Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One strategy I haven't seen mentioned yet is looking into Defined Benefit pension plans if your S-corp has consistent high profits. While Solo 401ks are great, DB plans can allow much higher contribution limits - sometimes $200k+ annually depending on your age and income level. The catch is they're more complex and expensive to administer, requiring actuarial calculations and annual filings. But if you're consistently generating substantial profits and want maximum tax-deferred savings, they can be incredibly powerful. You'd need to commit to funding the plan for several years, but the tax savings can be substantial. I set one up for my consulting S-corp three years ago and it's been game-changing for managing tax liability during high-income years. The key is working with a specialist who understands both the pension rules and S-corp taxation to make sure everything is structured properly. Worth exploring if traditional retirement plans aren't handling enough of your excess profits.
Tony Brooks
ā¢This is fascinating! I had no idea DB plans could allow such high contribution limits. How do you handle the complexity and costs? Are we talking about needing a full-time pension administrator or can smaller firms manage this effectively? Also, when you mention committing to funding for several years, what kind of flexibility do you have if business income fluctuates significantly year to year? I'm intrigued by the potential tax savings but want to understand the practical implications before exploring this route.
@Jade Santiago You don't need a full-time administrator, but you do need specialists. I work with a Third Party Administrator (TPA) who handles the actuarial work and compliance filings - costs about $3-5k annually depending on plan complexity. The setup fees were around $10k initially. For funding flexibility, that's where it gets tricky. DB plans require "minimum funding" each year based on actuarial calculations, so you can't just skip years if business is slow. However, there are some design options that can build in flexibility - like cash balance plans that blend features of DB and DC plans. The key is really running projections before committing. My TPA modeled different scenarios showing required contributions vs. tax savings over a 5-7 year period. In my case, even with the administrative costs and funding commitments, the tax deferral benefits were substantial enough to justify the complexity. But it's definitely not right for everyone - you need consistent substantial income and the discipline to maintain the plan long-term.
This thread has been incredibly helpful - I'm in a similar situation with my S-corp and had been researching the same investment strategy. It's disappointing to learn that keeping profits in the company doesn't defer personal taxation, but the alternative strategies mentioned here are exactly what I needed to hear. The retirement plan discussion is particularly valuable. I had been focused on traditional 401k limits but hadn't considered Solo 401k employer contributions or the potential for DB plans. @Jade Santiago, your experience with the defined benefit plan is eye-opening - I'm definitely going to explore that option given my consistent income levels. One question for the group: has anyone dealt with state tax implications of these strategies? I'm in California and wondering if the state treatment of S-corp pass-through income and retirement contributions aligns with federal rules, or if there are additional considerations I should be aware of when planning these strategies. Also want to echo the positive feedback on both taxr.ai and Claimyr mentioned earlier - I tried both after reading this thread and they were genuinely helpful for getting personalized guidance rather than generic advice.
Join the conversation
I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! Got my W-2 last week with the same FF code showing $1,800, and like you, I have zero health benefits through my employer. I'm also primarily reimbursed for mileage when I travel to client sites. What's really frustrating is that my employer's HR department seems just as confused as I am. They keep saying "the payroll company handles all that stuff" but won't give me direct contact information to follow up myself. One thing I noticed when I calculated my mileage reimbursements for the year - it comes out to almost exactly $1,800, so I'm pretty convinced this is a coding error where they used FF instead of whatever code should be used for business mileage reimbursement. Have you had any luck getting through to the payroll company directly? I'm wondering if I should just contact them myself since my employer doesn't seem motivated to resolve this quickly. The tax deadline is approaching and I really don't want to file with incorrect information.
I'm in almost the exact same boat! Just got my W-2 with an FF code for $2,100 and I only get mileage reimbursement too - no health benefits at all. My employer also seems clueless about it. I actually managed to get the direct contact info for our payroll company by asking for it specifically for "tax document corrections." I told them I needed to speak directly with someone who could explain or correct the W-2 coding since we're running up against filing deadlines. Most employers should be willing to provide that contact info if you frame it as a time-sensitive tax compliance issue. If your employer won't give you the contact info, you might be able to find the payroll company name somewhere on your pay stubs or in your employee portal, then contact them directly. They should be able to look up your employer's account and help clarify whether this is an error. I'm also planning to file for an extension if this doesn't get resolved in the next few days. The peace of mind is worth it rather than potentially dealing with IRS notices later!
I work as a tax consultant and see this exact scenario probably 5-6 times every tax season. The FF code is supposed to indicate a QSEHRA benefit, but what's happening here is almost certainly a payroll system miscoding of your mileage reimbursements. Here's what likely happened: When your employer set up their payroll system or switched providers, someone incorrectly mapped your mileage reimbursement category to the FF code instead of leaving it unreported (since proper business mileage reimbursements at the standard IRS rate shouldn't appear on your W-2 at all). The dead giveaway is that your $2400 amount is right in line with typical annual mileage reimbursements for someone who drives regularly for work. A legitimate QSEHRA would usually be communicated clearly to employees since there are specific rules about how you can use those funds. My advice: Don't wait around for your employer to figure this out. Contact the payroll company directly if possible, or give your employer a firm deadline (like "I need this resolved by [specific date] or I'm filing for a tax extension"). Document everything in writing. If it's confirmed as an error, insist on a W-2c before filing your return. The good news is this type of error is very common and easily correctable - just don't file your taxes with the wrong information if you can avoid it.
This is exactly the kind of expert insight I was hoping to find! As a tax consultant, have you seen any situations where employers actually did have legitimate QSEHRA programs but just failed to communicate them properly to employees? I'm trying to figure out if there's any chance this could be a real benefit I'm missing out on rather than just a coding error. Also, when you mention giving the employer a firm deadline, what's a reasonable timeframe? I don't want to be unreasonable, but I also don't want to get stuck filing an extension if this could be resolved quickly. Is a week enough time for them to get clarification from their payroll company? Thanks for sharing your professional experience with this - it's really reassuring to know this is a common issue and not some unique problem that's going to cause major headaches!
Join the conversation
This is such a common confusion point! I just went through this same dilemma last month. After calling the IRS taxpayer assistance line (took forever to get through), the representative confirmed that for Form 1040, you should write "0" in boxes where the amount is zero rather than leaving them blank. The reasoning is that their processing systems are designed to expect numerical entries, and blank fields can sometimes trigger manual review flags. For your examples - taxable interest and alimony received - definitely put "0" if those amounts are zero for you. One tip I learned: if you're using tax software like TurboTax or FreeTaxUSA, they automatically handle this for you by entering zeros where appropriate. But if you're filing by hand or using fillable PDFs, make sure to enter those zeros manually. Better safe than sorry when it comes to avoiding processing delays!
This is really helpful! I've been using tax software for years but never knew it was automatically handling the zero entries. Good to know for anyone who might switch to paper filing or PDFs in the future. Did the IRS rep mention anything about specific sections where blanks might actually be preferred over zeros?
Lara Woods
ā¢Great question! The IRS rep did mention a few specific cases where blanks might be preferred. For example, on certain worksheets that are just for your own calculations (not submitted with your return), you can leave inapplicable lines blank. Also, some schedules have "skip this section if..." instructions where leaving it blank is actually the correct approach. But for the main 1040 form lines themselves, she was very clear that zeros are the way to go. The key is always checking the specific instructions for each form or schedule you're working with.
I work as a tax preparer and can confirm that you should definitely write "0" in boxes where amounts are zero on Form 1040. This is standard practice and what we recommend to all our clients. The IRS processing systems are designed to read numerical entries, and blank fields can cause unnecessary delays or trigger review flags. For your specific examples - taxable interest and alimony received - both should show "0" if you have no amounts to report. One thing to keep in mind is that this rule applies consistently across most tax forms. When in doubt, "0" is almost always the safer choice than leaving something blank. The only exceptions are usually clearly marked with instructions like "leave blank if not applicable" which is rare on the main 1040 form. Your concern about getting flagged for an audit over this is understandable, but using zeros appropriately actually reduces your audit risk by showing you've properly considered each line item on your return.
Thank you so much for the professional perspective! As someone who's always been intimidated by tax forms, it's really reassuring to hear from an actual tax preparer that zeros are the way to go. I've been second-guessing myself on every single line of my 1040, so knowing this is standard practice makes me feel much more confident about my filing approach. Quick follow-up question - when you mention that zeros reduce audit risk by showing proper consideration of each line item, does that mean the IRS actually looks favorably on returns that have zeros filled in versus those with blanks? I never realized there could be a difference in how they're perceived by the system.
Join the conversation
Quick question - if I'm a single-member LLC, do I even need an EIN? I read somewhere that single-member LLCs can just use the owner's SSN for tax purposes? So confused about all this.
Technically, a single-member LLC that doesn't have employees and doesn't file certain tax elections (like choosing to be taxed as a corporation) isn't required to have an EIN. You could use your SSN instead. However, I still strongly recommend getting an EIN anyway for several practical reasons. Most banks require one to open a business account, it adds a layer of privacy protection (so you're not sharing your SSN), and if you ever decide to hire employees or change your tax classification, you'll need one anyway. It's free and relatively easy to get, so there's really no downside to having it.
You can absolutely apply for your EIN without having a trade name finalized! I went through this same situation when I started my LLC last year. The trade name field on Form SS-4 is optional - just leave it blank if you haven't decided yet. The IRS primarily cares about your LLC's legal name and structure for tax purposes. Your trade name is really just for marketing and customer-facing purposes. When you do settle on a trade name later, you'll register it as a DBA with your state/local government, but you won't need to update anything with the IRS. Don't let the trade name decision hold up getting your EIN - you'll need that EIN for opening a business bank account and other important business setup tasks. You can always add the trade name information to future tax filings once you've registered it officially. Go ahead and submit that application with just your LLC's legal name. You're not messing anything up by leaving the trade name field blank!
Khalid Howes
ā¢This is really helpful! I'm in a similar boat with my new LLC. Just to clarify - when you say "register it as a DBA with your state/local government," does that mean I need to file paperwork in addition to just using the trade name? I thought I could just start doing business under any name I wanted as long as it wasn't already taken by someone else.
CyberNinja
Former H&R Block employee here. The price difference exists because the downloadable version (sold on Amazon) and the online version are technically different products with different target customers. The downloadable version is cheaper because it's designed for people who use the same tax software year after year and are comfortable with tax prep. It also doesn't include all the hand-holding and live help features. The online version charges more because it includes more interactive guidance, the ability to start on one device and continue on another, and usually some form of support. They're essentially charging for convenience.
0 coins
Mateo Lopez
ā¢Does the Amazon version include the ability to import last year's return if I used H&R Block online last year? Or would I have to manually enter everything again?
0 coins
CyberNinja
ā¢If you used H&R Block online last year, you'll need to manually export your previous return from the online account first, then import it into the desktop software. It's not automatic like it would be if you stayed within the same ecosystem. The process isn't difficult, but it's an extra step. You'll need to download a PDF of last year's return from your online account, then use the import feature in the desktop version. Just be aware that some information might not transfer perfectly and may need manual correction.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
One major difference nobody's mentioned yet is that the website version of H&R Block regularly updates throughout tax season if tax laws change. With the Amazon download version, you might need to manually check for and install updates. This became a big issue during COVID when tax laws were changing rapidly and some people using downloaded software missed some benefits because they didn't update.
0 coins
Ethan Davis
ā¢Wow that's a really good point. If I buy the Amazon version, how would I know if there's an update I need to install? Do they email you or something?
0 coins