amount based on your results the previous year. If you got too big a refund, reduce it. If you owed too much, increase it. Not everyone needs a complicated tax simulator to get reasonable results.

0 coins

Natasha Volkova

โ€ข

As someone who went through this exact situation last year, I'd recommend using the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator first before making any changes. My husband makes $140k and I make $82k, so very similar to your situation. What we learned is that the "married filing jointly" checkbox on both W-4s can actually cause overwithholding when both spouses work, because each employer's payroll system assumes it's withholding for your entire tax liability when it's really only responsible for a portion. The estimator told us to select "married filing jointly" on both forms but to add $75 per paycheck in additional withholding on my husband's W-4 (the higher earner) and $0 additional on mine. This ended up being perfect - we owed about $50 at tax time. The income gap itself isn't really the issue - it's more about making sure the total withholding from both jobs covers your combined tax liability correctly. Don't stress too much about it though - you can always adjust your W-4s mid-year if needed once you see how your first few paychecks look.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious though - when you say you owed about $50 at tax time, was that your goal or were you aiming to break even completely? I'm always torn between wanting to avoid owing anything vs not wanting to give the government an interest-free loan with a big refund. Also, did you find the IRS estimator easy to use? I've heard mixed things about how user-friendly it is.

0 coins

Miguel Harvey

โ€ข

Have u guys actually checked the tax courts on this? Theres been cases where painting WAS allowed as capital improvement if it was part of a bigger renovation or if it substantially prolonged the life of the house. IRS Publication 523 is worth reading on this topic.

0 coins

Ashley Simian

โ€ข

This is correct. I've worked in real estate for years and painting CAN sometimes be a capital improvement. The key factors are: 1) Was it part of a larger renovation? 2) Did it protect the structure from deterioration (not just aesthetic)? 3) Was it done immediately after purchase? 4) Was the condition noted in your purchase documentation? In your case, since it was done right after purchase and noted in the inspection, you have a decent argument for capitalizing it.

0 coins

Miguel Harvey

โ€ข

Thanks for backing me up. I think a lot of ppl dont realize tax rules aren't always black and white. The context matters! If the paint was peeling and exposing wood to potential rot and damage, and u have that documented in ur inspection report, thats not just making it look pretty - thats protecting the structure, which leans more toward capital improvement.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

โ€ข

I'd definitely lean toward treating this as a capital improvement given your specific circumstances. The fact that you have an inspection report documenting the poor paint condition and completed the work within 30 days of purchase creates a strong case that this was necessary to bring the property up to standard rather than routine maintenance. The IRS looks at the substance over form - since this was clearly identified as a deficiency that affected your purchase negotiations and price, it's more like completing your acquisition of a livable property than maintaining an already-functional one. Make sure to keep copies of: your inspection report highlighting the paint issues, any communications about the paint factoring into price negotiations, all receipts for the painting work, and ideally some before/after photos. When you eventually sell, this documentation will support adding the painting costs to your basis. One tip: consider having a brief written summary prepared that connects all these documents together - it'll make things much clearer if you ever need to explain the situation to the IRS or a future tax preparer.

0 coins

Noah Torres

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation - bought a house last month that needed immediate roof repairs that were documented in our inspection. The written summary idea is brilliant - I never would have thought to create a narrative that ties all the documentation together. @94b6fced1c00 Do you have any suggestions on what specific language to use in that summary? Like should it reference specific IRS publications or court cases, or just stick to the facts of the situation?

0 coins

Paolo Bianchi

โ€ข

Have you considered hiring a tax attorney to do some due diligence? That's what I did when buying a small manufacturing business. They can do a more thorough check than most of us could do ourselves. Though it costs money, it's WAY cheaper than getting stuck with someone else's tax problems!

0 coins

Yara Assad

โ€ข

How much does something like that typically cost? I'm interested in this approach but working with a tight budget for my due diligence.

0 coins

Paolo Bianchi

โ€ข

For my situation, I paid around $1500 for a business tax attorney to do a thorough review. This included checking for tax liens, reviewing their provided tax returns, and helping me draft language in our purchase agreement to protect me from undisclosed liabilities. If you're on a tight budget, you might find attorneys who will do a more limited scope review for $500-750. Just make sure they specialize in business tax issues. It might seem expensive upfront, but considering the potential disaster of inheriting tax problems, it was some of the best money I ever spent. My attorney actually found an unresolved state tax issue that would have become my problem after the purchase!

0 coins

Olivia Clark

โ€ข

Another option is to request a business credit report from Dun & Bradstreet or Experian Business. These often show tax liens and can give you insight into payment patterns. Many suppliers and vendors report to these agencies, so it gives a picture of how they handle financial obligations.

0 coins

Tyrone Johnson

โ€ข

Thanks for this suggestion. I hadn't thought about business credit reports. Do you know if there's a way to get one without the business owner's involvement or permission? I'm trying to do some preliminary research before I approach them about this directly.

0 coins

Lucas Turner

โ€ข

I've been in a similar situation with charitable donations, and the advice here is spot on. For a $300 donation, you'll definitely want to keep your purchase receipts and get an acknowledgment from Toys for Tots when you drop off the items. One thing I learned the hard way is to take photos of the items before donating them. This helps establish the condition and fair market value if you ever need to prove it to the IRS. For toys and gifts, the fair market value is typically less than what you paid - think about what someone would reasonably pay for these items at a thrift store or garage sale. Given your income situation and the numbers mentioned in other comments, you're almost certainly better off taking the standard deduction. But it's still worth keeping the documentation just in case your situation changes in future years or you end up making more charitable donations than expected. Also, don't forget that even if you can't deduct it this year, your charitable giving still makes a real difference for families in need. Sometimes the tax benefit isn't the most important part!

0 coins

Dmitry Ivanov

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I never thought about taking photos of the items before donating - that's such a smart idea for documenting condition. Quick question though - when you say fair market value is typically less than what you paid, how much less are we talking? Like if I bought a $20 toy, should I be valuing it at $10 for donation purposes, or is there a more specific guideline? I want to make sure I'm not overvaluing things and getting into trouble later.

0 coins

Grace Johnson

โ€ข

Great question about fair market value! The IRS doesn't give exact percentages, but generally for new items donated shortly after purchase, you might value them at 60-80% of retail price depending on condition. For that $20 toy example, $12-16 would probably be reasonable if it's in excellent condition. The key is being realistic about what someone would actually pay for the item in its current condition. Thrift stores like Goodwill publish valuation guides that can be helpful references - you can find their donation valuation guide online. For toys specifically, they often suggest 25-60% of retail depending on condition and demand. Just remember to be conservative rather than aggressive with your valuations. The IRS tends to scrutinize charitable deduction claims that seem inflated, and it's better to slightly undervalue than to trigger an audit over a few dollars.

0 coins

Mei Lin

โ€ข

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that if you're making regular charitable donations throughout the year, it might be worth keeping a running tally to see if you could benefit from "bunching" donations. Since you're currently well below the itemizing threshold, you could consider making larger charitable contributions every other year instead of smaller ones annually. For example, instead of donating $300 this year and $300 next year, you could donate $600 in one year and skip the next. This strategy works best when combined with other timing-flexible deductions like medical expenses or additional mortgage payments. Also, if your income increases in future years or if the standard deduction amounts change, having good documentation habits now will pay off later. I'd recommend starting a simple spreadsheet or folder system to track all potential deductions - even if you don't itemize this year, you'll be prepared if your situation changes. The generosity is what really matters though - Toys for Tots does incredible work, and those families will be so grateful regardless of the tax implications!

0 coins

The bunching strategy is brilliant! I never thought about timing donations strategically like that. For someone in our situation where we're nowhere near the itemizing threshold, spreading out larger donations every other year could actually make them tax-beneficial. Do you know if there are any limits on how much you can bunch in one year? Like if we saved up and donated $2000 worth of toys and household items in 2026 instead of $500 each year, would that cause any red flags with the IRS? I'm assuming as long as we have proper documentation it should be fine, but I want to make sure we're not accidentally triggering an audit by being too strategic about it. Also appreciate the reminder about keeping good records even when not itemizing - you're right that our situation could definitely change in the future!

0 coins

Gianna Scott

โ€ข

Great thread with lots of helpful insights! I went through this exact situation with my Aetna disability payments earlier this year. One thing I'd add is to check if your employer continues any benefits during your disability leave that might affect your tax situation. In my case, my company continued paying their portion of my health insurance premiums, which meant I had less taxable income than I initially calculated. This actually reduced the amount I needed to have withheld. I had to adjust my W-4S form mid-way through my leave to avoid over-withholding. Also, if you're planning to return to work part-way through the tax year, remember that your regular paycheck withholding will resume, so you don't want to double up and have too much withheld overall. I used a simple spreadsheet to track my total projected income and withholding across both my disability payments and expected regular paychecks for the remainder of the year. The key is looking at your total annual tax picture, not just the disability payment period in isolation.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

โ€ข

This is such a helpful discussion! I'm dealing with a similar W-4S situation right now with my Aflac disability coverage. One thing I learned from my tax preparer that might be useful - if you're married filing jointly, make sure to consider your spouse's income and withholding when determining your disability withholding rate. In my case, my spouse's regular paycheck withholding was already covering a good portion of our combined tax liability, so I didn't need to withhold as much from my disability payments as I initially thought. We calculated that withholding about 15% from my disability pay (compared to the 22% from my regular paychecks) would keep us on track. Also, don't forget that if you're paying for your own disability insurance premiums with after-tax dollars, those payments are generally not taxable when you receive them. But if your employer pays the premiums (which sounds like your case with MetLife), then the benefits are taxable. This distinction can significantly impact how much you need to withhold.

0 coins

Mateo Rodriguez

โ€ข

This is really helpful information about spousal income considerations! I hadn't thought about how my partner's withholding might affect my disability withholding calculations. We file jointly, and she has a steady job with consistent withholding, so this could definitely change the math for me. Quick question - when you mention that employer-paid premiums make the benefits taxable, does this apply even if I contribute part of the premium cost through payroll deduction? My employer pays most of my MetLife premium, but I think I pay a small portion post-tax. Does this create a partial tax situation, or is it all-or-nothing based on who pays the majority? Thanks for bringing up the spousal consideration - I'm definitely going to factor that into my calculations now!

0 coins

Prev1...507508509510511...5643Next