


Ask the community...
Your second guess is spot on. When you start a job mid-year, payroll systems calculate withholding as if you're making that same amount for the full year. So your actual annual projected income is lower, hence lower withholding. Easiest fix? Use the IRS Withholding Calculator online to check if you're on track. If needed, you can submit a new W-4 to your employer requesting additional withholding. Just put the extra amount you want withheld per paycheck in Box 4(c). For next year, once you've both worked at your jobs for the full year, your withholdings should naturally align better. But I always recommend doing a mid-year withholding checkup anyway.
Thanks for confirming my suspicion! I used the calculator and it's showing we might be slightly underwithholding overall. Is it better to adjust both our W-4s slightly or just have one of us make a bigger adjustment? Does it matter which approach we take?
Either approach works from a tax perspective - the IRS doesn't care which spouse has the withholding as long as your household total is correct. For simplicity, I'd recommend just having one person make the adjustment - usually the higher earner or whoever has the more stable income. Remember that if your incomes are fairly high, the "married" withholding tables assume that one spouse might not work, so with two similar high incomes, you might need more withholding than the standard tables suggest. The calculator should account for this, but it's always good to recheck your withholdings around June each year to make sure you're on track.
Random tip that helped my wife and me - we both selected "Married but withhold at higher Single rate" on our W-4s since we make similar salaries. This automatically adjusts for the fact that both of us work. Then at the end of each quarter, we do a quick check using an online calculator to see if we're on track. The old W-4 used to have allowances which was confusing af. The new one is better but still not perfect. Married couples with similar incomes often need to withhold extra to avoid an unpleasant surprise at tax time.
Is this still the best approach with the redesigned W-4? I thought the new form was supposed to fix these issues with the two-earner worksheet?
Have you checked if there's a difference between your actual Schedule D and what the software summary is showing? Sometimes the software interface displays simplifications but the actual Schedule D will show the correct carryover amount. Look at the Schedule D and the "Capital Loss Carryover Worksheet" in the actual forms. Also, some tax software require you to manually enter previous year carryovers rather than importing them correctly. Double check if that might be the issue.
Thanks for the tip! I just looked at the actual Schedule D form in the PDF and you're right - there's a discrepancy. The main software screen shows $0 carryover, but Schedule D Line 16 is showing the $4,000 remaining loss amount. So it looks like the calculation is correct in the actual forms but just displaying wrong in the summary screen? Do you think I should contact the software company about this display issue or just ignore it since the actual form seems correct?
If the actual Schedule D shows the correct $4,000 carryover amount, then your tax return is being filed correctly and you should be fine. This is definitely just a display issue in the software interface. It's still worth reporting to the software company since others might be confused by the same issue. Take screenshots of both the incorrect summary page and the correct Schedule D to include with your report. But as far as your taxes are concerned, you're good to go - the IRS receives the actual forms, not the software's summary screens.
Double check your amounts across tax years. I went through smth similar and realized I misremembered my 2022 loss. Ended up being $21k not $24k like I thought. Check all the actual Schedule D forms across years. The math should always balance out if your going from 1 yr to next!
This is good advice. Numbers get fuzzy when we rely on memory. I've messed up carryovers before because I was working from memory instead of having my previous return open while doing my current taxes.
Something important that hasn't been mentioned yet - the IRS actually has a specific "9 factors test" they use to determine if an activity is a hobby or business: 1. Whether you carry on the activity in a businesslike manner 2. Your expertise (or your advisors') 3. The time and effort you spend on it 4. Whether assets used may appreciate in value 5. Your success in similar activities 6. Your history of income or losses 7. The amount of occasional profits earned 8. Your financial status (if you have other income sources) 9. Elements of personal pleasure/recreation From what you described, you have more hobby factors (personal pleasure, not your main income, not conducted in a super businesslike way), but documenting expenses and showing intent to make profit over time might push you toward business territory if you want that classification.
This is super helpful, thank you! Looking at these factors, I'm definitely more on the hobby side. My financial records are pretty basic, I primarily do it for enjoyment, and the income is small compared to my day job. One more question - if I do decide to formally track this as a hobby on my taxes, should I be keeping receipts for all my bonsai-related purchases even though I can't deduct them? Just in case the IRS ever has questions?
Good question! Yes, I would recommend keeping basic records of both your sales and expenses, even though you can't deduct the expenses for a hobby. This serves two important purposes: First, if the IRS ever questions whether this is truly a hobby, your records can help demonstrate the financial reality of your activity. Second, if you eventually transition to business status, having historical records will be valuable. Also, while you can't deduct hobby expenses against hobby income anymore (thanks to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act), keeping track of expenses helps you understand the true economics of your activity. Just keep it simple - a basic spreadsheet and a folder for receipts should be sufficient. No need for elaborate bookkeeping if it's truly just a hobby.
Anyone know if selling plants online through Etsy changes the hobby/business determination? I've been propagating houseplants (not bonsai but similar concept) and selling about $1500/year through Etsy. They sent me a 1099-K last year and I didn't know what to do with it.
Getting a 1099-K means Etsy is reporting that income to the IRS, so you definitely need to report it on your tax return. Starting in 2022, platforms like Etsy are required to issue 1099-Ks for $600+ in sales (used to be $20k). This doesn't automatically make your activity a business, but it does mean the IRS knows about the income. You'd still apply the same hobby vs business tests others mentioned. If it's a hobby, report on Schedule 1 (Other Income). If business, Schedule C.
Honestly, just fire him and move on. I've been through three different CPAs in the last five years. The good ones are worth their weight in gold, but there are plenty of duds out there. Your review sounds totally fair - you're describing exactly what happened. Pro tip: for next tax season, ask potential CPAs specifically about their experience with crypto taxes. Many traditional CPAs are totally out of their depth with crypto but won't admit it until they've already taken your money. I found my current guy through a crypto subreddit recommendation, and he's been amazing with all my DeFi stuff.
Thanks for the validation. I've already started asking around for recommendations for next year. Did you find any specific questions that helped you separate the knowledgeable CPAs from those just claiming to understand crypto?
I ask them to explain how they handle specific crypto situations that I know are tricky - like liquidity pool rewards, token airdrops, or NFT transactions. The ones who give vague answers or just say "we can handle any crypto situation" without details are the ones to avoid. The good ones will be honest about what they know and don't know. My current CPA straight up told me he specialized in DeFi and mining operations but wasn't as familiar with NFTs. That honesty was refreshing, and he ended up partnering with an NFT tax specialist for that portion of my return. Transparency about their limitations is a huge green flag.
Dude you were too nice. I would've refused to pay anything and given a 1-star review. He literally didn't do what you hired him for and then tried to charge you full price! I've noticed a lot of accountants think they can get away with garbage service because people are scared of doing taxes themselves.
Eh, I disagree. The CPA did complete part of the work, so paying nothing would be unfair. The $250 partial payment makes sense. And honestly, most CPAs are overwhelmed during tax season - it sounds more like miscommunication than intentional deception.
Amara Okafor
Another option is to check if your brokerage offers any summary reports. Robinhood specifically has a "tax summary" section in their tax documents that gives you consolidated numbers you can use. For crypto, they should provide a summary of proceeds and cost basis for all transactions. If you're reporting everything on FreeTaxUSA, you can often just enter the summary totals rather than each individual transaction. Look for the line items on your 1099-B that show total proceeds and total cost basis for short-term and long-term transactions separately.
0 coins
AstroAce
ā¢I found the summary page on my Robinhood statement but I'm still confused about one thing. Some of my trades are marked as "covered" and others as "uncovered" - do I need to separate these when entering them into FreeTaxUSA?
0 coins
Amara Okafor
ā¢Yes, you should separate covered and uncovered transactions when entering them into FreeTaxUSA. "Covered" means your broker is reporting the cost basis to the IRS, while "uncovered" means they're not (usually for older securities or ones transferred from another broker). FreeTaxUSA will have separate entry sections for covered vs. uncovered transactions. The tax calculation is the same, but the IRS wants them reported separately because they can verify the covered transactions against what your broker reported, while uncovered transactions are based solely on your records.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
If you have a lot of trades, don't try to enter them one by one! I made that mistake last year with about 40 trades and wasted hours. Three options that worked for me: 1. Use the summary totals from your 1099-B (usually on the last page) 2. Use FreeTaxUSA's bulk entry option where you can enter multiple similar transactions at once 3. If your brokerage offers a CSV or Excel download of your transactions, you might be able to use that to organize things before entering
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
ā¢Do you know if FreeTaxUSA allows you to import a CSV file directly? That would save so much time compared to manual entry.
0 coins