IRS
CommunityGovernment Services
Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Tax planning for 2025 if retiring end of 2024 - Social Security taxation questions
I'm trying to get my head around our estimated taxes for next year (2025) if I retire at the end of this year (2024). If I retire on 12/31/24 and start collecting Social Security, my SSI will be approximately $37,500 for the year of 2025. My wife has a part-time job and will gross about $34,000. We're planning to withdraw roughly $15,000 on top of that, but only from a Roth IRA. My questions are: - Would any portion of my Social Security benefits be taxable for Federal Income Tax? (I'm in PA, and as I understand it, there's no state tax on SSI here) - What would be an estimated Federal Income Tax on our entire income with these numbers? - Should my wife continue having Federal taxes withheld from her paychecks? Just trying to do some planning, but the tax implications are really confusing! Thanks for any help you can provide!
Join the conversation
Is this stock-for-product exchange strategy a viable tax-free business model?
I've been brainstorming a business approach that might create a tax advantage, and I wanted to run it by people who understand tax implications better than I do. Here's my concept: Let's say I have a product line that retails for $270 (plus applicable taxes), but my manufacturing cost is only $65 per unit - so there's a healthy markup. Now, what if instead of a traditional sale, I offered customers the following deal: "Purchase one share of our newly issued company stock for $195, and receive the product completely free as a promotion." My understanding is that since customers would be buying newly issued stock (not treasury stock), this transaction wouldn't trigger immediate tax consequences for my business. The stock would be valued at around $30 per share. If customers later decide to sell their stock back at market value ($30), they'd have a capital loss of approximately $165. Meanwhile, my company would have received $195 tax-free, spent $65 on product costs, and potentially repurchased the stock for $30 - netting $100 profit with potentially lower tax exposure. Additionally, couldn't the "free" product be considered a promotional expense and potentially tax-deductible? I realize there are securities regulations to consider, and customers would need full disclosure about risks and terms to avoid anything resembling market manipulation. But theoretically, both parties might benefit - the company gets lower-taxed revenue, and customers effectively get the product for $165 ($195 minus the $30 stock value). Would this approach work under current tax law? Are there obvious regulatory issues I'm missing? I'm trying to understand if there are legitimate tax advantages here before exploring this further with professional advisors.
Join the conversation
Speaking as someone with background in corporate finance, there's another issue nobody's mentioned yet. Selling new stock isn't a tax-free event for the company the way you're describing. When a company issues new shares at above par value (which is typically pennies per share), the excess amount received is recorded as "additional paid-in capital," but it's not tax-free income. Companies don't pay income tax on true equity investments because those aren't considered revenue - they're capital contributions. But if the IRS determines you're artificially inflating the stock price to disguise what's basically product revenue, they'll reclassify it. Also, regular buybacks of stock from customers at below the issue price creates a whole host of securities problems around market manipulation. The SEC wouldn't look kindly on a system designed to issue overpriced shares with the expectation customers will take a loss selling them back.
Would it make any difference if the company structured this as a membership program instead of actual stock? Like what if customers bought a "premium membership" that came with the product, and members could later sell back their membership at a reduced rate if they wanted to exit the program?
A membership program would face similar issues if it's just a disguised product sale. The IRS evaluates the economic reality of transactions. However, legitimate membership programs with actual ongoing benefits (beyond just getting one product) might be viewed differently. The key distinction is whether there's a genuine business purpose beyond tax avoidance. If members receive ongoing privileges, exclusive access, or other continuing benefits, and the pricing reflects fair market value for those benefits, then it starts looking more like a legitimate business model rather than a tax avoidance scheme.
I'm not a tax expert but I think everyone's missing the critical flaw here - who would actually buy stock at $195 that's publicly known to be worth $30? Even with a "free" product, customers would recognize they're effectively paying $165 for the product and taking on the hassle of owning and then selling stock. Most customers would simply prefer to pay directly for the product rather than jumping through these hoops, especially when they realize they're effectively paying the same amount either way. Plus, if you're publicly acknowledging the stock is worth $30 in your marketing materials (which you'd need to do for securities compliance), the whole scheme becomes transparent and pointless.
Exactly! And imagine the customer experience. "Congratulations on your purchase of our widget! Now please fill out these stock transfer forms, provide your social security number for securities reporting, and don't forget you'll need to report this capital loss on your Schedule D next tax season!" Nobody wants that hassle for a regular product purchase.
Where exactly is the line between Tax Fraud and legitimate Tax Strategy?
I've been noticing the term 'fraud' thrown around pretty casually in tax discussions lately, and I'm honestly confused about where the actual line is between fraud and legitimate tax strategy. Isn't it literally a tax preparer's job to help clients minimize their tax burden through deductions, credits, and timing strategies? That's what we pay them for, right? For example, if I own a small business on a cash basis and I decide to be less aggressive in collecting outstanding invoices in December because I know tax rates are increasing next year - is that fraud or just smart planning? The intent is obviously to pay less tax, but that seems like strategy to me. I understand that not reporting income or flat-out lying is clearly fraud - the intent there is dishonesty. But strategic tax planning is ALSO intended to reduce taxes. So where's the dividing line? I'm pretty confident I know what actual tax fraud looks like, but I'm throwing this out there as a discussion point. Maybe we should be more careful about casually accusing people of "fraud" when they're discussing what might actually be legitimate tax strategies?
Join the conversation
Tax strategy vs fraud also depends a lot on which software you use to file. Some tax programs actually warn you when something might cross the line or create audit risk. I use TurboTax and it flagged when I was getting too aggressive with home office deductions and explained why it might be considered fraudulent.
I've found FreeTaxUSA actually does a better job with these warnings than TurboTax. It explains the actual tax code reasons why something might be questionable rather than just giving generic warnings.
The distinction I've always used: Strategy is what you discuss openly with your tax preparer and would be willing to explain to an IRS agent. Fraud is what you hide or would be embarrassed to admit to during an audit. If you're worried about whether something crosses the line, that gut feeling is usually worth listening to. The tax code has plenty of legitimate ways to minimize taxes without venturing into shady territory.
What specific qualifications do you need to start as a Tax Preparer now?
So my roommate recently completed an 8-week QuickBooks certification program and is now taking some free online tax preparation courses. She's already talking about setting up her own tax prep business next season. I'm a little concerned because it seems too easy? Is that really all you need to legally prepare someone's taxes? No degree or special license? She's smart but has zero actual accounting experience and I'm worried she might be getting ahead of herself. Does anyone know what the actual requirements are to call yourself a Tax Preparer and start charging clients?
Join the conversation
Your roommate should look into the Annual Filing Season Program which is voluntary but gives limited representation rights. Also, tell her to join a professional organization like the National Association of Tax Professionals (NATP) or the National Association of Enrolled Agents (NAEA) - the networking and continuing education is invaluable. I've been in tax prep for 7 years and these organizations have been essential for staying current with tax law changes.
Thanks for the recommendation about those professional organizations. Are they expensive to join? And what exactly do you mean by "limited representation rights" with the Annual Filing Season Program?
The membership fees are pretty reasonable - usually between $150-250 per year depending on which organization you choose. Many offer discounts for new members or students. The benefits far outweigh the costs when you consider the resources, forums, and continuing education they provide. The Annual Filing Season Program gives you limited rights to represent clients whose returns you've prepared in case of an audit. Without this or an EA/CPA credential, you can prepare the return but can't speak to the IRS on behalf of your client if questions come up later. Having representation rights makes you much more valuable to clients since you can help them through the entire process.
If your roommate is serious, she should also get professional liability insurance before taking on any clients! I know someone who started preparing taxes with minimal qualifications and made a mistake that cost their client thousands. The client sued, and without insurance, it was financially devastating. Even with all the proper certifications, mistakes happen.
How much does tax preparer insurance typically cost? Is it worth it for someone just doing a few returns on the side?
Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit Calculation for 2023 - Confused by H&R Block Software
So I think I'm having issues with TurboTax calculating my childcare tax credit for 2023 correctly. I know using TurboTax is probably not the most cost-effective option, but I've always found it convenient with how it pre-fills most of my information. It's been reliable until now. Here's my situation: TurboTax seems to be calculating my credit wrong. I paid $4,250 for my son's daycare in fall semester 2023. From what I understand, the maximum eligible expense is $3,000 for one child and $6,000 for two or more children for the 2023 tax year. The credit percentage is based on income brackets. My percentage should be 20% since my adjusted gross income is above $43,000. Without any employer dependent care benefits (which I don't have), the math seems straightforward: $3,000 × 0.2 = $600. But TurboTax told me the calculation was complex and suggested I upgrade to their "expert help" for an extra $75. When I declined and chose to calculate it myself, they made me agree to some disclaimer about the IRS possibly flagging my return. Then they gave me $659 as my credit amount based on the information I entered. Given my AGI and the percentage from Form 2441, this number doesn't make sense. I thought maybe TurboTax wasn't capping my expenses at $3,000, so I manually changed the childcare expense to exactly $3,000. Now it's giving me $571 as my credit. Without any employer benefits affecting this, I can't figure out where the missing $29 is going. I don't think I can even view the actual forms they're generating without paying for the upgrade. Has anyone else experienced this? Am I misunderstanding something about this credit? It feels like TurboTax is trying to upsell me and then punishing me for declining.
Join the conversation
Just a heads up for anyone using tax software for the Child and Dependent Care Credit - make sure you're entering your expenses correctly. I had a similar issue and realized I was accidentally entering some expenses as "education expenses" rather than "childcare expenses" which caused the software to calculate things differently. Also, check if your state offers a separate childcare credit. In Massachusetts, we have an additional deduction that works differently from the federal credit, and my tax software wasn't prompting me for it until I specifically searched for it.
Do you know if before/after school programs count as childcare expenses? My kids are in elementary school but I pay for after-school care until I get off work. My tax software is giving me contradictory information about whether this qualifies.
Yes, before/after school programs definitely count as qualifying childcare expenses as long as they allow you to work or look for work. The IRS is pretty clear on this - any care provided for children under 13 that enables you to work or actively search for work qualifies. The key is that the primary purpose of the program must be childcare, not education. Most standard before/after school programs fall into this category. Summer day camps can also qualify, but overnight camps don't. Make sure you get the tax ID or SSN of the provider, as you'll need to include that on Form 2441.
I found a workaround for the TurboTax issue! If you go to "Review" mode, then select "View/Print Return" (sometimes you have to dig around for this option), you can actually see the completed Form 2441 before paying. In my case, I noticed TurboTax was splitting my childcare expenses across two different entries because I had entered two separate payment periods (spring and fall semesters). This was causing some weird rounding in the calculation. When I combined them into one entry, the credit calculated correctly at exactly $600.
Thank you! This worked for me too. When I went to the form view, I saw TurboTax had somehow entered part of my childcare expenses in the wrong field. It was counting some of my expenses as "dependent care benefits" from an employer (which I don't have). Once I zeroed out that field and put everything under the actual expenses, it calculated correctly to $600. Thanks everyone for the help! Saved me from either overpaying for the "expert" review or submitting an incorrect return.
Glad it worked for you! I've found that looking at the actual forms is always the best way to catch these errors. TurboTax and similar software try to make things "easy" by hiding the forms behind their interview questions, but sometimes that just creates confusion. For anyone else with this issue, another thing to check is that your care provider information is entered correctly. If the provider's tax ID is missing or formatted incorrectly, some tax software will reduce the credit amount without clearly explaining why.
Giovanni Colombo
Don't forget about Required Minimum Distributions! Since you mentioned only withdrawing from Roth accounts now, I'm assuming you might have traditional IRAs or 401ks too? Once you hit 73, you HAVE to start taking RMDs from those accounts, which could push more of your Social Security into taxable territory in future years. Might be worth considering some Roth conversions now if you're in a lower tax bracket.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
This is great advice. I did this exact thing - strategic Roth conversions for 3 years between retirement and when my RMDs kicked in. Saved a ton on lifetime taxes and now almost none of my SS is taxable.
0 coins
StarStrider
Just a heads-up on PA taxes - while PA doesn't tax Social Security, they DO tax distributions from IRAs, 401ks and other retirement accounts (except military). Even if you paid PA tax on the money when you contributed, they tax it again when you withdraw. One of the few states that does this. Roth withdrawals are the exception since they're federally tax-free. So your strategy of using Roth money is smart from a PA perspective too!
0 coins