


Ask the community...
From my experience with business deductions, anything dual-purpose tends to draw scrutiny. My tax guy always says to ask: "Would I have bought this if I didn't have the business?" If the answer is yes, it's harder to justify as 100% business. A $3k custom putter might be questionable unless you can show clients actually use it regularly as part of your business process. Maybe document each time clients use it? Just my 2 cents.
Is it different if you're in a golf-related business? I sell custom golf accessories and have display items in my office that are technically usable but mainly for showing clients.
For your situation it's completely different since those items directly relate to what you're selling. That's a clear business purpose - they're essentially product samples or demonstration items. You could likely deduct those as ordinary and necessary business expenses. In the original poster's consulting business that's unrelated to golf, it's harder to show a direct business purpose for an expensive putter beyond general office decor or client entertainment. That's where the documentation becomes more important to demonstrate regular business use.
Has anyone considered Section 179 deduction for this? Since it's office equipment that will last longer than a year, couldn't you just depreciate the putter over time instead of trying to deduct the full amount in year one? Might attract less attention that way?
Have you considered TaxAct? Their interface is much more direct than TurboTax. You can go straight to forms you need with minimal clicking. I've used it for my single-member LLC for years and it's way less frustrating than TurboTax's hand-holding.
I haven't tried TaxAct. How's the pricing compared to TurboTax? And does it let you jump directly to Schedule C without going through personal info you've already entered a million times before?
The pricing is definitely better - usually about half what TurboTax charges for the same features. For 2023 tax year I paid $65 total for federal and state with business income, compared to around $140 with TurboTax. Yes, you can jump directly to Schedule C and other forms! They have a forms-based navigation option where you can select exactly what you want to work on. You still need to complete basic personal info once, but after that you can move freely between different sections without following their sequence. It's much more efficient if you know what you're doing.
I'm surprised nobody's mentioned doing it by hand with PDF fillable forms from the IRS website. If you know what you're doing and it's just a single Schedule C, it might take less time than fighting with any software. That's what I do for my consulting business - takes about 30 minutes total.
I tried the PDF forms route but got nervous about math errors. Don't the software programs check calculations and look for red flags? I'm always worried I'll miss something and get audited.
I was in almost your exact situation - splitting time between US and Hungary (about 7 months there, 5 months here). I learned that establishing a "tax home" in the foreign country is crucial. For me, what worked was using the Foreign Housing Exclusion alongside the FEIE. Since you won't qualify for the Physical Presence Test, focus hard on documenting everything for the Bona Fide Residence Test. Keep all your Polish bank statements, rental agreements, utility bills, residency permit paperwork, etc. Also, don't forget about FBAR requirements if your foreign accounts exceed $10,000 total at any point in the year! I got hit with penalties for missing that.
Thanks for sharing your experience! Did you have any issues with the IRS questioning your Bona Fide Residence status since you were still in the US for almost half the year? And did you have to pay US taxes on the portion of your income earned while physically in the US?
I did initially get some questions from the IRS about my Bona Fide Residence status. What helped my case was having documentation showing I was paying taxes in Hungary, had a permanent residence there (rental agreement), maintained local bank accounts, and had community ties (memberships in local organizations). The key factor that seemed to satisfy them was that my life was clearly centered in Hungary, with US visits being temporary. Yes, I absolutely had to pay US taxes on income earned while physically working in the US, even though it was for my Hungarian employer. I tracked my work days by location and reported accordingly. I used a time-tracking app that logged my IP address to help document where I was working each day, which was helpful documentation.
Don't forget about Form 8833 for claiming treaty benefits! The US-Poland tax treaty might let you avoid double taxation, but you MUST file this form to claim the benefits. I missed this my first year as an expat in Germany and it was a huge headache. Also, look into whether you qualify as a tax resident in Poland under their rules. Sometimes you can be a tax resident of both countries, which is when the treaty provisions become super important.
Form 8833 isn't always required though. The instructions specifically say you don't need it for claiming foreign tax credits or the foreign earned income exclusion. You only need it for treaty positions that aren't already covered by existing forms.
You're right about Form 8833 not being required for standard foreign tax credits or the FEIE. I should have been more specific - I was thinking about treaty-specific provisions that might help in a split residency situation, particularly the "tie-breaker" rules that determine which country has primary taxing rights when you're technically a resident of both. For example, if both the US and Poland consider you a tax resident under their respective domestic laws, the treaty's tie-breaker provisions would determine where your primary tax residence is. Claiming that type of treaty benefit typically does require Form 8833. This became relevant in my case because Germany considered me a tax resident based on my having an apartment there, even though I didn't meet the US FEIE requirements that year.
Another option that nobody's mentioned is that you can create an online account on the IRS website and access your tax records that way. Go to IRS.gov and look for "View Your Account." You'll need to create an ID.me account or login.gov account if you don't already have one. The verification process is kind of a pain (you need to upload ID and do a video selfie), but once you're in, you can see your tax records for multiple years. That's how I get mine without dealing with TurboTax's fees.
The ID.me verification is actually why I couldn't get my transcript online! They couldn't verify my phone for some reason and I got stuck in this endless loop. Has anyone found a workaround for the ID.me verification issues?
The ID.me system can definitely be frustrating. If you're having trouble with the automated verification, try their "video chat verification" option. It lets you speak with a human representative who can manually verify your identity. It takes longer (sometimes there's a waiting room), but it usually works when the automated system fails. Another option is to use the login.gov pathway instead of ID.me if it gives you that choice. Some people have better luck with one system versus the other.
Am I the only one who thinks it's ridiculous that we have to jump through all these hoops just to get copies of OUR OWN tax returns??? The tax prep companies charge us to prepare the returns, then charge again to access them later, and the IRS makes it incredibly difficult to get copies directly from them. The whole system seems designed to be as frustrating as possible!
It's not just you! The tax system in the US is deliberately complicated because tax prep companies lobby to keep it that way. Many other countries have simple tax filing systems where the government pre-fills your forms and you just verify them. But companies like H&R Block and TurboTax literally spend millions lobbying to prevent simplification because it would hurt their business model.
I had no idea about the lobbying thing, but it makes total sense. I lived in Sweden for a few years and filing taxes there took like 5 minutes - they sent me a pre-filled form and I just confirmed it was correct by text message. Coming back to the US tax system was a huge shock. I'm definitely going to be more careful about saving copies of everything from now on. Lesson learned the hard way!
Nia Thompson
Just wanted to share my experience with a similar issue. I forgot to list a foreign account entirely on Schedule B two years ago (not just the country name), but had filed the FBAR correctly. I didn't amend and nothing happened - no audit, no questions. The general consensus from my tax preparer was that as long as the FBAR is filed correctly, the Schedule B issue is less critical. The FBAR has the detailed info they really care about. That said, everyone's situation is different and past results don't guarantee future outcomes.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
ā¢Did you at least check "Yes" on line 7a? Or did you check "No" and still had no issues? My situation is I checked "No" but did file the FBAR correctly, trying to decide if I need to amend.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
ā¢I actually checked "Yes" on line 7a, just didn't fill in the countries on 7b. That's probably why it didn't raise any flags. If you checked "No" on 7a but filed an FBAR, that's a direct contradiction that might be more likely to raise questions. The IRS systems do compare FBAR filings with tax returns, so having contradictory information between them could potentially trigger a review. In your case, I'd probably consider amending since the "No" answer on 7a directly conflicts with your FBAR filing.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
IMPORTANT: The risk really depends on the total value of your foreign accounts. If your aggregate balance is over $10,000 (which I assume it is since you filed FBARs), you definitely should have completed line 7b correctly. While many people here are saying it's no big deal, the penalties for FBAR-related issues CAN be severe if the IRS decides to pursue them. Non-willful violations can be up to $10,000 per violation, and willful ones much more. That said, if you've filed your FBARs on time and correctly, forgetting just the country name on Schedule B while still checking "Yes" on 7a is likely to be viewed as a minor oversight rather than an attempt to hide accounts. If I were in your shoes, I'd file an amended return just for peace of mind.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
ā¢Thanks for this perspective. My foreign accounts total about $35,000, so definitely over the FBAR threshold. I did check "Yes" on 7a correctly, just left 7b blank where it asks for the countries. And yes, I filed the FBAR on time with complete information. I think I'll go ahead with an amended return just to be safe. Better to spend a little time fixing it now than worrying about it later.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
ā¢That's a wise decision. With $35,000 in foreign accounts, you're definitely required to have complete and accurate reporting. While the chance of issues arising solely from a missing country name when you've otherwise properly reported is relatively small, filing the amendment eliminates that risk entirely. The amendment process for this kind of correction is fairly straightforward. You'll file Form 1040-X along with a corrected Schedule B. Make sure to clearly indicate in Part III of Form 1040-X that you're correcting the country information for foreign accounts on Schedule B, Line 7b. This type of amendment shouldn't affect your tax liability at all.
0 coins