


Ask the community...
Don't forget about other deductions beyond just gas/mileage! I do Uber/Lyft part-time and was able to deduct: - Phone mount for car ($25) - Portion of cell phone bill (20% business use) - Car chargers - Dashcam - Snacks/water for passengers (I keep receipts) - Special seat covers to protect from wear and tear - Spotify subscription (for passenger entertainment) Made a big difference on my Schedule C!
Thanks for this list! I hadn't thought about the phone mount or dashcam. Can you really deduct Spotify though? I use it while driving but isn't that kind of a gray area?
You can deduct Spotify if you're using it specifically for your business - like providing music for passengers as part of your service. It's considered a business expense if it's primarily for your customers' experience. If you're just listening to it yourself while doing DoorDash deliveries, that would be much harder to justify as a business expense since there are no passengers benefiting from it. It's all about whether it's necessary for your business operations versus personal enjoyment.
Something I learned the hard way - if you choose standard mileage the first year you use your car for business, you can switch between standard and actual expenses in future years. BUT if you choose actual expenses the first year, you're STUCK with that method for the life of that vehicle in your business. Also, don't forget you can deduct business parking fees and tolls IN ADDITION to the standard mileage rate! Those aren't included in the $0.67/mile.
Yup, this is super important! I made that mistake with my first delivery car. I used actual expenses the first year when the car was new and had higher value for depreciation. When the car got older and needed fewer repairs, standard mileage would have been better but I was stuck with actual expenses. For parking and tolls - gig drivers should use apps that track these separately! I use the Stride app for mileage and the Everlance app to snap photos of parking receipts. Makes tax time way easier.
Thanks for pointing this out! I didn't realize that choosing actual expenses would lock me in for the life of the vehicle. That's definitely something to consider since I might keep this car for several years. And I had no idea about the parking fees and tolls! I've probably spent around $200 on parking in downtown areas for pickups/deliveries. Good to know I can deduct those on top of the standard mileage.
One approach my accountant suggested was to look at what I'd have to pay someone else to do my job. If you'd have to pay someone $30k to do the work you do in your business, that's a good benchmark for "reasonable compensation" regardless of profitability. My S-corp is slightly bigger (around $120k gross), but I take a $36k salary which is what we determined would be the replacement cost for my specialized work. I've also documented WHY this is reasonable in case of audit - job listings for similar positions, industry salary surveys, etc. The benefit of S-corps is avoiding SE tax on distributions, but you have to play by the reasonable salary rules to get that benefit. Otherwise, the IRS position is basically "if you want to take all distributions, just be a sole prop or LLC.
I've heard this "replacement cost" approach too, but what about when you're wearing multiple hats? In my small S-Corp, I'm the CEO, marketing department, sales, and janitor. Should I be calculating different reasonable salaries for each role?
That's a great question and something I struggled with too! My accountant advised documenting the approximate percentage of time spent in each role, then calculating a blended "replacement cost." For example, if you spend 30% of time on high-level strategy (CEO work), 50% on billable service work, and 20% on admin tasks, you'd calculate what each of those roles would cost to replace, multiply by the percentage of time, and add them up. This approach acknowledges that not all your time is spent on the highest-value tasks, which helps justify a lower overall salary while still being "reasonable.
Has anyone used the "minimum wage" method for establishing reasonable compensation? My CPA suggested that at minimum, I document all hours worked in the business and pay myself at least minimum wage for those hours as salary. For example, if I work 20 hours a week (1,040 hours/year) and minimum wage is $15/hour, my minimum reasonable salary would be $15,600. He said this approach works better for businesses with low profit margins, and it's easier to defend than a percentage of revenue or profit.
The minimum wage approach can work as a starting point, but it depends on your specific situation. For highly skilled professions (doctors, lawyers, consultants, etc.), the IRS would likely challenge minimum wage as "reasonable" since the market rate for those services is much higher. However, for businesses with tight margins in less specialized fields, documenting your hours and paying at least minimum wage could be defensible - especially if you clearly document your business circumstances and why this approach makes sense for your situation. The key is having that documentation ready if questioned.
This happened to me too. The issue is that TurboTax asks about your children in multiple places. Even if you say your ex is claiming them as dependents, there's another section where it asks about qualifying children for Earned Income Credit. If you put their info there, your return will get rejected with that error code.
OMG thank you!! I just checked and you're right - I had their info in the EIC section even though I answered "no" to claiming them as dependents. Deleted their info from that section and resubmitted. Finally went through! Can't believe TurboTax doesn't make this clearer.
Glad it worked out! TurboTax does this annoying thing where it treats the dependent section and the EIC qualifying child section as separate things (which technically they are according to tax law), but they don't make it obvious to normal people. For next year, just remember that if you're not claiming them at all, you generally shouldn't enter their info anywhere in the return.
Has anyone actually called the IRS about this? Their official guidance might be different from what we're all guessing here.
I called them last year about this exact error. 3 hours on hold only to be told I needed to mail in a paper return because their system couldn't handle my specific situation. Complete waste of time.
Just a heads-up that prepaying property taxes to maximize deductions doesn't always work as expected. I tried to prepay a bunch of my property taxes in December 2020 to get under the SALT cap, and my accountant said some of them weren't deductible because they weren't actually "assessed" yet. Apparently there's a rule that you can only deduct property taxes that have been officially assessed by the taxing authority. So if your second installment has been assessed (meaning you have an official bill), you should be fine to pay and deduct it early. But if it's not technically assessed yet, you might run into issues.
Does this apply to supplemental property tax bills too? I thought those were different since they're retroactively assessing tax for periods before the bill was created.
Supplemental property tax bills are actually a good example of properly assessed taxes. Since the supplemental bill has already been issued with specific amounts and due dates, it has been officially assessed by the tax authority. The concern I was mentioning applies more to trying to prepay future regular property tax installments that haven't been billed yet. With supplemental bills, both installments are typically assessed at the same time when the bill is issued, even though the second payment is due months later. So paying both installments in the same tax year for deduction purposes is usually fine with supplemental bills.
Have any of you ever had success getting your supplemental property tax bill reduced? We just got a MASSIVE one from when we bought in 2021 (apparently backlogged due to covid). The assessment seems way off compared to what we actually paid for the house.
Keisha Johnson
Did you file an extension earlier this year? Sometimes when you file an extension and then try to submit your actual return, you can get weird reject codes if there's any discrepancy between the information on the extension and your final return.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
ā¢This happened to me! I had filed an extension and when I finally did my taxes, I got rejected because I had typed my SSN wrong on the extension form. Had to call the IRS to sort it out. Super annoying.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
Another possibility for this error code is if you've been a victim of identity theft. If someone has already filed a fraudulent return using your SSN, you'll get rejected when you try to file the legitimate one. Might be worth checking if you have any other signs of identity theft.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
ā¢Oh man, that's scary. I haven't noticed anything unusual with my credit or accounts, but now I'm worried. How would I check if someone filed a fraudulent return with my info?
0 coins